Abstract
Rationale
Impairments in behavioral flexibility lie at the core of anxiety and obsessive-compulsive disorders. Few studies, however, have investigated the neural substrates of natural variation in behavioral flexibility and whether inflexible behavior is linked to anxiety and peripheral markers of stress and monoamine function.
Objective
The objective of the study was to investigate peripheral and central markers associated with perseverative behavior on a spatial-discrimination serial reversal learning task.
Methods
Rats were trained on a reversal learning task prior to blood sampling, anxiety assessment, and the behavioral evaluation of selective monoamine oxidase-A (MAO-A) and MAO-B inhibitors, which block the degradation of serotonin (5-HT), dopamine (DA), and noradrenaline (NA).
Results
Perseveration correlated positively with 5-HT levels in blood plasma and inversely with trait anxiety, as measured on the elevated plus maze. No significant relationships were found between perseveration and the stress hormone corticosterone or the 5-HT precursor tryptophan. Reversal learning was significantly improved by systemic administration of the MAO-A inhibitor moclobemide but not by the MAO-B inhibitor lazabemide. Moclobemide also increased latencies to initiate a new trial following an incorrect response suggesting a possible role in modulating behavioral inhibition to negative feedback. MAO-A but not MAO-B inhibition resulted in pronounced increases in 5-HT and NA content in the orbitofrontal cortex and dorsal raphé nuclei and increased 5-HT and DA content in the basolateral amygdala and dorsomedial striatum.
Conclusions
These findings indicate that central and peripheral monoaminergic mechanisms underlie inter-individual variation in behavioral flexibility, which overlaps with trait anxiety and depends on functional MAO-A activity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Behavioral inflexibly is common to a range of compulsive and anxiety-related brain disorders, including addiction, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), and schizophrenia (Fineberg et al. 2010; Robbins et al. 2012; Voon et al. 2015). Elucidating the neural and psychological mechanisms of behavioral inflexibility is therefore important to facilitate the diagnosis and treatment of a range of mental disorders. Based on selective brain intervention studies, much is known about the neural mechanisms underlying one aspect of impaired behavioral flexibility, namely excessive perseveration in response to shifts in the stimulus-reward contingency of reversal learning paradigms (Castane et al. 2010; Rygula et al. 2010). However, few studies have investigated the neural mechanisms of inter-individual differences in behavioral flexibility and how these relate to anxiety and other traits present in OCD and related disorders.
Convergent evidence indicates that serotonin (5-HT) modulates reversal learning in a number of species (Roberts 2006). As reviewed by Izquierdo et al. (2016), elevated post synaptic 5-HT activity facilitates reversal learning (Bari et al. 2010; Barlow et al. 2015; Danet et al. 2010; Wallace et al. 2014) whereas reduced 5-HT signaling impairs reversal learning and increases perseveration (Clarke et al. 2005, 2007; Lapiz-Bluhm et al. 2009; Rygula et al. 2015). In a similar manner, selective 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptor antagonists, respectively, impair and improve reversal learning (Boulougouris et al. 2008) with the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) an important locus for the latter beneficial effects (Boulougouris and Robbins 2010), consistent with much previous evidence implicating the OFC in reversal learning (Boulougouris et al. 2007; Dias et al. 1996; Schoenbaum et al. 2009; Stalnaker et al. 2009). Functionally, 5-HT in this region is hypothesized to inhibit actions to previously rewarded stimuli when aversive or negative outcomes are expected (Cools et al. 2011; Roberts 2011).
We recently reported in outbred rats that excessive perseveration on an appetitive, spatial reversal learning task is associated with diminished 5-HT metabolism and 5-HT2A receptor availability in the OFC, as well as altered gene expression of the two isoforms of monoamine oxidase, MAO-A and MAO-B, in the dorsal raphé nucleus (DRN) and OFC (Barlow et al. 2015). In the present study, we extended these findings by investigating the causal involvement of MAO-A and MAO-B in mediating reversal learning performance. We reasoned that since MAO-A has a high affinity for 5-HT and norepinephrine (NE), unlike MAO-B (Da Prada et al. 1988; Shih and Thompson 1999), selective MAO-A inhibition by moclobemide would improve behavioral flexibility. We extended our analysis to the measurement of 5-HT in blood samples since MAO inhibition produces parallel increases in 5-HT levels in the brain and blood (Malyszko et al. 1993), similar to the effects of psychostimulants and selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitors (Zolkowska et al. 2006). In addition, platelet MAO activity has been proposed as an index of central 5-HT activity (Stahl 1985) and low activity of this enzyme has been associated with OCD severity (Arrojo et al. 2007). Thus, the peripheral measurement of unbound 5-HT may be an accessible marker of central 5-HT transmission, under some circumstances, and reflect inter-individual differences in behavioral flexibility. We also measured levels of the 5-HT precursor tryptophan, as well as circulating levels of the stress hormone corticosterone. Subsequently, we used a factor analysis to relate these levels to trait anxiety and perseverative errors on a spatial reversal learning task (Barlow et al. 2015).
The primary objective of the present study was to clarify the extent to which individual variation in behavioral flexibility on a spatial-discrimination serial reversal learning task can be explained by peripheral biomarkers and trait anxiety and to relate these trait markers to levels of 5-HT and other monoamines in key brain loci implicated in reversal learning, including the OFC, basolateral amygdala (BLA), and striatum (Izquierdo et al. 2013; Ochoa et al. 2015).
Methods
Subjects
Male Lister-hooded rats (n = 48) weighing 290 ± 17 g at the beginning of experiments were used (Charles River, Kent, UK). They received 18 g of laboratory chow once a day with ad libitum access to water. The weight of each animal was recorded each week with animals maintained at 85–95% of free-feeding weights. When no behavioral training or testing took place, rats received 20 g of chow per day. All animals were housed in groups of four per cage and kept under a reversed 12 h light/dark cycle (lights off 07:00 h until 19:00 h). Rats were trained on the spatial reversal learning task between 14:00 and 19:00 h. Testing on the elevated plus maze (EPM) and the collection of blood samples took place between 15:30 and 16:30 h. Five rats were excluded from the study because they failed to reach criterion on the reversal learning task. One further animal developed audiogenic seizures and therefore was culled before drug challenge. Forty-two animals received systemic drug injections, of which 19 animals were used for region-specific post mortem monoamine analysis to validate the effects of moclobemide and lazabemide (Fig. 1a). Three other animals failed to complete the task after drug administration and therefore were excluded from further analysis. Experiments complied with the UK Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act of 1986 and were approved by the ethics review committee at Cambridge University.
Behavioral apparatus
Twelve five-hole operant chambers (Med Associates, Georgia, VT) controlled by two computers and Whisker Control software (Cardinal and Aitken 2010) were used (Fig. 1b). Each chamber was enclosed in a ventilated sound-attenuating box, fitted with five apertures in a curved wall and a food magazine on the opposite wall of the box that delivered rodent sugar pellets (TestDiet®, Purina, UK). A yellow light-emitting diode stimulus was placed at the rear of each aperture. The middle three apertures were blocked using a metal plate and were not part of the experimental setup. The food magazine and entire chamber was illuminated by light emitting diodes. Infrared beams detected responses in the magazine and apertures.
