Skip to main content
Log in

An experimental investigation on the heat transfer and friction coefficients of a small plate heat exchanger with chevron angle

  • Original
  • Published:
Heat and Mass Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present study, a small brazed and commercial plate heat exchanger (PHE) with chevron angle 60° and symmetrical layout, was experimentally investigated. New correlations for calculating heat transfer and friction coefficients of hot flow channels were presented. Few studies have been done on the small PHEs and due to the industrial needs, it is necessary to conduct new researches in this field. For this purpose, an experimental model was designed to calculate the single-phase water flow, heat transfer, and friction coefficients. The previously presented correlations were not successful in predicting the mentioned coefficients for the small PHEs and showed a 34% difference with the results of this study. Chevron grooves on the PHE plate can enhance the heat transfer as well as increasing the pressure drop. Defining \( \left(\frac{j}{f}\right) \) factor, it was revealed that with the increase of Reynolds number, heat transfer increased more than friction. In previous studies, with increasing Reynolds, \( \left(\frac{j}{f}\right) \) factor is almost constant in large PHEs but the results of the present study showed that this increase may be 5-fold higher in the small PHEs as compared with the larger ones. As there was no temperature and heat transfer coefficient value in the hot flow channels of PHE, the Nusselt number was calculated by the modified Wilson plot method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A :

area (m2)

A c :

cross-sectional area (m2)

b :

corrugation depth (m)

C:

heat capacity rate (W/K), \( \dot{m}{c}_p \)

c p :

specific heat (J/kgK)

D:

hydraulic diameter (m), \( \frac{2b}{\varphi } \)

f :

friction coefficient

G:

optional function

h :

heat transfer coefficient (W/m2K)

j :

Colburn factor, \( \frac{Nu}{\mathit{\operatorname{Re}}{\mathit{\Pr}}^{\raisebox{1ex}{$1$}\!\left/ \!\raisebox{-1ex}{$3$}\right.}} \)

k :

conduction heat transfer coefficient (W/mK)

L :

length (m)

\( \dot{m} \) :

flow rate (kg/s)

N :

number of hot channels

Nu :

Nusselt number

NTU :

number of the thermal unit

PHE:

plate heat exchanger

P :

pressure (Pa)

Pr :

Prandtl number

Q :

heat transfer rate (W)

R :

thermal resistance (K/W)

Re :

Reynolds number, \( \frac{\dot{m}D}{Nb{L}_w\mu } \)

S:

error

T :

temperature (K)

t :

thickness (m)

U :

overall heat transfer coefficient (W/m2K)

V :

velocity (m/s)

W :

width (m)

X:

optional variable

μ:

dynamic viscosity (kg/ms)

ρ :

density (kg/m3)

β:

chevron angle(deg)

λ:

pitch (m)

φ :

enlargement surface factor, \( \frac{Real\ area}{projected\ area} \)

ε:

thermal effectiveness

b:

bulk

c:

cold fluid

h:

hot fluid

i:

inlet

LMTD :

logarithmic mean temperature difference

o:

outlet

w :

wall

References

  1. Elmaaty TA, Kabeel AE, Mahgoub M (2017) Corrugated plate heat exchanger review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 70:852–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arsenyeva O, Tovazhnyansky L, Kapustenko P, Khavin G (2011) Optimal design of plate-and-frame heat exchangers for efficient heat recovery in process industries. Energy 36:4588–4598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang L, Sunden B, Manglik RM (2007) PHEs. Design, applications, and performance. UK: WIT Press, Southhampton, pp 2–10

  4. Tovazshnyansky LL, Kapustenko PO, Khavin GL, Arsenyeva OP (2004) PHEs in industry. NTU KhPI, Kharkiv

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kukulka DJ, Smith R, Fuller KG (2011) Development and evaluation of enhanced heat transfer tubes. Appl Therm Eng 31:2141–2145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang QW, Lin M, Zeng M (2009) Effect of lateral fin profiles on turbulent flow and heat transfer performance of internally finned tubes. Appl Therm Eng 29:3006–3013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Savostin AF, Tikhonov AM (1970) Investigation of the characteristics of plate type heating surfaces. Therm Eng 17:113–117

    Google Scholar 

  8. Focke WW, Zacharides J, Oliver I (1985) The effect of the corrugation inclination angle on the thermohydraulic performance of plate heat exchangers. Int J Heat Mass Transf 28:1469–1479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Thonon B, Vidil R, Marvillet C (1995) Recent research and developments in plate heat exchangers. J Enhance Heat Transf 2:149–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wanniarachchi AS, Ratnam U, Tilton BE, Dutta-Roy K (1995) Approximate Correlations for Chevron-Type Plate Heat Exchangers. Proc National Heat Transfer Conference (HTD 314) ASME 12:145–151

