Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparing the effects of cerebellar and prefrontal anodal transcranial direct current stimulation concurrent with postural training on balance and fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis: a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fatigue and balance disorders are common challenges experienced by Multiple Sclerosis (MS) individuals. The purpose of this study was to compare the concurrent effects of cerebellar and prefrontal anodal trans-cranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) with postural training on balance and fatigue in MS patients. 51 patients were evaluated to randomly allocation to a-tDCS over cerebellum, a-tDCS over dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and sham group. 46 individuals (n = 16 in experimental groups and n = 14 in control group) followed treatment. All the groups received 10 sessions of postural training. The experimental groups underwent a-tDCS with a current of 1.5 mA for a period of 20 min. While, in the sham group, tDCS was only activated for 30 s and then turned off. The treatment included 10 sessions for four weeks. Before and after intervention, fatigue and balance were assessed using Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Timed Up and Go (TUG) test and Berg Balance Score (BBS), respectively. There was found a significant reduction in fatigue in the group receiving a-tDCS over the prefrontal cortex with postural training compared to the other two groups (P < 0.001). Additionally, a significant improvement was found in balance in the group receiving a-tDCS over the cerebellum concurrent with postural training in comparison to the other two groups (P < 0.001). Besides, in the sham group, the significant results were not reported in the variables. (P > 0.001). The results demonstrated that a-tDCS enhances the effects of postural training on balance and fatigue in MS patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to Imam Hossein Hospital and the Faculty of Rehabilitation at Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences for collaborating with us and creating the required conditions for conducting this study.

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: [Narges Jahantigh Akbari] [ Nahid Tahan]; Methodology: [Narges Jahantigh Akbari] [ Nahid Tahan][ Sedigheh Sadat Naimi]; Formal analysis and investigation: [Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban] [Nahid Beladi Moghadam]; Writing - original draft preparation: [Narges Jahantigh Akbari] [ Nahid Tahan]; Writing - review and editing: [Narges Jahantigh Akbari] [ Nahid Tahan][ Maryam Zoghi]; Supervision: [Narges Jahantigh Akbari] [ Nahid Tahan][ Maryam Zoghi].

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nahid Tahan.

Ethics declarations

Informed consent

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the human Ethics Committee of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences in Tehran, Iran, granted approval for this study (No. IR.SBMU.RETECH.REC.1400.499). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent for publication of the image.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by Winston D Byblow.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akbari, N.J., Tahan, N., Naimi, S.S. et al. Comparing the effects of cerebellar and prefrontal anodal transcranial direct current stimulation concurrent with postural training on balance and fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis: a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial. Exp Brain Res (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-024-06816-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-024-06816-9

Keywords

Navigation