Abstract
We consider an extended version of Horn’s problem: given two orbits \( {{\mathcal {O}}}_\alpha \) and \( {{\mathcal {O}}}_\beta \) of a linear representation of a compact Lie group, let \(A\in {\mathcal O}_\alpha \), \(B\in {{\mathcal {O}}}_\beta \) be independent and invariantly distributed random elements of the two orbits. The problem is to describe the probability distribution of the orbit of the sum \(A+B\). We study in particular the familiar case of coadjoint orbits, and also the orbits of self-adjoint real, complex and quaternionic matrices under the conjugation actions of \(\mathrm{SO}(n)\), \(\mathrm{SU}(n)\) and \(\mathrm {USp}(n)\) respectively. The probability density can be expressed in terms of a function that we call the volume function. In this paper, (i) we relate this function to the symplectic or Riemannian geometry of the orbits, depending on the case; (ii) we discuss its non-analyticities and possible vanishing; (iii) in the coadjoint case, we study its relation to tensor product multiplicities (generalized Littlewood–Richardson coefficients) and show that it computes the volume of a family of convex polytopes introduced by Berenstein and Zelevinsky. These considerations are illustrated by a detailed study of the volume function for the coadjoint orbits of \(B_2=\mathfrak {so}(5)\).
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In most cases this distinction is immaterial because the spectrum of \(A+B\) uniquely determines its orbit. The only exceptions are the even special orthogonal groups \(G = SO(2n)\), in which case \(\mathrm{diag \,}(x_1, \ldots , x_n)\) and \(\mathrm{diag \,}(x_{w(1)}, \ldots , x_{w(n)})\) lie in different orbits whenever \(w \in S_n\) is an odd permutation.
In the language of \(\beta \)-ensembles appearing in random matrix theory, our \(\theta \) is equal to \(\beta /2\). We opted for this notation, which is more common in symmetric function theory, to avoid overloading the symbol \(\beta \).
In the following, we use boldface \(\pmb {\alpha }\) to denote roots, not to confuse them with eigenvalues \(\alpha _i\).
The r.h.s. of (30), interpreted as a volume as we shall see in the next section, can be read, for instance, from the (stretched) LR polynomial defined by the triples that appear as arguments of \({{\mathcal {J}}}\), or, for low rank, computed from explicit expressions such as those in [39] or below in Sect. 5.1.
One may use this relation and the dimensions \(\text {dim}\, (V_\kappa )\), \(\kappa \in K\), to check the weights \({r}_\kappa \). In the above examples of \(B_2\) and \(B_3\), the dimensions \(\text {dim}\, (V_\kappa )\) for the representations with \(\kappa \in K\) are respectively \(\{1, 5\}\) and \(\{1, 7, 21, 27, 35, 105, 189\}\).
Actually the BZ-polytope is the image of the hive polytope under an injective lattice-preserving linear map [32], so that one can identify them for the purpose of counting arguments; however the Euclidean volumes of the two polytopes differ by an r-dependent constant.
For instance, as noted in the previous section, for some algebras if a triple is compatible then the corresponding Weyl shifted triple is not. This occurs for example in the case of \(B_2\).
For example, by inspection of the BZ inequalities for \(B_2\) (see (53) below), it is easy to see that in this case \(H_{\lambda \mu }^\nu \) may have corners at integer or half-integer points, hence \(P_{\lambda \mu }^{\nu }(s)\) is a quasi-polynomial of period 2. In fact it is well known that in the \(B_r,\, C_r\) and \(D_r\) cases, the period of \(P_{\lambda \mu }^{\nu }(s)\) is at most 2 [9].
There is an unfortunate misprint in Sect. 5 of [39]: the function \({{\mathcal {J}}}\) of \(B_r=\mathfrak {so}(2r+1)\) is of class \(C^{2r-3}\), again as a consequence of the Riemann–Lebesgue lemma.
Note however that when counting integer solutions to the BZ inequalities, we must make sure that the eliminated parameters are also integers.
In the \(A_r\) cases we prefer to use our own version of an algorithm using Ocneanu-blades (or O-blades, see [8]), because it has an easy interpretation and because it is fast.
