Skip to main content
Log in

Oenological properties and terroir characteristics of an autochthonous grape cultivar: Ada Karası (Vitis vinifera L.)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to review the current knowledge about cv. ‘Ada Karası’ and its wine, including oenological features and terroir characteristics gathered during geographical indication labelling studies. The research analyzed the climate and soil characteristics to determine the terroir properties of cv. ‘Ada Karası’. Furthermore, existing data on ampelographic and agronomic features were compiled, and the phenological traits and maturation dynamics of the cultivar and wine aroma profile were shared. The study also investigated the grape berry and wine quality traits of cv. ‘Ada Karası’. The must analysis of cv. ‘Ada Karası’ grapes during maturity revealed an average TA of 7.35 g 100 mL−1, a TSS of 22.17%, and a pH level of 3.55. Additionally, the total phenolic content was recorded as 2151.68 mg GAE kg−1, total anthocyanin content as 268.12 mg kg−1, and total tannin content as 2.64 g kg−1. The results of the quality evaluation indicated that ‘Ada Karası’ wine possessed a favorable chemical composition, yielding a middle-bodied and pleasant red wine with moderate alcohol, high acidity, high and dry tannins, high total phenolic compounds, moderate anthocyanin content, and volatile compounds. Sensory evaluation also showed a deep-red, with high and harsh tannins, a medium body, and a rich aroma of red fruits, woody, and spicy notes. Therefore, ‘Ada Karası’ wine could be considered a potential alternative to native Turkish grape varieties. However, producers should make wiser decisions regarding cultivation techniques, especially during harvest time, to produce top-quality wines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

There is no applicable data availability statement for this manuscript.

References

  1. International Organization of Vine and Wine (2022a) State of the vitivinicultural world [Report]. Retrieved from https://www.oiv.int/public/medias/6039/oiv-state-of-the-vitivinicultural-world-2021.pdf. Accessed 10 April 2023

  2. Alço T, Candar S, Bahar E, Korkutal İ (2018) Major reasons and solutions for incapability of wine grape growing in Turkey (in Turkish with English Abstract). Bahçe 47:595–604

    Google Scholar 

  3. Akdemir U, Candar S (2022) Regional economics of viticulture in Turkey in the period. VIS 2:55–71. https://doi.org/10.52001/vis.2022.11.55.71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Candar S, Uysal T, Ayaz A, Akdemir U, Korkutal İ, Bahar E (2021) Viticulture tradition in Turkey. VIS 1:39–54. https://doi.org/10.52001/vis.2021.5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. European Commission (2023) Geographical indications register. European Union. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/food-farming-fisheries/food-safety-and-quality/certification/quality-labels/geographical-indications-register/. Accessed 08 April 2023

  6. Vouillamoz JF, McGovern PE, Ergul A, Söylemezoğlu G, Tevzadze G, Meredith CP, Grando MS (2006) Genetic characterization and relationships of traditional grape cultivars from Transcaucasia and Anatolia. Plant Genet Resour 4:144–158. https://doi.org/10.1079/pgr2006114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Arroyo-García R, Ruiz-García L, Bolling L, Ocete R, López MA, Arnold C, Ergul A, Söylemezoǧlu G, Uzun HI, Cabello F, Ibáñez J, Aradhya MK, Atanassov A, Atanassov I, Balint S, Cenis JL, Costantini L, Gorislavets S, Grando MS, Martinez-Zapater JM (2006) Multiple origins of cultivated grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. ssp. sativa) based on chloroplast DNA polymorphisms. Mol Ecol 15:3707–3714. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03049.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ergül A, Perez-Rivera G, Söylemezoǧlu G, Kazan K, Arroyo-Garcia R (2011) Genetic diversity in anatolian wild grapes (Vitis vinifera subsp. sylvestris) estimated by SSR markers. Plant Genet Resour Charact Util 9:375–383. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479262111000013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Soylemezoglu G, Atak A, Boz Y, Unal A, Saglam M (2016) Viticulture in Turkey. Chronica Hortic 56:27–31

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eyduran SP, Ercisli S, Akin M, Eyduran E (2016) Genetic characterization of autochthonous grapevine cultivars from Eastern Turkey by simple sequence repeats (SSRs) Genetic characterization of autochthonous grapevine cultivars from Eastern Turkey by simple sequence repeats (SSRs). Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2015.1105726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Karataş DD, Karataş H, Laucou V, Sarikamiş G, Riahi L, Bacilieri R, This P (2014) Genetic diversity of wild and cultivated grapevine accessions from southeast Turkey. Hereditas 151:73–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/hrd2.00039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Korkutal İ, Bahar E, Kök D, Şahin N, Uysal T, Özalp ZO, Yaşasın AS, Candar S, Alço T, Işın MA (2018) Collecting genetic materials and isolating DNAs of grapevine (Vitis spp.) as naturally grown in Ganos Mountains (in Turkish with English abstract). Mediterr Agric Sci 31:5–15. https://doi.org/10.2913/mediterranean.377609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dong Y, Duan S, Xia Q, Liang Z, Dong X, Margaryan K, Musayev M, Goryslavets S, Zdunić G, Bert F, Lacombe T, Maul E, Nick P, Bitskinashvili K, Bisztray GD, Drori E, Lorenzis GD, Cunha J, Popescu CF, Chen W (2023) Dual domestications and origin of traits in grapevine evolution. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.add8655

