Abstract
Current theories regarding factors that influence people’s awareness of their actions have underscored the role of peripheral signals (e.g., proprioceptive feedback) and central commands (e.g., the intention to make a response). The role of covert attention has been largely underexplored, even though attention and awareness have been tightly linked. The aim of the current study was to directly examine the impact of shifts of visual attention on people’s awareness of their eye movements as they performed the antisaccade task. People tend to be unaware of a high percentage of erroneous eye movements on this task, thus lending it to the study of variables that might modulate people’s awareness of their actions. In addition, this task provides the opportunity to compare two classes of actions, voluntary (antisaccade) and involuntary (erroneous prosaccade) eye movements, and thus to assess whether shifts of covert attention can or cannot override sources of information that may be present when people make voluntary but not reflexive responses. We found that shifts of visual attention did indeed influence participants’ awareness of their own eye movements, leading them to misperceive reflexive and voluntary movements alike, suggesting that covert attention may override both peripheral and central signals to bias awareness.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We also tested these proportion data after implementing an arcsine transformation, and the pattern of results was exactly the same. There was a main effect of eye movement (F(1,23) = 156, p < 0.001) and attention condition (F(1,23) = 5.05, p = 0.01), and no interaction between eye movement and attention condition (F(2,46) = 0.941, p = 0.397).
References
Bachman T (2011) Attention as a process of selection, perception as a process of representation, and phenomenal experience as the resulting process of perception being modulated by a dedicated consciousness mechanism. Front Psychol. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00387
Baloh RW, Sills AW, Kumley WE, Honrubia V (1975) Quantitative measurement of saccade amplitude, duration, and velocity. Neurology 25:1065–1070
Beck DM, Lavie N (2005) Look here but ignore what you see: effects of distractors at fixation. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 31(3):592–607
Belopolsky AV, Kramer AF (2006) Error-processing of oculomotor capture. Brain Res 1081(1):171–178
Belopolsky AV, Kramer AF, Theeuwes J (2008) The role of awareness in processing of oculomotor capture: evidence from event-related potentials. J Cogn Neurosci 20(12):2285–2297
Blakemore S, Wolpert DM, Frith CD (2002) Abnormalities in the awareness of action. Trends Cogn Sci 6(6):237–242
Carrasco M (2011) Visual attention: the past 25 years. Vis Res 51(13):1484–1525
Corbetta M, Akbudak E, Conturo TE, Snyder AZ, Olligner JM, Drury HA, Linenweber MR, Petersen SE, Raichle ME, Van Essen DC, Shulman GL (1998) A common network of functional areas for attention and eye movements. Neuron 21:761–773
Dehaene S, Changeux JP, Naccache L, Sackur J, Sergent C (2006) Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: a testable taxonomy. Trends Cogn Sci 10(5):204–211
Deubel H, Schneider WX (1996) Saccades target selection and object recognition: evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vis Res 36(12):1827–1837
Deubel H, Irwin DE, Schneider WX (1999) The subjective direction of gaze shifts long before the saccade. In: Becker W, Deubel H, Mergner T (eds) Current oculomotor research: physiological and psychological aspects. Plenum Publishers, New York
Donaldson W (1992) Measuring recognition memory. J Exp Psychol Gen 121(3):275–277
Eimer M (1997) Uninformative symbolic cues may bias visual-spatial attention: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Biol Psychol 46(1):67–71
Endrass T, Kathmann N (2005) Error awareness in a saccade countermanding task. J Psychophysiol 19(4):275–280.
