Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Techno-economic analysis of energy storage integration combined with SCUC and STATCOM to improve power system stability

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Electrical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In today's grid power system, the emergence of flexibility devices such as energy storage systems (ESS), static synchronous compensators (STATCOM), and demand response programs (DRP) can help power system operators make more effective and cost-effective power system scheduling decisions. This paper proposes security-constrained unit commitment (SCUC) for stochastic scheduling of power systems based on the grid and the coordinated strategy of ESS, STATCOM, and DRP units in the presence of high solar PV power penetration. By addressing the problem constraints, the goal is to reduce operational, ESS cost, load shedding, solar power curtailment, and DRP costs. The AC power flow equations and all the model relations have been given convexities to produce a mixed-integer quadratically constrained programming (MIQCP) model, the solution to which would produce global optimum results. The developed model is used for solving the general algebraic modeling system (GAMS), realistic to the IEEE 24-bus system in several case studies, and the outcomes are carefully examined. The economic benefits shared by ESS and DRP with STATCOM devices were reduced by about 5.6% in scheduling costs as compared to solar PV farms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Tarashandeh N, Karimi A (2021) Utilization of energy storage systems in congestion management of transmission networks with incentive-based approach for investors. J Energy Storage 33:102034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Artis R, Shivaie M, Weinsier PD (2023) A flexibility-based multi-objective model for contingency-constrained transmission expansion planning incorporating large-scale hydrogen/compressed-air energy storage systems and wind/solar farms. J Energy Storage 70:108086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Soroudi A (2021) Controllable transmission networks under demand uncertainty with modular FACTS. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 130:106978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Moradi-Sepahvand M, Amraee T, Aminifar F, Akbari A (2023) Coordinated expansion planning of transmission and distribution systems integrated with smart grid technologies. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 147:108859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Namilakonda S, Guduri Y (2021) Chaotic Darwinian particle swarm optimization for real-time hierarchical congestion management of power system integrated with renewable energy sources. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 128:106632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Saboori H, Jadid S (2022) Capturing curtailed renewable energy in electric power distribution networks via mobile battery storage fleet. J Energy Storage 46:103883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Prajapati VK, Mahajan V, Padhy NP (2021) Congestion management of integrated transmission and distribution network with RES and ESS under stressed condition. Int Trans Electr Energy Syst 31(2):e12757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Korab R, Połomski M, Owczarek R (2021) Application of particle swarm optimization for optimal setting of phase shifting transformers to minimize unscheduled active power flows. Appl Soft Comput 105:107243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ahmad AA, Sirjani R, Daneshvar S (2020) New hybrid probabilistic optimisation algorithm for optimal allocation of energy storage systems considering correlated wind farms. J E Storage 29:101335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Punda L, Capuder T, Pandžić H, Delimar M (2017) Integration of renewable energy sources in southeast Europe: a review of incentive mechanisms and feasibility of investments. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 71:77–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang X, Shi Di, Wang Z, Zeng Bo, Wang X, Tomsovic K, Jin Y (2018) Optimal allocation of series FACTS devices under high penetration of wind power within a market environment. IEEE Trans Power Syst 33(6):6206–6217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sang Y, Sahraei-Ardakani M (2017) The interdependence between transmission switching and variable-impedance series FACTS devices. IEEE Trans Power Syst 33(3):2792–2803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kwon K-B, Kim D (2021) Enhanced method for considering energy storage systems as ancillary service resources in stochastic unit commitment. Energy 213:118675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gupta P et al (2022) Battery energy storage train routing and security-constrained unit commitment under solar uncertainty. J Energy Storage 55:105811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Attarha A, Amjady N, Dehghan S et al (2018) Adaptive robust self-scheduling for a wind producer with compressed air energy storage. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 9(4):1659–1671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jadid Bonab M, Dolatabadi A, Mohammadi Ivatloo B et al (2019) Risk constrained energy management of PV integrated smart energy hub in the presence of demand response program and compressed air energy storage. IET Renew Power Gener 13:998–1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ghaljehei M, Ahmadian A, Golkar MA et al (2018) Stochastic SCUC considering compressed air energy storage and wind power generation: a techno-economic approach with static voltage stability analysis. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 100:489–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gupta PP, Jain P, Kalkhambkar V, Sharma KC, Bhakar R (2020) Stochastic security-constrained unit commitment with battery energy storage and wind power integration. Int Trans Electr Energy Syst 30(10):e12556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kalantari N, Abdolahi A, Mousavi SH et al (2023) Strategic decision making of energy storage owned virtual power plant in day-ahead and intra-day markets. J Energy Storage 73:108839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gupta PP, Jain P, Sharma K, Bhakar R (2019) Stochastic scheduling of compressed air energy storage in DC SCUC framework for high wind penetration. IET Gener Transm Distrib 13(13):2747–2760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Luburić Z, Pandžić H (2019) FACTS devices and energy storage in unit commitment. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 104:311–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang Z, Shen C, Zhang L, Crow ML, Atcitty S (2001) Integration of a STATCOM and battery energy storage. IEEE Trans Power Syst 16(2):254–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sreejith S, Simon SP, Selvan MP (2015) Analysis of FACTS devices on security constrained unit commitment problem. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 66:280–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dawn S, Tiwari PK (2016) Improvement of economic profit by optimal allocation of TSCS & UPFC with wind power generators in double auction competitive power market. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 80:190–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sahraei-Ardakani M, Hedman KW (2016) Day-ahead corrective adjustment of FACTS reactance: a linear programming approach. IEEE Trans Power Syst 31(4):2867–2875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zarate-Minano R, Conejo A, Milano F (2008) OPF-based security redispatching including FACTS devices. IET Gener Transm Distrib 2(6):821–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Norouzi MR, Ahmadi A, Nezhad AE, Ghaedi A (2014) Mixed integer programming of multi-objective security constrained hydro/thermal unit commitment. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 29:911–923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lorca A, Sun XA (2017) Multi-stage robust unit commitment with dynamic uncertainty sets and energy storage. IEEE Trans Power Syst 32(3):1678–1688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Nikoobakht A, Mardaneh M, Aghaei J et al (2017) Flexible power system operation accommodating uncertain wind power generation using transmission topology control: an improved linearised AC SCUC model. IET Gener Transm Distrib 11(1):142–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Park H, Jin YG, Park JK (2018) Stochastic security-constrained unit commitment with wind power generation based on dynamic line rating. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 102:211–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Henrion R, Romisch W (2022) Problem-based optimal scenario generation and reduction in stochastic programming. Math Program 191(1):183–205

