Abstract
Fatigue and balance disorders are common challenges experienced by Multiple Sclerosis (MS) individuals. The purpose of this study was to compare the concurrent effects of cerebellar and prefrontal anodal trans-cranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) with postural training on balance and fatigue in MS patients. 51 patients were evaluated to randomly allocation to a-tDCS over cerebellum, a-tDCS over dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and sham group. 46 individuals (n = 16 in experimental groups and n = 14 in control group) followed treatment. All the groups received 10 sessions of postural training. The experimental groups underwent a-tDCS with a current of 1.5 mA for a period of 20 min. While, in the sham group, tDCS was only activated for 30 s and then turned off. The treatment included 10 sessions for four weeks. Before and after intervention, fatigue and balance were assessed using Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Timed Up and Go (TUG) test and Berg Balance Score (BBS), respectively. There was found a significant reduction in fatigue in the group receiving a-tDCS over the prefrontal cortex with postural training compared to the other two groups (P < 0.001). Additionally, a significant improvement was found in balance in the group receiving a-tDCS over the cerebellum concurrent with postural training in comparison to the other two groups (P < 0.001). Besides, in the sham group, the significant results were not reported in the variables. (P > 0.001). The results demonstrated that a-tDCS enhances the effects of postural training on balance and fatigue in MS patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Akbari NJ, Yousefi M (2023) Examining the gait pattern in terms of spatio-temporal, kinematic and kineti parameters during gait initiation in MS patients. Gait Posture 106:S89–S90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.110
Ayache SS, Palm U, Chalah MA, Al-Ani T, Brignol A, Abdellaoui M, Dimitri D, Sorel M, Créange A, Lefaucheur J-P (2016) Prefrontal tDCS decreases pain in patients with multiple sclerosis. Front Neurosci 10:147. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00147
Bailey A, Channon S, Beaumont J (2007) The relationship between subjective fatigue and cognitive fatigue in advanced multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J 13(1):73–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458506071162
Baroni A, Magro G, Martinuzzi C, Brondi L, Masiero S, Milani G, Zani G, Bergonzoni A, Basaglia N, Straudi S (2022) Combined effects of cerebellar tDCS and task-oriented circuit training in people with multiple sclerosis: a pilot randomized control trial. Restor Neurol Neurosci 40(2):85–95. https://doi.org/10.3233/RNN-211245
Benito-León J, Manuel Morales J, Rivera-Navarro J, Mitchell AJ (2003) A review about the impact of multiple sclerosis on health-related quality of life. Disabil Rehabil 25(23):1291–1303. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280310001608591
Berg K (1992) Measuring balance in the elderly. Development and validation of an instrument
Bernard JA, Seidler RD (2014) Moving forward: age effects on the cerebellum underlie cognitive and motor declines. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 42:193–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.02.011
Bisecco A, Caiazzo G, d’Ambrosio A, Sacco R, Bonavita S, Docimo R, Cirillo M, Pagani E, Filippi M, Esposito F (2016) Fatigue in multiple sclerosis: the contribution of occult white matter damage. Mult Scler J 22(13):1676–1684. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458516628331
Borm GF, Fransen J, Lemmens WA (2007) A simple sample size formula for analysis of covariance in randomized clinical trials. J Clin Epidemiol 60(12):1234–1238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.02.006
Calabrese M, Rinaldi F, Grossi P, Mattisi I, Bernardi V, Favaretto A, Perini P, Gallo P (2010) Basal ganglia and frontal/parietal cortical atrophy is associated with fatigue in relapsing—remitting multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 16(10):1220–1228. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458510376405
Celnik P (2015) Understanding and modulating motor learning with cerebellar stimulation. Cerebellum 14:171–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2016.11.015
Chalah MA, Riachi N, Ahdab R, Créange A, Lefaucheur J-P, Ayache SS (2015) Fatigue in multiple sclerosis: neural correlates and the role of non-invasive brain stimulation. Front Cell Neurosci 9:460. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2015.00460
Chalah MA, Riachi N, Ahdab R, Mhalla A, Abdellaoui M, Créange A, Lefaucheur J-P, Ayache SS (2017) Effects of left DLPFC versus right PPC tDCS on multiple sclerosis fatigue. J Neurol Sci 372:131–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2016.11.015
Charvet LE, Dobbs B, Shaw MT, Bikson M, Datta A, Krupp LB (2018a) Remotely supervised transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of fatigue in multiple sclerosis: results from a randomized, sham-controlled trial. Mult Scler J 24(13):1760–1769. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458517732842
Charvet L, Shaw M, Dobbs B, Frontario A, Sherman K, Bikson M, Datta A, Krupp L, Zeinapour E, Kasschau M (2018b) Remotely supervised transcranial direct current stimulation increases the benefit of at-home cognitive training in multiple sclerosis. Neuromodulation: Technol Neural Interface 21(4):383–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12583
Dobson R, Giovannoni G (2019) Multiple sclerosis–a review. Eur J Neurol 26(1):27–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.13819
