Abstract
Neurostimulation, e.g., transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), shows promise as an effective cognitive intervention. In spite of low spatial resolution, limited penetration, and temporary influence, evidence highlights tDCS-linked cognitive benefits in a range of cognitive domains. The left posterior parietal cortex (PPC) is an accessible node in frontoparietal networks engaged during long-term memory (LTM). Here, we tested the hypothesis that tDCS can facilitate LTM by pairing LTM encoding and retrieval with PPC stimulation. Healthy young adults performed a verbal LTM task (California Verbal Learning Task) with four different stimulation parameters. In Experiment 1, we applied tDCS to left PPC during LTM encoding. In Experiment 2, we applied tDCS just prior to retrieval to test the temporal specificity of tDCS during a LTM task. In later experiments, we tested hemispheric specificity by replicating Experiment 1 while stimulating the right PPC. Experiment 1 showed that tDCS applied during LTM encoding improved the pace of list learning and enhanced retrieval after a short delay. Experiment 2 indicated anodal left PPC tDCS only improved LTM when applied during encoding, and not during maintenance. Experiments 3 and 4 confirmed that tDCS effects were hemisphere specific and that no effects were found after right PPC stimulation during encoding. These findings indicate that anodal tDCS to the PPC helps verbal LTM in healthy young adults under certain conditions. First, when it is applied to the left, not the right, PPC and second, when it is applied during encoding.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agnew WF, McCreery DB (1987) Considerations for safety in the use of extracranial stimulation for motor evoked potentials. Neurosurgery 20(1):143–147
Antal A, Kincses TZ, Nitsche MA, Bartfai O, Paulus W (2004) Excitability changes induced in the human primary visual cortex by transcranial direct current stimulation: direct electrophysiological evidence. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45(2):702–707
Baker JM, Rorden C, Fridriksson J (2010) Using transcranial direct-current stimulation to treat stroke patients with aphasia. Stroke 41(6):1229–1236. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.576785
Berryhill ME (2012) Insights from neuropsychology: pinpointing the role of the posterior parietal cortex in episodic and working memory. Front Integr Neurosci 6:31. doi:10.3389/fnint.2012.00031
Berryhill ME, Jones KT (2012) tDCS selectively improves working memory in older adults with more education. Neurosci Lett 521(2):148–151. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2012.05.074
Berryhill ME, Wencil EB, Coslett HB, Olson IR (2010) A selective working memory impairment after transcranial direct current stimulation to the right parietal lobe. Neurosci Lett 479(3):312–316. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2010.05.087
Boggio PS, Ferrucci R, Rigonatti SP, Covre P, Nitsche M, Pascual-Leone A, Fregni F (2006) Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on working memory in patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Sci 249(1):31–38. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2006.05.062
Boggio PS, Ferrucci R, Mameli F, Martins D, Martins O, Vergari M, Priori A (2012) Prolonged visual memory enhancement after direct current stimulation in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Stimul 5(3):223–230. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2011.06.006
Bolognini N, Fregni F, Casati C, Olgiati E, Vallar G (2010) Brain polarization of parietal cortex augments training-induced improvement of visual exploratory and attentional skills. Brain Res 1349:76–89. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2010.06.053
Brunoni AR, Ferrucci R, Bortolomasi M, Vergari M, Tadini L, Boggio PS, Priori A (2011) Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in unipolar vs. bipolar depressive disorder. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 35(1):96–101. doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.09.010
Cabeza R (2008) Role of parietal regions in episodic memory retrieval: the dual attentional processes hypothesis. Neuropsychologia 46(7):1813–1827. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.03.019
Cabeza R, Ciaramelli E, Olson IR, Moscovitch M (2008) The parietal cortex and episodic memory: an attentional account. Nat Rev Neurosci 9(8):613–625. doi:10.1038/nrn2459
Cabeza R, Ciaramelli E, Moscovitch M (2012) Cognitive contributions of the ventral parietal cortex: an integrative theoretical account. Trends Cogn Sci 16(6):338–352. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.04.008
Cattaneo Z, Rota F, Vecchi T, Silvanto J (2008) Using state-dependency of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to investigate letter selectivity in the left posterior parietal cortex: a comparison of TMS-priming and TMS-adaptation paradigms. Eur J Neurosci 28(9):1924–1929. doi:10.1111/J.1460-9568.2008.06466.X
