Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Memory-guided obstacle crossing: more failures were observed for the trail limb versus lead limb

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During adaptive locomotion, vision is used to guide the lead limb; however, the individual must rely on knowledge of obstacle height and position, termed obstacle memory, to guide the trail limb. Previous research has demonstrated that visual sampling of the obstacle during approach was adequate to provide obstacle height information, but online visual update of distance to the obstacle was required to plan and implement appropriate foot placement. Our purpose was to determine whether obstacle height memory, coupled with a visible obstacle position cue, could successfully guide the foot during obstacle crossing. Subjects first stepped over an obstacle for 25 trials; then, the obstacle was removed, but its position was marked with high-contrast tape; subjects were instructed to step over the obstacle as if it was still there (termed “virtual obstacle”) for 25 trials. No changes in foot placement were observed; therefore, the position cue provided salient online information to guide foot placement. Average failure rates (subject would have contacted the virtual obstacle if it was present) were 9 and 47 % (lead and trail limb, respectively). Therefore, action was impaired for both limbs when guided by obstacle height memory, but action was impaired to a greater extent for the trail limb. Therefore, viewing the obstacle during approach appears to facilitate the memory needed to guide obstacle crossing, particularly for the trail limb. This is likely because the lead limb is visible in the peripheral visual field during crossing, but the trail limb is not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander MS, Flodin BW, Marigold DS (2011) Prism adaptation and generalization during visually guided locomotor tasks. J Neurophysiol 106:860–871

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amicuzi I, Stortini M, Petrarca M et al (2006) Visual recognition and visually guided action after early bilateral lesion of occipital cortex: a behavioral study of a 4.6-year-old girl. Neurocase 12:263–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anson JG, Burgess R, Scott RL (2010) Vision and movement planning. In: Elliott D, Khan MA (eds) Vision and goal-directed movement: neurobehav perspect. Human Kinetics, Champaign, pp 59–78

  • Berard JR, Vallis LA (2006) Characteristics of single and double obstacle avoidance strategies: a comparison between adults and children. Exp Brain Res 175:21–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berg WP, Blasi ER (2000) Stepping performance during obstacle clearance in women: age differences and the association with lower extremity strength in older women. J Am Geriatr Soc 48:1414–1423

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Binsted G, Heath M (2005) No evidence of a lower visual field specialization for visuomotor control. Exp Brain Res 162:89–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Binsted G, Rolheiser TM, Chua R (2006) Decay in visuomotor representations during manual aiming. J Mot Behav 38:82–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen HC, Ashton-Miller JA, Alexander NB, Schultz AB (1991) Stepping over obstacles: gait patterns of healthy young and old adults. J Gerontol 46:M196–M203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drew T, Andujar J-E, Lajoie K, Yakovenko S (2008) Cortical mechanisms involved in visuomotor coordination during precision walking. Brain Res Rev 57:199–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott D (1988) The influence of visual target and limb information on manual aiming. Can J Psychol 42:57

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson JJ (1958) Visually controlled locomotion and visual orientation in animals. Br J Psychol 49:182–194

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson JJ (1966) The senses considered as perceptual systems. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

  • Heath M (2005) Role of limb and target vision in the online control of memory-guided reaches. Motor Control 9:281–311

  • Heath M, Neely K, Krigolson O, Binsted G, Elliott D (2010) Memory-guided reaching: what the visuomotor system knows and how long it knows it. In: Elliott D, Khan MA (eds) Vision and goal-directed movement: neurobehav perspect. Human Kinetics, Champaign, pp 79–96

  • Heijnen MJH, Muir BC, Rietdyk S (2012a) Factors leading to obstacle contact during adaptive locomotion. Exp Brain Res 223:219–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heijnen MJH, Muir BC, Rietdyk S (2012b) Interpolation techniques to reduce error in measurement of toe clearance during obstacle avoidance. J Biomech 45:196–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly VE, Janke AA, Shumway-Cook A (2010) Effects of instructed focus and task difficulty on concurrent walking and cognitive task performance in healthy young adults. Exp Brain Res 207:65–73

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lajoie K, Andujar J-É, Pearson K, Drew T (2010) Neurons in area 5 of the posterior parietal cortex in the cat contribute to interlimb coordination during visually guided locomotion: a role in working memory. J Neurophysiol 103:2234–2254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lajoie K, Bloomfield LW, Nelson FJ, Suh JJ, Marigold DS (2012) The contribution of vision, proprioception, and efference copy in storing a neural representation for guiding trail leg trajectory over an obstacle. J Neurophysiol 107:2283–2293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee DN, Lishman JR, Thomson JA (1982) Regulation of gait in long jumping. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 8:448–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loverro KL, Mueske NM, Hamel KA (2013) Location of minimum foot clearance on the shoe and with respect to the obstacle changes with locomotor task. J Biomech 46:1842–1850