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. International Organisation of Vine and Wine. (2022b). Descriptor list for grape varieties and Vitis species (2nded.). https://www.oiv.int/sites/default/files/2022-12/Code%202e%20edition%20Finale.pdf

  15. Blouin J, Guimberteau G (2000) Maturation et Maturite des Raisins (in French). Feret, Bordeaux.

  16. Waterhouse AL (2002) Determination of total phenolics. Curr Protoc Food Anal Chem 6:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142913.fai0101s06

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Giusti MM, Wrolstad RE (2001) Characterization and measurement of anthocyanins by uv - visible spectroscopy characterization and measurement of anthocyanins by UV-Visible spectroscopy. Curr Protoc Food Anal Chem. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142913.faf0102s00

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. INRA 2007. Determination d’anthocyanes en echantillons de raisin. Mode operatiore. Ref: MO-LAB-23. UE Pech Rouge. Montpellier

  19. International Organisation of Vine and Wine (2022) Compendium of international methods of wine and must analysis international organisation of vine and wine. International Organisation of Vine and Wine, Paris (978-2-85038-053-2)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Altug T, Elmacı Y (2011) Gıdalarda Duyusal Değerlendirme (in Turkish). Sidas, İstanbul

  21. Pococke R (1743) A description of the East, and some other countries. W. Bowyer, London

  22. Smith W (1854) Dictionary of Greek and Roman Geography: Abacaenum-Hytanis. Walton & Maberly, London

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dönmez G, (2018) An Example to the Sunken Prehistoric Settlements of Marmara Sea Avşa Island sauvignon (in Turkish with English abstract) [M.Sc dissertation]. Selçuk University. Konya, 105 p.

  24. Özdoğan M (2011) Submerged Sites and Drowned Topographies along the Anatolian Coasts: an overview. In: Benjamin J, Bonsall C, Pickard C, Fischer A (ed) Submerged Prehistory, Oxbow Books https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvh1dx0v

  25. Değirmencioğlu N (2000) Researches on the quality of wines tahat are produced in Avşa Island (in Turkish with English abstract) [PhD dissertation]. Uludağ University, Bursa, p 116

    Google Scholar 

  26. Günsenin N (1995) Marmara Islands Underwater Survey, Report vol.1, T.R. Ministry of Culture and Tourism, General Directorate of Cultural Property and Museums, Publication: 1809, Ankara

  27. Anonymous (2000) Personal communication with the owner of Sezer Winery.

  28. Sertkaya-Doğan Ö (2009) Beşeri Coğrafya Açısından Marmara Takımadaları (in Turkish). Çantay Kitabevi, İstanbul Isbn: 978–975–9060–53–4

  29. Öztürk MZ, Çetinkaya G, Aydın S (2017) Climate types of Turkey according to Köppen-Geiger climate classification (in Turkish with English abstract). Cografya Dergisi 35:17–27. https://doi.org/10.26650/jgeog295515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yılmaz E, Çiçek İ (2018) Detailed Köppen-Geiger climate regions of Turkey (in Turkish with English abstract). J Human Sci 15:225–242. https://doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v15i1.5040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tunçbilek N (1987) Marmara Adaları (in Turkish). Istanbul University Institute of Marine Sciences and Geography Publications, İstanbul (9584510012458)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Enön A (1995) Marmara Takım Adaları / Geçmişten Günümüze ve Geleceğe (in Turkish). Mapsan, Balıkesir

    Google Scholar 

  33. Candar S, Açıkbaş B, Uysal Seçkin G, Ekiz M, Alço T, Yaşasın AS, Bahar E, Coşkun Z, Gülcü M (2022) Determination of Drought Tolerances in Thrace Region Local Wine Grape Varieties (in Turkish with English abstract). TAGEM Final Report.

  34. Candar S, Açıkbaş B, Korkutal İ, Bahar E (2021) The effects of water deficit on leaf and stoma morphological properties of wine grapes in Thrace Region (in Turkish with English abstract). KSU J Agric Nat 24:766–776. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.738285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Candar S, (2022) The effects of water restriction on leaf morphological characteristics and vegetative growth components in Vitis vinifera L. Cultivars. 5th Agriculture, Environment and Health Congress, Aydın Adnan Menderes University, 17–19 February 2022, Aydın/Turkey. Full Texts Book. p:83–95. (Oral presentation).

