Skip to main content
Log in

Stokes Phenomenon and Yang–Baxter Equations

  • Published:
Communications in Mathematical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study the Stokes phenomenon of the generalized Knizhnik–Zamolodchikov (gKZ) equations, and prove that their Stokes matrices satisfy the Yang–Baxter equations. In particular, the monodromy of the gKZ equations defines a family of braid groups representations via the Stokes matrices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The convention is that if we write \(R=\sum X_a\otimes Y_a\), then \(R^{12}:=\sum X_a\otimes Y_a\otimes 1, \ \ R^{13}:=\sum X_a\otimes 1\otimes Y_a, \ \ R^{23}:=\sum 1\otimes X_a\otimes Y_a\in \mathrm{End}(V)^{\otimes 3}.\)

  2. Here we use the fact the diagonal elements of u are distinct, which implies the projection of \(\sum _{i<j}\Omega _{ij}\) to the centralizer of \(\sum _i \xi _iu^{(i)}\) is \(\sum _{i<j}[\Omega ]_{ij}\). See “Appendix A”.

  3. See [11, Section 8.4], for the discussion for the monodromy with respect to an infinite base point in the case of \(\mathrm{KZ}\) equations. In a similar way, one checks this method is valid in our situation.

References

  1. Balser, W.: Explicit evaluation of the Stokes multipliers and central connection coefficients for certain systems of linear differential equations. Math. Nachr. 138, 131–144 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Balser, W.: Formal Power Series and Linear Systems of Meromorphic Ordinary Differential Equations. Springer, New York (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Balser, W., Jurkat, W.B., Lutz, D.A.: Birkhoff invariants and Stokes’ multipliers for meromorphic linear differential equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 71, 48–94 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Boalch, P.: Stokes matrices, Poisson Lie groups and Frobenius manifolds. Invent. Math. 146, 479–506 (2001)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Boalch, P.: G-bundles, isomonodromy and quantum Weyl groups. Int. Math. Res. Not. 2002(22), 1129–1166 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Boalch, P.: Geometry and braiding of Stokes data; fission and wild character varieties. Ann. Math. 179, 301–365 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Costello, K., Witten, E., Yamazaki, M.: Gauge Theory and Integrability I, II. arXiv:1709.09993; arXiv:1802.01579

  8. Drinfeld, V.: Quasi-Hopf algebras, Algebra i Analiz (6), 114–148 (1989); English translation in Leningrad Math. J. 1, 1419–1457 (1990) (in Russian)

  9. Dubrovin, B.: Geometry of 2D Topological Field Theories. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1620. Springer, Berlin (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Etingof, P., Varchenko, A.: Dynamical Weyl groups and applications. Adv. Math. 167(1), 74–127 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Etingof, P.I., Frenkel, I.B., Kirillov, A.A.: Lectures on Representation Theory and Knizhnik–Zamolodchikov Equations. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 58. American Mathematical Society, Providence (1998)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Felder, G., Markov, Y., Tarasov, V., Varchenko, A.: Differential equations compatible with KZ equations. Math. Phys. Anal. Geom. 3, 139–177 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Gaiotto, D., Teschner, J.: Irregular singularities in Liouville theory and Argyres-Douglas type gauge theories, I. JHEP 1212, 050 (2012)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Jimbo, M., Miwa, T., Ueno, K.: Monodromy preserving deformations of linear differential equations with rational coefficients I. Physica 2D, 306–352 (1981)

    ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Knizhnik, V.G., Zamolodchikov, A.B.: Current algebra and Wess–Zumino model in two dimensions. Nucl. Phys. B 247, 83–103 (1984)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Kazhdan, D., Lusztig, G.: Tensor structures arising from affine Lie algebras, I, II. J. Am. Math. Soc. 6(905–947), 949–1011 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Kazhdan, D., Lusztig, G.: Tensor structures arising from affine Lie algebras, III, IV. J. Am. Math. Soc. 7(335–381), 383–453 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Malgrange, B., Ramis, J.-P.: Fonctions multisommables. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 42(1–2), 353–368 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Kirillov, A.N., Reshetikhin, N.Y.: q-Weyl group and a multiplicative formula for universal R-matrices. Commun. Math. Phys. 134, 421–31 (1990)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Kohno, T.: Monodromy representations of braid groups and Yang–Baxter equations. Ann. Inst. Fourier 37(4), 139–160 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Toledano, V.L.: Quasi-Coxeter quasitriangular quasibialgebras and the Casimir connection. arXiv:1601.04076

