Abstract
New synthetic opioids continue to emerge in the illicit market, and among them, fentanyl analogues pose a serious threat to the public health with their abuse and trafficking. We investigated the toxicity of fentanyl analogues on the liver and kidneys mediated by the µ-opioid receptor (MOR). Our study focused on 4-fluoro-isobutyrylfentanyl (4F-iBF), which is classified as a “narcotic” in Japan; structurally similar analogues 4-chloro-isobutyrylfentanyl (4Cl-iBF) and isobutyrylfentanyl (iBF) were also investigated. Rats that were intraperitoneally administered 4F-iBF (5 mg/kg (12.3 μmol/kg)) or iBF (12.3 μmol/kg) displayed hepatic and renal ischemic-like damage, but 4Cl-iBF (12.3 μmol/kg) did milder renal damage only. We found that the agonist activity of 4F-iBF, at MORs was approximately 7.2 times that of 4Cl-iBF, and that pretreatment with MOR antagonist naltrexone (0.8 mg/kg) alleviated liver and kidney injuries caused by 4F-iBF. These results suggested that 4F-iBF might cause ischemic damage to the liver and kidneys, induced by respiratory depression mediated by MORs. Furthermore, to elucidate the metabolism of fentanyl analogues, we investigated the change over time in the amount of 4F-iBF, 4Cl-iBF, iBF (6.15 μmol/kg, respectively), and their respective metabolites in serum after intraperitoneal administration to rats. The results showed that in 24-h post-dose serum, 4Cl-iBF and iBF were substantially eliminated while 4F-iBF remained at about 30% of the maximum level, and each of the N-dephenylethylated metabolites of 4F-iBF, 4Cl-iBF, and iBF was detected in 2-h post-dose serum. The results from this study revealed information on the hepatic and renal toxicities and metabolism related to fentanyl analogues.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data related to this study are publicly available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.
References
Almousa AA, Ikeda R, Wada M, Kuroda N, Hanajiri RK, Nakashima K (2011) HPLC-UV method development for fentanyl determination in rat plasma and its application to elucidate pharmacokinetic behavior after i.p. administration to rats. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 879(27):2941–2944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2011.08.029
Atici S, Cinel I, Cinel L, Doruk N, Eskandari G, Oral U (2005) Liver and kidney toxicity in chronic use of opioids: an experimental long term treatment model. J Biosci 30(2):245–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02703705
Dahan A, Yassen A, Bijl H, Romberg R, Sarton E, Teppema L, Olofsen E, Danhof M (2005) Comparison of the respiratory effects of intravenous buprenorphine and fentanyl in humans and rats. Br J Anaesth 94(6):825–834. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aei145
El Sabbahy M, Vaidya VS (2011) Ischemic kidney injury and mechanisms of tissue repair. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med 3(5):606–618. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsbm.133
Evans RG, Smith DW, Lee CJ, Ngo JP, Gardiner BS (2020) What makes the kidney susceptible to hypoxia? Anat Rec (hoboken) 303(10):2544–2552. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.24260
Expert Committee on Drug Dependence Thirty-ninth Meeting (2017) 4-Fluoroisobutyrfentanyl (4-FIBF) Review report agenda item 4.912. https://www.who.int/medicines/access/controlled substances/Critical_Review_4FIBF.pdf. Accessed April 2022
Ghosh A, Onsager C, Mason A, Arriola L, Lee W, Mubayi A (2021) The role of oxygen intake and liver enzyme on the dynamics of damaged hepatocytes: implications to ischaemic liver injury via a mathematical model. PLoS ONE 16(4):e0230833. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230833
Hamlin DM, Schultze AE, Coyne MJ, McCrann DJ 3rd, Mack R, Drake C, Murphy RE, Cross J, Strong-Townsend M, Yerramilli M, Leissinger MK (2021) Evaluation of renal biomarkers, including symmetric dimethylarginine, following gentamicin-induced proximal tubular injury in the rat. Kidney 3(2):341–356. https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0006542020
Hill R, Santhakumar R, Dewey W, Kelly E, Henderson G (2020) Fentanyl depression of respiration. Br J Pharmacol 177(2):254–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.14860
Japan Cabinet Order No. 187 (2018) June 20, 2018
Japan Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare No. 153 (2020) August 26, 2020
Japan Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare No. 18 (2018) February 28, 2018
Jenkins MW, Khalid F, Baby SM, May WJ, Young AP, Bates JN, Cheng F, Seckler JM, Lewis SJ (2021) Glutathione ethyl ester reverses the deleterious effects of fentanyl on ventilation and arterial blood-gas chemistry while prolonging fentanyl-induced analgesia. Sci Rep 11(1):6985. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86458-x
Kanamori T, Togawa Iwata Y, Segawa H, Yamamuro T, Kuwayama K, Tsujikawa K, Inoue H (2018) Metabolism of fentanyl and acetylfentanyl in human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived hepatocytes. Biol Pharm Bull 41(1):106–114. https://doi.org/10.1248/bpb.b17-00709
