Abstract
Rationale
Contextual stimuli present during drug experiences become associated with the drug through Pavlovian conditioning and are thought to sustain drug-seeking behavior. Thus, extinction of conditioned responses is an important target for treatment. To date, acquisition and extinction to drug-paired cues have been studied in animal models or drug-dependent individuals, but rarely in non-drug users.
Objective
We have recently developed a procedure to study acquisition of conditioned responses after single doses of methamphetamine (MA) in healthy volunteers. Here, we examined extinction of these responses and their persistence after conditioning.
Methods
Healthy adults (18–35 years; N = 20) received two pairings of audio-visual stimuli with MA (20 mg oral) or placebo. Responses to stimuli were assessed before and after conditioning, using three tasks: behavioral preference, attentional bias, and subjective “liking.”
Results
Subjects exhibited behavioral preference for the drug-paired stimuli at the first post-conditioning test, but this declined rapidly on subsequent extinction tests. They also exhibited a bias to initially look towards the drug-paired stimuli at the first post-test session, but not thereafter. Subjects who experienced more positive subjective drug effects during conditioning exhibited a smaller decline in preference during the extinction phase. Further, longer inter-session intervals during the extinction phase were associated with less extinction of the behavioral preference measure.
Conclusions
Conditioned responses after two pairings with MA extinguish quickly, and are influenced by both subjective drug effects and the extinction interval. Characterizing and refining this conditioning procedure will aid in understanding the acquisition and extinction processes of drug-related conditioned responses in humans.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Psychiatric A (2000) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR, 4th edn. American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC. doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890423349.7060
Annau Z, Kamin LJ (1961) The conditioned emotional response as a function of US intensity. J Comp Physiol Psychol 54:428–432. doi:10.1037/h0042199
Bedi G, Preston KL, Epstein DH, Heishman SJ, Marrone GF, Shaham Y, de Wit H (2011) Incubation of cue-induced cigarette craving during abstinence in human smokers. Biol Psychiatry 69:708–711. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.07.014
Bozarth MA (Ed) (1987) Methods of assessing the reinforcing properties of abused drugs. Springer-Verlag New York. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-4812-5
Braver TS, Barch DM, Gray JR, Molfese DL, Snyder A (2001) Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: effects of frequency, inhibition and errors. Cereb Cortex 11:825–836. doi:10.1093/cercor/11.9.825
Cain CK, Blouin AM, Barad M (2003) Temporally massed CS presentations generate more fear extinction than spaced presentations. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 29:323–333. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.29.4.323
Chait LD, Fischman MW, Schuster CR (1985) “Hangover” effects the morning after marijuana smoking. Drug Alcohol Depend 15:229–238. doi:10.1016/0376-8716(85)90002-x
Collins B, Brandon T (2002) Effects of extinction and retrieval cues on alcohol cue reactivity among nonalcoholic drinkers. J Consult Clin Psychol 70:390–397. doi:10.1037//0022-006x.70.2.390
Conklin CA, Tiffany ST (2002) Applying extinction research and theory to cue-exposure addiction treatments. Addiction 97:155–167. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00014.x
Cook CE, Jeffcoat AR, Sadler BM, Hill JM, Voyksner RD, Pugh DE, White WR, Perez-Reyes M (1992) Pharmacokinetics of oral methamphetamine and effects of repeated daily dosing in humans. Drug Metab Dispos 20:856–862
de Wit H, Stewart J (1981) Reinstatement of cocaine-reinforced responding in the rat. Psychopharmacology 75:134–143. doi:10.1007/bf00432175
