Abstract
This study examined the relation between movement amplitude and tempo during self-paced rhythmic finger tapping to test a preferred velocity account of the preferred tempo construct. Preferred tempo refers to the concept that individuals have preferences for the pace of actions or events in their environment (e.g., the desired pace of walking or tempo of music). The preferred velocity hypothesis proposes that assessments of preferred tempo do not represent a pure time preference independent of spatial movement characteristics, but rather reflects a preference for an average movement velocity, predicting that preferred tempo will depend on movement amplitude. We tested this by having participants first perform a novel spontaneous motor amplitude (SMA) task in which they repetitively tapped their finger at their preferred amplitude without instructions about tapping tempo. Next, participants completed the spontaneous motor tempo (SMT) task in which they tapped their finger at their preferred tempo without instructions about tapping amplitude. Finally, participants completed a target amplitude version of the SMT task where they tapped at their preferred tempo at three target amplitudes (low, medium, and high). Participants (1) produced similar amplitudes and tempi regardless of instructions to produce either their preferred amplitude or preferred tempo, maintaining the same average movement velocity across SMA and SMT tasks and (2) altered their preferred tempo for different target amplitudes in the direction predicted by their estimated preferred velocity from the SMA and SMT tasks. Overall, results show the interdependence of movement amplitude and tempo in tapping assessments of preferred tempo.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data are available upon request.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
Notes
To address whether the outlier in Fig. 3a may have affected the results, we calculated Spearman’s rank-ordered correlation coefficient rho for the data reported in both Fig. 3a and b. For the correlation in Panel A: ρ(18) = 0.74, p < 0.001, and for the correlation in Panel B: ρ(18) = 0.74, p < 0.001
References
Baruch C, Panissal-Vieu N, Drake C (2004) Preferred perceptual tempo for sound sequences: comparison of adults, children, and infants. Percept Mot Skills 98(1):325–339. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.98.1.325-339
Baudouin A, Vanneste S, Isingrini M (2004) Age-related cognitive slowing: the role of spontaneous tempo and processing speed. Exp Aging Res 30(3):225–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610730490447831
Boltz MG (1994) Changes in internal tempo and effects on the learning and remembering of event durations. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cog 20(5):1154. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.5.1154
Broderick MP, Van Gemmert AW, Shill HA, Stelmach GE (2009) Hypometria and bradykinesia during drawing movements in individuals with Parkinson’s disease. Exp Brain Res 197:223–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-1925-z
Chen JL, Penhune VB, Zatorre RJ (2008) Listening to musical rhythms recruits motor regions of the brain. Cereb Cortex 18(12):2844–2854. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhn042
Collyer CE, Broadbent HA, Church RM (1994) Preferred rates of repetitive tapping and categorical time production. Percept Psychophys 55(4):443–453. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205301
Dahl S, Huron D, Brod G, Altenmüller E (2014) Preferred dance tempo: does sex or body morphology influence how we groove? J New Music Res 43(2):214–223
Dosseville F, Moussay S, Larue J, Gauthier A, Davenne D (2002) Physical exercise and time of day: influences on spontaneous motor tempo. Percept Mot Skills 95(3):965–972. https://doi.org/10.1081/CBI-120015966
Drake C, Jones MR, Baruch C (2000) The development of rhythmic attending in auditory sequences: attunement, referent period, focal attending. Cognition 77(3):251–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00106-2
Fraisse P (1956) Les structures rhythtmiques. Publications Universitaires de Louvain
Fraisse P (1963) The psychology of time. Harper & Row
Fraisse P (1967) Le Seuil différentiel De durée dans une suite régulière d‘intervalles. L’année Psychologique 67(1):43–49
Fraisse P (1982) Rhythm and tempo. Psychol Music 1:149–180
Fujioka T, Trainor LJ, Large EW, Ross B (2012) Internalized timing of isochronous sounds is represented in neuromagnetic beta oscillations. J Neurosci 32(5):1791–1802. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4107-11.2012
Grahn JA, Brett M (2007) Rhythm and beat perception in motor areas of the brain. J Cogn Neurosci 19(5):893–906. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.5.893
Guérin SM, Vincent MA, Karageorghis CI, Delevoye-Turrell YN (2021) Effects of motor tempo on frontal brain activity: an fNIRS Study. NeuroImage 230:117597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117597
Hammerschmidt D, Wöllner C (2022) Spontaneous motor tempo over the course of a week: the role of the time of the day, chronotype, and arousal. Psychol Res 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01646-2
Hammerschmidt D, Frieler K, Wöllner C (2021) Spontaneous motor tempo: investigating psychological, chronobiological, and demographic factors in a large-scale online tapping experiment. Front Psychol 12:2338. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.677201
Janata P, Tomic ST, Haberman JM (2012) Sensorimotor coupling in music and the psychology of the groove. J Exp Psychol Gen 141(1):54. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024208
Jones MR (1976) Time, our lost dimension: toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory. Psychol Rev 83(5):323. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.83.5.323