Farrer C, Franck N, Paillard J, Jeannerod M (2003) The role of proprioception in action recognition. Conscious Cogn 12(4):609–619
Faul F, Edrfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A (2007) G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39(2):175–191
Hallett PE, Adams BD (1980) The predictability of saccadic latency in a novel voluntary oculomotor task. Vis Res 20(4):329–339
Hoffman JE, Subramaniam B (1995) The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements. Atten Percept Psychophys 57(6):787–795
Hutton BS, Ettinger U (2006) The antisaccades task as a research tool in psychopathology: a critical review. Psychophysiology 43(3):302–313
Irwin DE, Gordon RD (1998) Eye movements, attention and trans-saccadic memory. Vis Cogn 2:127–155
Irwin DE, Thomas LE (2007) The effect of saccades on number processing. Percept Psychophys 69(3):450–458
Kahneman D (1973) Attention and effort. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Kowler E, Anderson E, Dosher B, Blaser E (1995) The role of attention in the programming of saccades. Vis Res 35(13):1897–1916
Kuhn G, Kingstone A (2009) Look away! Eyes and arrows engage oculomotor responses automatically. Atten Percept Psychophys 71(2):314–327
Lisi M, Cavanagh P, Zorzi M (2015) Spatial constancy of attention across eye movements is mediated by the presence of visual objects. Atten Percept Psychophys 77:1159–1169
Marti S, Bayet L, Dehaene S (2015) Subjective report of eye fixations during serial search. Conscious Cogn 33:1–15
Mokler A, Fischer B (1998) The recognition and correction of involuntary prosaccades in an antisaccade task. Exp Brain Res 125:511–516
Moore T, Fallah M (2004) Microstimulation of the frontal eye field and its effects on covert spatial attention. J Neurophysiol 91(1):152–162
Munoz DP, Everling S (2004) Look away: the antisaccade task and the voluntary control of eye movement. Nature 5:218–228
Nieuwenhuis S, Ridderinkhof KR, Blow J, Band GPH, Kok A (2001) Error-related brain potentials are differentially related to awareness of response errors: evidence from an antisaccade task. Psychophysiology 38:752–760
Niewenhuis S, Broerse A, Nielen MMA, de Jong R (2004) A goal activation approach to the study of executive function: an application to antisaccade tasks. Brain Cogn 56(2):198–214
Overbeek TJM, Niewenhuis S, Ridderinkhof KR (2005) Dissociable components of error processing: on the functional significance of the PE vis-à-vis the ERN/Ne. J Psychophysiol 19(4):319–329
Paxton JL, Barch DM, Racine CA, Braver TS (2008) Cognitive control, goal maintenance, and prefrontal function in healthy aging. Cereb Cortex 18(5):1010–1028
Peterson MS, Kramer AF, Irwin DE (2004) Covert shifts of attention precede involuntary eye movements. Percept Psychophys 66(3):398–405
Ristic J, Kingstone A (2012) A new form of human spatial attention: automated symbolic orienting. Vis Cogn 20(3):244–264
Snodgrass JG, Levy-Berger G, Haydon M (1985) Human experimental psychology. Oxford University Press, New York
Theeuwes J, Kramer AF, Hahn S, Irwin DE (1998) Our eyes do not always go where we want them to go: capture of the eyes by new objects. Psychol Sci 9(5):379–385
Theeuwes J, Kramer AF, Hahn S, Irwin DE, Zelinksy GJ (1999) Influence of attentional capture on oculomotor control. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25(6):1595–1608
Tipples J (2002) Eye gaze is not unique: automatic orienting in response to uninformative arrows. Psychon Bull Rev 9(2):314–318
Tipples J (2008) Orienting to counterpredictive gaze and arrow cues. Percept Psychophys 70(1):77–87
Ullsperger M, Harsay HA, Wessel JR, Ridderinkhof KR (2010) Conscious perception of errors and its relation to the anterior insula. Brain Struct Funct 214(5):629–643
Unsworth N, Schrock JC, Engle RW (2004) Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: individual difference in voluntary saccade control. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 30(6):1302–1321
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Robinson, M.M., Irwin, D.E. Shifts of attention bias awareness of voluntary and reflexive eye movements. Exp Brain Res 234, 1689–1699 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4588-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4588-6