Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of sequential co-culture fermentations on flavour characters of Solaris wines

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nowadays, the use of non-Saccharomyces yeasts in combination with Saccharomyces cerevisiae is being recognised to enhance the analytical composition of the wines. The aim of this work was to evaluate the influence of indigenous non-Saccharomyces yeasts on the flavour character of wines from the cool-climate grape cultivar Solaris in Denmark. The volatile and non-volatile compounds as well as the sensory properties of wines were evaluated. Solaris wines with Hanseniaspora uvarum sequentially inoculated with S. cerevisiae produced a larger amount of glycerol as well as heptyl acetate and 2-phenylethyl acetate. This co-culture fermentation also produced higher amounts of ethyl acetate and acetic acid, reducing the possibility of its use in winemaking. Three Metschnikowia strains, a M. chrysoperlae strain and two M. fructicola strains, gave a comparable production of volatile compounds. These wines were characterised by several floral and fruity attributes. The Metschnikowia strains turned out to be promising in winemaking from Solaris grapes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barrajon N, Capece A, Arevalo-Villena M, Briones A, Romano P (2011) Co-inoculation of different Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains and influence on volatile composition of wines. Food Microbiol 28:1080–1086

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ciani M, Beco L, Comitini F (2006) Fermentation behaviour and metabolic interactions of multistarter wine yeast fermentations. Int J Food Microbiol 108:239–245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Loira I, Morata A, Comuzzo P, Callejo MJ, González C, Calderón F, Suárez-Lepe JA (2015) Use of Schizosaccharomyces pombe and Torulaspora delbrueckii strains in mixed and sequential fermentations to improve red wine sensory quality. Food Res Int 76:325–333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Medina K, Boido E, Farina L, Gioia O, Gomez ME, Barquet M, Gaggero C, Dellacassa E, Carrau F (2013) Increased flavour diversity of Chardonnay wines by spontaneous fermentation and co-fermentation with Hanseniaspora vineae. Food Chem 141:2513–2521

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sadineni V, Kondapalli N, Obulam VSR (2012) Effect of co-fermentation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Torulaspora delbrueckii or Metschnikowia pulcherrima on the aroma and sensory properties of mango wine. Ann Microbiol 62:1353–1360

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Benito S, Hofmann T, Laier M, Lochbühler B, Schüttler A, Ebert K, Fritsch S, Röcker J, Rauhut D (2015) Effect on quality and composition of Riesling wines fermented by sequential inoculation with non-Saccharomyces and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eur Food Res Technol 241:707–717

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lederer MA, Nielsen DS, Toldam-Andersen TB, Herrmann JV, Arneborg N (2013) Yeast species associated with different wine grape varieties in Denmark. Acta Agric Scand, Sect B—Soil Plant Sci 63:89–96

    Google Scholar 

  8. Banani H, Spadaro D, Zhang D, Matic S, Garibaldi A, Gullino ML (2015) Postharvest application of a novel chitinase cloned from Metschnikowia fructicola and overexpressed in Pichia pastoris to control brown rot of peaches. Int J Food Microbiol 199:54–61

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Karabulut OA, Smilanick JL, Gabler FM, Mansour M, Droby S (2003) Near-harvest applications of Metschnikowia fructicola, ethanol, and sodium bicarbonate to control postharvest diseases of grape in central California. Plant Dis 87:1384–1389

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Karabulut OA, Tezcan H, Daus A, Cohen L, Wiess B, Droby S (2004) Control of preharvest and postharvest fruit rot in Strawberry by Metschnikowia fructicola. Biocontrol Sci Technol 14:513–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Spadaro D, Lorè A, Garibaldi A, Gullino ML (2013) A new strain of Metschnikowia fructicola for postharvest control of Penicillium expansum and patulin accumulation on four cultivars of apple. Postharvest Biol Technol 75:1–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Suh SO, Gibson CM, Blackwell M (2004) Metschnikowia chrysoperlae sp. nov., Candida picachoensis sp. nov. and Candida pimensis sp. nov., isolated from the green lacewings Chrysoperla comanche and Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54:1883–1890

