Abstract
In many activities, we need to predict the arrival of an occluded object. This action is called prediction motion or motion extrapolation. Previous researchers have found that both eye tracking and the internal clocking model are involved in the prediction motion task. Additionally, it is reported that concurrent hand movement facilitates the eye tracking of an externally generated target in a tracking task, even if the target is occluded. The present study examined the effect of concurrent hand movement on the estimated time to contact in a prediction motion task. We found different (accurate/inaccurate) concurrent hand movements had the opposite effect on the eye tracking accuracy and estimated TTC in the prediction motion task. That is, the accurate concurrent hand tracking enhanced eye tracking accuracy and had the trend to increase the precision of estimated TTC, but the inaccurate concurrent hand tracking decreased eye tracking accuracy and disrupted estimated TTC. However, eye tracking accuracy does not determine the precision of estimated TTC.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In the current study, the time of minimum eye velocity after target occlusion was just before the onset time of the anticipatory saccade. Thus, we can regard the time of anticipatory recovery as the onset time of the anticipatory saccade.
References
Barnes GR (2008) Cognitive processes involved in smooth pursuit eye movements. Brain Cogn 68(3):309–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2008.08.020
Barnes GR, Collins CJS (2008) The influence of briefly presented randomized target motion on the extraretinal component of ocular pursuit. J Neurophysiol 99(2):831–842. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01033.2007
Battaglini L, Contemori G, Maniglia M, Casco C (2016) Fast moving texture has opposite effects on the perceived speed of visible and occluded object trajectories. Acta Psychol 170:206–214
Benguigui N, Bennett SJ (2010) Ocular pursuit and the estimation of time-to-contact with accelerating objects in prediction motion are controlled independently based on first-order estimates. Exp Brain Res 202(2):327–339
Bennett SJ, Barnes GR (2003) Human ocular pursuit during the transient disappearance of a visual target. J Neurophysiol 90(4):2504–2520
Bennett SJ, Barnes GR (2005) Timing the anticipatory recovery in smooth ocular pursuit during the transient disappearance of a visual object. Exp Brain Res 163:198–203
Bennett SJ, Barnes GR (2006) Combined smooth and saccadic ocular pursuit during the transient occlusion of a moving visual object. Exp Brain Res 168(3):313–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-0101-3
Bennett SJ, Baures R, Hecht H, Benguigui N (2010) Eye movements influence estimation of time-to-contact in prediction motion. Exp Brain Res 206(4):399–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2416-y
Bennett SJ, Donnell DO, Hansen S, Barnes GR (2012) Facilitation of ocular pursuit during transient occlusion of externally-generated target motion by concurrent upper limb movement. J Vis 12(13):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1167/12.13.17
Bootsma RJ (1989) Accuracy of perceptual processes subserving different perception–action systems. Q J Exp Psychol Sect A 41(3):489–500
Cooper LA (1989) Mental models of the structure of visual objects. In: Shepp BE, Ballesteros S (eds) Object perception: structure and process. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ pp 91–119
de Brouwer S, Missal M, Lefèvre P (2001). Role of retinal slip in the prediction of target motion during smooth and saccadic pursuit. J Neurophysiol 86(2):550–558. http://jn.physiology.org/content/86/2/550.long
DeLucia PR, Liddell GW (1998) Cognitive motion extrapolation and cognitive clocking in prediction motion task. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24(3):901–914. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.901
Fooken J, Yeo SH, Pai DK, Spering M (2016) Eye movement accuracy determines natural interception strategies. J Vis 16(14):1–1
Gauthier GM, Hofferer JM (1976) Eye tracking of self-moved targets in the absence of vision. Exp Brain Res 26(2):121–139
Gauthier GM, Vercher JL, Mussa Ivaldi F, Marchetti E (1988) Oculo-manual tracking of visual targets: control learning, coordination control and coordination model. Exp Brain Res 73(1):127–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00279667
Huang CT, Hwang IS (2013) Kinematic property of target motion conditions gaze behavior and eye-hand synergy during manual tracking. Hum Mov Sci 32(6):1253–1269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2013.03.007
Lee DN (1976) A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision. Perception 5(4):437–459
Lyon DR, Waag WL (1995) Time course of visual extrapolation accuracy. Acta Psychol 89(3):239–260
Makin ADJ, Chauhan T (2014) Memory-guided tracking through physical space and feature space. J Vis 14(13):10. https://doi.org/10.1167/14.13.10
Makin ADJ, Poliakoff E (2011) Do common systems control eye movements and motion extrapolation? Q J Exp Psychol 64(7):1327–1343. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2010.548562
Mather JA, Lackner JR (1980) Visual tracking of active and passive movements of the hand. Q J Exp Psychol 32(2):307–315
Mazich MM, Studenka BE, Newell KM (2015) Visual information about past, current and future properties of irregular target paths in isometric force tracking. Atten Percept Psychophys 77(1):329–339. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0766-4
Niehorster DC, Siu WWF, Li L (2015) Manual tracking enhances smooth pursuit eye movements. J Vis 15(15):11. https://doi.org/10.1167/15.15.11
Orban de Xivry JJ, Bennett SJ, Lefèvre P, Barnes GR (2006) Evidence for synergy between saccades and smooth pursuit during transient target disappearance. J Neurophysiol 95:418–427
Rodríguez-Herreros B, López-Moliner J (2011) Proprioception improves temporal accuracy in a coincidence-timing task. Exp Brain Res 210(2):251–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2627-x
Rosenbaum Da (1975) Perception and extrapolation of velocity and acceleration. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1(4):395–403. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.1.4.395
Sokolov A, Pavlova M (2003) Timing accuracy in motion extrapolation: reverse effects of target size and visible extent of motion at low and high speeds. Perception 32(6):699–706. https://doi.org/10.1068/p3397
Tresilian JR (1995) Perceptual and cognitive processes in time-to-contact estimation: analysis of prediction-motion and relative judgment tasks. Percept Psychophys 57(2):231–245. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206510
Tresilian JR (1999) Visually timed action: time-out for “tau”? Trends Cogn Sci 3(8):301–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01352-2
Tresilian JR (2012) Sensorimotor control and learning. Palgrave Macmillan, London
Vercher JL, Quaccia D, Gauthier GM (1995) Oculo-manual coordination control: respective role of visual and non-visual information in ocular tracking of self-moved targets. Exp Brain Res 103(2):311–322
Wexler M, Klam F (2001) Movement prediction and movement production. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27(1):48
Williams LRT, Jasiewicz JM, Simmons RW (2001) Coincidence timing of finger, arm, and whole body movements. Percept Mot Skills 92(2):535–547
Yakimoff N, Mateeff S, Ehrenstein WH, Hohnsbein J (1993) Motion extrapolation performance: a linear model approach. Hum Factors 35(3):501–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872088502700306
Acknowledgements
The work is supported by the Human Performance Fund, University of Alberta. The authors would like to thank the reviewers for their helpful comments. The authors would also like to thank all of the participants for their willingness to take part.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zheng, R., Maraj, B.K.V. The effect of concurrent hand movement on estimated time to contact in a prediction motion task. Exp Brain Res 236, 1953–1962 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-018-5276-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-018-5276-5