Abstract
Detection of 3D object-motion trajectories depends on the integration of two distinct visual cues: translational displacement and looming. Electrophysiological studies have identified distinct neuronal populations, whose activity depends on the precise motion cues present in the stimulus. This distinction, however, has been less clear in humans, and it is confounded by differences in the behavioral task being performed. We analyzed whole-brain fMRI, while subjects performed a common time-to-arrival task for objects moving along three trajectories: moving directly towards the observer (collision course), with trajectories parallel to the line of sight (passage course), and with trajectories perpendicular to the line of sight (gap closure). We found that there was substantial overlap in the pattern of activation associated with each of the three tasks, with differences among conditions limited to the human motion area (hMT+), which showed greater activation extent in the gap closure condition than for either collision or passage courses. These results support a common substrate for temporal judgments of an object’s time-to-arrival, wherein the special cases of object motion directly toward, or perpendicular to, the observer represent two extremes within the broader continuum of 3D passage trajectories relative to the observer.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aguirre GK, Zarahn E, D’Esposito M (1998) The variability of human, BOLD hemodynamic responses. Neuroimage 8:360–369
Amano K, Wandell BA, Dumoulin SO (2009) Visual field maps, population receptive field sizes, and visual field coverage in the human MT+ complex. J Neurophysiol 102:2704–2718. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00102.2009
Ball K, Sekuler R (1980) Models of stimulus uncertainty in motion perception. Psychol Rev 87:435–469
Billington J, Wilkie RM, Field DT, Wann JP (2011) Neural processing of imminent collision in humans. Proc Biol Sci 278:1476–1481. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.1895
Brainard DH (1997) The psychophysics toolbox. Spat Vis 10:433–436
Brunia CH, Damen EJ (1988) Distribution of slow brain potentials related to motor preparation and stimulus anticipation in a time estimation task. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 69:234–243
Burock MA, Dale AM (2000) Estimation and detection of event-related fMRI signals with temporally correlated noise: a statistically efficient and unbiased approach. Hum Brain Mapp 11:249–260
Burock MA, Buckner RL, Woldorff MG et al (1998) Randomized event-related experimental designs allow for extremely rapid presentation rates using functional MRI. NeuroReport 9:3735–3739
Calabro FJ, Beardsley SA, Vaina LM (2011) Different motion cues are used to estimate time-to-arrival for frontoparallel and looming trajectories. Vision Res 51:2378–2385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2011.09.016
Chen G, Adleman NE, Saad ZS et al (2014) Applications of multivariate modeling to neuroimaging group analysis: a comprehensive alternative to univariate general linear model. NeuroImage 99:571–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.027
Claeys KG, Lindsey DT, De Schutter E, Orban GA (2003) A higher order motion region in human inferior parietal lobule: evidence from fMRI. Neuron 40:631–642
Cox RW (1996) AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput Biomed Res 29:162–173. https://doi.org/10.1006/cbmr.1996.0014
Duffy CJ, Wurtz RH (1991) Sensitivity of MST neurons to optic flow stimuli. I. A continuum of response selectivity to large-field stimuli. J Neurophysiol 65:1329–1345. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1991.65.6.1329
Duhamel JR, Colby CL, Goldberg ME (1998) Ventral intraparietal area of the macaque: congruent visual and somatic response properties. J Neurophysiol 79:126–136. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1998.79.1.126
Dukelow SP, DeSouza JF, Culham JC et al (2001) Distinguishing subregions of the human MT+ complex using visual fields and pursuit eye movements. J Neurophysiol 86:1991–2000. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.2001.86.4.1991
Eklund A, Nichols TE, Knutsson H (2016) Cluster failure: why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:7900–7905. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602413113
Ferrandez AM, Hugueville L, Lehéricy S et al (2003) Basal ganglia and supplementary motor area subtend duration perception: an fMRI study. NeuroImage 19:1532–1544
Field DT, Wann JP (2005) Perceiving time to collision activates the sensorimotor cortex. Curr Biol CB 15:453–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2004.12.081
Georgeson MA, Harris MG (1978) Apparent foveofugal drift of counterphase gratings. Perception 7:527–536. https://doi.org/10.1068/p070527
Gray R, Regan D (1998) Accuracy of estimating time to collision using binocular and monocular information. Vision Res 38:499–512
Grill-Spector K, Kourtzi Z, Kanwisher N (2001) The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition. Vision Res 41(10–11):1409–1422
Hallquist MN, Hwang K, Luna B (2013) The nuisance of nuisance regression: spectral misspecification in a common approach to resting-state fMRI preprocessing reintroduces noise and obscures functional connectivity. NeuroImage 82:208–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.116
