Abstract
Based on H-reflex data, spinal mechanisms are proposed to be responsible for the first 50–80 ms of the transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-induced silent period. As several methodological issues can compromise H-reflex validity as a measure of motoneuron excitability, this study used transmastoid stimulation to elicit cervicomedullary motor evoked potentials (CMEPs) during the silent period. Eleven subjects made 1–3 visits which involved 32 or 44 brief (~3 s) isometric elbow flexor contractions at 25 % of maximal torque. During each contraction, transmastoid stimulation was delivered in isolation to elicit an unconditioned CMEP and at interstimulus intervals (ISIs) ranging from 50 to 150 ms after TMS to elicit a conditioned CMEP. Stimulus intensities for TMS and transmastoid stimulation were set to elicit a silent period of ~200 ms and an unconditioned CMEP of 15, 50, or 85 % of the maximal compound muscle action potential (M max), respectively. At all ISIs and intensities of transmastoid stimulation, the conditioned CMEP was significantly smaller than the unconditioned CMEP (p < 0.001). However, suppression of the conditioned CMEP was significantly less at 85 % compared to 15 or 50 % M max (p = 0.001). Contrary to published H-reflex data, the conditioned CMEP did not recover within 50–80 ms, remaining significantly suppressed at the longest ISI tested (150 ms). These data suggest the spinal portion of the TMS-evoked silent period is considerably longer than reported previously. Transmastoid stimulation, unlike peripheral nerve stimulation, does not impact proprioceptive inflow to motoneurons. Hence, relative to the H-reflex, the CMEP will be subjected to greater afferent-mediated disfacilitation and inhibition due to the TMS-induced muscle twitch.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bhumbra GS, Bannatyne BA, Watanabe M, Todd AJ, Maxwell DJ, Beato M (2014) The recurrent case for the Renshaw cell. J Neurosci 34:12919–12932. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0199-14.2014
Bussel B, Pierrot-Deseilligny E (1977) Inhibition of human motoneurons, probably of Renshaw origin, elicited by an orthodromic motor discharge. J Physiol 269:319–339. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011904
Calancie B, Nordin M, Wallin U, Hagbarth KE (1987) Motor-unit responses in human wrist flexor and extensor muscles to transcranial cortical stimuli. J Neurophysiol 58:1168–1185
Cantello R, Gianelli M, Civardi C, Mutani R (1992) Magnetic brain stimulation: the silent period after the motor evoked potential. Neurology 42:1951–1959
Cowan JM, Day BL, Marsden C, Rothwell JC (1986) The effect of percutaneous motor cortex stimulation on H reflexes in muscles of the arm and leg in intact man. J Physiol 377:333–347
Dalton BH, Jakobi JM, Allman BL, Rice CL (2010) Differential age-related changes in motor unit properties between elbow flexors and extensors. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 200:45–55. doi:10.1111/j.1748-1716.2010.02100.x
Davey NJ, Romaiguere P, Maskill DW, Ellaway PH (1994) Suppression of voluntary motor activity revealed using transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in man. J Physiol 477:223–235
de Noordhout AM, Rapisarda G, Bogacz D, Gérard P, De Pasqua V, Pennisi G, Delwaide PJ (1999) Corticomotoneuronal synaptic connections in normal man: an electrophysiological study. Brain 122:1327–1340
Fuhr P, Agostino R, Hallett M (1991) Spinal motor neuron excitability during the silent period after cortical stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 81:257–262. doi:10.1016/0168-5597(91)90011-L
Gandevia SC, Petersen N, Butler JE, Taylor JL (1999) Impaired response of human motoneurones to corticospinal stimulation after voluntary exercise. J Physiol 521:749–759. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.00749.x
Giesebrecht S, Martin PG, Gandevia SC, Taylor JL (2011) Altered corticospinal transmission to the hand after maximum voluntary efforts. Muscle Nerve 43:679–687. doi:10.1002/mus.21938
Inghilleri M, Berardelli A, Cruccu G, Manfredi M (1993) Silent period evoked by transcranial stimulation of the human cortex and cervicomedullary junction. J Physiol 466:521–534
Jackson A, Baker SN, Fetz EE (2006) Tests for presynaptic modulation of corticospinal terminals from peripheral afferents and pyramidal tract in the macaque. J Physiol 573:107–120. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2005.100537
Magstim website (2016) http://www.magstim.com/product/20/magstim-bistim2. Accessed 18 July 2016
Martin PG, Gandevia SC, Taylor JL (2006) Output of human motoneuron pools to corticospinal inputs during voluntary contractions. J Neurophysiol 95:3512–3518. doi:10.1152/jn.01230.2005
Martin PG, Butler JE, Gandevia SC, Taylor JL (2008) Noninvasive stimulation of human corticospinal axons innervating leg muscles. J Neurophysiol 100:1080–1086. doi:10.1152/jn.90380.2008
McNeil CJ, Giesebrecht S, Gandevia SC, Taylor JL (2011a) Behaviour of the motoneurone pool in a fatiguing submaximal contraction. J Physiol 589:3533–3544. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2011.207191