Kanamori T, Okada Y, Segawa H, Yamamuro T, Kuwayama K, Tsujikawa K, Iwata YT (2021) Evaluation of agonistic activity of fluorinated and nonfluorinated fentanyl analogs on μ-opioid receptor using a cell-based assay system. Biol Pharm Bull 44(2):159–161. https://doi.org/10.1248/bpb.b20-00780
Kanamori T, Okada Y, Segawa H, Yamamuro T, Kuwayama K, Tsujikawa K, Iwata YT (2022) Agonistic activity of fentanyl analogs and their metabolites on opioid receptors. Forensic Toxicol 40:156–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11419-021-00602-w
Koehne de Gonzalez AK, Lefkowitch JH (2017) Heart disease and the liver: pathologic evaluation. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 46(2):421–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gtc.2017.01.012
Krishna M (2017) Patterns of necrosis in liver disease. Clin Liver Dis 10(2):53–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/cld.653
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (2012a-) LiverTox: clinical and research information on drug-induced liver injury [Internet], Fentanyl [Updated 2019 Apr 25]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK548026/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK548026.pdf Accessed 12 April 2022
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (2012b-) LiverTox: clinical and research information on drug-induced liver injury [Internet], Opioids [Updated 2020 Nov 24]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547864/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK547864.pdf Accessed 12 April 2022
Ricarte A, Dalton JAR, Giraldo J (2021) Structural assessment of agonist efficacy in the μ-opioid receptor: morphine and fentanyl elicit different activation patterns. J Chem Inf Model 61(3):1251–1274. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00890
Toll L, Berzetei-Gurske IP, Polgar WE, Brandt SR, Adapa ID, Rodriguez L, Schwartz RW, Haggart D, O’Brien A, White A, Kennedy JM, Craymer K, Farrington L, Auh JS (1998) Standard binding and functional assays related to medications development division testing for potential cocaine and opiate narcotic treatment medications. NIDA Res Monogr 178:440–466
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2021) World drug report 2021; Booklet 3-Drug market trends: Cannabis, Opioids. https://www.unodc.org/res/wdr2021/field/WDR21_Booklet_3.pdf Accessed 12 April 2022
Vandeputte MM, Persson M, Walther D, Vikingsson S, Kronstrand R, Baumann MH, Gréen H, Stove CP (2022) Characterization of recent non-fentanyl synthetic opioids via three different in vitro µ-opioid receptor activation assays. Arch Toxicol 96(3):877–897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-021-03207-9
Watanabe S, Vikingsson S, Roman M, Green H, Kronstrand R, Wohlfarth A (2017) In vitro and in vivo metabolite identification studies for the new synthetic opioids acetylfentanyl, acrylfentanyl, furanylfentanyl and 4-fluoro-isobutyrylfentanyl. AAPS J 19(4):1102–1122. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-017-0070-z
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Pharmaceutical Affairs Section, Health and Safety Division, Bureau of Social Welfare and Public Health, Tokyo Metropolitan Government, Tokyo, Japan. We would like to thank Yuzawa K, Hasegawa Y, and the late Kubo Y for their superb technical support. We are also grateful to personnel in the Animal Care Co., Ltd., and Division of Toxicology at the Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Public Health for their assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
YO designed the study, performed the research, analyzed the experimental data, wrote the main manuscript text, and prepared Fig. 1 and all tables. MS performed the LC–MS/MS analyses. KM and HT synthesized the reagents. KT contributed to the examinations of histopathology and serum biochemistry. YT contributed to the examinations of histopathology and serum biochemistry and prepared "Fig. 2 and 3." YN contributed to the examinations of histopathology and assisted in writing the manuscript. JN, JS, TS, AI, and TM contributed to administration of the project and assisted in submission of the manuscript. All authors approved for submission of the manuscript. The authors declare that all data were generated in-house and that no paper mill was used.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
This study received approval from the Animal Experiment Committee of the Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Public Health (approval nos. 30–16, 19–20, and 20–19). The laboratory animal facilities of the aforementioned institution are accredited by Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center (certification nos. 15–104 and 18–104).
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ono, Y., Sakamoto, M., Makino, K. et al. Hepatic and renal toxicities and metabolism of fentanyl analogues in rats. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 396, 149–159 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-022-02301-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-022-02301-8