Skip to main content
Log in

Motor unit number in a small facial muscle, dilator naris

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A loss of functioning motor units underlies many neuromuscular disorders. The facial nerve innervates the muscles of facial expression, including nasal muscles, which also play an important role in the regulation of airflow resistance. It is difficult to accurately assess motor unit number in the facial muscles, because the muscles are difficult to activate in isolation. Here, we apply the manual McComas method to estimate the number of motor units in a nasal dilator muscle. EMG of the dilator naris was recorded during graded stimulation of the zygomatic branch of the facial nerve in 26 subjects (12 males and 14 females), aged 20–41 years. Each subject was studied twice, on separate days, to estimate method reproducibility. As a check on our use of the McComas method, we also estimated motor unit number in the first dorsal interosseus muscle (FDI) of six subjects, as the muscle is also small and has been studied with the McComas method. Reproducibility was evaluated with a rigorous statistical approach, the Bland–Altman procedure. We estimate that dilator naris is composed of 75 ± 15.6 (SD) motor units, compared to 144 ± 35.5 in FDI. The coefficient of variation for test–retest reproducibility of dilator naris motor unit estimates was 29.6 %, similar to separate-day reproducibility reported for other muscles. Recording and stimulation were done with surface electrodes, and the recordings were of high quality and reproducible. This simple technique could be applied clinically to track motor neuron loss and to monitor facial nerve integrity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bridger GP (1970) Physiology of the nasal valve. Arch Otolaryngol 92:543–553

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bridger GP, Proctor DF (1970) Maximum nasal inspiratory flow and nasal resistance. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 79:481–488

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown WF, Milner-Brown HS (1976) Some electrical properties of motor units and their effects on the methods of estimating motor unit numbers. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 39:249–257

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown WF, Strong MJ, Snow R (1988) Methods for estimating numbers of motor units in biceps-brachialis muscles and losses of motor units with aging. Muscle Nerv 11:423–432. doi:10.1002/mus.880110503

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cattaneo L, Pavesi G (2014) The facial motor system. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 38:135–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Connel DC, Fregosi RF (1993) Influence of nasal airflow and resistance on nasal dilator muscle activities during exercise. J Appl Physiol 74:2529–2536

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Day SJ, Hulliger M (2001) Experimental simulation of cat electromyogram: evidence for algebraic summation of motor-unit action-potential trains. J Neurophysiol 86:2144–2158

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Defaria CR, de Melo-Souza SE, Lima AF (1979) Motor unit estimation in the orbicularis oculi muscle. In: 6th International congress of electromyography, vol 60. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, Supplement, Stockholm, p 73

  • Delbeke J (1982) Reliability of the motor unit count in the facial muscles. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 22:277–290

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DelloRusso C, Khurana N, Rankin L, Sullivan J, Fregosi RF (2002) Mechanisms of force failure during repetitive maximal efforts in a human upper airway muscle. Muscle Nerv 26:94–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devi S, Challenor Y, Duarte N, Lovelace RE (1978) Prognostic value of minimal excitability of facial nerve in Bell’s palsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 41:649–652

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Enoka RM (1995) Morphological features and activation patterns of motor units. J Clin Neurophysiol 12:538–559

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Figallo EE, Acosta JA (2001) Nose muscular dynamics: the tip trigonum. Plast Reconstr Surg 108:1118–1126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fregosi RF, Lansing RW (1995) Neural drive to nasal dilator muscles: influence of exercise intensity and oronasal flow partitioning. J Appl Physiol 79:1330–1337

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller D, Sullivan J, Essif E, Personius K, Fregosi RF (1995) Measurement of the EMG–force relationship in a human upper airway muscle. J Appl Physiol 79:270–278

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griesman B (1944) Muscles and cartilages of the nose from the standpoint of a typical rhinoplasty. Arch Otolaryngol 39:334–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haight JS, Cole P (1983) The site and function of the nasal valve. Laryngoscope 93:49–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Happak W, Liu J, Burggasser G, Flowers A, Gruber H, Freilinger G (1997) Human facial muscles: dimensions, motor endplate distribution, and presence of muscle fibers with multiple motor endplates. Anat Rec 249:276–284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keenan KG, Farina D, Merletti R, Enoka RM (2006) Amplitude cancellation reduces the size of motor unit potentials averaged from the surface EMG. J Appl Physiol 100:1928–1937. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01282.2005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick PJ, Watters G, Strong AJ, Walliker JR, Gleeson MJ (1991) Prediction of facial nerve function after surgery for cerebellopontine angle tumors: use of a facial nerve stimulator and monitor. Skull Base Surg 1:171–176

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mateika JH, Essif EG, Dellorusso C, Fregosi RF (1998) Contractile properties of human nasal dilator motor units. J Neurophysiol 79:371–378

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McComas AJ (1991) Invited review: motor unit estimation: methods, results, and present status. Muscle Nerv 14:585–597. doi:10.1002/mus.880140702

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McComas AJ, Fawcett PR, Campbell MJ, Sica RE (1971) Electrophysiological estimation of the number of motor units within a human muscle. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 34:121–131

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosler KM, Hess CW, Schmid UD (1989) Investigation of facial motor pathways by electrical and magnetic stimulation: sites and mechanisms of excitation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 52:1149–1156

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt K, DelloRusso C, Fregosi RF (2009) Force–EMG changes during sustained contractions of a human upper airway muscle. J Neurophysiol 101:558–568. doi:10.1152/jn.90922.2008

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein RB, Yang JF (1990) Methods for estimating the number of motor units in human muscles. Ann Neurol 28:487–495. doi:10.1002/ana.410280404

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan J, Fuller D, Fregosi RF (1996) Control of nasal dilator muscle activities during exercise: role of nasopharyngeal afferents. J Appl Physiol 80:1520–1527

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wedekind C, Klug N (2001) Recording nasal muscle F waves and electromyographic activity of the facial muscles: a comparison of two methods used for intraoperative monitoring of facial nerve function. J Neurosurg 95:974–978. doi:10.3171/jns.2001.95.6.0974

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Alan McComas, M.D., for advice with the method and interpretation of the data, E. Fiona Bailey, Ph.D., for a critical evaluation of the manuscript and Elik Essif, M.S. for technical support. These studies were supported by NIH Grant HL 51056.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralph F. Fregosi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Patel-Khurana, N., Fregosi, R.F. Motor unit number in a small facial muscle, dilator naris . Exp Brain Res 233, 2897–2902 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4359-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4359-9

Keywords

Navigation