Drobes D, Tiffany S (1997) Induction of smoking urge through imaginal and in vivo procedures: physiological and self-report manifestations. J Abnorm Psychol 106:15–25. doi:10.1037/0021-843x.106.1.15
Drummond DC (2001) Theories of craving ancient and modern. Addiction 96:33–46. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.961333.x
Ehrman RN, Robbins SJ, Childress AR, O’Brien CP (1992) Conditioned responses to cocaine-related stimuli in cocaine abuse patients. Psychopharmacology 107:523–529. doi:10.1007/bf02245266
Fareri DS, Martin LN, Delgado MR (2008) Reward-related processing in the human brain: developmental considerations. Dev Psychopathol 20:1191–1211. doi:10.1017/s0954579408000576
Ferguson S, Shiffman S (2009) The relevance and treatment of cue-induced cravings in tobacco dependence. J Subst Abuse Treat 36:235–243. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2008.06.005
Field M, Cox WM (2008) Attentional bias in addictive behaviors: a review of its development causes and consequence. Drug Alcohol Depend 97:1–20. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.03.030
Field M, Eastwood B (2005) Experimental manipulation of attentional bias increases the motivation to drink alcohol. Psychopharmacology 183:350–357. doi:10.1007/s00213-005-0202-5
Flaten M, Blumenthal T (1999) Caffeine-associated stimuli elicit conditioned responses: an experimental model of the placebo effect. Psychopharmacology 145:105–112. doi:10.1007/s002130051038
Foltin R, Haney M (2000) Conditioned effects of environmental stimuli paired with smoked cocaine in humans. Psychopharmacology 149:24–336. doi:10.1007/s002139900340
Fuster JM (2002) Frontal lobe and cognitive development. J Neurocytol 31:373–385. doi:10.1023/A:1024190429920
Garland EL, Franken IH, Howard MO (2012) Cue-elicited heart rate variability and attentional bias predict alcohol relapse following treatment. Psychopharmacology 222:17–26. doi:10.1007/s00213-011-2618-4
Geier A, Mucha RF, Pauli P (2000) Appetitive nature of drug cues confirmed with physiological measures in a model using pictures of smoking. Psychopharmacology 150:283–291. doi:10.1007/s002130000404
Havermans RC, Jansen AT (2003) Increasing the efficacy of cue exposure treatment in preventing relapse of addictive behavior. Addict Behav 28:989–994. doi:10.1016/S0306-4603(01)00289-1
Johanson CE, Uhlenhuth EH (1980) Drug preference and mood in humans: D-amphetamine. Psychopharmacology 71:275–279. doi:10.1007/bf00433062
Kamboj SK, Massey-Chase R, Rodney L, Das R, Almahdi B, Curran HV, Morgan CJ (2011) Changes in cue reactivity and attentional bias following experimental cue exposure and response prevention: a laboratory study of the effects of D-cycloserine in heavy drinkers. Psychopharmacology 217:25–37. doi:10.1007/s00213-011-2254-z
Kilts CD, Schweizer JB, Quinn CK, Gross RE, Muhammad TF, Ely TD, Hoffman JM, Drexler KPG (2001) Neural activity related to drug craving in cocaine addiction. Arch Gen Psychiatry 58:334–341. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.58.4.334
LaBerge D (1995) Attentional processing. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674183940
LaRowe S, Saladin M, Carpenter M, Upadhyaya H (2007) Reactivity to nicotine cues over repeated cue reactivity sessions. Addict Behav 32:2888–2899. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.04.025
Lazev A, Herzog T, Brandon T (1999) Classical conditioning of environmental cues to cigarette smoking. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 7:56–63. doi:10.1037/1064-1297.7.1.56
Lejuez CW, Aklin W, Daughters S, Zvolensky M, Kahler C, Gwadz M (2007) Reliability and validity of the youth version of the balloon analogue risk task (BART-Y) in the assessment of risk-taking behavior among inner-city adolescents. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 36:106–111. doi:10.1207/s15374424jccp3601_11
Leth-Steensen C, Elbaz ZK, Douglas VI (2000) Mean response times, variability, and skew in the responding of ADHD children: a response time distributional approach. Acta Psychol (Amst) 104:167–190. doi:10.1016/s0001-6918(00)00019-6
Li SH, Westbrook RF (2008) Massed extinction trials produced better short-term but worse long-term loss of context conditioned fear responses than spaced trials. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 34:336–351. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.34.3.336
MacKillop J, Lisman S (2008) Effects of a context shift and multiple context extinction on reactivity to alcohol cues. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 16:322–331. doi:10.1037/a0012686
Martin WR, Sloan JW, Sapira JD, Jasinski DR (1971) Physiologic, subjective, and behavioral effects of amphetamine, methamphetamine, ephedrine, phenmetrazine, and methylphenidate in man. Clin Pharm Ther 12:245–258. doi:10.1002/cpt/1971122part1245
Martin-Soelch C, Linthicum J, Ernst M (2007) Appetitive conditioning: neural bases and implications for psychopathology. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 31:426–440. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.11.002
Mayo LM, de Wit H (2015) Acquisition of responses to a methamphetamine-associated cue in healthy humans: self-report behavioral and psychophysiological measures. Neuropsychopharmacology 40:1734–1741. doi:10.1038/npp.2015.21
Mayo LM, Fraser D, Childs E, Momenan R, Hommer DW, de Wit H, Heilig M (2013) Conditioned preference to a methamphetamine-associated contextual cue in humans. Neuropsychopharmacology 38:921–929. doi:10.1038/npp.2013.3
McNair D, Lorr M, Droppleman L (1971) Profile of mood states. Educational and Industrial Testing Service, San Diego
Mucha R, Pauli P, Angrilli A (1998) Conditioned responses elicited by experimentally produced cues for smoking. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 76:259–268. doi:10.1139/y98-022
O’Brien C, Childress A, McLellan T, Ehrman R (1990) Integrating systematic cue exposure with standard treatment in recovering drug dependent patients. Addict Behav 15:335–365. doi:10.1016/0306-4603(90)90045-y
O’Brien C, Childress A, McLellan AT, Ehrman R (1992) Classical conditioning in drug-dependent humans. Ann N Y Acad Sci 654:400–415. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1992.tb25984.x
Oler D, Baum M (1968) Facilitated extinction of an avoidance response through shortening of the inter-trial interval. Psychon Sci 11:323–324. doi:10.3758/bf03328213
Powell J, Dawkins L, West R, Powell J, Pickering A (2010) Relapse to smoking during unaided cessation: clinical cognitive and motivational predictors. Psychopharmacology 212:537–549. doi:10.1007/s00213-010-1975-8
Price KL, Saladin ME, Baker NL, Tolliver BK, DeSantis SM, McRae-Clark AL, Brady KT (2010) Extinction of drug cue reactivity in methamphetamine-dependent individuals. Behav Res Ther 48:860–865. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2010.05.010
Rawson RA (2013) Current research on the epidemiology medical and psychiatric effects and treatment of methamphetamine use. J Food Drug Anal 21:S77–S81. doi:10.1016/j.jfda.2013.09.039
Rescorla RA, Durlach PJ (1987) The role of context in intertrial interval effects in autoshaping. Q J Exp Psychol 39B:35–48. doi:10.1080/14640748708402250
Robbins SJ, Ehrman RN (2004) The role of attentional bias in substance abuse. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev 3:243–260. doi:10.1177/1534582305275423
Robinson T, Berridge K (1993) The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 18:247–291. doi:10.1097/00008877-199308000-00021
Rutten K, van der Kam EL, De Vry J, Tzschentke TM (2011) Critical evaluation of the use of extinction paradigms for the assessment of opioid-induced conditioned place preference in rats. Pharmacology 87:286–296. doi:10.1159/000327680
See R (2002) Neural substrates of conditioned-cued relapse to drug-seeking behavior. Pharmacol, Biochem Behav 71:517–529. doi:10.1016/s0091-3057(01)00682-7
