Skip to main content
Log in

Foraging behaviour and habitat use by brown skuas Stercorarius lonnbergi breeding at South Georgia

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Top predators are critical to ecosystem function, exerting a stabilising effect on the food web. Brown skuas are opportunistic predators and scavengers. Although skuas are often the dominant land-based predator at seabird colonies, this is the first detailed study of their movements and activity during breeding. The study was carried out at Bird Island, South Georgia (54°00′S, 38°03′W), in the austral summer of 2011/2012 and included GPS data from 33 breeding adults tracked during the late incubation and early chick-rearing periods. Brown skuas spent on average more than 80 % of time in the territory, and it was extremely rare for both partners to leave the territory simultaneously. Much more time was spent foraging at the coast than in penguin colonies and, based on saltwater immersion data, adults never foraged at sea. None of the tracked birds appeared to specialise in catching small petrels at night. Fewer foraging trips were made per day, and hence, more time was spent in the territory, during incubation than chick-rearing. Despite the pronounced sexual size dimorphism, there were no effects of sex on territorial attendance, foraging time or habitat use. Skuas at Bird Island show higher territorial attendance and are less likely to leave the territory unattended than those breeding elsewhere, suggesting closer proximity to more diverse or abundant food resources than at other colonies. The results tie in with previous diet studies, indicating that brown skuas at this site feed mostly on seal placentae and carrion and that birds may rely on a broader range of food resources as the season progresses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainley DG, Hyrenbach KD (2010) Top-down and bottom-up factors affecting seabird population trends in the California current system (1985–2006). Prog Ocean 84:242–254. doi:10.1016/j.pocean.2009.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson ORJ, Phillips RA, Shore RF et al (2009) Diet, individual specialisation and breeding of brown skuas (Catharacta antarctica lonnbergi): an investigation using stable isotopes. Polar Biol 32:27–33. doi:10.1007/s00300-008-0498-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annett C, Pierotti R (1989) Chick hatching as a trigger for dietary switching in the western gull. Colon Waterbirds 12:4–11. doi:10.2307/1521306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron DG, Brawn JD, Weatherhead PJ (2010) Meta-analysis of transmitter effects on avian behaviour and ecology. Methods Ecol Evol 1:180–187. doi:10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00013.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B (2013) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999999-2

  • Brooke MdeL, Keith D, Røv N (1999) Exploitation of inland-breeding Antarctic petrels by south polar skuas. Oecologia 121:25–31. doi:10.1007/s004420050903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton RW (1968) Breeding biology of the brown skua, Catharacta skua lonnbergi (Mathews), at Signy Island, South Orkney Island. Br Antarct Surv Bull 15:9–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldow R, Furness R (2000) The effect of food availability on the foraging behaviour of breeding great skuas Catharacta skua and Arctic skuas Stercorarius parasiticus. J Avian Biol 31:367–375. doi:10.1034/j.1600-048X.2000.310313.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calenge C (2012) The package ‘adehabitatLT’ for the R Software: analysis of animal movements

  • Catry P, Furness R (1999) The influence of adult age on territorial attendance by breeding great skuas Catharacta skua: an experimental study. J Avian Biol 30:399–406. doi:10.2307/3677012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catry P, Ratcliffe N, Furness RW (1998) The influence of hatching date on different life-history stages of great skuas Catharacta skua. J Avian Biol 29:299–304. doi:10.2307/3677112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catry P, Phillips RA, Furness RW (1999) Evolution of reversed sexual size dimorphism in skuas and jaegers. Auk 116:158–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fridolfsson AK, Ellegren H (1999) A simple and universal method for molecular sexing of non-ratite birds. J Avian Biol 30:116–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furness RW (1987) The skuas. T and AD Poyser, Calton