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Andorrà I, Berradre M, Rozès N, Mas A, Guillamón JM, Esteve-Zarzoso B (2010) Effect of pure and mixed cultures of the main wine yeast species on grape must fermentations. Eur Food Res Technol 231:215–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Moreira N, Mendes F, Hogg T, Vasconcelos I (2005) Alcohols, esters and heavy sulphur compounds production by pure and mixed cultures of apiculate wine yeasts. Int J Food Microbiol 103:285–294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Romano P (2003) Function of yeast species and strains in wine flavour. Int J Food Microbiol 86:169–180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zironi R, Romano P, Suzzi G, Battistutta F, Comi G (1993) Volatile metabolites produced in wine by mixed and sequential cultures of Hanseniaspora guilliermondii or Kloeckera apiculata and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Lett 15:235–238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu J, Toldam-Andersen TB, Petersen MA, Zhang S, Arneborg N, Bredie WLP (2015) Instrumental and sensory characterisation of Solaris white wines in Denmark. Food Chem 166:133–142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang S, Petersen MA, Liu J, Toldam-Andersen TB (2015) Influence of pre-fermentation treatments on wine volatile and sensory profile of the new disease tolerant cultivar Solaris. Molecules 20:21609–21625

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu J, Grønbeck MS, Di Monaco R, Giacalone D, Bredie WLP (2016) Performance of Flash Profile and Napping with and without training for describing small sensory differences in a model wine. Food Qual Prefer 48:41–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gower JC (1975) Generalised procrustes analysis. Psychometrika 40:33–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Swiegers JH, Bartowsky EJ, Henschke PA, Pretorius IS (2005) Yeast and bacterial modulation of wine aroma and flavour. Aust J Grape Wine Res 11:139–173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zohre DE, Erten H (2002) The influence of Kloeckera apiculata and Candida pulcherrima yeasts on wine fermentation. Process Biochem 38:319–324

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Díaz-Maroto MC, Schneider R, Baumes R (2005) Formation pathways of ethyl esters of branched short-chain fatty acids during wine aging. J Sci Food Agric 53:3503–3509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ribereau-Gayon P, Glories Y, Maujean A, Dubourdieu D (2006) Handbook of enology, volume 2: the chemistry of wine and stabilization and treatments. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Moreno-Perez A, Vila-Lopez R, Fernandez-Fernandez JI, Martinez-Cutillas A, Gil-Munoz R (2013) Influence of cold pre-fermentation treatments on the major volatile compounds of three wine varieties. Food Chem 139:770–776

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gürbüz O, Rouseff JM, Rouseff RL (2006) Comparison of aroma volatiles in commercial Merlot and Cabernet Sauvignon wines using gas chromatography-olfactometry and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Sci Food Agric 54:3990–3996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Moreira N, Pina C, Mendes F, Couto JA, Hogg T, Vasconcelos I (2011) Volatile compounds contribution of Hanseniaspora guilliermondii and Hanseniaspora uvarum during red wine vinifications. Food Control 22:662–667

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Saberi S, Cliff MA, van Vuuren HJJ (2012) Impact of mixed S. cerevisiae strains on the production of volatiles and estimated sensory profiles of Chardonnay wines. Food Res Int 48:725–735

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bach V, Kidmose U, Kjeldsen BG, Edelenbos M (2012) Effects of harvest time and variety on sensory quality and chemical composition of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) tubers. Food Chem 133:82–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Álvarez-Pérez JM, Campo E, San-Juan F, Coque JJR, Ferreira V, Hernández-Orte P (2012) Sensory and chemical characterisation of the aroma of Prieto Picudo rosé wines: The differential role of autochthonous yeast strains on aroma profiles. Food Chem 133:284–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Van Leuven I, Van Caelenberg T, Dirinck P (2008) Aroma characterisation of Gouda-type cheeses. Int Dairy J 18:790–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Cortés S, Blanco P (2011) Yeast strain effect on the concentration of major volatile compounds and sensory profile of wines from Vitis vinifera var. Treixadura. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 27:925–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the University of Copenhagen, Denmark and the Chinese Scholarship Council.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nils Arneborg.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Compliance with ethics requirements

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, J., Arneborg, N., Toldam-Andersen, T.B. et al. Impact of sequential co-culture fermentations on flavour characters of Solaris wines. Eur Food Res Technol 243, 437–445 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-016-2757-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-016-2757-2

Keywords

Navigation