References
Berenstein, A., Zelevinsky, A.: Tensor product multiplicities and convex polytopes in partition space. J. Geom. Phys. 5, 453–472 (1988)
Berenstein, A., Zelevinsky, A.: Triple multiplicities for \(s\ell (r+1)\) and the spectrum of the exterior algebra of the adjoint representation. J. Algebr. Combin. 1, 7–22 (1992)
Berenstein, A., Zelevinsky, A.: Tensor product multiplicities, canonical bases and totally positive varieties. Invent. Math. 143, 77–128 (2001). arXiv:math/9912012
Capparelli, S.: Calcolo della funzione di partizione di Kostant. Bolletino dell’Unione Matematica Italiana 8, 89–110 (2003)
Coquereaux, R.: Quantum McKay correspondence and global dimensions for fusion and module-categories associated with Lie groups. arXiv:1209.6621
Coquereaux, R., Zuber, J.-B.: From orbital measures to Littlewood-Richardson coefficients and hive polytopes. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré Comb. Phys. Interact. 5, 339–386 (2018). arXiv:1706.02793
Coquereaux, R., Zuber, J.-B.: The Horn problem for real symmetric and quaternionic self-dual matrices. SIGMA15, 029 (2019). http://www.emis.de/journals/SIGMA/2019/029/sigma19-029.pdf, arXiv:1809.03394
Coquereaux, R., Zuber, J.-B.: Conjugation properties of tensor product multiplicities. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47, 455202 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/47/45/455202. arXiv:1405.4887
De Loera, J.A., McAllister, T.B.: On the computation of Clebsch-Gordan coefficients and the dilation effect. Exp. Math. 15, 7–19 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1080/10586458.2006.10128948
Derksen, H., Weyman, J.: On the Littlewood–Richardson polynomials. J. Algebra 255, 247–257 (2002)
Dooley, A.H., Repka, J., Wildberger, N.: Sums of adjoint orbits. Linear Multilinear Algebra 36, 79–101 (1993)
Duistermaat, J.J., Heckman, G.J.: On the variation in the cohomology of the symplectic form of the reduced phase space. Invent. Math. 69, 259–268 (1982)
Etingof, P., Rains, E.: Mittag–Leffler type sums associated with root systems. arXiv:1811.05293
Fulton, W.: Eigenvalues, invariant factors, highest weights, and Schubert calculus. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 37, 209–249 (2000). arXiv:math/9908012
Guillemin, V., Lerman, E., Sternberg, S.: Symplectic Fibrations and Multiplicity Diagrams. Cambridge Unversity Press, Cambridge (1996)
Heckman, G.J.: Projections of orbits and asymptotic behavior of multiplicities for compact connected lie groups. Invent. Math. 67, 333–356 (1982)
Horn, A.: Eigenvalues of sums of Hermitian matrices. Pac. J. Math. 12, 225–241 (1962)
Kirillov, A.A.: Lectures on the Orbit Method. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2004)
Klyachko, A.A.: Stable bundles, representation theory and Hermitian operators. Selecta Math. (N.S.) 4, 419–445 (1998)
Knutson, A.: The symplectic and algebraic geometry of Horn’s problem. Linear Algebra Appl. 319, 61–81 (2000)
Knutson, A., Tao, T.: Honeycombs and sums of Hermitian matrices. Notices Am. Math. Soc. 48, 175–186 (2001). arXiv:math/0009048
Knutson, A., Tao, T.: The honeycomb model of GL(n) tensor products I: proof of the saturation conjecture. J. Am. Math. Soc. 12, 1055–1090 (1999). arXiv:math/9807160
Knutson, A., Tao, T., Woodward, C.: The honeycomb model of GL(n) tensor products II: puzzles determine facets of the Littlewood–Richardson cone. J. Am. Math. Soc. 17, 19–48 (2004). arXiv:math/0107011
Lee, J.: Smooth Manifolds. Springer, New York (2003)
Lie Package, van Leeuwen, M.A.A., Cohen, A.M., Lisser, B.: Computer Algebra Nederland, Amsterdam. ISBN 90-74116-02-7 (1992)
Macdonald, I.G.: Some conjectures for root systems. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 13, 988–1007 (1982)
Opdam, E.M.: Some applications of hypergeometric shift operators. Invent. Math. 98, 1–18 (1989)
Mathematica, Wolfram Research, Inc., Champaign, IL (2012). http://www.wolfram.com/
McMullen, P.: Lattice invariant valuations on rational polytopes. Arch. Math. (Basel) 31, 509–516 (1978/1979)
McSwiggen, C.: A new proof of Harish–Chandra’s integral formula. Commun. Math. Phys. 365, 239–253 (2019). arXiv:1712.03995