The elevated plus maze was constructed from black Perspex and consisted of a central platform surrounded by two open arms and two enclosed arms in the shape of a plus sign (Molander et al. 2011; Walf and Frye 2007). The plus-shaped platform was elevated 60 cm above the floor in a room illuminated by white light (intensity 70 lx). Exploratory behavior in the maze was recorded and monitored on a ceiling-mounted Yi Action Camera connected wirelessly to a computer.
Behavioral training
Training began with 2 days of habituation during which animals were exposed to the testing boxes with all cue lights, magazine, and house lights on for 20 min. They were encouraged to explore the apparatus by baiting the response apertures and magazine with sugar pellets. Before the start of each session, all lights were extinguished. The first trial was initiated by the animal making a nose-poke in the magazine, which triggered the illumination of a cue light in each aperture. Responding in either aperture was initially reinforced by the delivery of a single food pellet. Task difficulty was then progressively increased with just one aperture reinforced (the “correct” aperture) under FR1, FR2, and FR3 schedules (see Table 1). Finally, the inter-trial interval (ITI) was gradually increased from 1 to 2 s and finally to 5 s upon completion of the previous stage. For all training stages, a criterion of 50 correct trials was required to proceed to the next level. While the FR1-FR3 stages were restricted to 20 min, session times increased to 30 min for the ITI stages. If a subject made an incorrect response at the non-cued aperture, it was not penalized during training. However, a failure to make the appropriate response within 30 s of initiating a new trial was recorded as an omission and was followed by a 5-s time-out where all lights were turned off.
In the spatial-discrimination task, the training setup above was modified with both apertures lit but with only one of apertures rewarded. Three nose-pokes in the “incorrect” aperture now resulted in the omission of reward and a 5 s time-out. Rats were given 1 h to complete the discrimination task by achieving 9 correct trials across previous 10 trials. If animals failed to achieve criterion after 2 days, they were retrained by completing the 5-s ITI condition within a single session.
On the day following the completion of the discrimination task, animals experienced the same configuration of the task, whereby the correct aperture was kept the same on both days as a measure of retention (Fig. 1b). Once the 9/10 criterion was achieved, the previously correct aperture was no longer rewarded and the rat was required to respond in the other aperture to obtain reward. Similar to the discrimination condition, an incorrect response or an omission resulted in a 5 s time-out. Subjects could complete up to three reversals during the 1-h session.
Elevated plus maze
Animals were habituated to the experimental room for 30 min in their home cage before testing commenced. Each rat was placed on the central platform facing an open arm. The maze was thoroughly cleaned with water and dried between each test. Recordings during the first 6 min on the EPM were manually scored, specifically to record the time spent in the open arms and the number of entries made into the open arms, as described previously (Walf and Frye 2007).
Systemic drug administration
Forty-two animals received mock injections 2 days before the start of the administration of the selective, reversible MAO-A and MAO-B inhibitors (moclobemide and lazabemide, respectively). Moclobemide and lazabemide hydrochloride were purchased from Tocris (UK) and dissolved in 15% hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin and 0.9% saline (“vehicle”). Moclobemide was fully dissolved using repeated sonication at +35 °C. Following the ranking of the animals by their reversal learning performance, two groups of animals were formed, matched for the number of perseverative errors made, and each assigned to one of the two MAO inhibitors. Given the relatively short washout periods for the drugs (Da Prada et al. 1988), each animal received four separate treatments across 3-day intervals, starting with a baseline retention session (day 1), a drug administration session (day 2), and a drug-free day. Doses for moclobemide (3 and 16 mg/kg, combination of 10 mg/kg of moclobemide and 10 mg/kg lazabemide) and lazabemide (1 and 10 mg/kg) were selected on the basis of previous literature (Da Prada et al. 1988; Jolkkonen et al. 2000; Kitaichi et al. 2006, 2010; Maki et al. 2000) and administered intraperitoneally (1 ml/kg). The dosing regimen followed a randomized modified Latin square design to control for training and crossover effects. One hour after the drug (or vehicle) injections, subjects were assessed for reversal learning performance.
In order to validate the effects of moclobemide and lazabemide on monoamine levels, 19 animals were matched for baseline performance and drug history and subsequently divided into three groups: a vehicle control group (15% HPB, n = 5), a lazabemide group (10 mg/kg, n = 6), and a moclobemide group (16 mg/kg, n = 4 and 3 mg/kg, n = 4) groups. Consistent with the timing of previous testing conditions, animals were culled for ex vivo neurochemical analysis 1 h after each injection.
Blood analyses
Sublingual blood samples were collected in isoflurane-anesthetized animals (2.5% isoflurane in 95% O2, 5% CO2). Approximately 1 ml of blood was collected in tubes primed with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), cooled on dry ice, and centrifuged at 3000×g for 20 min at 4 °C. Supernatant plasma was aliquoted in separate tubes for monoamine quantification using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with electrochemical detection (ECD). Plasma corticosterone was quantified by radioimmunoassay (Carter et al. 2004) using a citrate buffer at pH 3.0 to denature the corticosteroid-binding globulin and a specific corticosterone antibody (kindly supplied by G. Makara, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Budapest, Hungary), as previously described in detail (Atkinson et al. 2006; Windle et al. 1998).
Monoamine analysis
Plasma samples were diluted 1:20 in 0.2 M perchloric acid, and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm at 4 °C for 20 min. Twenty-five microliters of the supernatant was injected onto the HPLC-ECD system to measure levels of 5-HT, 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA), tryptophan, and noradrenaline (NA), as described previously (Dalley et al. 2002). Detection and quantification were achieved using a Coulochem II detector with an analytical cell and two electrodes in series (E1 −250 mV, E2 +250 mV). The signal from E2 was integrated using computer software (Chromeleon, Dionex, UK).
One hour after drug injection, animals were killed by asphyxiation in a rising concentration of CO2 (n = 19). Brains were rapidly removed and flash frozen in liquid nitrogen, placed on dry ice, and stored at −80 °C. They were later cut into 150 μm coronal sections on a Jung CM300 cryostat (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) and stored at −80 °C. At room temperature, small aliquots of tissue were removed bilaterally from two consecutive sections from the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC), OFC, DRN, hippocampal CA1 area, lateral hypothalamus (LH), BLA, dorsomedial striatum (dmS), and nucleus accumbens (NAcb) using a micropunch of diameter 1.0 mm (Fig. 6e). More details of this procedure can be found in Palkovits (1973). Samples were homogenized in 60 μl of 0.2 M perchloric acid using an ultrasonic cell disruptor, spun at 6000 rpm for 20 min (4 °C), and analyzed for 5-HT, NA, DA, 5-HIAA, and 3-4 dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC). Monoamine levels were quantified in 25 μl of the homogenized brain samples using HPLC-ECD, as described above.
Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS for Windows (IBM version 23). Perseveration was assessed using the total number of trials and errors made until subjects achieved criterion. Errors were considered perseverative in nature if in a window of 10 trials, 7 incorrect responses were made. The number of perseverative errors made during the three reversals was used to rank the animals, consistent with (Barlow et al. 2015). Based on this ranking, three groups were formed that included highly perseverative (n = 11), mid-range (n = 20), and low-perseverative animals (n = 11). One of the low-perseverative rats and two of the mid-range rats were unable to complete the task in drug conditions and had to be excluded (Table 2). A mixed effects ANOVA was used to analyze within-subject effects of the drugs and between-subject effects of group as well as their interactions following systemic drug administration. Partial eta-squared (η 2) was used to assess effect size. A two-way between-subject ANOVA was used to compare the effects of the drugs on monoamine levels in the brain. If sphericity was violated (significant Mauchly’s test), a Greenhouse-Geisser correction was used. When significant main effects or interactions were found, post hoc analyses were carried out using Fisher’s LSD tests and the calculation of effect size η 2.
To identify markers of perseveration and anxiety, a factor analysis model was used. Since several variables were positively skewed and significantly non-normal, principal axis factoring was chosen as the integration method (Costello and Osborne 2005). Further, since the extracted factors did not correlate well with each other, the orthogonal rotation method (varimax) was preferred. Most errors made by the animals were perseverative; hence, only those were included to avoid excessive multicollinearity. Factor analysis variables included perseverative errors, total trials to criterion, and plasma levels of neurochemicals and corticosterone, alongside measures of trait anxiety (proportion of time spent in open arms of the EPM and percentage of open arm entries). Proportions were the preferred dependent variable to control for general locomotor activity (Walf and Frye 2007). Inferential contrasts were considered statistically significant at α = 0.05.
Results
Means ± SEM perseverative errors were 36.3 ± 2.6 for high-perseverative animals, 19.6 ± 1.0 for the mid-range group and 7.3 ± 0.79 for the low-perseverative group. Within these high-, mid- and low-perseverative groups, the total number of errors (mean ± SEM: 58.9 ± 4.3, 37.6 ± 2.1, 31.5 ± 2.2, respectively) and total trials to criterion (mean ± SEM: 137.3 ± 10.3, 104.9 ± 6.0, 101.5 ± 6.5, respectively) followed the distribution of perseverative errors (Fig. 2). Prior to training, perseverative errors, total errors, and total trials to criterion as well as concentrations of peripheral NA, 5-HIAA, 5-HT, and tryptophan were positively skewed (skewness 0.82, 1.01, 0.97, 3.627, 1.0, 1.72, and 2.048, respectively). 5-HT and NE distributions remained skewed after training (1.70 and 0.73, respectively), similar to corticosterone levels and the 5-HT/5-HIAA ratio (1.71 and 1.52). Other variables were less skewed, as indicated by values below 0.7.
Increased perseveration is associated with decreased anxiety and plasma 5-HT levels
Factor analysis was used to investigate the correlative relationships between plasma monoamine levels and task performance. Following the Kaiser criterion, all five factors with eigenvalues greater than one were extracted and orthogonally rotated that jointly accounted for over 58.2% of the variance in the data (Fig. 3). The first factor featured the two anxiety measures as well as perseverative errors. The second factor included pre-training levels of NA, 5-HIAA, tryptophan, and corticosterone. The third factor, accounting for 11.9% of variance, included perseveration, plasma levels of 5-HT, and the 5-HT/5-HIAA ratio. Corticosterone levels and post training levels of NA were loaded on factor 4 whereas post training levels of 5-HIAA and 5-HT were loaded on factor 5. Factors 4 and 5 jointly explained 8% of the variance.
Linear regression models were then created to investigate the strength of associations between perseveration, anxiety measures, and peripheral biomarkers. As shown in Fig. 3, a positive relationship was found between the proportion of entries into the open arms of the EPM and the perseverative errors (F 1,43 = 7.82 r = 0.39, p = 0.008). Reflecting the loadings on the third factor, a significant correlation was found between perseverative errors and pre-training levels of 5-HT in the plasma (F 1,43 = 4.27, r = 0.31, p = 0.045).
MAO-A inhibition but not MAO-B inhibition improves reversal learning
The effects of MAO-A and MAO-B inhibition on reversal learning performance are shown in Fig. 4. As no interactive effects were found between the effects of moclobemide and perseveration group on total trials, errors, or proportion of perseverative errors (F 6,45 = 1.32, p = 0.27; F 6,45 = 0.40, p = 0.88, F 6,45 = 0.84, p = 0.55, respectively), these were collapsed across perseveration group for subsequent analyses. This analysis revealed that moclobemide significantly improved reversal learning performance, as indexed by total trials to criterion (F 3,45 = 11.27, p < 0.0001, η 2 = 0.429; Fig. 4a). Both the high and the low doses of moclobemide, as well as the combination of moclobemide and lazabemide, produced significant improvements compared with the vehicle group, as revealed by post hoc comparisons (p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.606; p < 0.0001, η 2 = 0.677; p < 0.002, η 2 = 0.486, respectively).
With respect to the lazabemide group, only the combined dose decreased the number of trials to achieve criterion (F 3,60 = 3.33, p < 0.025, η 2 = 0.143; Fig. 4b). No significant interactive effects of lazabemide and perseveration group were observed on this measure. The combination of moclobemide and lazabemide decreased the number of trials to criterion compared with the high (p = 0.046, η 2 = 0.184) and low doses (p = 0.033, η 2 = 0.209) of lazabemide and the vehicle group (p = 0.023, η 2 = 0.234). Lazabemide itself had no significant effects on total trials to criterion.
Analysis of total errors mirrored the effects of moclobemide and lazabemide on total trials to criterion. Thus, one-way repeated measures ANOVA revealed significant main effects of drug treatment (moclobemide F 3,45 = 7.51, p = 0.0001, η 2 = 0.344; lazabemide F 3,54 = 4.83, p = 0.005, η 2 = 0.212); post hoc analyses identified significant effects of high and low doses of moclobemide, as well as the drug combination, to decrease the total number of errors compared with the vehicle group (p = 0.001, η 2 = 0.542; p = 0.001, η 2 = 0.535; p = 0.01, η 2 = 0.367, respectively). The combination of both drugs significantly decreased the total number of errors to criterion compared to the high and low dose of lazabemide and vehicle (p = 0.021, η 2 = 0.261; p = 0.01, η 2 = 0.313; p = 0.004, η 2 = 0.383). No interactions between lazabemide and group were found (F 6,54 = 0.25, p = 0.96) nor did lazabemide itself have any effects on behavioral performance.
By contrast, moclobemide decreased the proportion of perseverative errors (F 3,45 = 3.86, p = 0.016 η 2 = 0.216; Fig. 4c) with the highest dose significantly reducing perseverative errors compared with the vehicle group (p = 0.003, η 2 = 0.428). As shown in Fig. 4d, no main effects or interactions were observed with respect to lazabemide on the proportion of perseverative errors (F 3,51 = 0.72, p = 0.55, F 6,51 = 0.37, p = 0.90, respectively).
MAO-A inhibition increases the latency to initiate a new trial following an incorrect response
Latencies to initiate a new trial following incorrect and correct responses are shown in Fig. 5. Mixed effect ANOVA with treatment as a within-subject factor and latency type as a between-subject factor revealed a significant difference in the pattern of effects produced by the drug treatment on correct and incorrect responses in the moclobemide group (treatment × latency type interaction F 3,87 = 5.74, p = 0.001, η 2 = 0.165) but not in the lazabemide group (F 3,87 = 1.81, p = 0.150). Repeated measures ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of dose for the moclobemide group (F 3,45 = 7.514, p = 0.011, η 2 = 0.334; Fig. 5a) with the highest dose prolonging incorrect response latencies compared with the vehicle group (p = 0.004, η 2 = 0.440), combination treatment (p = 0.038 η 2 = 0.258) and the low dose of moclobemide (p = 0.013, η 2 = 0.345). In addition, incorrect response latencies following the combined drug injections were significantly longer than those following a low dose of moclobemide (p = 0.024, η 2 = 0.297). A similar pattern of results was obtained for the lazabemide group (main effect of dose F 3,57 = 5.622, p = 0.002 η 2 = 0.228; Fig. 5b) with the drug combination again lengthening incorrect response latencies compared with the vehicle group (p = 0.012 η 2 = 0.287).
A different pattern of results was observed with respect to the effects of MAO-A and MAO-B inhibition on correct response latencies. No significant differences were found in the MAO-A group (F 3,45 = 2.164, p = 0.105; Fig. 5c), while correct response latencies in the MAO-B group were significantly variable between the different drug groups (F 3,57 = 13.523, p = 0.0001, η 2 = 0.416; Fig. 5d). A combination of both drugs increased the time to initiate a new trial following a correct response compared with the vehicle group (p = 0.0001, η 2 = 0.489).
MAO-A inhibition facilitates a lose-shift strategy in highly perseverative animals only
A repeated measures ANOVA with treatment as within-subject factor and baseline perseveration (high versus low perseveration) as between-subject factor revealed a significant main effect of drug (F 3,24 = 5507, p = 0.005, η 2 = 0.408) and a significant interactive effect of treatment with the probability of changing a response after a loss trial (F 3,24 = 3373, p = 0.035, η 2 = 0.297). Mean lose-shift probabilities indicated that moclobemide selectively increased the probability of shifting compared with vehicle or combination treatment after a loss trial in highly perseverative but not low-perseverative animals (Table 4). No other significant effects of drug treatment on the win-stay or lose-shift probabilities were observed (all p values >0.05).
MAO-A inhibition strongly increases 5-HT and NE content in OFC, DRN and BLA
The effects of selective MAO-A and MAO-B inhibition on brain monoamine content are shown in Fig. 6 and Table 3. For each chemical neuromodulator, a separate ANOVA model was tested. A two-way ANOVA with drug treatment and region as between-subject factors revealed significant main effects of treatment (F 3,119 = 82.17, p < 0.0001, η 2 = 0.627) with respect to 5-HT levels. Post hoc analyses of main effects (LSD) show that across all regions of interest, 5-HT levels were significantly higher following both high (16 mg/kg) and low (3 mg/kg) doses of moclobemide than following lazabemide or vehicle injections (all p < 0.0001). Notably, lazabemide did not increase 5-HT levels compared with the vehicle group (p = 0.6). However, the increase in 5-HT content induced by moclobemide was not uniform across all regions, as revealed by a significant treatment by region interaction (F 21,119 = 15.92, p < 0.0001, η 2 = 0.738). As shown in Fig. 6 and Table 3, average 5-HT levels increased 35 ± 10-fold (±CI0.95) following a high dose of moclobemide compared to vehicle in the OFC, 30 ± 13-fold in the DRN, 27 ± 17-fold in the lateral hypothalamus, 9 ± 4-fold in the BLA, and 4 ± 1-fold in the dorsomedial striatum.
MAO inhibition also produced significant changes in DA and NA content (F 3,118 = 33.70, p < 0.0001, η 2 = 0.461; F 3,120 = 29.69, p < 0.0001, η 2 = 0.426, respectively), with moclobemide significantly increasing DA and NA levels compared with both the vehicle and lazabemide groups (all p values <0.0001). However, DA and NA increases were not uniform across all areas, as indicated by the significant interaction between region and treatment (F 3,90 = 28.80, p < 0.0001, η 2 = 0.490; F 15,90 = 5.791, p < 0.0001, η 2 = 0.491, respectively). Strongest increases in average DA levels (11-fold) were found in the lateral hypothalamus, with up to 5-fold increases in other regions, including a 2-fold increase in the striatum (Fig. 6; Table 3). Similarly, 3-fold increases in NA were found in the OFC and DRN and up to 2-fold increases in other brain regions. MAO-B inhibition did not significantly affect 5-HT, DA, or NA levels compared to the vehicle treatment as revealed by post hoc contrasts (p = 0.60, p = 0.06, p = 0.24, respectively).
Discussion
The main findings of this investigation indicate that behavioral inflexibility, as measured by perseverative responding on a spatial reversal learning task, is multidimensional and linked to reduced anxiety and increased levels of circulating plasma 5-HT prior to behavioral training. Inflexible behavior on this task was significantly improved by MAO-A inhibition, but not by MAO-B inhibition, and was accompanied by strong increases in 5-HT and NE levels in the OFC, DRN, and BLA, as well as longer latencies to initiate a new trial following an incorrect, but not a correct response. These findings collectively indicate that inter-individual variation in behavioral flexibility correlates with low trait anxiety and peripheral measures of serotonergic function and is strongly and selectively modulated by MAO-A inhibition, which putatively may have the effect of strengthening behavioral inhibition in response to recent negative feedback.
Animals exhibiting high levels of perseverative responding during reversals of the instrumental contingency were less anxious on the elevated plus maze than low perseveration animals. At first glance, this finding appears to run counter to traditional views that anxiety relief is an important driver for maintaining compulsive behavior in OCD. However, although obsessions and compulsions may be accompanied by anxiety symptoms, and worsened by stress, a prominent causal role of anxiety in OCD for compulsive behavior is controversial and not widely accepted (Fineberg et al. 2010; Hollander et al. 2008; Stein et al. 2010). Moreover, to our knowledge, no studies have hitherto reported the direct relationship between trait-like variation in anxiety and behavioral flexibility in rodents. Nevertheless, consistent with the present study, high trait-like anxiety in marmoset monkeys has been associated with a tendency for improved flexibility on tasks that depend on the anterior OFC and ventrolateral PFC (Shiba et al. 2014). The explanation for the apparent inverse relationship between perseveration and trait anxiety is unclear but may be related to increased vigilance and/or enhanced sensitivity of highly anxious subjects to negative environmental cues and feedback (Bradley et al. 1999; Cisler and Koster 2010). Thus, following a shift in the stimulus-response (S-R) contingency, subjects exhibiting increased anxiety may be less likely to perseverate because their attention is drawn to the previously incorrect (i.e., non-reinforced) stimulus and through increased exploration more readily detect changes in the S-R contingency (Homberg and Lesch 2011). This hypothesis suggests that low-anxious, highly perseverative rats may disregard negative feedback in preference for positive stimuli, and this may be relevant to the beneficial effects of MAO-A inhibition on behavioral flexibility.
A small but significant component of the variance in perseveration was accounted for by plasma levels of 5-HT measured prior to training on the reversal learning task. No associations were found for circulating levels of the 5-HT precursor tryptophan or hormones linked to stress and the hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal axis (NE and corticosterone). While the latter markers provide further separation between perseveration and anxiety and stress responses, our exploratory finding of a positive relationship between perseveration and plasma 5-HT suggests a possible reciprocal relationship between peripheral and central measures of 5-HT function underlying natural variation in behavioral flexibility. Thus, in a recent study, rats stratified for high and low perseverations on an identical spatial reversal task exhibited reduced indices of serotonergic transmission in the DRN and OFC (Barlow et al. 2015). However, the exact mechanisms underlying the apparently opponent relationship between plasma and brain 5-HT remain unclear and would require further studies to directly contrast plasma 5-HT levels with task-related changes in extracellular 5-HT in the brain, in addition to assessing platelet MAO activity (Arrojo et al. 2007).
Using the same paradigm as the present study, we recently reported that high trait-like perseveration in rats is associated both with decreased MAO-A and MAO-B expressions in the dorsal raphé nucleus and increased MAO-A and MAO-B expression in the lateral OFC (Barlow et al. 2015). Highly perseverative animals exhibited reduced 5-HT metabolism and 5-HT2A receptors in the OFC compared with low-perseverative rats (Table 4). In the present study, the selective MAO-A inhibitor moclobemide, but not the MAO-B inhibitor lazabemide, significantly reduced the total number of trials and total errors animals made before they achieved the set criteria for reversal. Although both doses of moclobemide improved general reversal performance, only the highest dose (16 mg/kg) reduced the proportion of perseverative errors. Notably, the higher dose of moclobemide also prominently increased the time rats took to initiate a new trial following an incorrect response but not following a correct response. Similarly, only the high dose of moclobemide increased the probability of high- but not low-perseveration rats to change their response following an incorrect trial. These selective effects on trial outcome tend to rule out mechanisms relating to hyperactivity, a consequence of MAO inhibition (Barbelivien et al. 2001), and may instead indicate increased behavioral resilience to the negative feedback of non-reward or to error monitoring processes often associated in humans with the anterior cingulate cortex (via “error-related negativity”), which is also elevated in patients with OCD (Endrass and Ullsperger 2014).
The neural mechanism underlying the improvement in behavioral indices of cognitive flexibility by moclobemide is unclear but parsimoniously may involve a facilitation in serotonergic transmission in several other brain regions including the OFC and amygdaloid complex (Clarke et al. 2005, 2011; Izquierdo et al. 2016; Rygula et al. 2010). Reversible MAO-A inhibition profoundly increased 5-HT (and NA) content in every region assayed, including the DRN, BLA, and lateral OFC. Changes in DA content were less consistent, however, with significant increases evident only in the BLA and striatum. Central 5-HT plays a critical role in adaptive responses to aversive and threatening stimuli (Cools et al. 2008; Dayan and Huys 2009; Deakin and Graeff 1991) and low levels of 5-HT produced by acute dietary tryptophan depletion lead to negatively-biased decision-making (Cools et al. 2008; Rogers et al. 2003). In rats, 5-HT exerts complex effects on reward sensitivity and negative feedback (Bari et al. 2010; Rygula et al. 2015). For instance, acute 5-HT reuptake inhibition with a high dose of citalopram (10 mg/kg) decreased the sensitivity of rats to negative feedback in a probabilistic reversal learning task and facilitated behavioral flexibility (Bari et al. 2010), while the same dose was found to improve behavioral flexibility on a spatial reversal learning task (Barlow et al. 2015). However, it is less clear how the reported effects of moclobemide on reversal learning relate to measures of anxiety. While MAO-A inhibition produces anxiolytic effects in rats (Caille et al. 1996; Eroğlu and Güven 1998), both acute activation of the serotonergic dorsal raphé nucleus (Urban et al. 2015) and acutely administered selective 5-HT inhibitors (Birkett et al. 2011; Mombereau et al. 2010) increase anxiety. These findings thus suggest that the anxiolytic effects of MAO-A inhibitors, including moclobemide, are unlikely to be due to acute increases in 5-HT transmission and implicate as a result other neurotransmitter systems in this effect, including NA (see Eroğlu and Güven 1998). Since low anxiety was associated with high trait-like levels of perseveration, it is unlikely that moclobemide, with presumed anxiolytic effects, improved reversal learning by reducing anxiety.
Although citalopram and moclobemide both facilitated reversal performance, the effect size of moclobemide was significantly larger than that of citalopram (compare Barlow et al. 2015). This difference may be explained by the effects of SSRIs to simultaneously exert biphasic inhibitory and facilitating effects on 5-HT transmission through blockade of 5-HT reuptake and activation of inhibitory somatodendritic 5-HT1A autoreceptors in the DRN (Sprouse and Aghajanian 1987). Thus, high doses of citalopram have the effect of increasing extracellular levels of 5-HT in the PFC, as measured by in vivo microdialysis (Invernizzi et al. 1992) but not at lower doses, which activate inhibitory 5-HT autoreceptors and diminish the activity of serotonergic neurons in the DRN (Gardier et al. 1996). In contrast, MAO-A inhibition does not affect the function of 5-HT autoreceptors, even after long-term administration, (Blier et al. 1988), and consistently increases 5-HT levels by inhibiting its decomposition (Kumagae et al. 1991; Stahl 2015). Thus, unlike citalopram that dose-dependently impairs and improves reversal learning (Bari et al. 2010), moclobemide apparently exerts monophasic effects on 5-HT transmission and strongly promotes behavioral flexibility.
In addition to its effects on 5-HT, MAO-A inhibition also increased NE levels in the lateral OFC, PFC, and DRN. While some studies report that acute NE reuptake inhibition and α-2A receptor activation improves intradimensional (ID) reversal performance (Seu and Jentsch 2009; Steere and Arnsten 1997), other studies using similar manipulations report effects on extradimensional reversal learning (e.g., Bradshaw et al. 2016). Moreover, central NE depletion did not impair performance on a taste/tactile reversal task (Jarbe et al. 1988) and NE efflux increased only weakly in the rat medial PFC during the reversal phase of a serial reversal learning task (Van Der Meulen et al. 2007), suggesting that NE may be less important for behavioral adaptation following changing stimulus-reward contingencies than for general attentional processes needed for successful set-shifting (Cain et al. 2011; Tait et al. 2007; Totah et al. 2015).
Contrasting with the effects of moclobemide, selective MAO-B inhibition with lazabemide produced no significant effects on task performance nor did this compound affect tissue levels and turnover of 5-HT, DA, and NE in a number of cortical and subcortical regions. These negative findings were very unlikely to be due an insufficient dose of lazabemide since much lower doses were reported to inhibit ex vivo MAO-B activity by over 80% while leaving MAO-A activity unaffected (2 mg/kg (Henriot et al. 1994); 1 mg/kg (Jolkkonen et al. 2000)). Moreover, the selected high dose of lazabemide (10 mg/kg) has been shown to produce robust behavioral effects in other settings (Maki et al. 2000). Rather, the absence of significant effects of lazabemide in the present study is more consistent with its high selectivity for the MAO-B subtype that preferentially targets trace amines (Shih and Thompson 1999). The singular contribution of MAO-A inhibition to promoting behavioral flexibility was confirmed by the combination treatment of moclobemide and lazabemide, which mimicked the effects of moclobemide alone.
In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that selective and reversible inhibition of MAO-A but not MAO-B activity enhances behavioral indices of cognitive flexibility regardless of baseline flexibility on a spatial-discrimination reversal learning task. Our results show, apparently for the first time, that natural variation in behavioral flexibility is partly predicted by reduced measures of trait-like anxiety and increased plasma levels of 5-HT. Since cognitive flexibility is impaired in OCD (Watkins et al. 2005) and unaffected first-degree relatives of OCD patients (Chamberlain et al. 2007), the index of perseveration used in the present study may represent an endophenotype to support a deeper understanding of etiological mechanisms in OCD and related disorders. Our findings specifically implicate MAO-A in modulating cognitive flexibility and encourage further investigations of this ubiquitous enzyme as a target for diagnosis and treatment.
References
Arrojo M, Baca-Garcia E, Perez-Rodriguez MM, Dolengevich-Segal H, Navio-Acosta M, Rodriguez-Salgado B, Saiz-Ruiz J (2007) Platelet monoamine oxidase activity in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Eur Psychiatry 22:525–529. doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2007.06.006
Atkinson HC, Wood SA, Kershaw YM, Bate E, Lightman SL (2006) Diurnal variation in the responsiveness of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis of the male rat to noise stress. J Neuroendocrinol 18:526–533. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2826.2006.01444.x
Barbelivien A, Nyman L, Haapalinna A, Sirviö J (2001) Inhibition of MAO-A activity enhances behavioural activity of rats assessed using water maze and open arena tasks. Pharmacol Toxicol 88:304–312. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0773.2001.880604.x
Bari A, Theobald DE, Caprioli D, Mar AC, Aidoo-Micah A, Dalley JW, Robbins TW (2010) Serotonin modulates sensitivity to reward and negative feedback in a probabilistic reversal learning task in rats. Neuropsychopharmacology 35:1290–1301. doi:10.1038/npp.2009.233
Barlow RL, Alsiö J, Jupp B, Rabinovich R, Shrestha S, Roberts AC, Robbins TW, Dalley JW (2015) Markers of serotonergic function in the orbitofrontal cortex and dorsal Raphé nucleus predict individual variation in spatial-discrimination serial reversal learning. Neuropsychopharmacology 40:1619–1630. doi:10.1038/npp.2014.335
Birkett MA, Shinday NM, Kessler EJ, Meyer JS, Ritchie S, Rowlett JK (2011) Acute anxiogenic-like effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are attenuated by the benzodiazepine diazepam in BALB/c mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 98:544–551. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2010.12.017.Two-stage
Blier P, Chaput Y, De Montigny C (1988) Long-term 5-HT reuptake blockade, but not monoamine oxidase inhibition, decreases the function of terminal 5-HT autoreceptors: an electrophysiological study in the rat brain. Naunyn Schmiedeberg’s Arch Pharmacol 337:246–254
Boulougouris V, Robbins TW (2010) Enhancement of spatial reversal learning by 5-HT2C receptor antagonism is neuroanatomically specific. J Neurosci 30:930–938. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4312-09.2010
Boulougouris V, Dalley JW, Robbins TW (2007) Effects of orbitofrontal, infralimbic and prelimbic cortical lesions on serial spatial reversal learning in the rat. Behav Brain Res 179:219–228. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2007.02.005
Boulougouris V, Glennon JC, Robbins TW (2008) Dissociable effects of selective 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptor antagonists on serial spatial reversal learning in rats. Neuropsychopharmacology 33:2007–2019. doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1301584
Bradley BP, Mogg K, White J, Groom C, de Bono J (1999) Attentional bias for emotional faces in generalized anxiety disorder. Br J Clin Psychol 38(Pt 3):267–278
Bradshaw SE, Agster KL, Waterhouse BD, McGaughy JA (2016) Age-related changes in prefrontal norepinephrine transporter density: the basis for improved cognitive flexibility after low doses of atomoxetine in adolescent rats. Brain Res 1641:245–257. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2016.01.001
Caille D, Bergis OE, Fankhauser C, Gardes A, Adam R, Charieras T, Grosset A, Rovei V, Jarreau FX (1996). Befloxatone, a new reversible and selective monoamine oxidase-A inhibitor. II. Pharmacological profile. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 277:265–277
Cain RE, Wasserman MC, Waterhouse BD, McGaughy JA (2011) Atomoxetine facilitates attentional set shifting in adolescent rats. Dev Cogn Neurosci 1:552–559. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2011.04.003.Atomoxetine
Cardinal RN, Aitken MRF (2010) Whisker: a client-server high-performance multimedia research control system. Behav Res Methods 42:1059–1071. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.4.1059
Carter RN, Pinnock SB, Herbert J (2004) Does the amygdala modulate adaptation to repeated stress? Neuroscience 126:9–19. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.01.018
Castane A, Theobald DEH, Robbins TW (2010) Selective lesions of the dorsomedial striatum impair serial spatial reversal learning in rats. Behav Brain Res 210:74–83. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2010.02.017
Chamberlain SR, Fineberg NA, Menzies LA, Blackwell AD, Bullmore ET, Chir MBB, Robbins TW (2007) Impaired cognitive flexibility and motor inhibition in unaffected first-degree relatives of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Am J Psychiatry 164:335–338. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.164.2.335.Impaired
Cisler JM, Koster EHW (2010) Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders: an integrative review. Clin Psychol Rev 30:203–216. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2009.11.003
Clarke HF, Walker SC, Crofts HS, Dalley JW, Robbins TW, Roberts AC (2005) Prefrontal serotonin depletion affects reversal learning but not attentional set shifting. J Neurosci 25:532–538. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3690-04.2005
Clarke HF, Walker SC, Dalley JW, Robbins TW, Roberts AC (2007) Cognitive inflexibility after prefrontal serotonin depletion is behaviorally and neurochemically specific. Cereb Cortex 17:18–27. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhj120
Clarke HF, Hill GJ, Robbins TW, Roberts AC (2011) Dopamine, but not serotonin, regulates reversal learning in the marmoset caudate nucleus. J Neurosci 31:4290–4297. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5066-10.2011
Cools R, Roberts AC, Robbins TW (2008) Serotoninergic regulation of emotional and behavioural control processes. Trends Cogn Sci 12:31–40. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.10.011
Cools R, Nakamura K, Daw ND (2011) Serotonin and dopamine: unifying affective, activational, and decision functions. Neuropsychopharmacology 36:98–113. doi:10.1038/npp.2010.121
Costello AB, Osborne JW (2005) Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pract Assessement Res Eval 10:27–29. doi:10.1.1.110.9154
Da Prada M, Kettler R, Haefely E (1988) Neurochemical profile of moclobemide, a short-acting reversible inhibitor of monoamine oxidase type A1. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 248
Dalley JW, Theobald DE, Eagle DM, Passetti F, Robbins TW (2002) Deficits in impulse control associated with tonically-elevated serotonergic function in rat prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychopharmacology 26:716–728. doi:10.1016/S0893-133X(01)00412-2
Danet M, Lapiz-Bluhm S, Morilak DA (2010) A cognitive deficit induced in rats by chronic intermittent cold stress is reversed by chronic antidepressant treatment. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 13:997–1009. doi:10.1017/S1461145710000039
Dayan P, Huys QJM (2009) Serotonin in affective control. Annu Rev Neurosci 32:95–126. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135607
Deakin JFW, Graeff FG (1991) 5-HT and the mechanisms of defence. J Psychopharmacol 5:305–315. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.10.002.This
Dias R, Robbins TW, Roberts AC (1996) Dissociation in prefrontal cortex of affective and attentional shifts. Nature. doi:10.1038/380069a0
Endrass T, Ullsperger M (2014) Specificity of performance monitoring changes in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 46:124–138. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.03.024
Eroğlu L, Güven O (1998) The effects of moclobemide on the yohimbine-induced anxiogenic action in the elevated plus-maze. Pharmacol Res 37:137–143. doi:10.1006/phrs.1997.0275
Fineberg NA, Potenza MN, Chamberlain SR, Berlin HA, Menzies L, Bechara A, Sahakian BJ, Robbins TW, Bullmore ET, Hollander E (2010) Probing compulsive and impulsive behaviors, from animal models to endophenotypes: a narrative review. Neuropsychopharmacology 35:591–604. doi:10.1038/npp.2009.185
Gardier AM, Malagie I, Trillat AC, Jacquot C, Artigas F (1996) Role of 5-HT1A autoreceptors in the mechanism of action of serotoninergic antidepressant drugs: recent findings from in vivo microdialysis studies. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 10:16–27
Henriot S, Kuhn C, Kettler R, Da Prada M (1994) Lazabemide (Ro 19-6327), a reversible and highly sensitive MAO-B inhibitor: preclinical and clinical findings. J Neural Transm 41:321–325
Hollander E, Braun A, Simeon D (2008) Should OCD leave the anxiety disorders in DSM-V? The case for obsessive compulsive-related disorders. Depress Anxiety 25:317–329. doi:10.1002/da.20500
Homberg JR, Lesch KP (2011) Looking on the bright side of serotonin transporter gene variation. Biol Psychiatry 69:513–519. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.09.024
Invernizzi R, Belli S, Samanin R (1992) Citalopram’s ability to increase the extracellular concentrations of serotonin in the dorsal raphe prevents the drug’s effect in the frontal cortex. Brain Res 584:322–324. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(92)90914-U
Izquierdo A, Darling C, Manos N, Pozos H, Kim C, Ostrander S, Cazares V, Stepp H, Rudebeck PH (2013) Basolateral amygdala lesions facilitate reward choices after negative feedback in rats. J Neurosci 33:4105–4109. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4942-12.2013
Izquierdo A, Brigman JL, Radke AK, Rudebeck PH, Holmes A (2016) The neural basis of reversal learning: an updated perspective. Neuroscience. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.03.021
Jarbe T, Falk U, Mohammed A, Archer T (1988) Acquisition and reversal of taste/tactile discrimination after forebrain noradrenaline depletion. Behav Neurosci 102:925–933
Jolkkonen, J., Kauppinen, R., Nyman, L., Haapalinna, A., Sivenius, J., 2000. MAO-B inhibition by a single dose of l-deprenyl or lazabemide does not prevent neuronal damage following focal cerebral ischaemia in rats 242–245.
Kitaichi Y, Inoue T, Nakagawa S, Izumi T, Koyama T (2006) Effect of co-administration of subchronic lithium pretreatment and acute MAO inhibitors on extracellular monoamine levels and the expression of contextual conditioned fear in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 532:236–245. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2005.12.078
Kitaichi Y, Inoue T, Nakagawa S, Boku S, Izumi T, Koyama T (2010) Combined treatment with MAO-A inhibitor and MAO-B inhibitor increases extracellular noradrenaline levels more than MAO-A inhibitor alone through increases in beta-phenylethylamine. Eur J Pharmacol 637:77–82. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2010.04.014
Kumagae Y, Matsui Y, Iwata N (1991) Deamination of norepinephrine, dopamine and serotonin regions by type a monoamine oxidase in discrete regions of the rat brain and inhibition by RS-8359. Japan J Pharmacol 128:121–128
Lapiz-Bluhm MDS, Soto-Piña AE, Hensler JG, Morilak DA (2009) Chronic intermittent cold stress and serotonin depletion induce deficits of reversal learning in an attentional set-shifting test in rats. Psychopharmacology 202:329–341. doi:10.1007/s00213-008-1224-6
Maki Y, Inoue T, Izumi T, Muraki I, Ito K, Kitaichi Y, Li X, Koyama T (2000) Monoamine oxidase inhibitors reduce conditioned fear stress-induced freezing behavior in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 406:411–418. doi:10.1016/S0014-2999(00)00706-8
Malyszko J, Urano T, Serizawa K, Yan D, Kozima Y, Takada Y, Takada A (1993) Serotonergic measures in blood and brain and their correlations in rats treated with tranylcypromine, a monoamine oxidase inhibitor. Jpn J Physiol. doi:10.2170/jjphysiol.43.613
Molander AC, Mar A, Norbury A, Steventon S, Moreno M, Caprioli D, Theobald DEH, Belin D, Everitt BJ, Robbins TW, Dalley JW (2011) High impulsivity predicting vulnerability to cocaine addiction in rats: some relationship with novelty preference but not novelty reactivity, anxiety or stress. Psychopharmacology 215:721–731. doi:10.1007/s00213-011-2167-x
Mombereau C, Gur TL, Onksen J, Blendy JA (2010) Differential effects of acute and repeated citalopram in mouse models of anxiety and depression. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 13:321–334. doi:10.1017/S1461145709990630
Ochoa JG, Stolyarova A, Kaur A, Hart E, Bugarin A, Izquierdo A (2015) Post-training depletions of basolateral amygdala serotonin fail to disrupt discrimination, retention, or reversal learning. Front Neurosci 9:1–10. doi:10.3389/fnins.2015.00155
Palkovits M (1973) Isolated removal of hypothalamic or other brain nuclei of the rat. Brain Res 59:449–450. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(73)90290-4
Paxinos G, Watson C (2013) The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates. Academic Press, San Diego
Robbins TW, Gillan CM, Smith DG, de Wit S, Ersche KD (2012) Neurocognitive endophenotypes of impulsivity and compulsivity: towards dimensional psychiatry. Trends Cogn Sci 16:81–91. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.009
Roberts AC (2006) Primate orbitofrontal cortex and adaptive behaviour. Trends Cogn Sci 10:83–90. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.002
Roberts AC (2011) The importance of serotonin for orbitofrontal function. Biol Psychiatry 69:1185–1191. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.12.037
Rogers RD, Tunbridge EM, Bhagwagar Z, Drevets WC, Sahakian BJ, Carter CS (2003) Tryptophan depletion alters the decision-making of healthy volunteers through altered processing of reward cues. Neuropsychopharmacology 28:153–162. doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1300001
Rygula R, Walker SC, Clarke HF, Robbins TW, Roberts AC (2010) Differential contributions of the primate ventrolateral prefrontal and orbitofrontal cortex to serial reversal learning. J Neurosci 30:14552–14559. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2631-10.2010
Rygula R, Clarke HF, Cardinal RN, Cockcroft GJ, Xia J, Dalley JW, Robbins TW, Roberts AC (2015) Role of central serotonin in anticipation of rewarding and punishing outcomes: effects of selective amygdala or orbitofrontal 5-HT depletion. Cereb Cortex 25:3064–3076. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu102
Schoenbaum G, Roesch MR, Stalnaker TA (2009) A new perspective on the role of the orbitofrontal cortex in adaptive behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci 10:885–892. doi:10.1038/nrn2753
Seu E, Jentsch JD (2009) Effect of acute and repeated treatment with desipramine or methylphenidate on serial reversal learning in rats. Neuropharmacology 57:665–672. doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2009.08.007
Shiba Y, Santangelo AM, Braesicke K, Agustín-Pavón C, Cockcroft G, Haggard M, Roberts AC (2014) Individual differences in behavioral and cardiovascular reactivity to emotive stimuli and their relationship to cognitive flexibility in a primate model of trait anxiety. Front Behav Neurosci 8:137. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00137
Shih JC, Thompson RF (1999) Monoamine oxidase in neuropsychiatry and behavior. Am J Hum Genet 65:593–598. doi:10.1086/302562
Sprouse JS, Aghajanian GK (1987) Electrophysiological responses of serotoninergic dorsal raphe neurons to 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B agonists. Synapse 1:3–9. doi:10.1002/syn.890010103
Stahl, S., 1985. Platelets as pharmacological models for the receptors and biochemistry of monoaminergic neurons., in: The platelets: physiology and pharmacology. p. 340.
Stahl S (2015) Stahl’s essential psychopharmacology . doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004Chapter 5
Stalnaker T a, Takahashi Y, Roesch MR, Schoenbaum G (2009) Neural substrates of cognitive inflexibility after chronic cocaine exposure. Neuropharmacology 56:63–72. doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.07.019
Steere J, Arnsten A (1997) The alpha-2A noradrenergic receptor agonist guanfacine improves visual object discrimination reversal performance in aged rhesus monkeys. Behav Neurosci 111:883–891
Stein DJ, Fineberg NA, Bienvenu OJ, Denys D, Lochner C, Nestadt G, Leckman JF, Rauch SL, Phillips KA (2010) Should ocd be classified as an anxiety disorder in DSM-V? Depress Anxiety 27:495–506. doi:10.1002/da.20699
Tait DS, Brown VJ, Farovik A, Theobald DE, Dalley JW, Robbins TW (2007) Lesions of the dorsal noradrenergic bundle impair attentional set-shifting in the rat. Eur J Neurosci 25:3719–3724. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05612.x
Totah NK, Logothetis NK, Eschenko O (2015) Atomoxetine accelerates attentional set shifting without affecting learning rate in the rat. Psychopharmacology 232:3697–3707. doi:10.1007/s00213-015-4028-5
Urban DJ, Zhu H, Marcinkiewcz CA, Michaelides M, Oshibuchi H, Rhea D, Aryal DK, Farrell MS, Lowery-Gionta E, Olsen RHJ, Wetsel WC, Kash TL, Hurd YL, Tecott LH, Roth BL (2015) Elucidation of the behavioral program and neuronal network encoded by dorsal raphe serotonergic neurons. Neuropsychopharmacology 41:1–12. doi:10.1038/npp.2015.293
Van Der Meulen JAJ, Joosten RNJMA, De Bruin JPC, Feenstra MGP (2007) Dopamine and noradrenaline efflux in the medial prefrontal cortex during serial reversals and extinction of instrumental goal-directed behavior. Cereb Cortex 17:1444–1453. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl057
Voon V, Derbyshire K, Rück C, Irvine MA, Worbe Y, Enander J, Schreiber LRN, Gillan C, Fineberg NA, Sahakian BJ, Robbins TW, Harrison NA, Wood J, Daw ND, Dayan P, Grant JE, Bullmore ET (2015) Disorders of compulsivity: a common bias towards learning habits. Mol Psychiatry 20:345–352. doi:10.1038/mp.2014.44
Walf AA, Frye CA (2007) The use of the elevated plus maze as an assay of anxiety-related behavior in rodents. Nat Protoc 2:322–328. doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.44
Wallace A, Pehrson AL, Sánchez C, Morilak DA (2014) Vortioxetine restores reversal learning impaired by 5-HT depletion or chronic intermittent cold stress in rats. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 17:1695–1706. doi:10.1017/S1461145714000571
Watkins LH, Sahakian BJ, Robertson MM, Veale DM, Rogers RD, Pickard KM, Aitken MRF, Robbins TW (2005) Executive function in Tourette’s syndrome and obsessive–compulsive disorder. Psychol Med 571–582
Windle RJ, Wood SA, Shanks N, Lightman SL, Ingram CD (1998) Ultradian rhythm of basal corticosterone release in the female rat: dynamic interaction with the response to acute stress. Endocrinology 139:1–8
Zolkowska D, Rothman RB, Baumann MH (2006) Amphetamine analogs increase plasma serotonin: implications for cardiac and pulmonary disease. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 318:604–610. doi:10.1124/jpet.106.101618
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Medical Research Council Grants (G0701500, G9536855), a Wellcome Trust Senior Investigator Award to TW Robbins (106431/Z/14/Z).and by a Core Award from the Medical Research Council (G1000183) and Wellcome Trust (093875/Z/10/Z) to the Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute. PZ was supported by the Pinsent Darwin studentship from the Physiology, Development, and Neuroscience Department. JA was supported by a Fellowship from the Swedish Research Council. BJ was supported by Fellowships from the AXA Research Fund, the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, and the Cambridge Newton Trust.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Experiments complied with the UK Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act of 1986 and were approved by the ethics review committee at Cambridge University.
Funding and disclosures
TWR consults for Cambridge Cognition, Lilly, Merck Sharpe and Dohme, Lundbeck, Teva, Shire Pharmaceuticals, Otsuka and Chempartners and has held recent research grants with Lilly and Lundbeck. TWR has also received royalties from Cambridge Cognition (CANTAB), Springer and Elsevier. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-017-4674-x.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhukovsky, P., Alsiö, J., Jupp, B. et al. Perseveration in a spatial-discrimination serial reversal learning task is differentially affected by MAO-A and MAO-B inhibition and associated with reduced anxiety and peripheral serotonin levels. Psychopharmacology 234, 1557–1571 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-017-4569-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-017-4569-x