See R (2005) Neural substrates of cocaine-cue associations that trigger relapse. Eur J Pharmacol 526:140–146. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2005.09.034
Sell L, Morris J, Bearn J, Frackowiak R, Friston K, Dolan R (2000) Neural responses associated with cue evoked emotional states and heroin in opiate addicts. Drug Alcohol Depend 60:207–216. doi:10.1016/s0376-8716(99)00158-1
Shaham Y, Shalev U, Lu L, de Wit H (2003) The reinstatement model of drug relapse: history methodology and major findings. Psychopharmacology 168:3–20. doi:10.1007/s00213-002-1224-x
Sheynin J, Shikari S, Gluck MA, Moustafa AA, Servatius RJ, Myers CE (2013) Enhanced avoidance learning in behaviorally inhibited young men and women. Stress 16:289–299. doi:10.3109/10253890.2012.744391
Sinha R (2009) Modeling stress and drug craving in the laboratory: implications for addiction treatment development. Addict Biol 14:84–89. doi:10.1111/j.1369-1600.2008.00134.x
Thewissen R, Snijders S, Havermans R, van den Hout M, Jansen A (2006) Renewal of cue-elicited urge to smoke: implications for cue exposure treatment. Behav Res Ther 44:1441–1449. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2005.10.010
Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Telang F, Fowler JS, Logan J, Childress AR, Jayne M, Ma Y, Wong C (2006) Cocaine cues and dopamine in dorsal striatum: mechanism of craving in cocaine addiction. J Neurosci 26:6583–6588. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1544-06.2006
Wardle MC, Garner MJ, Munafo ME, de Wit H (2012) Amphetamine as a social drug: effects of d-amphetamine on social processing and behavior. Psychopharmacology 223:199–210. doi:10.1007/s00213-012-2708-y
Waters AJ, Shiffman S, Bradley BP, Mogg K (2003a) Attentional shifts to smoking cues in smokers. Addiction 98:1409–1417. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00465.x
Waters A, Shiffman S, Sayette M, Paty J, Gwaltney C, Balabanis M (2003b) Attentional bias predicts outcome in smoking cessation. Health Psychol 22:378–387. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.22.4.378
Waters AJ, Carter BL, Robinson JD, Wetter DW, Lam CY, Kerst W, Cinciripini PM (2009) Attentional bias is associated with incentive-related physiological and subjective measures. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 17:247–257. doi:10.1037/a0016658
Westbrook RF, Smith FJ, Charnock DJ (1985) The extinction of an aversion: role of the interval between non-reinforced presentations of the averted stimulus. Q J Exp Psychol 37B:255–273. doi:10.1080/14640748508402099
White TL, Justice AJ, de Wit H (2002) Differential subjective effects of D-amphetamine by gender, hormone levels and menstrual cycle phase. Pharmacol, Biochem Behav 73:729–741. doi:10.1016/s0091-3057(02)00818-3
Winkler MH, Weyers P, Mucha RF, Stippekohl B, Stark R, Pauli P (2011) Conditioned cues for smoking elicit preparatory responses in healthy smokers. Psychopharmacology 213:781–789. doi:10.1007/s00213-010-2033-2
Yurgelun-Todd D (2007) Emotional and cognitive changes during adolescence. Curr Opin Neurobiol 17:251–257. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2007.03.009
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge contributions from Chris Boyson, Markus Heilig, and Leah Mayo and technical assistance from Austin Lee, Frances Enger, Alex Gura, Kristen Kitsch, Lauren Walker, and Maria Olex.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
This research was supported by DA037011. Dr. Cavallo was supported in part by a fellowship from the Clinical Pharmacology Fellowship Program in the University of Chicago Division of Biological Sciences.
Disclosure
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(PDF 69 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cavallo, J.S., Ruiz, N.A. & de Wit, H. Extinction of Conditioned Responses to Methamphetamine-Associated Stimuli in Healthy Humans. Psychopharmacology 233, 2489–2502 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-016-4297-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-016-4297-7