Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Emotion and hypervigilance: negative affect predicts increased P1 responses to non-negative pictorial stimuli

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated that negative affect influences attentional processes. Here, we investigate whether pre-experimental negative affect predicts a hypervigilant neural response as indicated by increased event-related potential amplitudes in response to neutral and positive visual stimuli. In our study, seventeen male participants filled out the German version of the positive and negative affect schedule (Watson et al. in J Pers Soc Psychol 54:1063–1070, 1988; Krohne et al. in Diagnostica 42:139–156, 1996) and subsequently watched positive (erotica, extreme sports, beautiful women) and neutral (daily activities) photographs while electroencephalogram was recorded. In line with our hypothesis, low state negative affect but not (reduced) positive affect predicted an increase in the first positive event-related potential amplitude P1 as a typical marker of increased selective attention. As this effect occurred in response to non-threatening picture conditions, negative affect may foster an individual’s general hypervigilance, a state that has formerly been associated with psychopathology only.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baas M, De Dreu CKW, Nijstad BA (2008) A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychol Bull 134:779–806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Haim Y, Lamy D, Glickman S (2005) Attentional bias in anxiety: a behavioral and ERP study. Brain Cogn 59:11–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carretié L, Hinojosa JA, Martín-Loeches M, Mercado F, Tapia M (2004) Automatic attention to emotional stimuli: neural correlates. Hum Brain Mapp 22:290–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark VP, Hillyard SA (1996) Spatial selective attention affects early extrastriate but not striate components of the visual evoked potential. J Cogn Neurosci 8:387–402

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford LE, Cacioppo JT (2002) Learning where to look for danger: integrating affective and spatial information. Psychol Sci 13:449–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford JR, Henry JD (2004) The positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS): construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol 43:245–265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Derryberry D, Reed MA (1998) Anxiety and attentional focusing: trait, state and hemispheric influences. Pers Indiv Dif 25:745–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derryberry D, Reed MA (2002) Anxiety-related attentional biases and their regulation by attentional control. J Abnorm Psychol 111:225–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Easterbrook JA (1959) The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. Psychol Rev 66:183–201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck MW (1988) Anxiety and attention. Anxiety Res 1:9–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck MW (1992) Anxiety: the cognitive perspective. Erlbaum, Hove

    Google Scholar 

  • Finucane AM (2011) The effect of fear and anger on selective attention. Emotion 11:970–974

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Finucane AM, Power MJ (2010) The effect of fear on attentional processing in a sample of healthy females. J Anxiety Disord 24:42–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forgas JP (2000) Affect and information processing strategies: an interactive relationship. In: Forgas JP (ed) Feeling and thinking: the role of affect in social cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 253–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Gable PA, Harmon-Jones E (2010) The blues broaden, but the nasty narrows: attentional consequences of negative affects low and high in motivational intensity. Psychol Sci 21:211–215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gable PA, Harmon-Jones E (2011) Attentional states influence early neural responses associated with motivational processes: local vs. global attentional scope and N1 amplitude to appetitive stimuli. Biol Psychol 87:303–305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gasper K, Clore GL (2002) Attending to the big picture: mood and global versus local processing of visual information. Psychol Sci 13:34–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez CM, Clark VP, Fan S, Luck SJ, Hillyard SA (1994) Sources of attention-sensitive visual event-related potentials. Brain Topogr 7:41–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinze HJ, Mangun GR, Burchert W et al (1994) Combined spatial and temporal imaging of brain activity during visual selective attention in humans. Nature 372:543–546