Charlton RA, Barrick TR, Markus HS, Morris RG (2010) The relationship between episodic long-term memory and white matter integrity in normal aging. Neuropsychologia 48(1):114–122. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.08.018
Charlton RA, Barrick TR, Markus HS, Morris RG (2013) Verbal working and long-term episodic memory associations with white matter microstructure in normal aging investigated using tract-based spatial statistics. Psychol Aging 28(3):768–777. doi:10.1037/a0032668
Chrysikou EG, Hamilton RH (2011) Noninvasive brain stimulation in the treatment of aphasia: exploring interhemispheric relationships and their implications for neurorehabilitation. Restor Neurol Neurosci 29(6):375–394. doi:10.3233/RNN-2011-0610
Ciaramelli E, Grady CL, Moscovitch M (2008) Top-down and bottom-up attention to memory: a hypothesis (AtoM) on the role of the posterior parietal cortex in memory retrieval. Neuropsychologia 46(7):1828–1851. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.03.022
Courtney SM, Ungerleider LG, Keil K, Haxby JV (1996) Object and spatial visual working memory activate separate neural systems in human cortex. Cereb Cortex 6(1):39–49. doi:10.1093/Cercor/6.1.39
Daselaar SM, Prince SE, Cabeza R (2004) When less means more: deactivations during encoding that predict subsequent memory. NeuroImage 23(3):921–927. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.031
de Vries MH, Barth AC, Maiworm S, Knecht S, Zwitserlood P, Floel A (2010) Electrical stimulation of Broca’s area enhances implicit learning of an artificial grammar. J Cogn Neurosci 22(11):2427–2436. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21385
Delis D, Kramer J, Kaplan E, Ober BA (2000) California Verbal Learning Test, 2nd edn. Psychological Corporation, San Antonio
Dobbins IG, Rice HJ, Wagner AD, Schacter DL (2003) Memory orientation and success: separable neurocognitive components underlying episodic recognition. Neuropsychologia 41(3):318–333
Dockery CA, Hueckel-Weng R, Birbaumer N, Plewnia C (2009) Enhancement of planning ability by transcranial direct current stimulation. J Neurosci 29(22):7271–7277. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0065-09.2009
Elman JA, Cohn-Sheehy BI, Shimamura AP (2012a) Dissociable parietal regions facilitate successful retrieval of recently learned and personally familiar information. Neuropsychologia 51(4):573–583. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.12.013
Elman JA, Klostermann EC, Marian DE, Verstaen A, Shimamura AP (2012b) Neural correlates of metacognitive monitoring during episodic and semantic retrieval. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 12(3):599–609. doi:10.3758/s13415-012-0096-8
Elmer S, Burkard M, Renz B, Meyer M, Jancke L (2009) Direct current induced short-term modulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex while learning auditory presented nouns. Behav Brain Funct 5:29. doi:10.1186/1744-9081-5-29
Ferrucci R, Mameli F, Guidi I, Mrakic-Sposta S, Vergari M, Marceglia S, Priori A (2008) Transcranial direct current stimulation improves recognition memory in Alzheimer disease. Neurology 71(7):493–498. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000317060.43722.a3
Fiori V, Cipollari S, Di Paola M, Razzano C, Caltagirone C, Marangolo P (2013) tDCS stimulation segregates words in the brain: evidence from aphasia. Front Hum Neurosci 7:269. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00269
Floel A, Suttorp W, Kohl O, Kurten J, Lohmann H, Breitenstein C, Knecht S (2012) Non-invasive brain stimulation improves object-location learning in the elderly. Neurobiol Aging 33(8):1682–1689. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.05.007
Fregni F, Boggio PS, Mansur CG, Wagner T, Ferreira MJ, Lima MC, Pascual-Leone A (2005) Transcranial direct current stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. NeuroReport 16(14):1551–1555
Fregni F, Boggio PS, Nitsche MA, Marcolin MA, Rigonatti SP, Pascual-Leone A (2006) Treatment of major depression with transcranial direct current stimulation. Bipolar Disord 8(2):203–204. doi:10.1111/j.1399-5618.2006.00291.x
Fridriksson J, Richardson JD, Baker JM, Rorden C (2011) Transcranial direct current stimulation improves naming reaction time in fluent aphasia: a double-blind, sham-controlled study. Stroke 42(3):819–821. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.600288
Gandiga PC, Hummel FC, Cohen LG (2006) Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 117(4):845–850. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2005.12.003
Geschwind N (1965) Disconnexion syndromes in animals and man. I. Brain 88(2):237–294
