Abstract
It has been shown previously that a wealth of chemical insight may be drawn from studying the interelectronic distribution function for localized electron pairs within a molecular system (Hennessey et al. in Phys Chem Chem Phys 16(46):25548–25556, 2014); however, these accounts have been limited due to the relative inaccuracy of the underlying Hartree–Fock electronic structure model that has been employed. In the current work, we study how the interelectronic distribution function of single electron pairs, represented by localized molecular orbitals, changes between a Hartree–Fock and density functional electronic structure model. We find that localized electron pairs expand, relative to a Hartree–Fock model, in a small but significant way when modelled with density functional theory. More specifically, we generally find that compact electron pairs (i.e. those pairs having narrow distribution functions near small interelectronic distances) result in a smaller change due to correlation than electron pairs more broadly distributed. This counterintuitive effect is attributed to the fact that compact electron pairs are generally held close together by a relatively rigid confining potential (i.e. attraction from local nuclei and repulsion from neighbouring electrons). However, in cases where a series of species all have nearly identical nuclear structure in the vicinity of the LMO of interest, more compact electron pairs did in fact experience the greatest change in interelectronic separation and electron repulsion upon the incorporation of a correlated model. Also, if one allows the geometry of the molecular species to relax, bonds associated with LMOs having compact interelectronic distributions tend to elongate the most with a correlated model (relative to Hartree–Fock) and the resultant deformation of the interelectronic distribution functions then show the most significant changes due to correlation. The results presented herein demonstrate the utility of Kohn–Sham density functional theory for the description of localized chemical space within the scope of the localized pair model.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zielinski ZAM, Pearson JK (2013) The localized pair model of electronic structure analysis. Comput Theor Chem 1003:79–90
Hennessey DC, Sheppard BJH, Mackenzie DECK, Pearson JK (2014) Predicting bond strength from a single Hartree–Fock ground state using the localized pair model. Phys Chem Chem Phys 16(46):25548–25556
Bader RFW (1994) Atoms in molecules: a quantum theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Matta CF, Boyd RJ (2007) The quantum theory of atoms in molecules: from solid state to DNA and drug design. Wiley, Hoboken
Coulson CA, Neilson AH (1961) Electron correlation in the ground state of helium. Proc Phys Soc 78(5):831–837
Boyd RJ, Coulson CA (1973) Coulomb hole in some excited states of helium. J Phys B At Mol Phys 6(5):782–793
Ugalde JM, Boyd RJ (1985) Angular aspects of exchange correlation and the fermi hole. Int J Quantum Chem 27(4):439–449
Hohenberg P, Kohn W (1964) Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys Rev 136(3B):B864–B871
Kohn W, Sham LJ (1965) Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Phys Rev 140(4A):A1133–A1138
Stowasser R, Hoffmann R (1999) What do the Kohn–Sham orbitals and eigenvalues mean? J Am Chem Soc 121:3414–3420
Schmidt MW, Baldridge KK, Boatz JA, Elbert ST, Gordon MS, Jensen JH, Koseki S, Matsunaga N, Nguyen KA, Su S, Windus TL, Dupuis M, Montgomery JA (1993) General atomic and molecular electronic structure system. J Comput Chem 14(11):1347–1363
Edmiston C, Ruedenberg K (1963) Localized atomic and molecular orbitals. Rev Mod Phys 35(3):457–464
Bode BM, Gordon MS (1998) MacMolPlt: a graphical user interface for GAMESS. J Mol Graph Model 16(3):133–138
Wolfram Research, Inc., Mathematica, Version 7.0, Champaign, IL (2016)
Proud AJ, Walker MP, Pearson JK (2013) The analysis of polarization effects on the interelectronic separations in the atoms and molecules of the G1 test set. Int J Quantum Chem 113(1):76–82
Hollett JW, Gill PMW (2011) Intracule functional models. V. Recurrence relations for two-electron integrals in position and momentum space. Phys Chem Chem Phys 13(7):2972–2978
Schlegel HB (1982) An efficient algorithm for calculating abinitio energy gradients using s, p Cartesian Gaussians. J Chem Phys 77(7):3676–3681
Obara S, Saika A (1986) Efficient recursive computation of molecular integrals over Cartesian Gaussian functions. J Chem Phys 84(7):3963–3974
Obara S, Saika A (1988) General recurrence formulas for molecular integrals over Cartesian Gaussian functions. J Chem Phys 89:1540–1559
Ahlrichs R (2006) A simple algebraic derivation of the Obara–Saika scheme for general two-electron interaction potentials. Phys Chem Chem Phys 8(26):3072–3077
Pearson JK, Crittenden DL, Gill PMW (2009) Intracule functional models. IV. Basis set effects. J Chem Phys 130(16):164,110
Perdew JP, Schmidt K (2001) Jacob’s ladder of density functional approximations for the exchange-correlation energy. AIP Conf Proc 577(1):1–20
Becke AD (1988) Density-functional exchange-energy approximation with correct asymptotic behavior. Phys Rev A 38(6):3098–3100
Lee C, Yang W, Parr RG (1988) Development of the Colle–Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys Rev B Condens Matter 37(2):785–789
Mienlich B, Savin A, Stoll H, Preuss H (1989) Results obtained with the correlation energy density functionals of becke and Lee, Yang and Parr. Chem Phys Lett 157:200–206
Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1996) Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 77(18):3865–3868
Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1997) Generalized gradient approximation made simple [Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)]. Phys Rev Lett 78(7):1396–1396
Zhao Y, Truhlar DG (2006) A new local density functional for main-group thermochemistry, transition metal bonding, thermochemical kinetics, and noncovalent interactions. J Chem Phys 125(19):194101
Tao J, Perdew JP, Staroverov VN, Scuseria GE (2003) Climbing the density functional ladder: nonempirical meta-generalized gradient approximation designed for molecules and solids. Phys Rev Lett 91(14):146401
Becke AD (1993) Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J Chem Phys 98(7):5648
Stephens PJ, Devlin FJ, Chabalowski CF, Frisch MJ (1994) Ab initio calculation of vibrational absorption and circular dichroism spectra using density functional force fields. J Phys Chem 98(45):11623–11627
Zhao Y, Truhlar DG (2008) The M06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions, excited states, and transition elements: two new functionals and systematic testing of four M06-class functionals and 12 other functionals. Theor Chem Acc 120(1–3):215–241
Pearson JK, Gill PMW, Ugalde JM, Boyd RJ (2010) Can correlation bring electrons closer together? Mol Phys 107(8–12):1089–1093
Per MC, Russo SP, Snook IK (2009) Anisotropic intracule densities and electron correlation in H2: a quantum Monte Carlo study. J Chem Phys 130(13):134103
Hollett JW, McKemmish LK, Gill PMW (2011) The nature of electron correlation in a dissociating bond. J Chem Phys 134(22):224103
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, the Canadian Foundation for Innovation (CFI), and the University of Prince Edward Island for the financial support that made this research possible. Computational resources were provided by ACENET, the regional high-performance computing consortium for universities in Atlantic Canada. ACENET is funded by the CFI, the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA), and the provinces of Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sheppard, B.J.H., Pearson, J.K. Correlation effects on the interelectronic distributions of localized electron pairs. Theor Chem Acc 136, 25 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-017-2048-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-017-2048-4