  11. Abu-Khader MM (2012) Plate heat exchangers: recent advances. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16:1883–1891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Okada K, Ono M, Tomimura T, Okuma T, Konno H, Ohtani S (1972) Design and heat transfer characteristics of a new plate heat exchanger. Heat Transf Jpn Res 1:90–95

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rosenblad G, Kullendorff A (1975) Estimating heat transfer from mass transfer studies on plate heat exchanger surfaces. Warme – und Stoffuberrragung 8:187–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Khan TS, Khan MS, Chyu MC, Ayub ZH (2010) Experimental investigation of single-phase convective heat transfer coefficient in a corrugated plate heat exchanger for multiple plate configurations. Appl Therm Eng 30:1058–1065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Durmus A, Benli H, Kurtbas I, Gül H (2009) Investigation of heat transfer and pressure drop in plate heat exchangers having different surface profiles. Int J Heat Mass Transf 52:1451–1457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang YN, Lee JP, Pak MH, Jin BJ, Yun TJ, Song YH, Kiml IS (2017) A study on 3D numerical model for plate heat exchanger. Procedia Eng 174:188–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Muley A, Manglik RM (1999) Experimental study of turbulent flow heat transfer and pressure drop in a plate heat exchanger with chevron plates. ASME J Heat Transf 121:110–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Heavner RL, Kumar H, Wanniarachchi AS (1993) Performance of an industrial heat exchanger: effect of chevron angle. 29th National Heat Transf Conf 89:262–267

    Google Scholar 

  19. Focke WW, Knibbe PG (1986) Flow visualization in parallel-plate ducts with corrugated walls. J Fluid Mech 165:73–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gaiser G, Kottke V (1998) Effects of wavelength and inclination angle on the homogeneity of local heat transfer coefficients in plate heat exchangers. Heat Transfer: Proc 11th Int Heat Transf Conf Kyongju Korea 6:203–208

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pinto JM, Gut JAW (2002) A screening method for the optimal selection of plate heat exchanger configurations. Braz J Chem Eng 19:433–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Islamoglu Y, Parmaksizoglu C (2003) The effect of channel height on the enhanced heat transfer characteristics in a corrugated heat exchanger channel. Appl Therm Eng 23:979–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rao BP, Das SK (2004) An experimental study on the influence of flow maldistribution on the pressure drop across a plate heat exchanger. J Fluid Eng 126:680–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rao BP, Sunden B, Das SK (2005) An experimental and theoretical investigation of the effect of flow maldistribution on the thermal performance of plate heat exchanger. ASME J Heat Transf 127:332–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gulenoglu C, Akturk F, Aradag S, Uzol NS, Kakac S (2014) Experimental comparison of performances of three different plates for gasket plate heat exchangers. Int J Therm Sci 75:249–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim MB, Park CY (2017) An experimental study on single-phase convection heat transfer and pressure drop in two brazed plate heat exchangers with different chevron shapes and hydraulic diameters. J Mech Sci Technol 31:2559–2571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Martin H (1996) A theoretical approach to predict the performance of chevron-type plate heat exchanger. Chem Eng Process 35:301–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wilson EE (1915) A basis of rational design of heat transfer apparatus. ASME J Heat Transf 37:47–70

    Google Scholar 

  29. Briggs DE, Young EH (1969) Modified Wilson plot techniques for obtaining heat transfer correlations for Shell and tube heat exchangers. Chem Eng Process Symp 65:35–45

    Google Scholar 

  30. Fernandez-Seara J, Uhıa FJ, Sieres J, Campo A (2005) Experimental apparatus for measuring heat transfer coefficients by the Wilson plot method. Eur J Phys 26:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Fernandez Seara J, Uhıa FJ, Sieres J, Campo A (2007) A general review of the Wilson plot method and its modifications to determine convection coefficients in heat exchange devices. App Therm Eng 27:2745–2757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Shah RK, Focke WW (1988) Plate heat exchangers and their design theory, Hemisphere. New York, pp 227–254

  33. Kays WM, London AL (1984) Compact heat exchangers, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  34. Shames IH (1982) Mechanics of fluids, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  35. Moffatt RJ (1988) Describing the uncertainties in experimental results. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 1:3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yang J, Jacobi A, Liu W (2016) Heat transfer correlations for single-phase flow in plate heat exchangers based on experimental data. Appl Therm Eng 113:1547–1557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Dovic D, Palm B, Savaic S (2009) Generalized correlations for predicting heat transfer and pressure drop in plate heat exchanger channels of arbitrary geometry. Int J Heat Mass Transf 52:4553–4563

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farzad Veysi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohebbi, S., Veysi, F. An experimental investigation on the heat transfer and friction coefficients of a small plate heat exchanger with chevron angle. Heat Mass Transfer 56, 849–858 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-019-02749-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-019-02749-0

Navigation