Ehsani F, Ahmadi M, Masoudian N, Jaberzadeh S (2022) Priming of postural training with cerebellar anodal transcranial direct current stimulation for its effects on postural balance and fear of falling in patients with multiple sclerosis: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study. J Clin Neurosci 99:294–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2022.03.025
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A-G (2009) Statistical power analyses using G* power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods 41(4):1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
Foerster Á, Melo L, Mello M, Castro R, Shirahige L, Rocha S, Monte-Silva K (2017) Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS) impairs balance control in healthy individuals. Cerebellum 16:872–875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-017-0863-8
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) Mini-mental state: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12(3):189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
Fonteneau C, Redoute J, Haesebaert F, Le Bars D, Costes N, Suaud-Chagny M-F, Brunelin J (2018) Frontal transcranial direct current stimulation induces dopamine release in the ventral striatum in human. Cereb Cortex 28(7):2636–2646. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhy093
Fujita H, Kasubuchi K, Wakata S, Hiyamizu M, Morioka S (2016) Role of the frontal cortex in standing postural sway tasks while dual-tasking: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy study examining working memory capacity. BioMed Res Int 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7053867
Gandiga PC, Hummel FC, Cohen LG (2006) Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 117(4):845–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2005.12.003
George MS, Aston-Jones G (2010) Noninvasive techniques for probing neurocircuitry and treating illness: vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Neuropsychopharmacology 35(1):301–316. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2009.87
Gioftsidou A, Malliou P, Pafis G, Beneka A, Godolias G, Maganaris CN (2006) The effects of soccer training and timing of balance training on balance ability. Eur J Appl Physiol 96:659–664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-005-0123-3
Grecco LAC, Oliveira CS, Duarte NdAC, Lima VLC, Zanon N, Fregni F (2017) Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation in children with ataxic cerebral palsy: a sham-controlled, crossover, pilot study. Dev Neurorehabil 20(3):142–148. https://doi.org/10.3109/17518423.2016.1139639
Hebert J, Corboy J (2013) The association between multiple sclerosis-related fatigue and balance as a function of central sensory integration. Gait Posture 38(1):37–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.10.015
Hiew S, Nguemeni C, Zeller D (2022) Efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation in people with multiple sclerosis: a review. Eur Neurol 29(2):648–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.15163
Hunter T, Sacco P, Nitsche MA, Turner DL (2009) Modulation of internal model formation during force field-induced motor learning by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of primary motor cortex. J Physiol 587(12):2949–2961. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2009.169284
Khadka N, Woods AJ, Bikson M (2019) Transcranial direct current stimulation electrodes. Practical guide to transcranial direct current stimulation: principles, procedures and applications, 263–291
Krupp LB, LaRocca NG, Muir-Nash J, Steinberg AD (1989) The fatigue severity scale: application to patients with multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Arch Neurol 46(10):1121–1123. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1989.00520460115022
Ksiazek-Winiarek DJ, Szpakowski P, Glabinski A (2015) Neural plasticity in multiple sclerosis: the functional and molecular background. Neural Plast 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/307175
Kubsik-Gidlewska AM, Klimkiewicz P, Klimkiewicz R, Janczewska K, Woldańska-Okońska MZ (2017) Rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis. Adv Clin Exp Med 26(4). https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/62329
Kurtzke JF (1983) Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 33(11):1444–1444. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.33.11.1444
Lord S, Castell S (1994) Effect of exercise on balance, strength and reaction time in older people. Aust J Physiother 40(2):83–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60454-2
Lucas SM, Rothwell NJ, Gibson RM (2006) The role of inflammation in CNS injury and disease. Br J Pharmacol 147(S1):S232–S240. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0706400
McGowan K, Gunn SM, Vorobeychik G, Marigold DS (2017) Short-term motor learning and retention during visually guided walking in persons with multiple sclerosis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 31(7):648–656. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968317712472
Mortezanejad M, Ehsani F, Masoudian N, Zoghi M, Jaberzadeh S (2020) Comparing the effects of multi-session anodal trans-cranial direct current stimulation of primary motor and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices on fatigue and quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis: a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 34(8):1103–1111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215520921506
Muñoz-Paredes I, Herrero AJ, Llamas-Ramos R, Rodríguez-Pérez V, Seco-Calvo J (2022) The effect of combining transcranial direct current stimulation treatment and an exercise program on fragility in a population with multiple sclerosis: cross-over design trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(19):12747. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912747