Hamidi M, Tononi G, Postle BR (2008) Evaluating frontal and parietal contributions to spatial working memory with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain Res 1230:202–210. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.008
Hamilton RH, Chrysikou EG, Coslett B (2011) Mechanisms of aphasia recovery after stroke and the role of noninvasive brain stimulation. Brain Lang 118(1–2):40–50. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2011.02.005
Herron JE, Henson RN, Rugg MD (2004) Probability effects on the neural correlates of retrieval success: an fMRI study. NeuroImage 21(1):302–310
Hsu TY, Tseng LY, Yu JX, Kuo WJ, Hung DL, Tzeng OJ, Juan CH (2011) Modulating inhibitory control with direct current stimulation of the superior medial frontal cortex. NeuroImage 56(4):2249–2257. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.059
Hummel FC, Celnik P, Pascual-Leone A, Fregni F, Byblow WD, Buetefisch CM, Gerloff C (2008) Controversy: noninvasive and invasive cortical stimulation show efficacy in treating stroke patients. Brain Stimul 1(4):370–382. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2008.09.003
Ishihara O, Gondo Y, Poon LW (2002) The influence of aging on short-term and long-term memory in the continuous recognition paradigm. Shinrigaku Kenkyu 72(6):516–521
Jacobson L, Koslowsky M, Lavidor M (2012) tDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: a meta-analytical review. Exp Brain Res 216(1):1–10. doi:10.1007/s00221-011-2891-9
Javadi AH, Cheng P (2013) Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) enhances reconsolidation of long-term memory. Brain Stimul 6(4):668–674. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2012.10.007
Javadi AH, Walsh V (2012) Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex modulates declarative memory. Brain Stimul 5(3):231–241. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2011.06.007
Javadi AH, Cheng P, Walsh V (2012) Short duration transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) modulates verbal memory. Brain Stimul 5(4):468–474. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2011.08.003
Jones KT, Berryhill ME (2012) Parietal contributions to visual working memory depend on task difficulty. Front Psychiatry 3:81. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00081
Kessels RP, d’Alfonso AA, Postma A, de Haan EH (2000) Spatial working memory performance after high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left and right posterior parietal cortex in humans. Neurosci Lett 287(1):68–70
Kessler SK, Turkeltaub PE, Benson JG, Hamilton RH (2012) Differences in the experience of active and sham transcranial direct current stimulation. Brain Stimul 5(2):155–162. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2011.02.007
Kim H (2011) Neural activity that predicts subsequent memory and forgetting: a meta-analysis of 74 fMRI studies. NeuroImage 54(3):2446–2461. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.045
Kim DY, Ohn SH, Yang EJ, Park CI, Jung KJ (2009) Enhancing motor performance by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation in subacute stroke patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 88(10):829–836. doi:10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181b811e3
Kim DY, Lim JY, Kang EK, You DS, Oh MK, Oh BM, Paik NJ (2010) Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor recovery in patients with subacute stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 89(11):879–886. doi:10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181f70aa7
Konishi S, Wheeler ME, Donaldson DI, Buckner RL (2000) Neural correlates of episodic retrieval success. NeuroImage 12(3):276–286. doi:10.1006/nimg.2000.0614
Manenti R, Brambilla M, Petesi M, Ferrari C, Cotelli M (2013) Enhancing verbal episodic memory in older and young subjects after non-invasive brain stimulation. Front Aging Neurosci 5:49. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2013.00049
Marangolo P, Caltagirone C (2014) Options to enhance recovery from aphasia by means of non-invasive brain stimulation and action observation therapy. Expert Rev Neurother 14(1):75–91. doi:10.1586/14737175.2014.864555
Marangolo P, Fiori V, Campana S, Calpagnano MA, Razzano C, Caltagirone C, Marini A (2014) Something to talk about: enhancement of linguistic cohesion through tdCS in chronic non fluent aphasia. Neuropsychologia 53:246–256. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.12.003
Marshall L, Molle M, Siebner HR, Born J (2005) Bifrontal transcranial direct current stimulation slows reaction time in a working memory task. BMC Neurosci 6:23. doi:10.1186/1471-2202-6-23
McCarthy G, Puce A, Constable RT, Krystal JH, Gore JC, GoldmanRakic P (1996) Activation of human prefrontal cortex during spatial and nonspatial working memory tasks measured by functional MRI. Cereb Cortex 6(4):600–611. doi:10.1093/Cercor/6.4.600