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hillyard SA, Vogel EK, Luck SJ (1998) Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 353:1257–1270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Junghöfer M, Elbert T, Tucker DM, Rockstroh B (2000) Statistical control of artifacts in dense array EEG/MEG studies. Psychophysiology 37:523–532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kolassa IT, Kolassa S, Musial F, Miltner WHR (2007) Event-related potentials to schematic faces in social phobia. Cogn Emot 21:1721–1744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krohne HW, Egloff B, Kohlmann CW, Tausch A (1996) Untersuchungen mit einer deutschen Version der “positive and negative affect schedule” (PANAS). Diagnostica 42:139–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropotov J (2010) Quantitative EEG, event-related potentials and neurotherapy. Academic Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhr B, Schomberg J, Gruber T, Quirin M (2013) Beyond pleasure and arousal: appetitive erotic stimuli modulate electrophysiological brain correlates of early attentional processing. NeuroReport 24:246–250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Zinbarg RE, Paller KA (2007) Trait anxiety modulates supraliminal and subliminal threat: brain potential evidence for early and late processing influences. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 7:25–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein G, Lerner JS (2003) The role of affect in decision making. In: Davidson RJ, Scherer KR, Goldsmith HH (eds) Handbook of affective science. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 619–642

    Google Scholar 

  • Luck SJ, Woodman GF, Vogel EK (2000) Event-related potential studies of attention. Trends Cogn Sci 4:432–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Michalowski JM, Melzig CA, Weike AI, Stockburger J, Schupp HT, Hamm AO (2009) Brain dynamics in spider-phobic individuals exposed to phobia-relevant and other emotional stimuli. Emotion 9:306–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Michalowski JM, Pané-Farré CA, Löw A, Hamm AO (2015) Brain dynamics of visual attention during anticipation and encoding of threat- and safe-cues in spider-phobic individuals. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 10:117–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olofsson JK, Nordin S, Sequeira H, Polich J (2008) Affective picture processing: an integrative review of ERP findings. Biol Psychol 77:247–265

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pacheco-Unguetti AP, Acosta A, Callejas A, Lupiáñez J (2010) Attention and anxiety different attentional functioning under state and trait anxiety. Psychol Sci 21:298–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pessoa L, McKenna M, Gutierrez E, Ungerleider LG (2002) Neural processing of emotional faces requires attention. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:11458–11463

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Polich J, Kok A (1995) Cognitive and biological determinants of P300: an integrative review. Biol Psychol 41:103–146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Portella C et al (2012) Relationship between early and late stages of information processing: an event-related potential study. Neurol Int 4:e16

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pourtois G, Grandjean D, Sander D, Vuilleumier P (2004) Electrophysiological correlates of rapid spatial orienting towards fearful faces. Cereb Cortex 14:619–633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe G, Hirsh JB, Anderson AK (2007) Positive affect increases the breadth of attentional selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:383–388

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Smith NK, Cacioppo JT, Larsen JT, Chartrand TL (2003) May I have your attention, please: electrocortical responses to positive and negative stimuli. Neuropsychologia 41:171–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith NK, Larsen JT, Chartrand TL, Cacioppo JT, Katafiasz HA, Moran KE (2006) Being bad isn’t always good: affective context moderates the attention bias toward negative information. J Pers Soc Psychol 90:210–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Storbeck J, Clore GL (2005) With sadness comes accuracy; with happiness, false memory mood and the false memory effect. Psychol Sci 16:785–791

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen N (2010) Current positive and negative affective states modulate attention: an attentional blink study. Pers Indiv Dif 49:542–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel EK, Luck SJ (2000) The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process. Psychophysiology 37:190–203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol 54:1063–1070

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg A, Hajcak G (2011) Electrocortical evidence for vigilance-avoidance in Generalized Anxiety Disorder. Psychophysiology 48:842–851

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Rainer Düsing, Sebastian Gasse, Jakob Kaiser, and Carina Krause for their assistance in stimulus selection and data collection. In particular, we thank Playboy Germany for providing us with picture material.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Individual Differences and Personality Research, Osnabrück University, Seminarstr. 20, 49074, Osnabrück, Germany

    Jessica Schomberg, Benjamin Schöne, Thomas Gruber & Markus Quirin

Authors
  1. Jessica Schomberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Benjamin Schöne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thomas Gruber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Markus Quirin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessica Schomberg.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schomberg, J., Schöne, B., Gruber, T. et al. Emotion and hypervigilance: negative affect predicts increased P1 responses to non-negative pictorial stimuli. Exp Brain Res 234, 1395–1402 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4544-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4544-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation