Abstract
Gold clusters are currently regarded as new-generation catalysts owing to their exceptional efficiency in accelerating several classes of reactions. Density functional theory (DFT) is the method of choice for the investigation of energy pathways of reactions assisted by metal nanoparticles due to their computational efficiency. However, the reliability of such theoretical studies depends to a large extent on the choice of the DFT functional used. In the present work, the performance of a series of DFT-based functionals to accurately model the prototypical CO oxidation reaction catalyzed by a \(\hbox {Au}_3\) cluster has been examined by comparing the results with those obtained from high-level ab initio CCSD(T) method. This comparison study has been carried along the two possible pathways [Eley–Rideal (ER) and the Langmuir–Hinshelwood (LH)]. No significant differences among the DFT functionals were observed in terms of obtaining the geometries of stationary points including the transition states with minor exceptions. However, the adsorption energies, barrier heights and reaction energies calculated using the DFT methods lie in a wide range with some methods showing high deviations from the CCSD(T) results. Our calculations suggest that the adsorption energy values are sensitive to the inclusion of long-range correction and dispersion correction, whereas the barrier heights do not show much dependence on the inclusion of dispersion effects. The percentage of Hartree–Fock exchange included in the DFT functional also plays a crucial role in predicting the correct pathway. Based on this extensive benchmark study, it is suggested that the computationally less expensive hybrid density functionals, PBE0, B3PW91 and B3P86, are better suited for accurate modeling of this class of reactions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Haruta M, Kobayashi T, Sano H, Yamada N (1987) Chem Lett 16:405–408
Lopez-Acevedo O, Kacprzak KA, Akola J, Häkkinen H (2010) Nat Chem 2:329–334
Stratakis M, Garcia H (2012) Chem Rev 112:4469–4506
Hashmi ASK, Hutchings GJ (2006) Angew Chem Int Ed 45:7896–7936
Daté M, Okumura M, Tsubota S, Haruta M (2004) Angew Chem Int Ed 43:2129–2132
Weiher N, Beesley AM, Tsapatsaris N, Delannoy L, Louis C, van Bokhoven JA, Schroeder SL (2007) J Am Chem Soc 129:2240–2241
Haruta M (1997) Catal Today 36:153–166
Valden M, Lai X, Goodman DW (1998) Science 281:1647–1650
Meerson O, Sitja G, Henry CR (2005) Eur Phys J D 34:119–124
Della Pina C, Falletta E, Prati L, Rossi M (2008) Chem Soc Rev 37:2077–2095
Della Pina C, Falletta E, Rossi M (2012) Chem Soc Rev 41:350–369
Hutchings GJ (2008) Chem Commun 10:1148–1164
Edwards JK, Parker SF, Pritchard J, Piccinini M, Freakley SJ, He Q, Carley AF, Kiely CJ, Hutchings GJ (2013) Catal Sci Technol 3:812–818
Edwards JK, Solsona B, Ntainjua E, Carley AF, Herzing AA, Kiely CJ, Hutchings GJ (2009) Science 323:1037–1041
Zhao Y, Truhlar DG (2005) Phys Chem Chem Phys 7:2701–2705
Ricca A, Bauschlicher CW Jr (1995) Theor Chem Acc 92:123–131
Siegbahn PE, Borowski T (2006) Acc Chem Res 39:729–738
Zhao Y, Truhlar DG (2008) Acc Chem Res 41:157–167
Cramer CJ, Truhlar DG (2009) Phys Chem Chem Phys 11:10757–10816
Becke AD (1993) J Chem Phys 98:5648–5652
Kohn W, Becke AD, Parr RG (1996) J Phys Chem 100:12,974–12,980
Pu J, Truhlar DG (2005) J Phys Chem A 109:773–778
Lynch BJ, Fast PL, Harris M, Truhlar DG (2000) J Phys Chem A 104:4811–4815
Lynch BJ, Truhlar DG (2003) J Phys Chem A 107:3898–3906
Zhao Y, Lynch BJ, Truhlar DG (2004) J Phys Chem A 108:2715–2719
Goerigk L, Grimme S (2010) J Chem Theory Comput 7:291–309
Goerigk L, Grimme S (2011) Phys Chem Chem Phys 13:6670–6688
Perdew JP, Ernzerhof M, Burke K (1996) J Chem Phys 105:9982–9985
Laury ML, Wilson AK (2013) J Chem Theory Comput 9:3939–3946
Wolf LM, Thiel W (2014) J Org Chem 79:12,136–12,147
Chen ZN, Chan KY, Pulleri JK, Kong J, Hu H (2015) Inorg Chem 54:1314–1324
Xie X, Li Y, Liu ZQ, Haruta M, Shen W (2009) Nature 458:746–749
Freund HJ, Meijer G, Scheffler M, Schlögl R, Wolf M (2011) Angew Chem Int Ed 50:10,064–10,094
Zhang C, Yoon B, Landman U (2007) J Am Chem Soc 129:2228–2229
Lopez N, Nørskov JK (2002) J Am Chem Soc 124:11,262–11,263
Xu Y, Mavrikakis M (2003) J Phys Chem B 107:9298–9307
Liu ZP, Hu P, Alavi A (2002) J Am Chem Soc 124:14,770–14,779
Liu ZP, Gong XQ, Kohanoff J, Sanchez C, Hu P (2003) Phys Rev Lett 91:266,102–266,106
Gruene P, Rayner DM, Redlich B, van der Meer AFG, Lyon JT, Meijer G, Fielicke A (2008) Science 321:674–676
Jena NK, Chandrakumar KRS, Ghosh SK (2012) J Phys Chem C 116:17,063–17,069
Ehlers A, Bhme M, Dapprich S, Gobbi A, Hllwarth A, Jonas V, Khler K, Stegmann R, Veldkamp A, Frenking G (1993) Chem Phys Lett 208:111–114
Dolg M, Wedig U, Stoll H, Preuss H (1987) J Chem Phys 86:866–872
Andrae D, Huermann U, Dolg M, Stoll H, Preu H (1990) Theor Chim Acta 77:123–141
Fernández EM, Soler JM, Balbás LC (2006) Phys Rev B 73:235,433–235,441
Andrews L, Wang X, Manceron L, Balasubramanian K (2004) J Phys Chem A 108:2936–2940
Hou S, Li R, Qian Z, Zhang J, Shen Z, Zhao X, Xue Z (2005) J Phys Chem A 109:8356–8360
Dos Santos HF, Paschoal D, Burda JV (2012) Chem Phys Lett 548:64–70
Fan T, Chen X, Sun J, Lin Z (2012) Organometallics 31:4221–4227
Faza ON, Rodríguez RÁ, López CS (2011) Theor Chem Acc 128:647–661
Hariharan P, Pople J (1974) Mol Phys 27:209–214
Hariharan P, Pople J (1972) Chem Phys Lett 16:217–219
Rassolov VA, Ratner MA, Pople JA, Redfern PC, Curtiss LA (2001) J Comput Chem 22:976–984
Hehre WJ, Ditchfield R, Pople JA (1972) J Chem Phys 56:2257–2261
Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Scalmani G, Barone V, Mennucci B, Petersson GA, Nakatsuji H, Caricato M, Li X, Hratchian HP, Izmaylov AF, Bloino J, Zheng G, Sonnenberg JL, Hada M, Ehara M, Toyota K, Fukuda R, Hasegawa J, Ishida M, Nakajima T, Honda Y, Kitao O, Nakai H, Vreven T, Montgomery JA Jr, Peralta JE, Ogliaro F, Bearpark M, Heyd JJ, Brothers E, Kudin KN, Staroverov VN, Kobayashi R, Normand J, Raghavachari K, Rendell A, Burant JC, Iyengar SS, Tomasi J, Cossi M, Rega N, Millam JM, Klene M, Knox JE, Cross JB, Bakken V, Adamo C, Jaramillo J, Gomperts R, Stratmann RE, Yazyev O, Austin AJ, Cammi R, Pomelli C, Ochterski JW, Martin RL, Morokuma K, Zakrzewski VG, Voth GA, Salvador P, Dannenberg JJ, Dapprich S, Daniels AD, Farkas Ö, Foresman JB, Ortiz JV, Cioslowski J, Fox DJ (2009) Gaussian 09 revision C.01
Prestianni Antonio et al (2009) J Mol Struct (Theochem) 1:34–40
Prestianni Antonio et al (2013) Chem Eur J 14:4577–4585
Schroder D, Shaik S, Schwarz H (2000) Acc Chem Res 3:139–145
Handy NC, Cohen AJ (2001) Mol Phys 99:403–412
