Skip to main content
Log in

Habitat when foraging does not explain temporal segregation by sex in a breeding seabird

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Segregation by sex can allow partitioning of resources in time, space, or both. Little, however, is known about causes of sexual segregation, especially in species with little to no sexual size dimorphism. Female and male thick-billed murres (a seabird, Uria lomvia) use habitat differently at subpolar latitude, and they temporally and spatially segregate by sex across the diel cycle throughout their range, despite the sexes being of similar size. Here, we exploit the continuous light of polar summer and the presumable absence of diel vertical migration (‘DVM’) of prey at high latitude to elucidate whether the murres’ differential use of habitat when foraging at subpolar latitude was a cause or consequence of their spatial and temporal segregation by sex. We used biologgers (time-depth-temperature recorders [‘TDRs’] and global-positioning-system loggers [‘GPSs’]) to investigate temporal and spatial segregation of males and females when foraging, stable isotope analysis to assess diet, and morphometrics to assess size. Our results indicated that thick-billed murres’ temporal segregation by sex continued despite no spatial segregation and despite similarities among the sexes in foraging habitat and diet. This suggested that segregation in murres was probably caused by social mechanisms or ecological mechanisms other than foraging during biparental care. The results also suggested that the temporal segregation caused the differential use of habitat when foraging at subpolar latitude because the foraging differences disappeared when the light–dark cycle attenuated during polar summer. Our results therefore motivate further investigation of the diel behavior of murres and the cause of their sexual segregation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and code

The datasets and R code generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M Chudzinska, K Falk, AJ Kristensen, AL Labansen, and RS Tjørnløv for assistance in the field; A Tigano and V Friesen for assisting with molecular identification of the sexes from 2014 to 2016; and the DJ Anderson group at Wake Forest University for comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. We thank TA Clay, KH Elliott, and anonymous referees for insightful comments that improved the manuscript. We additionally thank KH Elliott for providing AJ Gaston’s TDR data from the thick-billed murres from Prince Leopold Island, Canada for analysis. We are also grateful to G Guillou and B Lebreton from the plateforme ‘Isotopic Spectrometry’ (La Rochelle University—LIENSs) for their assistance with isotopic analyses.

Funding

Maersk Oil Kalaallit Nunaat A/S supported NPH with a PhD scholarship. The Greenlandic Bureau of Minerals and Petroleum, Greenland Government partially supported fieldwork. Stable isotope analyses were funded by the French Arctic Initiative—CNRS (project PARCS) and the French National Agency for Research (ANR, project MAMBA, ANR-16-TERC-0004) within the ARCTOX initiative (arctox.cnrs.fr).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

NPH conceived the study, conducted statistical analyses, and drafted the manuscript; JF was responsible for the stable isotope analyses and the corresponding methods text; JFL was responsible for the handling of data from TDRs and GPSs, contributing to the analysis of the data from GPSs, and drafting the associated methods text; NPH, JFL, FRM, and MF conducted fieldwork; and all authors reviewed and revised the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas P. Huffeldt.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical approval

Field activities were completed in accordance with Greenlandic law, with approval by the Agency of Fisheries, Hunting, and Agriculture (Dok. Nr.: 66.01.13, 657108, 924560, 1203972, 1601149, 1565772, 1960823). Wake Forest University’s Animal Care and Use Committee (Protocol #: A14-088) approved activities occurring in years 2014–2016.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: T.A. Clay.

Reviewers: K.H. Elliott and an undisclosed expert.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 658 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huffeldt, N.P., Linnebjerg, J.F., Fort, J. et al. Habitat when foraging does not explain temporal segregation by sex in a breeding seabird. Mar Biol 168, 152 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-021-03958-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-021-03958-0

Navigation