    Google Scholar 

  • Furness RW, Camphuysen CJ (1997) Seabirds as monitors of the marine environment. ICES J Mar Sci 54:726–737. doi:10.1006/jmsc.1997.0243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Solís J, Croxall JP, Wood AG (2000) Sexual dimorphism and sexual segregation in foraging strategies of northern giant petrels, Macronectes halli, during incubation. Oikos 90:390–398. doi:10.2307/3547150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grémillet D, Dell’Omo G, Ryan PG et al (2004) Offshore diplomacy, or how seabirds mitigate intra-specific competition: a case study based on GPS tracking of Cape gannets from neighbouring colonies. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 268:265–279. doi:10.3354/meps268265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grilli MG, Montalti D (2012) Trophic interactions between brown and south polar skuas at Deception Island, Antarctica. Polar Biol 35:299–304. doi:10.1007/s00300-011-1054-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn S, Bauer S (2008) Dominance in feeding territories relates to foraging success and offspring growth in brown skuas Catharacta antarctica lonnbergi. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:1149–1157. doi:10.1007/s00265-007-0543-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn S, Peter H (2003) Feeding territoriality and the reproductive consequences in brown skuas Catharacta antarctica lonnbergi. Polar Biol 26:552–559. doi:10.1007/s00300-003-0522-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn S, Reinhardt K, Ritz MS et al (2007) Oceanographic and climatic factors differentially affect reproduction performance of Antarctic skuas. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 334:287–297. doi:10.3354/meps334287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamer KC, Furness RW, Caldow RWG (1991) The effects of changes in food availability on the breeding ecology of great skuas Catharacta skua in Shetland. J Zool 223:175–188. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1991.tb04758.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heithaus MR, Frid A, Wirsing AJ, Worm B (2008) Predicting ecological consequences of marine top predator declines. Trends Ecol Evol 23:202–210. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemmings AD (1984) Aspects of the breeding biology of McCormick’s skua Catharacta maccormicki at Signy Island, South Orkney Islands. Br Antarct Surv Bull 65:65–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Hipfner JM, McFarlane-Tranquilla L, Addison B, Hobson KA (2013) Trophic responses to the hatching of offspring in a central-place foraging seabird. J Ornithol (n.d.):1–6. doi:10.1007/s10336-013-0962-3

  • Hunter I, Croxall JP, Prince PA (1982) The distribution and abundance of burrowing seabirds (Procellariiformes) at Bird Island, South Georgia: I. Introduction and methods. Br Antarct Surv Bull 56:49–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenouvrier S, Weimerskirch H, Barbraud C et al (2005) Evidence of a shift in the cyclicity of Antarctic seabird dynamics linked to climate. Proc Biol Sci 272:887–895. doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Käkelä A, Crane J, Votier SC et al (2006) Fatty acid signatures as indicators of diet in great skuas Stercorarius skua, Shetland. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 319:297–310. doi:10.3354/meps319297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher WJ (1974) Ecology of pomarine, parasitic and long-tailed jaegers in Northern Alaska. Pac Coast Avifauna 37:1–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Moncorps S, Chapuis J, Haubreux D, Bretagnolle V (1998) Diet of the brown skua Catharacta skua lonnbergi on the Kerguelen archipelago: comparisons between techniques and between islands. Polar Biol 19:9–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mougeot F, Genevois F, Bretagnolle V (1998) Predation on burrowing petrels by the brown skua (Catharacta skua lonnbergi) at Mayes Island, Kerguelen. J Zool 244:429–438. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1998.tb00047.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Navarro J, Louzao M, Igual JM et al (2009) Seasonal changes in the diet of a critically endangered seabird and the importance of trawling discards. Mar Biol 156:2571–2578. doi:10.1007/s00227-009-1281-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Österblom H, Casini M, Olsson O, Bignert A (2006) Fish, seabirds and trophic cascades in the Baltic Sea. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 323:233–238. doi:10.3354/meps323233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oswald SA, Bearhop S, Furness RW et al (2008) Heat stress in a high-latitude seabird: effects of temperature and food supply on bathing and nest attendance of great skuas Catharacta skua. J Avian Biol 39:163–169. doi:10.1111/j.2008.0908-8857.04187.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paine RT (1966) Food web complexity and species diversity. Am Nat 100:65–75. doi:10.2307/2459379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Péron C, Authier M, Barbraud C et al (2010) Interdecadal changes in at-sea distribution and abundance of subantarctic seabirds along a latitudinal gradient in the southern Indian Ocean. Glob Change Biol 16:1895–1909. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02169.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phalan B, Phillips RA, Silk JRD et al (2007) Foraging behaviour of four albatross species by night and day. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 340:271–286. doi:10.3354/meps340271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips RA, Caldow RWG, Furness RW (1996) The influence of food availability on the breeding effort and reproductive success of Arctic skuas Stercorarius parasiticus. Ibis 138:410–419. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.1996.tb08059.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips RA, Thompson DR, Hamer KC (1999) The impact of great skua predation on seabird populations at St Kilda: a bioenergetics model. J Appl Ecol 36:218–232. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2664.1999.00391.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips RA, Dawson D, Ross D (2002) Mating patterns and reversed size dimorphism in southern skuas (Stercorarius skua lonnbergi). Auk 119:858–863. doi:10.1642/0004-8038(2002)119[0858:MPARSD]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips RA, Xavier JC, Croxall JP, Burger AE (2003) Effects of satellite transmitters on albatrosses and petrels. Auk 120:1082–1090. doi:10.1642/0004-8038(2003)120[1082:EOSTOA]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips RA, Phalan B, Forster I (2004a) Diet and long-term changes in population size and productivity of brown skuas Catharacta antarctica lonnbergi at Bird Island, South Georgia. Polar Biol 27:555–561. doi:10.1007/s00300-004-0633-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips RA, Silk JRD, Phalan B et al (2004b) Seasonal sexual segregation in two Thalassarche albatross species: competitive exclusion, reproductive role specialization or trophic niche divergence? Proc R Soc Ser B 271:1283–1291. doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2718

