Skip to main content
Log in

Thermal analysis of cylindrical natural-gas steam reformer for 5 kW PEMFC

  • Original
  • Published:
Heat and Mass Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The thermal characteristics of a natural-gas based cylindrical steam reformer coupled with a combustor are investigated for the use with a 5 kW polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell. A reactor unit equipped with nickel-based catalysts was designed to activate the steam reforming reaction without the inclusion of high-temperature shift and low-temperature shift processes. Reactor temperature distribution and its overall thermal efficiency depend on various inlet conditions such as the equivalence ratio, the steam to carbon ratio (SCR), and the fuel distribution ratio (FDR) into the reactor and the combustor components. These experiments attempted to analyze the reformer’s thermal and chemical properties through quantitative evaluation of product composition and heat exchange between the combustor and the reactor. FDR is critical factor in determining the overall performance as unbalanced fuel injection into the reactor and the combustor deteriorates overall thermal efficiency. Local temperature distribution also influences greatly on the fuel conversion rate and thermal efficiency. For the experiments, the operation conditions were set as SCR was in range of 2.5–4.0 and FDR was in 0.4–0.7 along with equivalence ratio of 0.9–1.1; optimum results were observed for FDR of 0.63 and SCR of 3.0 in the cylindrical steam reformer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

PEMFC :

Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell

SR :

Steam reforming

HTS :

High temperature shift

LTS :

Low temperature shift

SCR :

Steam to carbon ratio

A/F :

Air–fuel ratio

Fi :

Molar flow rate of species i

LHVi :

Low heating value of species i

ni :

Mole of species i

η :

Thermal efficiency

Ф :

Equivalence ratio

References

  1. Wang Y, Chen KS, Mishler J, Cho SC, Adroher XC (2011) A review of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells: technology, applications, and needs on fundamental research. Appl Energy 88:981–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Larminiie J, Dicks A (2003) Fuel cell systems explained. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Rostrup-Nielsen T (2005) Manufacture of hydrogen. Catal Today 106:293–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Authayanun S, Wiyaratn W, Assabumrungrat S, Arpornwichanop A (2013) Theoretical analysis of a glycerol reforming and high-temperature PEMFC integrated system: hydrogen production and system efficiency. Fuel 105:345–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. da Silva AL, Dick LFP, Muller IL (2012) Performance of a PEMFC system integrated with a biogas chemical looping reforming processor: a theoretical analysis and comparison with other fuel processors (steam reforming, partial oxidation and auto-thermal reforming). Int J Hydrog Energy 37:6580–6600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yuan J, Lv X, Yue D, Sunden B (2009) Transport phenomena coupled by chemical reactions in methane reforming ducts. Int J Transp Phenom 11:39–50

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhai X, Ding S, Cheng Y, Jin Y, Cheng Y (2010) CFD simulation with detailed chemistry of steam reforming of methane for hydrogen production in an integrated micro-reactor. Int J Hydrog Energy 35:5383–5392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Corbo P, Migliardini F (2007) Hydrogen production by catalytic partial oxidation of methane and propane on Ni and Pt catalysts. Int J Hydrog Energy 32:55–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Park J, Lee S, Kim S, Bae J (2010) Numerical analysis of the heat and mass transfer characteristics in an autothermal methane reformer. J Fuel Cell Sci Technol 7:051018-1–051018-7

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maximini M, Engelhardt P, Grote M, Brenner M (2012) Further development of a microchannel steam reformer for diesel fuel. Int J Hydrog Energy 37:10125–10134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee S, Schwartz WR, Choi J, Ahn J, Kim D, Son I, Kim J, Shin W (2010) Start-up characteristics of commercial propane steam reformer for 200 We portable fuel cell system. Int J Hydrog Energy 35:12286–12294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Morlanes N (2013) Reaction mechanism of naphtha steam reforming on nickel-based catalysts, and FTIR spectroscopy with CO adsorption to elucidate real active sites. Int J Hydrog Energy 38:3588–3596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cha K, Kim H, Yoo B, Lee Y, Kang K, Park C, Kim Y (2009) Reaction characteristics of two-step methane reforming, over a Cu–Ferrite/Ce–ZrO2 medium. Int J Hydrog Energy 34:1801–1808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sa S, Silva H, Brandao L, Sousa JM, Mendes A (2010) Catalysts for methanol steam reforming—a review. Appl Catal B 99:43–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lin S-T, Chen Y-H, Yu CC, Liu Y-C, Lee C-H (2005) Modelling an experimental methane fuel processor. J Power Sources 148:44–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yuan J, Ren F, Sunden B (2006) Analysis of chemical-reaction-coupled mass and heat transport phenomena in a methane reformer duct for PEMFCs. Int J Heat Mass Transf 50:687–701

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Heinzel A, Vogel B, Hubner P (2002) Reforming of natural gas–hydrogen generation for small scale stationary fuel cell systems. J Power Sources 105:202–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zanfir M, Gavriilidis A (2003) Catalytic combustion assisted methane steam reforming in a catalytic plate reactor. Chem Eng Sci 58:3947–3960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee K, Yun J, Ahn K, Lee S, Kang S, Yu S (2013) Operational characteristics of a planar steam reformer thermally coupled with a catalytic burner. Int J Hydrog Energy 38:4767–4775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Davis ME, Davis RJ (2003) Fundamentals of chemical reaction engineering. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Suh J, Lee M, Greif R, Grigoropoulos CP (2009) Transport phenomena in a steam-methanol reforming microreactor with internal heating. Int J Hydrog Energy 34:314–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Roh H, Jun K, Park S (2003) Methane-reforming reactions over Ni/Ce–ZrO2/θ–Al2O3 catalysts. Appl Catal A 251:275–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Xu J, Froment GF (1989) Methane steam reforming, methanation and water-gas shift: I. intrinsic kinetics. AIChE J 35:88–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Behnam M, Dixon AG, Wright PM, Nijemeisland M, Stitt EH (2012) Comparison of CFD simulations to experiment under methane steam reforming reacting conditions. Chem Eng J 207–208:690–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Turns SR (1996) An introduction to combustion: concepts and applications. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lutz AE, Bradshaw RW, Keller JO, Witmer DE (2003) Thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen production by steam reforming. Int J Hydrog Energy 28:159–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dubey VR, Vaidya PD (2012) Kinetics of steam reforming of acetol over Pt/C catalyst. Chem Eng J 180:263–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the New and Renewable Energy of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) grant funded by the Korea government Ministry of Knowledge Economy (Grant No. 20133010031751).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dohyung Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jo, T., Han, J., Koo, B. et al. Thermal analysis of cylindrical natural-gas steam reformer for 5 kW PEMFC. Heat Mass Transfer 52, 2459–2469 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-016-1757-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-016-1757-x

Keywords

Navigation