McNeil CJ, Martin PG, Gandevia SC, Taylor JL (2011b) Long-interval intracortical inhibition in a human hand muscle. Exp Brain Res 209:287–297. doi:10.1007/s00221-011-2552-z
McNeil CJ, Butler JE, Taylor JL, Gandevia SC (2013) Testing the excitability of human motoneurons. Front Hum Neurosci 7:152. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00152
Merton PA (1951) The silent period in a muscle of the human hand. J Physiol 114:183–198
Morales FR, Boxer PA, Fung SJ, Chase MH (1987) Basic electrophysiological properties of spinal cord motoneurons during old age in the cat. J Neurophysiol 58:180–194
Nielsen J, Petersen N (1994) Is presynaptic inhibition distributed to corticospinal fibres in man? J Physiol 477:47–58
Palmer E, Ashby P (1992) Corticospinal projections to upper limb motoneurones in humans. J Physiol 448:397–412
Petersen NT, Taylor JL, Gandevia SC (2002) The effect of electrical stimulation of the corticospinal tract on motor units of the human biceps brachii. J Physiol 544:277–284. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2002.024539
Pierrot-Deseilligny E, Mazevet D (2000) The monosynaptic reflex: a tool to investigate motor control in humans Interest and limitsInterest and limits. Neurophysiol Clin 30:67–80. doi:10.1016/S0987-7053(00)00062-9
Roick H, von Giesen HJ, Benecke R (1993) On the origin of the postexcitatory inhibition seen after transcranial magnetic brain stimulation in awake human subjects. Exp Brain Res 94:489–498. doi:10.1007/BF00230207
Schieppati M (1987) The Hoffmann reflex: a means of assessing spinal reflex excitability and its descending control in man. Prog Neurobiol 28:345–376. doi:10.1016/0301-0082(87)90007-4
Schnitzler A, Benecke R (1994) The silent period after transcranial magnetic stimulation is of exclusive cortical origin: evidence from isolated cortical ischemic lesions in man. Neurosci Lett 180:41–45. doi:10.1016/0304-3940(94)90909-1
Shahani BT, Young RR (1973) Studies of the normal human silent period. In: Desmedt JE (ed) New developments in electromyography and clinical neurophysiology. Karger, Basel, pp 589–602
Siebner HR, Dressnandt J, Auer C, Conrad B (1998) Continuous intrathecal baclofen infusions induced a marked increase of the transcranially evoked silent period in a patient with generalized dystonia. Muscle Nerve 21:1209–1212. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199809)21:9<1209:AID-MUS15>3.0.CO;2-M
Taube W, Lundbye-Jensen J, Schubert M, Gollhofer A, Leukel C (2011) Evidence that the cortical motor command for the initiation of dynamic plantarflexion consists of excitation followed by inhibition. PLoS One 6:e25657. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025657
Taylor JL, Butler JE, Allen GM, Gandevia SC (1996) Changes in motor cortical excitability during human muscle fatigue. J Physiol 490:519–528. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1996.sp021163
Triggs WJ, Cros D, Macdonell RA, Chiappa KH, Fang J, Day BJ (1993) Cortical and spinal motor excitability during the transcranial magnetic stimulation silent period in humans. Brain Res 628:39–48. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(93)90935-G
Ugawa Y, Rothwell JC, Day BL, Thompson PD, Marsden CD (1991) Percutaneous electrical stimulation of corticospinal pathways at the level of the pyramidal decussation in humans. Ann Neurol 29:418–427. doi:10.1002/ana.410290413
Uncini A, Treviso M, Di Muzio A, Simone P, Pullman S (1993) Physiological basis of voluntary activity inhibition induced by transcranial cortical stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 89:211–220. doi:10.1016/0168-5597(93)90098-A
von Giesen HJ, Roick H, Benecke R (1994) Inhibitory actions of motor cortex following unilateral brain lesions as studied by magnetic brain stimulation. Exp Brain Res 99:84–96. doi:10.1007/BF00241414
Werhahn KJ, Kunesch E, Noachtar S, Benecke R, Classen J (1999) Differential effects on motorcortical inhibition induced by blockade of GABA uptake in humans. J Physiol 517:591–597. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.0591t.x
Wilson SA, Lockwood RJ, Thickbroom GW, Mastaglia FL (1993) The muscle silent period following transcranial magnetic cortical stimulation. J Neurol Sci 114:216–222. doi:10.1016/0022-510X(93)90301-E
Zehr EP (2002) Considerations for use of the Hoffmann reflex in exercise studies. Eur J Appl Physiol 86:455–468. doi:10.1007/s00421-002-0577-5
Ziemann U, Netz J, Szelenyi A, Homberg V (1993) Spinal and supraspinal mechanisms contribute to the silent period in the contracting soleus muscle after transcranial magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex. Neurosci Lett 156:167–171. doi:10.1016/0304-3940(93)90464-V
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Canada Foundation for Innovation/British Columbia Knowledge Development Fund.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yacyshyn, A.F., Woo, E.J., Price, M.C. et al. Motoneuron responsiveness to corticospinal tract stimulation during the silent period induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Exp Brain Res 234, 3457–3463 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4742-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4742-1