Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A comparative study of vision transformers and convolutional neural networks: sugarcane leaf diseases identification

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Diseases in agricultural products cause significant decrease on harvest efficiency and economic values of the products, early detection of diseases can prevent this loss. The development of artificial intelligence has brought its use in the field of agriculture. These practices have facilitated the work of farmers and increased productivity. Sugarcane is one of the agricultural crops with high economic value, and in this study, diseases in sugarcane leaves were classified by using deep learning methods. The dataset we use contains a total of 2521 images and there are 5 classes; healthy, mosaic disease, redrot disease, rust disease and yellow leaf disease. DenseNet121, one of the convolutional neural network (CNN) models, is applied to this dataset first, followed by the Vision Transformers (ViT) model, and finally the ViT + CNN combination is applied, and the results are compared. As a result of the observations, it is understood that the precisions of 92.87%, 93.34%, and 87.37%, respectively, were obtained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Murugeswari R, Anwar ZS, Dhananjeyan VR, Karthik CN (2022) Automated sugarcane disease detection using faster rcnn with an Android application. 6th International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI). 1:1–7, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOEI53556.2022.9776685

  2. Li X, Li X, Zhang S, Zhang G, Zhang M, Shang H (2022) SLViT: shuffle-convolution-based lightweight Vision transformer for effective diagnosis of sugarcane leaf diseases. J King Saud Univ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2022.09.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Militante SV, Gerardo BD (2019) Detecting sugarcane diseases through adaptive deep learning models of convolutional neural network. IEEE 6th International Conference on Engineering Technologies and Applied Sciences (ICETAS) 1:1–5, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETAS48360.2019.9117332

  4. Hernandez AA, Bombasi JL, Lagman AC, (2022) Classification of Sugarcane Leaf Disease using Deep Learning Algorithms. IEEE 13th Control and System Graduate Research Colloquium (ICSGRC), 1:47–50, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSGRC55096.2022.9845137

  5. Alencastre-Miranda M, Johnson RM, Krebs HI (2021) Convolutional neural networks and transfer learning for quality inspection of different sugarcane varieties. IEEE Trans Industr Inf 17(2):787–794. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2020.2992229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Daphal SD, Koli SM (2021) Transfer learning approach to sugarcane foliar disease classification with state-of-the-art sugarcane database. Int Conf Comput Intell Comput Appl (ICCICA) 1:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCICA52458.2021.9697312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Militante SV, Gerardo BD, Medina RP (2019) Sugarcane disease recognition using deep learning. IEEE Eurasia Conference on IOT, Communication and Engineering (ECICE) 1:575–578, https://doi.org/10.1109/ECICE47484.2019.8942690

  8. Saavedra-Burbano RA, Marin-Hurtado JI (2020) Evaluation of deep learning architectures for the detection of rust in sugarcane crops. Virtual Symp Plant Omics Sci (OMICAS) 1:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/OMICAS52284.2020.9535653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Malik HS et al (2021) Computing disease recognition in sugarcane crop using deep learning. In: Kacprzyk J (ed) Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Springer, Singapore, pp 189–206

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sharma R, Kukreja V (2022) segmentation and multi-layer perceptron: an intelligent multi-classification model for sugarcane disease detection. Int Conf Decis Aid Sci Appl (DASA) 1:1265–1269. https://doi.org/10.1109/DASA54658.2022.9765191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen W, Ju C, Li Y, Hu S, Qiao X (2021) Sugarcane stem node recognition in field by deep learning combining data expansion. Appl Sci 11(18):8663. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11188663

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tamilvizhi T, Surendran R, Anbazhagan K, Rajkumar K (2022) Quantum behaved particle swarm optimization-based deep transfer learning model for sugarcane leaf disease detection and classification. Math Probl Eng 2022:3452413. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3452413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Grijalva I, Spiesman BJ, McCornack B (2023) Image classification of sugarcane aphid density using deep convolutional neural networks. Smart Agric Technol 3:100089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2022.100089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Daphal SD, Koli, SM (2022), Sugarcane leaf disease dataset, Mendeley Data, V1 https://doi.org/10.17632/9424skmnrk.1

  15. Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE (2012) ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 25(2):1106–1114

    Google Scholar 

  16. Singh D, Taspinar YS, Kursun R, Cinar I, Koklu M, Ozkan IA, Lee H-N (2022) Classification and analysis of pistachio species with pre-trained deep learning models. Electronics 11(7):981. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11070981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dosovitskiy A, Beyer L, Kolesnikov A, Weissenborn D, Zhai X, Unterthiner T, Dehghani M, Minderer M, Heigold G, Gelly S, Uszkoreit J, Houlsby N (2020) An image is worth 16x16 words: transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.11929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nimsuk N, Paewboontra W (2021) Compact cnn model for classifying rose apple species and detecting their skin defects. 18th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology (ECTI-CON). 1:136–139, https://doi.org/10.1109/ECTI-CON51831.2021.9454852

  19. Huang G, Liu Z, Van Der Maaten L, Weinberger KQ (2017) Densely connected convolutional networks. Proc IEEE Conf Comput Vision Pattern Recogn 1:4700–4708. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1608.06993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gupta A, Pawade P, Balakrishnan R (2022) Deep residual network and transfer learning-based person re-identification. Intell Syst Appl 16:200137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswa.2022.200137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Haurum JB, Madadi M, Escalera S, Moeslund TB (2022) Multi-scale hybrid vision transformer and Sinkhorn tokenizer for sewer defect classification. Autom Constr 144:104614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Han K et al (2022) A survey on vision transformer. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2022.3152247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Alhawas N, Tüfekci Z (2022) The identification of red-meat types using the fine-tuned vision transformer and mobilenet models. Eur J Sci Technol 36:237–242

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kathamuthu ND, Subramaniam S, Le QH, Muthusamy S, Panchal H, Sundararajan SCM, Alruabie AJ, Zahra MMA (2022) A deep transfer learning-based convolution neural network model for COVID-19 detection using Computed tomography scan images for medical applications. Adv Eng Softw 175:103317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2022.103317

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Süleyman Öğrekçi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Compliance with ethics requirements

This article does not contain any studies with human and animal.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Öğrekçi, S., Ünal, Y. & Dudak, M.N. A comparative study of vision transformers and convolutional neural networks: sugarcane leaf diseases identification. Eur Food Res Technol 249, 1833–1843 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-023-04258-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-023-04258-1

Keywords

Navigation