Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Exploring behavioural determinants relating to health professional reporting of medication errors: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework

  • Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Effective and efficient medication reporting processes are essential in promoting patient safety. Few qualitative studies have explored reporting of medication errors by health professionals, and none have made reference to behavioural theories. The objective was to describe and understand the behavioural determinants of health professional reporting of medication errors in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

Methods

This was a qualitative study comprising face-to-face, semi-structured interviews within three major medical/surgical hospitals of Abu Dhabi, the UAE. Health professionals were sampled purposively in strata of profession and years of experience. The semi-structured interview schedule focused on behavioural determinants around medication error reporting, facilitators, barriers and experiences. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF; a framework of theories of behaviour change) was used as a coding framework. Ethical approval was obtained from a UK university and all participating hospital ethics committees.

Results

Data saturation was achieved after interviewing ten nurses, ten pharmacists and nine physicians. Whilst it appeared that patient safety and organisational improvement goals and intentions were behavioural determinants which facilitated reporting, there were key determinants which deterred reporting. These included the beliefs of the consequences of reporting (lack of any feedback following reporting and impacting professional reputation, relationships and career progression), emotions (fear and worry) and issues related to the environmental context (time taken to report).

Conclusion

These key behavioural determinants which negatively impact error reporting can facilitate the development of an intervention, centring on organisational safety and reporting culture, to enhance reporting effectiveness and efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention. 2016 Available at http://www.nccmerp.org [accessed January 2016].

  2. Keers RN, Williams SD, Cooke J, Ashcroft DM (2013) Prevalence and nature of medication administration errors in health care settings: a systematic review of direct observational evidence. Ann Pharmacother 47(2):237–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Keers RN, Williams SD, Cooke J, Ashcroft DM (2013) Causes of medication administration errors in hospitals: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative evidence. Drug Saf 36(11):1045–1067

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Lewis PJ, Dornan T, Taylor D, Tully MP, Wass V, Ashcroft DM (2009) Prevalence, incidence and nature of prescribing errors in hospital inpatients: a systematic review. Drug Saf 32(5):379–389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ross S, Bond C, Rothnie H, Thomas S, Macleod MJ (2009) What is the scale of prescribing errors committed by junior doctors? A systematic review. Brit J Clin Pharm 67(6):629–640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wakefield DS, Wakefield BJ, Uden-Holman BMA (1996) Perceived barriers in reporting medication administration errors. Best Pract and Benchmarking Healthc 1:191–197

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Uribe CL, Schweikhart SB, Pathak DS, Marsh GB, Fraley RR (2002) Perceived barriers to medical error reporting: an exploratory investigation. J Healthc Manag 47:263–279

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McArdle D, Burns N, Ireland A (2003) Attitudes and beliefs of doctors towards medication error reporting. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 16:326–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stratton KM, Nlegen MA, Peppper G, Vaughn T (2004) Reporting of medication errors by pediatric nurses. J Pediatr Nurs 19:385–392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Evans SM, Berry JG, Smith BJ, Esterman A, Selim P, O’Shaughnessy J, et al. (2006) Attitudes and barriers to incident reporting: a collaborative hospital study. Qual Saf Health Care 15:39–43

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Sanghera IS, Franklin BD, Dhillon S (2007) The attitudes and beliefs of healthcare professionals on the causes and reporting of medication errors in a UK intensive care unit. Anaesthesia 62:53–61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Armitage G, Newell R, Wright J (2010) Improving the quality of drug error reporting. J Eval Clin Pract 16:1189–1197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sarvadikar A, Prescott G, Williams D (2010) Attitudes to reporting medication error among differing healthcare professionals. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 66:843–853

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Castel ES, Ginsburg LR, Zaheer S (2015) Understanding nurses’ and physicians’ fear of repercussions for reporting errors: clinician characteristics, organization demographics, or leadership factors? BMC Health Serv Res 15:326

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kingston MJ, Evans SM, Smith BJ, Berry J (2004) Attitudes of doctors and nurses towards incident reporting: a qualitative analysis. Med J Aus 181:36–39

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hartnell N, MacKinnon N, Sketeris I, Fleming M (2012) Identifying, understanding and overcoming barriers to medication error reporting in hospitals: a focus group study. BMJ Qual Saf 21:361–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Williams SD, Phipps DL, Ashcroft DM (2013) Understanding the attitudes of hospital pharmacists to reporting medication incidents: a qualitative study. Res Soc Adm Pharm 9:80–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M (2008) Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. Brit Med J 337:a1665

    Google Scholar 

  19. Davies P, Walker AE, Grimshaw JM (2010) A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluation. Implement Sci 5:14

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Cane J, O’Connor D, Michie S (2012) Validation of the Theoretical Domains Framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci 7:37

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Francis JJ, O’Connor D, Curran J (2012) Theories of behaviour change synthesised into a set of theoretical groupings: introducing a thematic series on the Theoretical Domains Framework. Implement Sci 7:35

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Health Authority Abu Dhabi Medication Error Reporting Policy version 1, 2009. Available at http://www.haad.ae/haad/tabid/58/Mid/417/ItemID/225/ctl/Details/Default.aspx [Accessed January 2016]

  23. Francis JJ, Johnston M, Robertson C, Glidewell L, Entwistle V, Eccles MP, et al. (2010) What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychol Health 25(10):1229–1245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ritchie J, Spencer L (2002) Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. Qual Res Companion 305-329

  25. Shenton AK (2004) Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Educ Inf 22:63–67

    Google Scholar 

  26. Halligan M, Zecevic A (2011) Safety culture in healthcare: a review of concepts, dimensions, measures and progress. BMJ Qual Saf 20(4):338–343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Morello RT, Lowthian JA, Barker AL, McGinnes R, Dunt D, Brand C (2013) Strategies for improving patient safety culture in hospitals: a systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf 22:11–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Weaver SJ, Lubomksi LH, Wilson RF, Pfoh ER, Martinez KA, Dy SM (2013) Promoting a culture of safety as a patient safety strategy: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 158:369–374

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R (2011) The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci 6:42

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. May CR, Mair F, Finch T, MacFarlane A, Dowrick C, Treweek S, et al. (2009) Development of a theory of implementation and integration: normalization process theory. Implement Sci 4:29

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. May C, Finch T (2009) Implementing, embedding and integrating practices: an outline of normalization process theory. Sociology 43:535–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the following for their contribution and support provided throughout this research: Embassy of the United Arab Emirates for funding Mai Alqubaisi; Katie MacLure, Gordon Rushworth, Cristin Ryan, and Anne Watson for reviewing the draught interview schedule; the ethical review panels and Human Resources Departments of all participating hospitals; and all interviewees.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Derek Stewart.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Mai Alqubaisi, Antonella Tonna, Alison Strath, and Derek Stewart declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

Funding for Mai Alqubaisi’s doctoral studies was provided by the Embassy of the United Arab Emirates.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alqubaisi, M., Tonna, A., Strath, A. et al. Exploring behavioural determinants relating to health professional reporting of medication errors: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 72, 887–895 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-016-2054-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-016-2054-9

Keywords

Navigation