Meinzer M, Jahnigen S, Copland DA, Darkow R, Grittner U, Avirame K, Floel A (2014) Transcranial direct current stimulation over multiple days improves learning and maintenance of a novel vocabulary. Cortex 50:137–147. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2013.07.013
Mitchell DB, Schmitt FA (2006) Short- and long-term implicit memory in aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn 13(3–4):611–635. doi:10.1080/13825580600697616
Monti A, Cogiamanian F, Marceglia S, Ferrucci R, Mameli F, Mrakic-Sposta S, Priori A (2008) Improved naming after transcranial direct current stimulation in aphasia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 79(4):451–453. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2007.135277
Naghavi HR, Nyberg L (2005) Common fronto-parietal activity in attention, memory, and consciousness: shared demands on integration? Conscious Cogn 14(2):390–425. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2004.10.003
Nitsche MA, Paulus W (2000) Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol 527(Pt 3):633–639
Nitsche MA, Paulus W (2001) Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology 57(10):1899–1901
Nitsche MA, Paulus W (2011) Transcranial direct current stimulation—update 2011. Restor Neurol Neurosci 29(6):463–492. doi:10.3233/RNN-2011-0618
Nitsche MA, Liebetanz D, Lang N, Antal A, Tergau F, Paulus W (2003a) Safety criteria for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in humans. Clin Neurophysiol 114(11):2220–2222 (author reply 2222–2223)
Nitsche MA, Nitsche MS, Klein CC, Tergau F, Rothwell JC, Paulus W (2003b) Level of action of cathodal DC polarisation induced inhibition of the human motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol 114(4):600–604
Ohn SH, Park CI, Yoo WK, Ko MH, Choi KP, Kim GM, Kim YH (2008) Time-dependent effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on the enhancement of working memory. NeuroReport 19(1):43–47. doi:10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282f2adfd
Oliveri M, Turriziani P, Carlesimo GA, Koch G, Tomaiuolo F, Panella M, Caltagirone C (2001) Parieto-frontal interactions in visual-object and visual-spatial working memory: evidence from transcranial magnetic stimulation. Cereb Cortex 11(7):606–618
Olson IR, Berryhill M (2009) Some surprising findings on the involvement of the parietal lobe in human memory. Neurobiol Learn Mem 91(2):155–165. doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2008.09.006
Park SH, Seo JH, Kim YH, Ko MH (2014) Long-term effects of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with computer-assisted cognitive training in healthy older adults. NeuroReport 25(2):122–126. doi:10.1097/WNR.0000000000000080
Paulus W (2011) Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES–tDCS; tRNS, tACS) methods. Neuropsychol Rehabil 21(5):602–617. doi:10.1080/09602011.2011.557292
Polanowska KE, Lesniak M, Seniow JB, Czlonkowska A (2013) No effects of anodal transcranial direct stimulation on language abilities in early rehabilitation of post-stroke aphasic patients. Neurol Neurochir Pol 47(5):414–422
Reis J, Robertson E, Krakauer JW, Rothwell J, Marshall L, Gerloff C, Cohen LG (2008) Consensus: “Can tDCS and TMS enhance motor learning and memory formation?”. Brain Stimul 1(4):363–369. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2008.08.001
Rosenkranz K, Nitsche MA, Tergau F, Paulus W (2000) Diminution of training-induced transient motor cortex plasticity by weak transcranial direct current stimulation in the human. Neurosci Lett 296(1):61–63
Ross LA, McCoy D, Wolk DA, Coslett HB, Olson IR (2010) Improved proper name recall by electrical stimulation of the anterior temporal lobes. Neuropsychologia 48(12):3671–3674. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.07.024
Ross LA, McCoy D, Coslett HB, Olson IR, Wolk DA (2011) Improved proper name recall in aging after electrical stimulation of the anterior temporal lobes. Front Aging Neurosci 3:16. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2011.00016
Rugg MD, Vilberg KL (2013) Brain networks underlying episodic memory retrieval. Curr Opin Neurobiol 23(2):255–260. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2012.11.005
Seibert TM, Gimbel SI, Hagler DJ Jr, Brewer JB (2011) Parietal activity in episodic retrieval measured by fMRI and MEG. NeuroImage 55(2):788–793. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.078
Seltzer B, Pandya DN (1984) Further observations on parieto-temporal connections in the rhesus monkey. Exp Brain Res 55(2):301–312
Sestieri C, Corbetta M, Romani GL, Shulman GL (2011) Episodic memory retrieval, parietal cortex, and the default mode network: functional and topographic analyses. J Neurosci 31(12):4407–4420. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3335-10.2011
Shahid S, Wen P, Ahfock T (2013) Numerical investigation of white matter anisotropic conductivity in defining current distribution under tDCS. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 109(1):48–64. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2012.09.001
Smith EE, Jonides J, Koeppe RA, Awh E, Schumacher EH, Minoshima S (1995) Spatial versus object working-memory—PET investigations. J Cogn Neurosci 7(3):337–356. doi:10.1162/Jocn.1995.7.3.337
Stagg CJ, Nitsche MA (2011) Physiological basis of transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroscientist 17(1):37–53. doi:10.1177/1073858410386614
Suzuki K, Fujiwara T, Tanaka N, Tsuji T, Masakado Y, Hase K, Liu M (2012) Comparison of the after-effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over the motor cortex in patients with stroke and healthy volunteers. Int J Neurosci 122(11):675–681. doi:10.3109/00207454.2012.707715
Tanoue RT, Jones KT, Peterson DJ, Berryhill ME (2012) Differential frontal involvement in shifts of internal and perceptual attention. Brain Stimul. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2012.11.003
Tseng P, Hsu TY, Chang CF, Tzeng OJ, Hung DL, Muggleton NG, Juan CH (2012) Unleashing potential: transcranial direct current stimulation over the right posterior parietal cortex improves change detection in low-performing individuals. J Neurosci 32(31):10554–10561. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0362-12.2012
Tulving E (1985) Memory and consciousness. Can Psychol 26(1):1–12
Uncapher MR, Wagner AD (2009) Posterior parietal cortex and episodic encoding: insights from fMRI subsequent memory effects and dual-attention theory. Neurobiol Learn Mem 91(2):139–154. doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2008.10.011
Uncapher MR, Hutchinson JB, Wagner AD (2011) Dissociable effects of top-down and bottom-up attention during episodic encoding. J Neurosci 31(35):12613–12628. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0152-11.2011
Valle A, Roizenblatt S, Botte S, Zaghi S, Riberto M, Tufik S, Fregni F (2009) Efficacy of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for the treatment of fibromyalgia: results of a randomized, sham-controlled longitudinal clinical trial. J Pain Manag 2(3):353–361
Vilberg KL, Rugg MD (2008) Memory retrieval and the parietal cortex: a review of evidence from a dual-process perspective. Neuropsychologia 46(7):1787–1799. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.01.004
Wagner AD, Shannon BJ, Kahn I, Buckner RL (2005) Parietal lobe contributions to episodic memory retrieval. Trends Cogn Sci 9(9):445–453. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.07.001
Wagner T, Valero-Cabre A, Pascual-Leone A (2007) Noninvasive human brain stimulation. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 9:527–565. doi:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.9.061206.133100
Wais PE, Gazzaley A (2014) Distractibility during retrieval of long-term memory: domain-general interference, neural networks and increased susceptibility in normal aging. Front Psychol 5:280. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00280
Wirth M, Rahman RA, Kuenecke J, Koenig T, Horn H, Sommer W, Dierks T (2011) Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on behaviour and electrophysiology of language production. Neuropsychologia 49(14):3989–3998. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.10.015
Xue G, Dong Q, Chen C, Lu Z, Mumford JA, Poldrack RA (2010) Greater neural pattern similarity across repetitions is associated with better memory. Science 330(6000):97–101. doi:10.1126/science.1193125
Yamanaka K, Yamagata B, Tomioka H, Kawasaki S, Mimura M (2010) Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the parietal cortex facilitates spatial working memory: near-infrared spectroscopy study. Cereb Cortex 20(5):1037–1045. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp163
Zaehle T, Sandmann P, Thorne JD, Jancke L, Herrmann CS (2011) Transcranial direct current stimulation of the prefrontal cortex modulates working memory performance: combined behavioural and electrophysiological evidence. BMC Neurosci 12:2
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Dwight Peterson, Jaclyn Stephens, and Sierra Kreamer-Hope. This work was supported by an Institutional Development Award (IDeA) from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the NIH P20GM103650 (PI Michael Webster, Project Leader Marian Berryhill), NEI R15EY022775 (to Marian Berryhill and Gideon Caplovitz), and faculty startup funds generously provided by the University of Nevada, Reno. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not represent the official views of the NIGMS, or the NEI.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jones, K.T., Gözenman, F. & Berryhill, M.E. Enhanced long-term memory encoding after parietal neurostimulation. Exp Brain Res 232, 4043–4054 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-4090-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-4090-y