  22. Toledano, V.L., Xu, X.: Stokes phenomenon, Poisson Lie groups and quantum groups. (in preparation)

  23. Varchenko, A.: Multidimensional Hypergeometric Functions and Representation Theory of Quantum Groups. Advanced Series in Mathematical Physics, vol. 21. World Scientific, River Edge (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Xu, X.: Stokes phenomenon, Gelfand–Zeitlin systems and relative Ginzburg–Weinstein linearization. Adv. Math. 338, 237–265 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Xu, X.: Frobenius manifolds and quantum groups. arXiv:1801.00123

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Anton Alekseev, Philip Boalch, Pavel Etingof, Valerio Toledano Laredo, and the referee for their useful discussions and comments on this paper. This work is partially supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation Grants P2GEP2-165118 and P300P2-174284.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaomeng Xu.

Additional information

Communicated by C. Schweigert

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 A. Canonical solutions and Stokes matrices

Let us consider the meromorphic linear system

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{dF}{dz}=(\lambda +\frac{A}{z})\cdot F, \end{aligned}$$
(12)

where \(F(z)\in \mathbb {C}^m\), \(\lambda =\mathrm{diag}(\lambda _1,\ldots ,\lambda _m)\) is a diagonal matrix, and \(A\in \mathrm{gl}_m\) an arbitrary matrix. Thus \(z=\infty \) is an irregular singularity, and the equation in general has only a formal solution around \(\infty \) taking the form

$$\begin{aligned} {\hat{F}}(z)={\hat{H}}(z)z^{[A]} e^{z \lambda }, \ \ \ { for} \ \ {\hat{H}}(z)=1+H_1z^{-1}+H_2z^{-2}+\cdot \cdot \cdot . \end{aligned}$$
(13)

Here [A] takes the projection of A to the centralizer of \(\lambda \) in \(\mathrm{gl}_m\). In particular, if \(\lambda \) has distinct diagonal elements, [A] takes the diagonal part of A.

Such a formal power series is, in fact, asymptotic to canonical holomorphic solutions \(F_i(z)\) (given by resummation methods, see e.g., [2], Chapter 4–6) in certain different sectors \(\mathrm{Sect}_i\) in the complex plane. The discontinuity of asymptotic expansions is known as the Stokes phenomenon, and is measured by the so called Stokes matrices which connect the different solutions \(F_i\) with the fixed asymptotic expansion \({\hat{F}}\) in the various sectors. We give more details in the following.

Definition 2.6

The anti-Stokes rays of the Eq. (12) are the directions along which \(e^{(\lambda _i-\lambda _j)z}\) decays most rapidly as \(z\mapsto \infty \) for some \(i\ne j\). The Stokes sectors are the open regions of \(\mathbb {C}\) bounded by two adjacent anti-Stokes rays.

On each Stokes sector \(\mathrm{Sect}_i\) bounded by two Stokes rays \(d_i\) and \(d_{i+1}\), there is a canonical solution \(F_i\) of (12) with prescribed asymptotics on the supersector \(\widehat{\mathrm{Sect}_i}=(d_i-\frac{\pi }{2},d_{i+1}+\frac{\pi }{2})\). In particular, the following result can be found in e.g., [2] Chapter 8 or [3, 18].

Theorem 2.7

On \(\mathrm{Sect}_i\), there is a unique (therefore canonical) holomorphic function \(H_i:\mathrm{Sect}_i\rightarrow \mathrm{GL}_m\) such that the function

$$\begin{aligned} F_i=H_i e^{z\lambda } z^{[A]} \end{aligned}$$

satisfies Eq. (12), and \(H_i\) can be analytically continued to \(\widehat{\mathrm{Sect}_i}\) and then \(H_i\) is asymptotic to \({\hat{H}}\) at \(z\mapsto \infty \) within \(\widehat{\mathrm{Sect}_i}\).

Suppose we are given a Stokes sector \(\mathrm{Sect}_0\) (with a chosen branch of \(\mathrm{log}(z)\) on it) and the opposite sector \(\mathrm{Sect}_l\).