Hoe WM, Cohen AJ, Handy NC (2001) Chem Phys Lett 341:319–328
Xu X, Goddard WA (2004) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:2673–2677
Tao J, Perdew JP, Staroverov VN, Scuseria GE (2003) Phys Rev Lett 91:146,401–146,405
Perdew JP (1986) Phys Rev B 33:8822–8824
Becke AD (1988) Phys Rev A 38:3098–3100
Adamo C, Barone V (1998) J Chem Phys 108:664–675
Peverati R, Truhlar DG (2012) J Phys Chem Lett 3:117–124
Lee C, Yang W, Parr RG (1988) Phys Rev B 37:785–789
Van Voorhis T, Scuseria GE (1998) J Chem Phys 109:400–410
Adamo C, Barone V (1999) J Chem Phys 110:6158–6170
Staroverov VN, Scuseria GE, Tao J, Perdew JP (2003) J Chem Phys 119:12,129–12,137
Heyd J, Scuseria GE (2004a) J Chem Phys 121:1187–1192
Heyd J, Scuseria GE (2004b) J Chem Phys 120:7274–7280
Heyd J, Peralta JE, Scuseria GE, Martin RL (2005) J Chem Phys 123:174,101–174,109
Heyd J, Scuseria GE, Ernzerhof M (2006) J Chem Phys 124:219,906–219,927
Iikura H, Tsuneda T, Yanai T, Hirao K (2001) J Chem Phys 115:3540–3544
Dreuw A, Head-Gordon M (2005) Chem Rev 105:4009–4037
Yanai T, Tew DP, Handy NC (2004) Chem Phys Lett 393:51–57
Vydrov OA, Scuseria GE (2006) J Chem Phys 125:234,109–234,114
Vydrov OA, Heyd J, Krukau AV, Scuseria GE (2006) J Chem Phys 125:074,106–074,111
Vydrov OA, Scuseria GE, Perdew JP (2007) J Chem Phys 126:154,109–154,113
Chai JD, Head-Gordon M (2008) Phys Chem Chem Phys 10:6615–6620
Minenkov Y, Singstad A, Occhipinti G, Jensen VR (2012) Dalton Trans 41:5526–5541
Grimme S (2006) J Chem Phys 124:034,108–034,111
Schwabe T, Grimme S (2007) Phys Chem Chem Phys 9:3397–3406
Raghavachari K, Trucks GW, Pople JA, Head-Gordon M (1989) Chem Phys Lett 157:479–483
Kang R, Lai W, Yao J, Shaik S, Chen H (2012) J Chem Theory Comput 8:3119–3127
Sun Y, Chen H (2013) J Chem Theory Comput 9:4735–4743
Weymuth T, Couzijn EP, Chen P, Reiher M (2014) J Chem Theory Comput 10:3092–3103
Řezáč J, Hobza P (2013) J Chem Theory Comput 9:2151–2155
Wu ZJ, Shi JS, Zhang SY, Zhang HJ (2004) Phys Rev A 69:064,502–064,506
Wang LL, Johnson D (2005) J Phys Chem B 109:23,113–23,117
Adamo C, Barone V (2000) Theor Chem Acc 105:169–172
Paier J, Marsman M, Kresse G (2007) J Chem Phys 127:024,103–024,105
Stroppa A, Termentzidis K, Paier J, Kresse G, Hafner J (2007) Phys Rev B 76:195,440–195,459
Johansson MP, Sundholm D, Vaara J (2004) Angew Chem Int Ed 43:2678–2681
Rai S, Ehara M, Priyakumar UD (2015) Phys Chem Chem Phys 17:24,275–24,281
Xie YP, Gong XG (2010) J Chem Phys 132:244,302–244,309
Assadollahzadeh B, Schwerdtfeger P (2009) J Chem Phys 131:064,306–064,317
Grimme S (2011) WIREs Comput Mol Sci 1:211–228
Svelle S, Tuma C, Rozanska X, Kerber T, Sauer J (2009) J Am Chem Soc 131:816–825
Acknowledgments
S. R. acknowledges support from CSIR for SRF fellowship. M. E. acknowledges the financial support from a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), Nanotechnology Platform Program of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) of Japan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gurtu, S., Rai, S., Ehara, M. et al. Ability of density functional theory methods to accurately model the reaction energy pathways of the oxidation of CO on gold cluster: A benchmark study. Theor Chem Acc 135, 93 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-016-1852-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-016-1852-6