Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Factors affecting high-grade hepatotoxicity of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in cancer patients: a multi-center observational study

  • Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Although several studies have examined tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-induced hepatotoxicity, the majority of patients in those studies displayed low-grade (grade I–II) hepatotoxicity. The purpose of this study was to investigate factors affecting high-grade (grade III–IV) hepatotoxicity of TKIs.

Methods

This multi-center, retrospective study used individual patient data from five studies that examined factors affecting hepatotoxicity by TKIs (crizotinib, erlotinib, gefitinib, imatinib, and lapatinib). Odds ratio (OR) and adjusted OR (AOR) were estimated from univariate and multivariate analyses, respectively.

Results

Data from 1279 patients treated with TKIs were analyzed. The rate of patients who experienced high-grade hepatotoxicity after TKI administration was 5.5%. In multivariable analysis, H2 blockers and CYP3A4 inducers increased high-grade hepatotoxicity 2.2- (95% CI 1.255–3.944) and 3.3-fold (95% CI 1.260–8.698), respectively. Patients with liver metastasis revealed a 3.4-fold (95% CI 1.561–7.466) higher risk of high-grade hepatotoxicity. Among underlying malignancies, pancreatic cancer and other cancers including acute lymphoblastic leukemia increased the risk of high-grade hepatotoxicity by 2.6- and 24.3-fold, respectively, whereas breast cancer decreased the risk (AOR 0.3, 95% CI 0.106–0.852), compared to non-small cell lung cancer. In patients who administrated TKIs which form reactive metabolites, use of CYP3A4 inducers and liver metastasis increased incidence of high-grade hepatotoxicity by 3.0- and 2.3-fold, respectively. In patients with EGFR mutation, exon 19 deletion and use of proton pump inhibitors were risk factors for high-grade hepatotoxicity in addition to liver metastasis and use of H2 blockers.

Conclusion

The use of H2 blockers, presence of liver metastasis, and CYP3A4 inducers were associated with high-grade hepatotoxicity of TKIs. In subgroup analyses, presence of exon 19 deletion, and/or proton pump inhibitors, was additional risk factors for high-grade hepatotoxicity in special patients and use of specific TKIs. Close liver function monitoring is recommended, especially in patients with liver metastasis or using H2 blockers or CYP3A4 inducers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files (Online Resource 2).

References

  1. Krause DS, Van Etten RA (2005) Tyrosine kinases as targets for cancer therapy. N Engl J Med 353(2):172–187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen MH, Kerkelä R, Force T (2008) Mechanisms of cardiac dysfunction associated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor cancer therapeutics. Circulation 118(1):84–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Iqbal N, Iqbal N (2014) Imatinib: a breakthrough of targeted therapy in cancer. Chemother Res Pract 2014:357027

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen MH, Williams G, Johnson JR, Duan J, Gobburu J, Rahman A, Benson K, Leighton J, Kim SK, Wood R, Rothmann M, Chen G, U K, Staten AM, Pazdur R (2002) Approval summary for imatinib mesylate capsules in the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia. Clin Cancer Res 8(5):935–942

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shah RR, Morganroth J, Shah DR (2013) Cardiovascular safety of tyrosine kinase inhibitors: with a special focus on cardiac repolarisation (QT interval). Drug Saf 36(5):295–316

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shah DR, Shah RR, Morganroth J (2013) Tyrosine kinase inhibitors: their on-target toxicities as potential indicators of efficacy. Drug Saf 36(6):413–426

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schutz FA, Je Y, Choueiri TK (2011) Hematologic toxicities in cancer patients treated with the multi-tyrosine kinase sorafenib: a meta-analysis of clinical trials. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 80(2):291–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shah RR, Morganroth J, Shah DR (2013) Hepatotoxicity of tyrosine kinase inhibitors: clinical and regulatory perspectives. Drug Saf 36(7):491–503

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Paech F, Bouitbir J, Krähenbühl S (2017) Hepatocellular toxicity associated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: mitochondrial damage and inhibition of glycolysis. Front Pharmacol 8:367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim MK, Yee J, Cho YS, Jang HW, Han JM, Gwak HS (2018) Risk factors for erlotinib-induced hepatotoxicity: a retrospective follow-up study. BMC Cancer 18(1):988

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cho S, Yee J, Kim JY, Jeong Rhie S, Gwak HS (2018) Effects of concomitant medication use on Gefitinib-induced hepatotoxicity. J Clin Pharmacol 58(2):263–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Park YH, Cho S, Yee J, Kim JY, Rhie SJ, Gwak HS (2018) Factors affecting time to reach and recover from gefitinib-induced hepatotoxicity. Anti-Cancer Drugs 29(5):471–476

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jung D, Han JM, Yee J, Kim JY, Gwak HS (2018) Factors affecting crizotinib-induced hepatotoxicity in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Med Oncol 35(12):154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE): version 4.0 (2010) National Cancer Institute Enterprise vocabulary services website. National Cancer Institute

  15. Thanarajasingam G, Hubbard JM, Sloan JA, Grothey A (2015) The imperative for a new approach to toxicity analysis in oncology clinical trials. J Natl Cancer Inst 107(10):djv216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Veatch JR, Sandhu V, Becker PS, Pagel JM, Appelbaum FR, Estey E (2013) The NCI common toxicity criteria and treatment-associated mortality in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 122(2):293–294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Han JM, Yee J, Cho YS, Gwak HS (2019) Factors influencing imatinib-induced hepatotoxicity. Cancer Res Treat 52(1):181–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Moon JY, Han JM, Seo I, Gwak HS (2019) Risk factors associated with the incidence and time to onset of lapatinib-induced hepatotoxicity. Breast Cancer Res Treat 178(1):239–244

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. King PD, Perry MC (2001) Hepatotoxicity of chemotherapy. Oncologist 6(2):162–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hodges LM, Markova SM, Chinn LW, Gow JM, Kroetz DL, Klein TE, Altman RB (2011) Very important pharmacogene summary: ABCB1 (MDR1, P-glycoprotein). Pharmacogenet Genomics 21(3):152–161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Budha NR, Frymoyer A, Smelick GS, Jin JY, Yago MR, Dresser MJ, Holden SN, Benet LZ, Ware JA (2012) Drug absorption interactions between oral targeted anticancer agents and PPIs: is pH-dependent solubility the Achilles heel of targeted therapy? Clin Pharmacol Ther 92(2):203–213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Duckett DR, Cameron MD (2010) Metabolism considerations for kinase inhibitors in cancer treatment. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 6(10):1175–1193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Smith DA, Koch KM, Arya N, Bowen CJ, Herendeen JM, Beelen A (2009) Effects of ketoconazole and carbamazepine on lapatinib pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol 67(4):421–426

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bolton AE, Peng B, Hubert M, Krebs-Brown A, Capdeville R, Keller U, Seiberling M (2004) Effect of rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics of imatinib mesylate (Gleevec, STI571) in healthy subjects. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 53(2):102–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Senior JR (2010) Unintended hepatic adverse events associated with cancer chemotherapy. Toxicol Pathol 38(1):142–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Srivastava A, Maggs JL, Antoine DJ, Williams DP, Smith DA, Park BK (2010) Role of reactive metabolites in drug-induced hepatotoxicity. Handb Exp Pharmacol 196:165–194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Teo YL, Saetaew M, Chanthawong S, Yap YS, Chan EC, Ho HK et al (2012) Effect of CYP3A4 inducer dexamethasone on hepatotoxicity of lapatinib: clinical and in vitro evidence. Breast Cancer Res Treat 133(2):703–711

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Maemondo M, Inoue A, Kobayashi K, Sugawara S, Oizumi S, Isobe H, Gemma A, Harada M, Yoshizawa H, Kinoshita I, Fujita Y, Okinaga S, Hirano H, Yoshimori K, Harada T, Ogura T, Ando M, Miyazawa H, Tanaka T, Saijo Y, Hagiwara K, Morita S, Nukiwa T (2010) Gefitinib or chemotherapy for non–small-cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR. N Engl J Med 362(25):2380–2388

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Han JY, Park K, Kim SW, Lee DH, Kim HY, Kim HT, Ahn MJ, Yun T, Ahn JS, Suh C, Lee JS, Yoon SJ, Han JH, Lee JW, Jo SJ, Lee JS (2012) First-SIGNAL: first-line single-agent iressa versus gemcitabine and cisplatin trial in never-smokers with adenocarcinoma of the lung. J Clin Oncol 30(10):1122–1128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Jackman DM, Yeap BY, Sequist LV, Lindeman N, Holmes AJ, Joshi VA, Bell DW, Huberman MS, Halmos B, Rabin MS, Haber DA, Lynch TJ, Meyerson M, Johnson BE, Jänne PA (2006) Exon 19 deletion mutations of epidermal growth factor receptor are associated with prolonged survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with gefitinib or erlotinib. Clin Cancer Res 12(13):3908–3914

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ma Y, Xin S, Huang M, Yang Y, Zhu C, Zhao H, Zhang Y, Chen L, Zhao Y, Li J, Zhuang W, Zhu X, Zhang L, Wang X (2017) Determinants of Gefitinib toxicity in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a pharmacogenomic study of metabolic enzymes and transporters. Pharm J 17(4):325–330

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JMH, HWH and HSG contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and data collection were performed by JMH, HWH, MKK, JYM, SC, and DJ. Data analysis and interpretation were performed by JMH, HWH, JY, YSC, IS, and JYK. The manuscript was written by JMH and HWH. The manuscript was revised by HSG. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hye Sun Gwak.

Ethics declarations

All procedures performed in five studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the relevant ethics committees, which approved the studies, and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The requirement for obtaining informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 404 kb)

ESM 2

(XLSX 120 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, J.M., Han, H.W., Yee, J. et al. Factors affecting high-grade hepatotoxicity of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in cancer patients: a multi-center observational study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 76, 1183–1191 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-020-02897-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-020-02897-x

Keywords

Navigation