Kay BA, Kelso JA, Saltzman EL, Schöner G (1987) Space–time behavior of single and bimanual rhythmical movements: data and limit cycle model. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 13(2):178. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.13.2.178
Kliger-Amrani A, Zion-Golumbic E (2020) Spontaneous and stimulus-driven rhythmic behaviors in ADHD adults and controls. Neuropsychologia 146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107544
McAuley JD, Jones MR, Holub S, Johnston HM, Miller NS (2006) The time of our lives: life span development of timing and event tracking. J Exp Psychol Gen 135(3):348. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.135.3.348
McPherson T, Berger D, Alagapan S, Fröhlich F (2018) Intrinsic rhythmicity predicts synchronization-continuation entrainment performance. Sci Rep 8(1):11782. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29267-z
Michaelis K, Wiener M, Thompson JC (2014) Passive listening to preferred motor tempo modulates corticospinal excitability. Front Hum Neurosci 8:252. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00252
Mishima J (1956) On the factors of the mental tempo. Jpn Psychol Res 1956(4):27–38
Miyake Y, Onishi Y, Poppel E (2004) Two types of anticipation in synchronization tapping. Acta Neurobiol Exp 64(3):415–426
Moelants D (2002) Preferred tempo reconsidered. In C. Stevens, D. Burnham, G. McPherson, E. Schubert, & J. Renwick (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition (pp. 580–583). Sydney, Australia: Causal Productions
Moussay S, Dosseville F, Gauthier A, Larue J, Sesboüe B, Davenne D (2002) Circadian rhythms during cycling exercise and finger-tapping task. Chronobiol Int 19(6):1137–1149. https://doi.org/10.1081/CBI-120015966
Moustafa AA, Chakravarthy S, Phillips JR, Gupta A, Keri S, Polner B, Jahanshahi M (2016) Motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease: a unified framework. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 68:727–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.07.010
Rimoldi HJ (1951) Personal tempo. J Abnorm Social Psychol 46(3):283. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057479
Ringenbach SDR, Amazeen PG, Amazeen EL (2003) Frequency and amplitude are inversely related in circle drawing. In: Studies in perception and action VII: twelfth international conference on perception and action: July 13–18, 2003, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia (pp. 41). Lawrence Erlbaum
Rose D, Cameron DJ, Lovatt PJ, Grahn JA, Annett LE (2020) Comparison of spontaneous motor tempo during finger tapping, toe tapping and stepping on the spot in people with and without Parkinson’s disease. J Mov Disord 13(1):47. https://doi.org/10.14802/jmd.19043/J
Rosenbaum DA, Slotta JD, Vaughan J, Plamondon R (1991) Optimal movement selection. Psychol Sci 2(2):86–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00106.x
Stegemöller EL, Zaman A, Uzochukwu J (2019) Repetitive finger movement and circle drawing in persons with Parkinson’s disease. PLoS ONE 14(9):e0222862. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222862
Stern W (1900) Über Psychologie Der Individuellen Differenzen: Ideen zu Einer Differentiellen Psychologie (No. 12). JA Barth
Tierney A, Kraus N (2013) Neural responses to sounds presented on and off the beat of ecologically valid music. Front Syst Neurosci 7:14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2013.00014
Todd NPM, O’Boyle DJ, Lee CS (1999) A sensory-motor theory of rhythm, time perception and beat induction. J New Music Res 28(1):5–28. https://doi.org/10.1076/jnmr.28.1.5.3124
Todd NPM, Cousins R, Lee CS (2007) The contribution of anthropometric factors to individual differences in the perception of rhythm. Empir Musicology Rev 2(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.18061/1811/24478
Tranchant P, Vuvan DT, Peretz I (2016) Keeping the beat: a large sample study of bouncing and clapping to music. PLoS ONE 11(7):e0160178. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160178
Van Gemmert AWA, Teulings HL, Contreras-Vidal JL, Stelmach GE (1999) Parkinson’s disease and the control of size and speed in handwriting. Neuropsychologia 37(6):685–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00122-5
van Noorden L, Moelants D (1999) Resonance in the perception of musical pulse. J New Music Res 28(1):43–66. https://doi.org/10.1076/jnmr.28.1.43.3122
Vanneste V, Pouthas JH, Wearden S (2001) Temporal control of rhythmic performance: a comparison between young and old adults. Exp Aging Res 27(1):83–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610730125798
Wagenaar RC, Van Emmerik REA (2000) Resonant frequencies of arms and legs identify different walking patterns. J Biomech 33(7):853–861. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00020-8
Wallin JE (1911) Experimental studies of rhythm and time. Psychol Rev 18(2):100. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0070543
Yu H, Russell DM, Sternad D (2003) Task-effector asymmetries in a rhythmic continuation task. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 29(3):616. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.29.3.616
Funding
No funding was received for this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Permissions
Manuscript was adapted from pre-published dissertation (Kroger, 2022) with permission from the author.
Additional information
Communicated by Bill J Yates.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kroger, C., Kagerer, F.A. & McAuley, J.D. Interdependence of movement amplitude and tempo during self-paced finger tapping: evaluation of a preferred velocity hypothesis. Exp Brain Res 242, 1025–1036 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-024-06814-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-024-06814-x