Skip to main content
Log in

Online Regenerator Placement

  • Published:
Theory of Computing Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Connections between nodes in optical networks are realized by lightpaths. Due to the decay of the signal, a regenerator has to be placed on every lightpath after at most d hops, for some given positive integer d. A regenerator can serve only one lightpath. The placement of regenerators has become an active area of research during recent years, and various optimization problems have been studied. The first such problem is the Regeneration Location Problem (Rlp), where the goal is to place the regenerators so as to minimize the total number of nodes containing them. We consider two extreme cases of online Rlp regarding the value of d and the number k of regenerators that can be used in any single node. (1) d is arbitrary and k unbounded. In this case a feasible solution always exists. We show an O(log|X|⋅ logd)-competitive randomized algorithm for any network topology, where X is the set of paths of length d. The algorithm can be made deterministic in some cases. We show a deterministic lower bound of \({\Omega } \left (\frac {\log (|{E}|/d) \cdot \log d}{\log (\log (|{E}|/d) \cdot \log d)}\right )\), where E is the edge set. (2) d = 2 and k = 1. In this case there is not necessarily a solution for a given input. We distinguish between feasible inputs (for which there is a solution) and infeasible ones. In the latter case, the objective is to satisfy the maximum number of lightpaths. For a path topology we show a lower bound of \(\sqrt {l}/2\) for the competitive ratio (where l is the number of internal nodes of the longest lightpath) on infeasible inputs, and a tight bound of 3 for the competitive ratio on feasible inputs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The node at distance 1 must have no regenerator, else there are two consecutive internal nodes with regenerators and the algorithm would have rejected the path.

  2. Here we simplify the discussion slightly by assuming that the path P i does not contain a chain of two internal edges that both do not belong to any other paths because the algorithm can simply assign regenerators to alternate internal nodes without conflicting any other paths and this would not affect the number of paths that can be satisfied by the algorithm.

References

  1. Alon, N., Awerbuch, B., Azar, Y., Buchbinder, N., Naor, S.: The online set cover problem. SIAM J. Computing 39(2), 361–370 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Borodin, A., El-Yaniv, R.: Online Computation and Competitive Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, S., Ljubic, I., Raghavan, S.: The regenerator location problem. Networks 55(3), 205–220 (2010)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Fedrizzi, R., Galimberti, G.M., Gerstel, O., Martinelli, G., Salvadori, E., Saradhi, C.V., Tanzi, A., Zanardi, A.: Traffic Independent Heuristics for Regenerator Site Selection for Providing Any-to-Any Optical Connectivity. In: Proceedings of IEEE/OSA Conference on Optical Fiber Communications (OFC) (2010)

  5. Flammini, M., Marchetti-Spaccamela, A., Monaco, G., Moscardelli, L., Zaks, S.: On the complexity of the regenerator placement problem in optical networks. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking 19(2), 498–511 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Flammini, M., Monaco, G., Moscardelli, L., Shalom, M., Zaks, S.: Optimizing regenerator cost in traffic grooming. Theor. Comput. Sci. 412(52), 7109–7121 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim, S. W., Seo, S.W.: Regenerator placement algorithms for connection establishment in all-optical networks. IEEE Proceedings Communications 148(1), 25–30 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mertzios, G.B., Sau, I., Shalom, M., Zaks, S.: Placing regenerators in optical networks to satisfy multiple sets of requests. IEEE Trans. Networking 20(6), 1870–1879 (2012)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Pachnicke, S., Paschenda, T., Krummrich, P.M.: Physical impairment based regenerator placement and routing in translucent optical networks. In: Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exposition and The National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference, page OWA2. Optical Society of America (2008)

  10. Sriram, K., Griffith, D., Su, R., Golmie, N.: Static vs. dynamic regenerator assignment in optical switches: models and cost trade-offs. Workshop on High Performance Switching and Routing (HPSR), 151–155 (2004)

  11. Yang, X., Ramamurthy, B.: Dynamic routing in translucent WDM optical networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pp 955–971 (2002)

  12. Yang, X., Ramamurthy, B.: Sparse regeneration in translucent wavelength-routed optical networks: Architecture, network design and wavelength routing. Photon Netw. Commun. 10(1), 39–53 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the Israel Science Foundation grant No. 1249/08 and British Council Grant UKTELHAI09.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mordechai Shalom.

Additional information

A preliminary version of this paper appeared in the 15th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS), Toulouse, France, December 2011, pp. 4–17.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mertzios, G.B., Shalom, M., Wong, P.W.H. et al. Online Regenerator Placement. Theory Comput Syst 61, 739–754 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00224-016-9711-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00224-016-9711-3

Keywords

Navigation