Skip to main content
Log in

Prism adaptation magnitude has differential influences on perceptual versus manual responses

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous research has indicated that rightward prism adaptation can reduce symptoms of spatial neglect following right brain damage. In addition, leftward prism adaptation can create “neglect-like” patterns of performance in healthy adults on tasks that measure attention and spatial biases. Although a great deal of research has focused on which behaviors are influenced by prism adaptation, very few studies have focused directly on how the magnitude of visual shift induced by prisms might be related to the observed aftereffects, or the effects of prisms on measures of attentional and spatial biases. In the current study, we examined these questions by having groups of healthy adult participants complete manual line bisection and landmark tasks prior to and following adaptation to either 8.5° (15 diopter; n = 22) or 17° (30 diopter; n = 25) leftward shifting prisms. Our results demonstrated a significantly larger rightward shift in straight-ahead pointing (a measure of prism aftereffect) following adaptation to 17°, compared to 8.5° leftward shifting prisms. In addition, only 17° leftward shifting prisms resulted in a significant rightward shift in line bisection following adaptation. However, there was a significant change in performance on the landmark task pre- versus post-adaptation in both the 8.5° and 17° leftward shifting prism groups. Interestingly, correlation analyses indicated that changes in straight-ahead pointing pre- versus post-adaptation were positively correlated with changes in performance on the manual line bisection task, but not the landmark task. These data suggest that larger magnitudes of prism adaptation seem to have a greater influence on tasks that require a response with the adapted hand (i.e., line bisection), compared to tasks that only require a perceptual judgment (i.e., the landmark task). In addition, these data provide further evidence that the effects of prisms on manual and perceptual responses are not related to one another.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Note that in addition to testing 8.5° and 17° leftward shifting prisms groups, we also tested a 17° rightward shifting prisms group (n = 22) as a control. Although we were able to demonstrate a significant leftward aftereffect in straight-ahead pointing in the rightward shifting prisms group (pre = 1.09 vs. post = –2.58, p = .016, corrected), there were no significant changes in either LB (pre = –.74 vs. post = –1.03; F(1,21) = .824, p = .37) or the LM task (pre = 55 % vs. post = 53 %; F(1,21) = .28, p = .60) following rightward prism adaptation. This result is similar to previous studies that have failed to find significant effects of rightward shifting prisms on tests of attention and perceptual biases in healthy adults (e.g. Colent et al., 2000).

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded through a Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital Clinical Research Grant and a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada Discovery Grant to C.S., and a MacEwan University Undergraduate Student Research Initiative (USRI) award to K.R. The authors would like to thank Jonathan Kuziek for his assistance in collecting the rightward shifting prisms control group.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher L. Striemer.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 16 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Striemer, C.L., Russell, K. & Nath, P. Prism adaptation magnitude has differential influences on perceptual versus manual responses. Exp Brain Res 234, 2761–2772 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4678-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4678-5

Keywords

Navigation