  • McVea DA, Pearson KG (2006) Long-lasting memories of obstacles guide leg movements in the walking cat. J Neurosci 26:1175–1178

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McVea DA, Pearson KG (2007) Stepping of the forelegs over obstacles establishes long-lasting memories in cats. Curr Biol 17:R621–R623

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milner AD, Goodale MA (1995) The visual brain in action. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner A, Dijkerman H, McIntosh R, Rossetti Y, Pisella L (2003) Delayed reaching and grasping in patients with optic ataxia. Prog Brain Res 142:225–242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mohagheghi AA, Moraes R, Patla AE (2004) The effects of distant and on-line visual information on the control of approach phase and step over an obstacle during locomotion. Exp Brain Res 155:459–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Niang A, McFadyen B (2004) Adaptations in bilateral mechanical power patterns during obstacle avoidance reveal distinct control strategies for limb elevation versus limb progression. Mot Control 8:160

    Google Scholar 

  • Patla AE (1998) How is human gait controlled by vision. Ecol Psychol 10:287–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patla AE, Greig M (2006) Any way you look at it, successful obstacle negotiation needs visually guided on-line foot placement regulation during the approach phase. Neurosci Lett 397:110–114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patla A, Rietdyk S (1993) Visual control of limb trajectory over obstacles during locomotion: effect of obstacle height and width. Gait Posture 1:45–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patla AE, Vickers JN (1997) Where and when do we look as we approach and step over an obstacle in the travel path? NeuroReport 8:3661–3665

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patla AE, Rietdyk S, Martin C, Prentice S (1996) Locomotor patterns of the leading and the trailing limbs as solid and fragile obstacles are stepped over: some insights into the role of vision during locomotion. J Mot Behav 28:35–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rhea CK, Rietdyk S (2007) Visual exteroceptive information provided during obstacle crossing did not modify the lower limb trajectory. Neurosci Lett 418:60–65

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rhea CK, Rietdyk S (2011) Influence of an unexpected perturbation on adaptive gait behavior. Gait Posture 34:439–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rhea CK, Rietdyk S, Haddad JM (2010) Locomotor adaptation versus perceptual adaptation when stepping over an obstacle with a height illusion. PLoS ONE 5:e11544

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rietdyk S, Rhea CK (2006) Control of adaptive locomotion: effect of visual obstruction and visual cues in the environment. Exp Brain Res 169:272–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rietdyk S, Rhea CK (2011) The effect of the visual characteristics of obstacles on risk of tripping and gait parameters during locomotion. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 31:302–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shinya M, Popescu A, Marchak C, Maraj B, Pearson K (2012) Enhancing memory of stair height by the motor experience of stepping. Exp Brain Res 223:405–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siu K-C, Woollacott MH (2007) Attentional demands of postural control: the ability to selectively allocate information-processing resources. Gait Posture 25:121–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Telonio A, Blanchet S, Maganaris C, Baltzopoulos V, McFadyen B (2013) The detailed measurement of foot clearance by young adults during stair decent. J Biomech 46:1400–1402

  • Thies S, Jones R, Kenney L, Howard D, Baker R (2011) Effects of ramp negotiation, paving type and shoe sole geometry on toe clearance in young adults. J Biomech 44:2679–2684

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Warren WH (2006) The dynamics of perception and action. Psychol Rev 113:358–389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whishaw IQ, Sacrey LA, Gorny B (2009) Hind limb stepping over obstacles in the horse guided by place-object memory. Behav Brain Res 198:372–379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winter DA (2009) Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yang JF, Lam T, Pang MYC, Lamont E, Musselman K, Seinen E (2004) Infant stepping: a window to the behaviour of the human pattern generator for walking. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 82(8):662–674

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yogev-Seligmann G, Rotem-Galili Y, Mirelman A, Dickstein R, Giladi N, Hausdorff JM (2010) How does explicit prioritization alter walking during dual-task performance? Effects of age and sex on gait speed and variability. Phys Ther 90:177–186

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health and Kinesiology, Purdue University, 800 W. Stadium Ave., West Lafayette, IN, 47907-2046, USA

    Michel J. H. Heijnen, Nathaniel L. Romine, Dana M. Stumpf & Shirley Rietdyk

Authors
  1. Michel J. H. Heijnen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nathaniel L. Romine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dana M. Stumpf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shirley Rietdyk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shirley Rietdyk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Heijnen, M.J.H., Romine, N.L., Stumpf, D.M. et al. Memory-guided obstacle crossing: more failures were observed for the trail limb versus lead limb. Exp Brain Res 232, 2131–2142 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-3903-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-3903-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation