Abstract
Considerable evidence suggests that emotional cues influence processing prioritization and neural representations of stimuli. Specifically, within the visual domain, emotion is known to impact ventral stream processes and ventral stream-mediated behaviours; it remains unclear, however, the extent to which emotion impacts dorsal stream processes. In the present study, participants localized a visual target stimulus embedded within a background array utilizing allocentric localization (requiring an object-centred representation of visual space to perform an action) and egocentric localization (requiring purely target-directed actions), which are thought to differentially rely on the ventral versus dorsal visual stream, respectively. Simultaneously, a task-irrelevant negative, positive or neutral sound was presented to produce an emotional context. In line with predictions, we found that during allocentric localization, response accuracy was enhanced in the context of negative compared to either neutral or positive sounds. In contrast, no significant effects of emotion were identified during egocentric localization. These results raise the possibility that negative emotional auditory contexts enhance ventral stream, but not dorsal stream, processing in the visual domain. Furthermore, this study highlights the complexity of emotion–cognition interactions, indicating how emotion can have a differential impact on almost identical overt behaviours that may be governed by distinct neurocognitive systems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amaral DG, Behniea H, Kelly JL (2003) Topographic organization of projections from the amygdala to the visual cortex in the macaque monkey. Neuroscience 118:1099–1120
Amting JM, Greening SG, Mitchell DG (2010) Multiple mechanisms of consciousness: the neural correlates of emotional awareness. J Neurosci 30:10039–10047. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6434-09.2010
Andersen RA (1997) Multimodal integration for the representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 352:1421–1428. doi:10.1098/rstb.1997.0128
Baizer JS, Desimone R, Ungerleider LG (1993) Comparison of subcortical connections of inferior temporal and posterior parietal cortex in monkeys. Vis Neurosci 10:59–72
Bradley MM, Lang PJ (1999) International affective digitized sounds (IADS): stimuli, instruction manual and affective ratings (Tech. Rep. No. B-2). University of Florida. Center for Research in Psychophysiology, Gainesville, Florida
Cavina-Pratesi C, Goodale MA, Culham JC (2007) FMRI reveals a dissociation between grasping and perceiving the size of real 3D objects. PLoS ONE 2:e424. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000424
Cohen NR, Cross ES, Tunik E, Grafton ST, Culham JC (2009) Ventral and dorsal stream contributions to the online control of immediate and delayed grasping: a TMS approach. Neuropsychologia 47:1553–1562. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.12.034
Culham JC, Danckert SL, DeSouza JFX, Gati JS, Menon RS, Goodale MA (2003) Visually guided grasping produces fMRI activation in dorsal but not ventral stream brain areas. Exp Brain Res 153:180–189. doi:10.1007/s00221-003-1591-5
Davidson RJ (2003) Affective neuroscience and psychophysiology: toward a synthesis. Psychophysiology 40:655–665
Frassinetti F, Bolognini N, Ladavas E (2002) Enhancement of visual perception by crossmodal visuo–auditory interaction. Exp Brain Res 147:332–343. doi:10.1007/s00221-002-1262-y
Freese JL, Amaral DG (2005) The organization of projections from the amygdala to visual cortical areas TE and V1 in the macaque monkey. J Comp Neurol 486:295–317. doi:10.1002/cne.20520
Goebel R, Khorram-Sefat D, Muckli L, Hacker H, Singer W (1998) The constructive nature of vision: direct evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of apparent motion and motion imagery. Eur J Neurosci 10:1563–1573
Goldberg H, Preminger S, Malach R (2014) The emotion-action link? Naturalistic emotional stimuli preferentially activate the human dorsal visual stream. Neuroimage 84:254–264
Goodale MA, Milner AD, Jakobson LS, Carey DP (1991) A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature 349:154–156. doi:10.1038/349154a0
Goodale MA, Jakobson LS, Keillor JM (1994) Differences in the visual control of pantomimed and natural grasping movements. Neuropsychologia 32:1159–1178
Haffenden AM, Goodale MA (1998) The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception. J Cogn Neurosci 10:122–136
Honda M, Wise SP, Weeks RA, Deiber MP, Hallett M (1998) Cortical areas with enhanced activation during object-centred spatial information processing. A PET study. Brain 121(Pt 11):2145–2158
Kroliczak G, Cavina-Pratesi C, Goodman DA, Culham JC (2007) What does the brain do when you fake it? An fMRI study of pantomimed and real grasping. J Neurophysiol 97:2410–2422. doi:10.1152/jn.00778.2006
Krusemark EA, Li W (2011) Do all threats work the same way? Divergent effects of fear and disgust on sensory perception and attention. J Neurosci 31:3429–3434. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4394-10.2011
Kryklywy JH, Macpherson EA, Greening SG, Mitchell DG (2013) Emotion modulates activity in the ‘what’ but not ‘where’ auditory processing pathway. Neuroimage 82:295–305. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.051
Liu G, Healey CG, Enns JT (2003) Target detection and localization in visual search: a dual systems perspective. Percept Psychophys 65:678–694
Milner AD, Goodale MA (1993) Visual pathways to perception and action. Prog Brain Res 95:317–337
Milner AD, Goodale MA (1995) The visual brain in action. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Milner AD, Goodale MA (2008) Two visual systems re-viewed. Neuropsychologia 46:774–785. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.10.005
Mitchell DG, Greening SG (2012) Conscious perception of emotional stimuli: brain mechanisms. Neuroscientist 18:386–398. doi:10.1177/1073858411416515
Morris JS, Friston KJ, Buchel C, Frith CD, Young AW, Calder AJ, Dolan RJ (1998) A neuromodulatory role for the human amygdala in processing emotional facial expressions. Brain 121(Pt 1):47–57
Pessoa L, Japee S, Sturman D, Ungerleider LG (2006) Target visibility and visual awareness modulate amygdala responses to fearful faces. Cereb Cortex 16:366–375. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhi115
Phelps EA, Ling S, Carrasco M (2006) Emotion facilitates perception and potentiates the perceptual benefits of attention. Psychol Sci 17:292–299. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01701.x
Pisella L, Grea H, Tilikete C et al (2000) An ‘automatic pilot’ for the hand in human posterior parietal cortex: toward reinterpreting optic ataxia. Nat Neurosci 3:729–736. doi:10.1038/76694
Pourtois G, Vuilleumier P (2006) Dynamics of emotional effects on spatial attention in the human visual cortex. Prog Brain Res 156:67–91. doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56004-2
Rolls ET, Perrett D, Thorpe SJ, Puerto A, Roper-Hall A, Maddison S (1979) Responses of neurons in area 7 of the parietal cortex to objects of different significance. Brain Res 169:194–198
Schenk T (2006) An allocentric rather than perceptual deficit in patient DF. Nat Neurosci 9:1369–1370. doi:10.1038/nn1784
Schepman A, Rodway P, Geddes P (2012) Valence-specific laterality effects in vocal emotion: interactions with stimulus type, blocking and sex. Brain Cogn 79:129–137. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2012.03.001
Singhal A, Kaufman L, Valyear K, Culham JC (2006) fMRI reactivation of the human lateral occipital complex during delayed actions to remembered objects. Vis Cogn 14:122–125
Stein BE, London N, Wilkinson LK, Price DD (1996) Enhancement of perceived visual intensity by auditory stimuli: a psychophysical analysis. J Cogn Neurosci 8:497–506. doi:10.1162/jocn.1996.8.6.497
Ta KN, Liu G, Brennan AA, Enns JT (2010) Spider-phobia influences conscious, but not unconscious, control of visually guided action. J Vis 10:1069
Tamietto M, de Gelder B (2010) Neural bases of the non-conscious perception of emotional signals. Nat Rev Neurosci 11:697–709. doi:10.1038/nrn2889
Thaler L, Goodale MA (2011) Neural substrates of visual spatial coding and visual feedback control for hand movements in allocentric and target-directed tasks. Front Hum Neurosci 5:92. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00092
Vuilleumier P (2005) How brains beware: neural mechanisms of emotional attention. Trends Cogn Sci 9:585–594. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.10.011
Vuilleumier P, Driver J (2007) Modulation of visual processing by attention and emotion: windows on causal interactions between human brain regions. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 362:837–855. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2092
Vuilleumier P, Huang Y (2009) Emotional attention: uncovering the mechanisms of affective biases in perception. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 18:148–152
Zaehle T, Jordan K, Wustenberg T, Baudewig J, Dechent P, Mast FW (2007) The neural basis of the egocentric and allocentric spatial frame of reference. Brain Res 1137:92–103. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.12.044
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Dr. Melvyn Goodale at the Brain and Mind Institute (University of Western Ontario) for helpful discussions on experimental design. This work was funded by a Natural Science and Engineering Research Council Discovery Grant to Dr. Derek Mitchell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kryklywy, J.H., Mitchell, D.G.V. Emotion modulates allocentric but not egocentric stimulus localization: implications for dual visual systems perspectives. Exp Brain Res 232, 3719–3726 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-4058-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-4058-y