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Ahmad AA, Sirjani R, Daneshvar S (2020) New hybrid probabilistic optimization algorithm for optimal allocation of energy storage systems considering correlated wind farms. J Energy Storage 29:101335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Numan M, Feng D, Abbas F, Habib S, Hao Su (2021) Coordinated operation of reconfigurable networks with dynamic line rating for optimal utilization of renewable generation. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 125:106473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lai CM, Jiashen T (2022) Network topology optimisation based on dynamic thermal rating and battery storage systems for improved wind penetration and reliability. Appl Energy 305:117837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Jadidbonab M et al (2019) Risk-constrained energy management of PV integrated smart energy hub in the presence of demand response program and compressed air energy storage. IET Renew Power Gener 13(6):998–1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pathiravasam C, Venayagamoorthy GK (2022) Distributed demand response management for a virtually connected community with solar power. IEEE Access 10:8350–8362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Rehman AU et al (2021) An efficient energy management in smart grid considering demand response program and renewable energy sources. IEEE Access 9:148821–148844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mohseni S, Brent AC, Kelly S, Browne WN (2022) Demand response-integrated investment and operational planning of renewable, and sustainable energy systems considering forecast uncertainties: a systematic review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 158:112095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Yang J, Wiedmann T, Luo F, Yan G, Wen F, Broadbent GH (2022) A fully decentralized hierarchical transactive energy framework for charging EVs with local DERs in power distribution systems. IEEE Trans Transport Electrif 8:1–1

    Google Scholar 

  40. AL Ahmad A, Sirjani R (2021) Optimal planning and operational strategy of energy storage systems in power transmission networks: an analysis of wind farms. Int J Energy Res 45(7):11258–11283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Soroudi A (2017) Power system optimization modeling in GAMS, vol 78. Springer, Switzerland

    Book  Google Scholar 

  42. Rosenthal A, Richard E (2004) GAMS—a user's guide

  43. Gupta PP, Jain P, Sharma CK, Bhakar R (2019) Optimal scheduling of electric vehicles in stochastic AC SCUC problem for large-scale wind power penetration. Intern Trans Electr Energy Syst 30:e2596

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the Department of Technology, Shivaji University, Kolhapur, for their support and resources throughout this research endeavor. Special thanks are extended to Prof. H. T. Jadhav for his invaluable guidance and mentorship. Nileshkumar, working as a PhD research scholar, acknowledges the support and encouragement received from all those involved in this study. Their contributions have been instrumental in the successful completion of this research.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Technology, Shivaji University Kolhapur, Kolhapur Institute of Technology’s, College of Engineering (Autonomous), Kolhapur, India

    Nileshkumar J. Kumbhar

  2. Department of Technology, Shivaji University, Kolhapur, India

    H. T. Jadhav

Authors
  1. Nileshkumar J. Kumbhar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. T. Jadhav
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Nileshkumar J. Kumbhar contributed to conceptualization, writing—original draft, visualization, methodology, software, investigation, formal analysis, and writing—review and editing. H.T. Jadhav contributed to investigation, methodology, visualization, writing—review and editing, and supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nileshkumar J. Kumbhar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumbhar, N.J., Jadhav, H.T. Techno-economic analysis of energy storage integration combined with SCUC and STATCOM to improve power system stability. Electr Eng (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-024-02410-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-024-02410-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation