Skip to main content
Log in

Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry to determine artificial sweeteners in environmental waters

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Artificial sweeteners are food additives employed as sugar substitutes which are now considered to be emerging organic contaminants. In the present study, a method is developed for the determination of a group of artificial sweeteners in environmental waters. Considering the polar and hydrophilic character of these compounds, hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography is proposed for their separation as an alternative to traditional reversed-phase liquid chromatography. Two stationary phases with different chemistry were compared for this purpose. For the detection of the analytes, high-resolution mass spectrometry (Orbitrap) was employed to take advantage of its benefits in terms of reliable quantification and confirmation for the measurement of accurate masses. Solid-phase extraction was chosen as the sample treatment, in which the extract in a mixture of NH4OH:MeOH:ACN (1:4:15) was directly injected into the chromatographic system, simplifying the analytical procedure. The optimized method was validated on river and waste water samples. For example, in the case of effluent water samples, limits of detection ranged from 0.002 to 0.7 μg/L and limits of quantification ranged from 0.004 to 1.5 μg/L. Apparent (whole method) recoveries ranged from 57 to 74 % with intra-day precision (%RSD, n = 5) ranging from 6 to 25 %. The method was successfully applied to water samples from different rivers in Catalonia and different waste water treatment plants in Tarragona. Acesulfame, cyclamate, saccharine and sucralose were found in several samples.

Illustrative figure of the SPE/HILIC-HRMS method proposed

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scheurer M, Brauch H-J, Lange FT (2009) Anal Bioanal Chem 394(6):1585–1594

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ordóñez EY, Benito Quintana J, Rodil R, Cela R (2013) J Chromatogr A 1320:10–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Morlock GE, Meyer S, Zimmermann BF, Roussel J-M (2014) J Chromatogr A 1350:102–111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen X-H, Zhao Y-G, Shen H-Y, Jin M-C (2012) J Chromatogr A 1263:34–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kokotou MG, Thomaidis NS (2013) Anal Methods 5(16):3825–3833

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zygler A, Wasik A, Namiesnik J (2009) TrAC Trend Anal Chem 28(9):1082–1102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lange FT, Scheurer M, Brauch H-J (2012) Anal Bioanal Chem 403(9):2503–2518

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Perkola N, Sainio P (2014) Environ Pollut 184:391–396

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Neset T-SS, Singer H, Longree P, Bader H-P, Scheidegger R, Wittmer A, Andersson JCM (2010) Sci Total Environ 408(16):3261–3269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferrer I, Zweigenbaum JA, Thurman EM (2013) Anal Chem 85(20):9581–9587

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Loos R, Gawlik BM, Boettcher K, Locoro G, Contini S, Bidoglio G (2009) J Chromatogr A 1216(7):1126–1131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mawhinney DB, Young RB, Vanderford BJ, Borch T, Snyder SA (2011) Environ Sci Technol 45(20):8716–8722

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Batchu SR, Quinete N, Panditi VR, Gardinali PR (2013) Chem Cent J 7

  14. Ferrer I, Thurman EM (2010) J Chromatogr A 1217(25):4127–4134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Arbeláez P, Borrull F, Pocurrul E, Marcé RM (to be submitted)

  16. Commission Decision (EU) of 12 August 2002 implementing Council Directive 96/23/EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation of results, 2002 L221:8

  17. Gan Z, Sun H, Wang R, Feng B (2013) J Chromatogr A 1274:87–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Berset J-D, Ochsenbein N (2012) Chemosphere 88(5):563–569

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ngoc Han T, Hu J, Ong SL (2013) Talanta 113:82–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fontanals N, Marcé RM, Borrull F (2011) J Chromatogr A 1218(35):5975–5980

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wolf L, Zwiener C, Zemann M (2012) Sci Total Environ 430:8–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Buerge IJ, Buser H-R, Kahle M, Mueller MD, Poiger T (2009) Environ Sci Technol 43(12):4381–4385

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Scheurer M, Storck FR, Brauch H-J, Lange FT (2010) Water Res 44(12):3573–3584

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sang Z, Jiang Y, Tsoi Y-K, Leung KS-Y (2014) Water Res 52:260–274

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Project CTQ2011-24179) for the financial support given. D. Salas would also like to thank the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness for a grant (BES-2012-057792).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Núria Fontanals.

Additional information

Published in the topical collection Advances in LC-MS/MS Analysis with guest editors Damià Barceló and Mira Petrovic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salas, D., Borrull, F., Fontanals, N. et al. Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry to determine artificial sweeteners in environmental waters. Anal Bioanal Chem 407, 4277–4285 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-014-8330-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-014-8330-6

Keywords

Navigation