Nguemeni C, Homola GA, Nakchbandi L, Pham M, Volkmann J, Zeller D (2020) A single session of anodal cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation does not induce facilitation of locomotor consolidation in patients with multiple sclerosis. Front Hum Neurosci 14:588671. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.588671
Nitsche MA, Liebetanz D, Lang N, Antal A, Tergau F, Paulus W (2003) Safety criteria for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in humans. Clin Neurophysiology: Official J Int Federation Clin Neurophysiol 114(11):2220–2223. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1388-2457(03)00235-9
Oliva Ramirez A, Keenan A, Kalau O, Worthington E, Cohen L, Singh S (2021) Prevalence and burden of multiple sclerosis-related fatigue: a systematic literature review. BMC Neurol 21:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02396-1
Park C-h, Chang WH, Park J-Y, Shin Y-I, Kim ST, Kim Y-H (2013) Transcranial direct current stimulation increases resting state interhemispheric connectivity. Neurosci Lett 539:7–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2013.01.047
Podsiadlo D, Richardson S (1991) The timed up & go: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 39(2):142–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x
Priori A, Ciocca M, Parazzini M, Vergari M, Ferrucci R (2014) Transcranial cerebellar direct current stimulation and transcutaneous spinal cord direct current stimulation as innovative tools for neuroscientists. J Physiol 592(16):3345–3369. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2013.270280
Riachi N, Ahdab R, Challah MA, Creange A, Lefaucheur J-P, Ayache SS (2015) Fatigue in multiple sclerosis. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2015.00460
Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH (2007) Motor control: translating research into clinical practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Stadelmann C, Wegner C, Brück W (2011) Inflammation, demyelination, and degeneration—recent insights from MS pathology. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Molecular basis of Disease. 1812(2):275–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2010.07.007
Torriero S, Oliveri M, Koch G, Caltagirone C, Petrosini L (2007) The what and how of observational learning. J Cogn Neurosci 19(10):1656–1663. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.10.1656
Wagner T, Fregni F, Fecteau S, Grodzinsky A, Zahn M, Pascual-Leone A (2007) Transcranial direct current stimulation: a computer-based human model study. NeuroImage 35(3):1113–1124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.027
Woods AJ, Antal A, Bikson M, Boggio PS, Brunoni AR, Celnik P, Cohen LG, Fregni F, Herrmann CS, Kappenman ES (2016) A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools. Clin Neurophysiol 127(2):1031–1048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2015.11.012
Woollacott M, Shumway-Cook A (2002) Attention and the control of posture and gait: a review of an emerging area of research. Gait Posture 16(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00156-4
Zahiri N, Abollahi I, Nabavi SM, Ehsani F, Arab AM, Shaw I, Shariat A, Shaw BS, Dastoorpoor M, Danaee M (2017) Interference effect of prior explicit information on motor sequence learning in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients. Malaysian J Med Sciences: MJMS 24(1):69. https://doi.org/10.21315/mjms2017.24.1.8
Zhou J, Manor B, Yu W, Lo OY, Gouskova N, Salvador R, Katz R, Cornejo Thumm P, Brozgol M, Ruffini G (2021) Targeted tDCS mitigates Dual-Task costs to Gait and Balance in older adults. Ann Neurol 90(3):428–439. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.26156
Ziemssen T (2011) Symptom management in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 311:S48–S52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-510X(11)70009-0
Zuchowski ML, Timmann D, Gerwig M (2014) Acquisition of conditioned eyeblink responses is modulated by cerebellar tDCS. Brain Stimul 7(4):525–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2014.03.010
Acknowledgements
We express our gratitude to Imam Hossein Hospital and the Faculty of Rehabilitation at Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences for collaborating with us and creating the required conditions for conducting this study.
Funding
The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: [Narges Jahantigh Akbari] [ Nahid Tahan]; Methodology: [Narges Jahantigh Akbari] [ Nahid Tahan][ Sedigheh Sadat Naimi]; Formal analysis and investigation: [Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban] [Nahid Beladi Moghadam]; Writing - original draft preparation: [Narges Jahantigh Akbari] [ Nahid Tahan]; Writing - review and editing: [Narges Jahantigh Akbari] [ Nahid Tahan][ Maryam Zoghi]; Supervision: [Narges Jahantigh Akbari] [ Nahid Tahan][ Maryam Zoghi].
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Informed consent
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the human Ethics Committee of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences in Tehran, Iran, granted approval for this study (No. IR.SBMU.RETECH.REC.1400.499). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Consent for publication
The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent for publication of the image.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by Winston D Byblow.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Akbari, N.J., Tahan, N., Naimi, S.S. et al. Comparing the effects of cerebellar and prefrontal anodal transcranial direct current stimulation concurrent with postural training on balance and fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis: a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial. Exp Brain Res (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-024-06816-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-024-06816-9