Mehta, M.L., Dyson, F.J.: Statistical theory of the energy levels of complex systems. V. J. Math. Phys 4, 713–719 (1963)
Pak, I., Vallejo, E.: Combinatorics and geometry of Littlewood–Richardson cones. Eur. J. Comb. 6, 995–1008 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejc.2004.06.008. arXiv:math/0407170
Racah, G.: In: Gürsey, F. (ed.) Group Theoretical Concepts and Methods in Elementary Particle Physics, p. 1. Gordon and Breach, New York; D. Speiser, ibid., p. 237 (1964)
Shiga, K.: Some aspects of real-analytic manifolds and differentiable manifolds. J. Math. Soc. Jpn. 16, 128–142 (1964)
Stanley, R.P.: Enumerative Combinatorics. Volume 1, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 49. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)
Steinberg, R.: A general Clebsch–Gordan theorem. Bull. AMS 67, 406–407 (1961)
Tarski, J.: Partition function for certain simple Lie algebras. J. Math. Phys. 4, 569–574 (1963)
Vergne, M.: private communication
Zuber, J.-B.: Horn’s problem and Harish–Chandra’s integrals. Probability distribution functions. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré Comb. Phys. Interact. 5, 309–338 (2018). arXiv:1705.01186
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge fruitful discussions with P. Di Francesco, P. Etingof, V. Gorin, R. Kedem, S. Sam and M. Vergne. The work of Colin McSwiggen is partially supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DMS 1714187, as well as by the Chateaubriand Fellowship of the Embassy of France in the United States.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by J. Marklof
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix: Covolumes
Appendix: Covolumes
Let us sketch how the covolume \(c_{{\mathfrak {g}}}\) may be determined for the lattice \(\Lambda \) of integer points of \(\mathrm {aff}(H_{\lambda \mu }^\nu )\), in the case that \(\dim H_{\lambda \mu }^\nu = d_r\) so that \(\mathrm {aff}(H_{\lambda \mu }^\nu ) = \mathrm {aff}(\mathrm {Part}_{{\mathfrak {g}}}(\sigma ))\), see (33). This affine span has codimension r in the Euclidean space \(\mathbb {R}^{N_r}\) generated as the formal span of the positive roots, which are taken to form a canonical basis, i.e. \(\langle \pmb {\alpha }_a, \pmb {\alpha }_b\rangle = \delta _{ab}\), \(a,b=1,\cdots , N_r\). Since the covolume of \(\Lambda \) is independent of the value of \(\sigma \), we may take \(\sigma =0\). Thus we consider the lattice of integer combinations of the positive roots \(\pmb {\alpha }_a\) subject to the condition
Suppose that the first r of the \(\pmb {\alpha }\)’s are the simple roots, and denote by A the \((N_r-r) \times r\) matrix that expresses the non-simple roots in terms of the simple ones:
Then eliminate the parameters \(u_i\) for \(i=1,\ldots ,r\) in the condition (58), using the relation \(u_i= - \sum _{a=r+1}^{N_r} u_a A_{ai}\). The lattice is thus generated by the linear combinations \(\sum _{a=r+1}^{N_r} u_a (-\sum A_{ai} \pmb {\alpha }_i +\pmb {\alpha }_a)\). Under the assumption that its fundamental domain is generated by the \(N_r-r\) vectors \( w_a= (-\sum A_{ai} \pmb {\alpha }_i +\pmb {\alpha }_a)\), we can compute the volume of this fundamental domain, i.e. the covolume, as follows. The Gram matrix of the vectors \(w_a\) in the Euclidean space \(\mathbb {R}^{N_r}\) reads
The covolume is then the square root of the determinant \(\delta _r\) of G, \(c_{{\mathfrak {g}}}=\delta _r^\frac{1}{2}\). We have computed these determinants for the classical algebras \(A_r,\ B_r,\ C_r\) and \(D_r\) up to \(r=8\) and the values of \(\delta _r\) listed in Table 1 are extrapolations of these numbers. The values for the exceptional algebras are also included in Table 1. A last observation is that for all the simple algebras, a single formula encompasses the expressions found in the table:
where C is the Cartan matrix, \(h^\vee \) is the dual Coxeter number and the product runs over the simple roots.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Coquereaux, R., McSwiggen, C. & Zuber, JB. On Horn’s Problem and Its Volume Function. Commun. Math. Phys. 376, 2409–2439 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-019-03646-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-019-03646-7