  36. Candar S, Açıkbaş B, Ekiz M, Zobar Z, Korkutal İ, Bahar E (2021) Influence of water scarcity on macronutrients contents in young leaves of wine grape cultivars. Cienc e Tec Vitivinic 36:104–115. https://doi.org/10.1051/ctv/ctv20213602104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Candar S, Uysal Seçkin G, Kizildeniz T, Korkutal İ, Bahar E (2023) Variations of chlorophyll, proline, and abscisic acid (aba) contents in grapevines (Vitis Vinifera L.) under water deficit conditions. Erwerbs-obstbau. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-023-00875-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Martim SA, Santos MP, Peçanha AL, Pommer C, Campostrini E, Viana AP, Façanha AR, Smith RB (2009) Photosynthesis and cell respiration modulated by water deficit in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cv. Cabernet Sauvignon Braz J Plant Physiol 21:95–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zulini L, Rubinigg M, Zorer R, Bertamini M (2007) Effects of drought stress on chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthetic pigments in grapevine leaves (Vitis vinifera cv ’White Riesling’). Acta Hortic 754:289–294. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.754.37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Pieterse CMJ, van der Does D, Zamioudis C, Leon-Reyes A, van Wees SCM (2012) Hormonal modulation of plant immunity. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 28:489–521. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154055

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lorenz D, Eichhorn K, Bleiholder H, Klose R, Meier U (1995) Phenological growth stages of the grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. ssp. vinifera)-codes and descriptions according to the extended BBCH scale. Aust J Grape Wine Res 1:100–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.17550238.1995.tb00085.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Bozan B, Tosun G, Özcan D (2008) Study of polyphenol content in the seeds of red grape (Vitis vinifera L.) varieties cultivated in Turkey and their antiradical activity. Food Chem 109:426–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.12.056

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Anli E, Vural N, Demiray S, Özkan M (2006) Trans-resveratrol and other phenolic compounds in Turkish red wines with HPLC. J Wine Res 17:117–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571260601004328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Cabaroglu T (2005) Methanol contents of Turkish varietal wines and effect of processing. Food Control 16:177–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2004.01.008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Ferreira V, López R, Cacho JF (2000) Quantitative determination of the odorants of young red wines from different grape varieties. J Sci Food Agric 80:1659–1667. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0010(20000901)80:11%3c1659::AID-JSFA693%3e3.0.CO;2-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Guth H (1997) Quantification and sensory studies of character impact odorants of different white wines varieties. J Agric Food Chem 45:3027–3032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Cullere L, Escudero A, Cacho J, Ferreira V (2004) Gas chromatography–olfactory and chemical qualitative study of the aroma of six premium quality Spanish aged red wines. J Agric Food Chem 52:1653–1660

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Gomez MJ, Cacho JF (2007) Volatiles components of Zalema white wines. Food Chem 100:1464–1473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Li H (2006) Wine tasting. China Science Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ferreira V, Ortı´n N, Escudero A, Lo´pez R, Cacho J, (2002) Chemical characterization of the aroma of grenache rose wines: aroma extract dilution analysis, quantitative determination, and sensory reconstitution studies. J Agric Food Chem 50:4048–4054

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Zhang L, Tao Y, Wen Y, Wang H (2013) Aroma evaluation of young Chinese merlot wines with denomination of origin. SAJEV 34:46–53

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Part of this study was based on the data collected during the geographical indication labelling studies for the Vitis vinifera L. 'Ada Karası' grape cultivar and wine. The authors extend their sincere gratitude to the Erdek Chamber of Commerce for organizing and funding these studies. They would also like to express their appreciation to the former chamber president, Özlem Sarı, during the time the studies were carried out, as well as to vignerons and the winery owners in Avşa Island for their valuable contributions to the research. Lastly, the authors thank the people of the island for their warm hospitality during the course of the study. At the time of writing this article, the Vitis vinifera L. ‘Ada Karası’ cv. had obtained the geographical indication label with the registration number 1323. Furthermore, an application for the geographical indication label for ‘Ada Karası’ wine was submitted, and the process is currently ongoing.

Funding

This study was organized and funded by the Erdek Chamber of Commerce, Turkey.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The data collection were performed by the authors SC, TA, TU, IE, EA, and GS. Soil analyses were interpreted by BA, while berry analyses were conducted by GUS and TAG. Ampelographic studies were carried out by TU. TA and TAG performed wine analyses, while SC and TA interpreted the results. Additionally, SC, TA, and TA made critical revisions to the manuscript for intellectual content. Finally, all authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Serkan Candar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Compliance with ethics requirements

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Candar, S., Alço, T., Uysal, T. et al. Oenological properties and terroir characteristics of an autochthonous grape cultivar: Ada Karası (Vitis vinifera L.). Eur Food Res Technol 249, 2595–2610 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-023-04317-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-023-04317-7

Keywords

Navigation