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips RA, Catry P, Silk JRD et al (2007) Movements, winter distribution and activity patterns of Falkland and brown skuas: insights from loggers and isotopes. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 345:281–291. doi:10.3354/meps06991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pietz PJ (1986) Daily activity patterns of south polar and brown skuas near Palmer Station, Antarctica. Auk 103:726–736

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietz PJ (1987) Feeding and nesting ecology of sympatric south polar and brown skuas. Auk 104:617–627

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S et al (2013) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-109

  • Quillfeldt P, McGill RAR, Masello JF et al (2008) Stable isotope analysis reveals sexual and environmental variability and individual consistency in foraging of thin-billed prions. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 373:137–148. doi:10.3354/meps07751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quillfeldt P, Schroff S, van Noordwijk HJ et al (2011) Flexible foraging behaviour of a sexually dimorphic seabird: large males do not always dive deep. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 428:271–287. doi:10.3354/meps09058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe N, Furness RW (1999) The effect of parental age and experimentally manipulated brood size on the foraging effort and breeding performance of great skuas (Catharacta skua). J Zool 249:195–201. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1999.tb00758.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardt K, Hahn S, Peter H-U, Wemhoff H (2000) A review of the diets of southern hemisphere skuas. Mar Ornithol 28:7–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan PG, Moloney CL (1991) Prey selection and temporal variation in the diet of subantarctic skuas at Inaccessible Island, Tristan da Cunha. Ostrich 62:52–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan PG, Whittington PA, Crawford RJM (2009) A tale of two islands: contrasting fortunes for subantarctic skuas at the Prince Edward Islands. Afr J Mar Sci 31:431–437. doi:10.2989/AJMS.2009.31.3.16.1004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer SA, Costa DP, Weimerskirch H (2003) Foraging effort in relation to the constraints of reproduction in free-ranging albatrosses. Funct Ecol 17:66–74. doi:10.2307/3599029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skira J (1984) Breeding distribution of the brown skua on Macquarie Island. Emu 84:248–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soulé ME, Estes JA, Berger J, Del Rio CM (2003) Ecological effectiveness: conservation goals for interactive species. Conserv Biol 17:1238–1250. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01599.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stauss C, Bearhop S, Bodey TW et al (2012) Sex-specific foraging behaviour in northern gannets Morus bassanus: incidence and implications. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 457:151–162. doi:10.3354/meps09734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivelpiece W, Volkman NJ (1982) Feeding strategies of sympatric south polar Catharacta maccormicki and brown skuas C. lonnbergi. Ibis 124:50–54. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.1982.tb03740.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivelpiece W, Butler RG, Volkman NJ (1980) Feeding territories of brown skuas (Catharacta lonnbergi). Auk 97:669–676

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandenabeele SP, Shepard EL, Grogan A, Wilson RP (2012) When three percent may not three per cent; device-equipped seabirds experience variable flight constraints. Mar Biol 159:1–14. doi:10.1007/s00227-011-1784-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Votier SC, Bearhop S, Ratcliffe N, Furness R (2004) Reproductive consequences for great skuas specializing as seabird predators. Condor 106:275–287. doi:10.1650/7261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Votier SC, Crane JE, Bearhop S et al (2006) Nocturnal foraging by great skuas Stercorarius skua: implications for conservation of storm-petrel populations. J Ornithol 147:405–413. doi:10.1007/s10336-005-0021-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woehler EJ, Croxall JP (1997) The status and trends of Antarctic and sub-Antarctic seabirds. Mar Ornithol 25:43–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Young EC (1963) The breeding behaviour of the south polar skua Catharacta maccormicki. Ibis 105:203–233. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.1963.tb02496.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young EC, Jenkins PE, Douglas ME, Lovegrove TG (1988) Nocturnal foraging by Chatham Island skuas. NZ J Ecol 11:113–117

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the field team on Bird Island for assisting with device recoveries, and to the South Georgia Heritage Trust and Government of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands for part-funding the study. We would also like to thank Michelle King and Elaine Fitzcharles for assistance with molecular sexing. The study complied with the relevant laws of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands. This study is part of the Ecosystems component of the British Antarctic Survey Polar Science for Planet Earth Programme, funded by The Natural Environment Research Council.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Paula B. Carneiro.

Additional information

Communicated by S. Garthe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carneiro, A.P.B., Manica, A. & Phillips, R.A. Foraging behaviour and habitat use by brown skuas Stercorarius lonnbergi breeding at South Georgia. Mar Biol 161, 1755–1764 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-014-2457-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-014-2457-z

Keywords

Navigation