Definition 2.8

The Stokes matrices of the Eq. (12) (with respect to to \(\mathrm{Sect}_0\)) are the matrices \(S_\pm \) determined by

$$\begin{aligned}F_l=F_{0}\cdot S_+, \ \ \ \ \ F_{0}=F_l\cdot e^{2\pi i [A]} S_- \end{aligned}$$

where the first (resp. second) identity is understood to hold in \(\mathrm{Sect}_l\) (resp. \(\mathrm{Sect}_0\)) after \( F_0\) (resp. \( F_{l}\)) has been analytically continued counterclockwise.

We remark that the Stokes matrices \(S_\pm \) will in general depend on the irregular data \(\lambda \) in (12). Such dependence was studied by many authors, see e.g., [5, 14].

1.2 B. Confluence of \(\mathrm{KZ}\) equations

First note that the results in the paper can be generalized to the gKZ equations associated to any complex simple Lie algebra. Let \(\mathfrak {g}\) be such a Lie algebra with a Cartan subalgebra \(\mathfrak {h}\) and a root system \(\Delta =\Delta _+\sqcup \Delta _-\). For \(\alpha \in \Delta \), we choose generators \(e_\alpha \) of the root subspaces \(\mathfrak {g}_\alpha \) such that \((e_\alpha ,e_{-\alpha })=1\), and choose \(\{x_i\}\) an orthogonal basis of \(\mathbb {h}\). We set

$$\begin{aligned}{}[\Omega ]=\sum x_i\otimes x_i, \ \ \ \ \Omega ^+=\frac{1}{2}[\Omega ]+\sum _{\alpha \in \Delta _+}e_\alpha \otimes e_{-\alpha }, \ \ \ \Omega ^-=\frac{1}{2}[\Omega ]+\sum _{\alpha \in \Delta _+}e_{-\alpha } \otimes e_\alpha . \end{aligned}$$

Define the Casimir element and the trigonometric r-matrix (see e.g., [11], Section 3.8 or [10]) by

$$\begin{aligned} \Omega =\Omega ^++\Omega ^-, \ \ \ \ \ \ r(z)=\frac{\Omega ^+z+\Omega ^-}{z-1}. \end{aligned}$$

Then the trigonometric \(\mathrm{KZ}_n\) equation associated to a \(\mathfrak {g}\)-module V and a regular element \(u\in \mathfrak {h}_\mathrm{reg}\) is

$$\begin{aligned} \kappa z_i \frac{\partial F}{\partial z_i}=(t u^{(i)}+\sum _{j\ne i} r(z_i/z_j)^{ij})\cdot F, \ \ \ { for} \ i=1,\ldots ,n, \end{aligned}$$

where \(F(z_1,\ldots ,z_n)\) is valued in \(V^{\otimes n}\), \(r^{ij}\) and \(u^{(i)}\) denote r acting in the ith and jth factors of the tensor product and u acting in the ith factor, and t is a complex parameter.

In terms of \(s_i=t (1+z_i)\), the above \(\mathrm{KZ}_n\) equation becomes

$$\begin{aligned} \kappa \frac{\partial F}{\partial s_i}=\left( \frac{t u^{(i)}}{s_i-t}+\sum _{j\ne i} (\frac{\Omega _{ij}}{s_i-s_j}-\frac{\Omega _{ij}^-}{s_i-t})\right) \cdot F, \ \ \ { for} \ i=1,\ldots ,n. \end{aligned}$$

When \(t\rightarrow \infty \), it approaches to the \(\mathrm{gKZ}_n\) equation

$$\begin{aligned} \kappa \frac{\partial F}{\partial s_i}=(-u^{(i)}+\sum _{j\ne i}\frac{\Omega _{ij}}{s_i-s_j})\cdot F, \ \ \ { for} \ i=1,\ldots ,n. \end{aligned}$$

Therefore, at the level of equations, the \(\mathrm{gKZ}_n\) (4) is a limit of the \(\mathrm{KZ}_n\) (14). At the level of solutions, the limit is related to the fact that the Kummer’s function (or confluent hypergeometric function) is a limit of the hypergeometric function. Thus we expect that many theories related to the \(\mathrm{KZ}\) equations should have a degeneration, which is coupled with irregular singularities and Stokes phenomenon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, X. Stokes Phenomenon and Yang–Baxter Equations. Commun. Math. Phys. 377, 149–159 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-019-03565-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-019-03565-7

Navigation