Handwerker DA, Ollinger JM, D’Esposito M (2004) Variation of BOLD hemodynamic responses across subjects and brain regions and their effects on statistical analyses. Neuroimage 21:1639–1651
Henson RNA, Price CJ, Rugg MD et al (2002) Detecting latency differences in event-related BOLD repsonses Application to words versus nonwords and initial versus repeated face presentations. NeuroImage 15:83–97
Hildreth EC (1983) The detection of intensity changes by computer and biological vision systems. Comput Vis Graph Image Process 22:1–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/0734-189X(83)90093-2
Huk AC, Dougherty RF, Heeger DJ (2002) Retinotopy and functional subdivision of human areas MT and MST. J Neurosci 22:7195–7205. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-16-07195.2002
Kosillo P, Smith AT (2010) The role of the human anterior insular cortex in time processing. Brain Struct Funct 214:623–628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-010-0267-8
Kourtzi Z, Bülthoff HH, Erb M, Grodd W (2002) Object-selective responses in the human motion area MT/MST. Nat Neurosci 5:17–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn780
Lewis LD, Setsompop K, Rosen BR, Polimeni JR (2018) Stimulus-dependent hemodynamic response timing across the human subcortical-cortical visual pathway identified through high spatiotemporal resolution 7T fMRI. NeuroImage 181:279–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.06.056
Livesey AC, Wall MB, Smith AT (2007) Time perception: manipulation of task difficulty dissociates clock functions from other cognitive demands. Neuropsychologia 45:321–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.06.033
Malikovic A, Amunts K, Schleicher A et al (2007) Cytoarchitectonic analysis of the human extrastriate cortex in the region of V5/MT+: a probabilistic, stereotaxic map of area hOc5. Cereb Cortex 17:562–574. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhj181
Marr D (1982) Vision: the philosophy and the approach. Freeman, San Francisco
Movshon JA, Newsome WT (1996) Visual response properties of striate cortical neurons projecting to area MT in macaque monkeys. J Neurosci 16:7733–7741
Pack CC, Born RT (2001) Temporal dynamics of a neural solution to the aperture problem in visual area MT of macaque brain. Nature 409:1040–1042. https://doi.org/10.1038/35059085
Paradis AL, Cornilleau-Pérès V, Droulez J et al (2000) Visual perception of motion and 3-D structure from motion: an fMRI study. Cereb Cortex 10:772–783
Pelli DG (1997) The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat Vis 10:437–442
Rao SM, Mayer AR, Harrington DL (2001) The evolution of brain activation during temporal processing. Nat Neurosci 4:317–323. https://doi.org/10.1038/85191
Smyser CD, Snyder AZ, Neil JJ (2011) Functional connectivity MRI in infants: exploration of the functional organization of the developing brain. NeuroImage 56:1437–1452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.02.073
Son J, Ai L, Lim R et al (2019) Evaluating fMRI-Based Estimation of Eye Gaze during Naturalistic Viewing. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/347765
Stevens MC, Kiehl KA, Pearlson G, Calhoun VD (2007) Functional neural circuits for mental timekeeping. Hum Brain Mapp 28:394–408. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20285
Tanaka K, Saito H (1989) Analysis of motion of the visual field by direction, expansion/contraction, and rotation cells clustered in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey. J Neurophysiol 62:626–641. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1989.62.3.626
Tanaka K, Hikosaka K, Saito H et al (1986) Analysis of local and wide-field movements in the superior temporal visual areas of the macaque monkey. J Neurosci 6:134–144
Tootell RB, Reppas JB, Dale AM et al (1995) Visual motion aftereffect in human cortical area MT revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Nature 375:139–141. https://doi.org/10.1038/375139a0
van der Kouwe AJW, Benner T, Fischl B et al (2005) On-line automatic slice positioning for brain MR imaging. NeuroImage 27:222–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.03.035
Vanduffel W, Fize D, Peuskens H et al (2002) Extracting 3D from motion: differences in human and monkey intraparietal cortex. Science 298:413–415
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by NIH Grant RO1NS064100 to L.M.V. This research was carried out in part at the Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging at the Massachusetts General Hospital, using resources provided by the Center for Functional Neuroimaging Technologies, P41RR14075, a P41 Regional Resource supported by the Biomedical Technology Program of the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), National Institutes of Health. This work also involved the use of instrumentation supported by the NCRR Shared Instrumentation Grant Program and/or High-End Instrumentation Grant Program; specifically, Grant Number S10RR021110.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Calabro, F.J., Beardsley, S.A. & Vaina, L.M. Differential cortical activation during the perception of moving objects along different trajectories. Exp Brain Res 237, 2665–2673 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05613-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05613-z