Skip to main content
Log in

Dispersion of odorants in natural gas distribution networks

  • Original
  • Published:
Heat and Mass Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A numerical modeling analysis of a pulse train diffusion, representing an odorant injection in a natural gas pipeline, was carried out and compared with experimental data from a real pipeline. The main purpose of this study is to evaluate how the odorant dispersion occurs along the pipe. Due to technical limitations, the odorant is injected in the line as a pulse and it is important to find out the point in the pipeline where the oscillating concentration of odorant fits into a range of values that meet both the legislation and the interests of customers who may have the quality of their products affected by this oscillation. Since the natural gas pipelines do not have strong streamline curvatures and the flow is always turbulent, it is relatively easy to determine the velocity and concentration fields using the Computational Fluid Dynamics techniques. In this study the RANS (Reynolds Average Navier-Stokes) equations with the k − ε turbulence model was used to build the mathematical model. Comparisons of the experimental data and numerical results show a strong agreement for the studied cases. Based on the results, it was possible to know the minimum and maximum values of odorant concentration along the pipelines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

k :

Turbulent kinetic energy (m2 s−2).

c :

Species concentration (mol/m3).

D eff :

Effective diffusion coefficient (m2/s).

D:

Diffusion coefficient (m2/s).

D T :

Turbulent diffusion coefficient (m2/s).

U :

Time-averaged velocity vector (m/s).

Sc T :

Turbulent Schmidt number.

ε :

Rate of turbulent kinetic energy dissipation (m2 s−3).

μ :

Dynamic viscosity (kg m−1 s−1).

μ T :

Turbulent viscosity (kg m−1 s−1).

ρ :

Density (kg m−3).

References

  1. Usher MJ (1999) Odor fade - possible causes and remedies. Proc CGA Gas Meas Sch 285:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jacobus J, Yaeger AG Jr (2008) Odorant loss in new gas distribution steel pipelines. Pipeline Gas J 4(235):48–49

    Google Scholar 

  3. Saadatmand M, Foroughi H, Dai T, Misra T, Bensabath T, Farnood R (2015) Odor fading in natural gas distribution systems. Process Saf Environ Prot 94:131–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ivanov I, Jones L, Strmen J (2009) Pre-odorization or “pickling” of new natural gas pipe. Pipeline Gas J 11(236):48–54

    Google Scholar 

  5. Taylor G (1954) The dispersion of matter in turbulent flow through a pipe. Proc R Soc Lond A 223:446–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Puri AN, Kuo CY, Chapman RS (1983) Turbulent diffusion of mass in circular pipe flow. Appl Math Model 7:135–138

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Davidson JF, Farquharson DC, Picken JQ, Taylor DC (1955) Gas mixing in long pipelines. Chem Eng Sci 5(4):202–205

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fox RW, Mc Donald AT, Pritchard PJ (2011) Introduction to fluid mechanics. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pontiggia M, Derudi M, Rota R (2009) Hazardous gas dispersion: A CFD model accounting for atmospheric stability classes. J Hazard Mater 171:739–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Starling KE, Savidge JL (1992) Compressibility factors of natural gas and other related hydrocarbon gases. AMERICAN GAS ASSOCIATION: Transmission Measurement Committee Report N° 8. Arlington, VA. Catalog N° XQ9212

  11. Lee AL, Gonzalez MH, Eakin BE (1966) The viscosity of natural gases. Journal of Petroleum Tehcnology 997–1000

  12. Heidaryan E, Moghadasi J, Rahimi M (2010) New correlations to predict natural gas viscosity and compressibility factor. J Pet Sci Eng 73:67–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jeje O, Mattar L (2006) Comparison of correlations for viscosity of sour natural gas. J Can Pet Technol 7(45):10–13

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fuller EN, Schettler PD, Giddings JC (1966) A new method for prediction of binary gas-phase diffusion coefficients. Ind Eng Chem 5(58):19–27

    Google Scholar 

  15. Koeltzsch K (2000) The height dependence of the turbulent Schmidt number within the boundary layer. Atmos Environ 34:1147–1151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Spalding DB (1971) Concentration fluctuations in a round turbulent free jet. J Chem Eng Sci 26:95–107

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Gross.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gross, R., Fontana, E., Silva, A. et al. Dispersion of odorants in natural gas distribution networks. Heat Mass Transfer 54, 2827–2834 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-018-2323-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-018-2323-5

Navigation