Abstract
Available transfer capability (ATC) is very important for system operators for a fair and transparent electricity market. There are many methods to calculate and to improve the ATC value in the power system. Due to green energy focus across the globe, renewable energy integration to the system to improve the ATC value need to be established. Lots of literature have been published on wind power integration to improve ATC value using active power support. During highly loaded conditions, reactive power plays an important role. In this paper, active as well as reactive power of wind turbine generation for ATC calculation has been considered. The reactive power limit has been considered based on the capability curve of the wind turbine generator. Real-time wind speed data for wind power output calculation are taken. The impact analysis of wind power generation on ATC variation under normal as well as contingency cases has been carried out. The effectiveness of the proposed method is tested on the IEEE-30 bus system.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- ACPTDF:
-
AC power distribution factor
- ATC:
-
Available transfer capability
- CBM:
-
Capacity benefit margin
- CSO:
-
Cat swarm optimization
- DCPTDF:
-
DC power distribution factor
- DFIG:
-
Doubly fed induction generator
- DRCC:
-
Distributionally robust chance constrained
- FACTS:
-
Flexible AC transmission system
- HB:
-
Hopf bifurcation
- IEA:
-
Indian Electricity Act
- LMI:
-
Linear matrix inequality
- MCS:
-
Monte Carlo simulation
- MIL:
-
Mixed-integer linear programming problem
- MLPNN:
-
Multilayer perceptron neural network
- MO:
-
Market operator
- MPEC:
-
Mathematical program with equilibrium constraints
- NR:
-
Newton–Raphson
- OPF:
-
Optimal power flow
- pu:
-
Per unit
- RES:
-
Renewable energy sources
- SVC:
-
Static var compensators
- SVR:
-
Support vector regression
- WECS:
-
Wind energy conversion system
- TCSC:
-
Thyristor-controlled series compensation
- WG:
-
Wind generation
- WPG:
-
Wind power generation
- \(R\) :
-
Length of the blade
- \(P_{ab}^{max}\) :
-
Thermal limit of the line between buses a and b
- \(N_{L}\) :
-
Total number of lines
- \(\Delta P_{ab}^{New}\) :
-
Change in real power flow between lines a and b
- \(C_{p\_max}\) :
-
Maximum power coefficient
- \(\Delta tr_{k}\) :
-
Bilateral transaction in line-k
- \(U_{a}\) :
-
Voltage of bus a
- \(\rho\) :
-
Air density
- \({\text{x}}_{ab}\) :
-
Reactance of line between \({\text{ line a and line b}}\)
- \(X_{ac}\) :
-
Entry in the ath row and cth column of the reactance matrix X
- \(\Delta qu_{l}\) :
-
Active power change in line-l
- \(\nu\) :
-
Speed of the wind
- \(\theta_{ab}\) :
-
Angle between bus voltages
- \(P_{t\_max}\) :
-
Power output of the wind turbine
- \(Y_{ab}\) :
-
Admittance matrix
- \(P_{ab}^{0}\) :
-
Base case power flow between buses a and b
- \({\text{ATC}}_{ab}\) :
-
Available transfer capability in MW
- \(P_{cd}^{New}\) :
-
Power linked with new transaction
- \(P_{{{\text{ab}}}}\) :
-
Real power flow from line a to line b
- \({\text{PTDF}}_{ab,cd}\) :
-
Power transfer distribution factor for DC (DCPTDF) and AC (ACPTDF)
References
Thakur T, Deshmukh SG, Kaushik SC, Kulshrestha M (2005) Impact assessment of the Electricity Act 2003 on the Indian power sector. Energy Policy 33(9):1187–1198
Narain A, Srivastava SK, Singh SN (2020) Congestion management approaches in restructured power system: key issues and challenges. Electr J 33(3):106715
Mohammed OO, Mustafa MW, Mohammed DSS, Otuoze AO (2019) Available transfer capability calculation methods: a comprehensive review. Int Trans Electr Energy Syst 29(6):e2846
Bhesdadiya RH, Patel RM (2016) Available transfer capability calculation using deterministic methods: a case study of Indian power system. In: 2016 International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, and Optimization Techniques (ICEEOT), pp. 2261–2264. IEEE
Othman, M. M., Abd Rahman, N., Musirin, I., Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M., & Rajabi-Ghahnavieh, A. (2015). A heuristic ranking approach on capacity benefit margin determination using pareto-based evolutionary programming technique. The Scientific World Journal, 2015.
Wang B, Fang X, Zhao X, Chen H (2015) Bi-level optimization for available transfer capability evaluation in deregulated electricity market. Energies 8(12):13344–13360
Kumar A, Srivastava SC, Singh SN (2004a) Available transfer capability assessment in a competitive electricity market using a bifurcation approach. IEE Proceedings-Gener, TransmDistrib 151(2):133–140
Srinivasan A, Venkatesh P, Dineshkumar B, Ramkumar N (2015) Dynamic available transfer capability determination in power system restructuring environment using support vector regression. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 69:123–130
Othman MM, Busan S (2015) A novel approach of rescheduling the critical generators for a new available transfer capability determination. IEEE Trans Power Syst 31(1):3–17
Nireekshana T, Rao GK, Raju SS (2016) Available transfer capability enhancement with FACTS using cat swarm optimization. Ain Shams Eng J 7(1):159–167
Kumar A, Kumar J (2013) ATC determination with FACTS devices using PTDFs approach for multi-transactions in competitive electricity markets. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 44(1):308–317
Christie RD, Wollenberg BF, Wangensteen I (2000) Transmission management in the deregulated environment. Proc IEEE 88(2):170–195
Kumar A, Srivastava SC, Singh SN (2004b) Available transfer capability (ATC) determination in a competitive electricity market using AC distribution factors. Electric Power ComponSyst 32(9):927–939
Kumar J, Kumar A (2011) ACPTDF for multi-transactions and ATC determination in deregulated markets. Int J Electrical ComputEng (IJECE) 1(1):71–84
Herbert GJ, Iniyan S, Sreevalsan E, Rajapandian S (2007) A review of wind energy technologies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 11(6):1117–1145
Georgilakis PS (2008) Technical challenges associated with the integration of wind power into power systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 12(3):852–863
Bajaj M, Singh AK (2020) Grid integrated renewable DG systems: a review of power quality challenges and state-of-the-art mitigation techniques. Int J Energy Res 44(1):26–69
Sharifzadeh M, Lubiano-Walochik H, Shah N (2017) Integrated renewable electricity generation considering uncertainties: the UK roadmap to 50% power generation from wind and solar energies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 72:385–398
Gupta A, Kumar A (2016) Optimal power flow based ATC calculation incorporating probabilistic nature of wind. In: 2016 IEEE Students' Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Science (SCEECS), pp. 1–6. IEEE
Xie J, Wang L, Bian Q, Zhang X, Zeng D, Wang K (2016) Optimal available transfer capability assessment strategy for wind integrated transmission systems considering uncertainty of wind power probability distribution. Energies 9(9):704
Chen H, Fang X, Zhang R, Jiang T, Li G, Li F (2017) Available transfer capability evaluation in a deregulated electricity market considering correlated wind power. IET GenerTransmDistrib 12(1):53–61
Kou X, Li F (2018) Interval optimization for available transfer capability evaluation considering wind power uncertainty. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 11(1):250–259
Khosravifard M, Shaaban M (2015) Risk-based available transfer capability assessment including nondispatchable wind generation. Int Trans Electrical Energy Syst 25(11):3169–3183
Tian J, Su C, Chen Z (2013) Reactive power capability of the wind turbine with doubly fed induction generator. In: IECON 2013–39th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, pp. 5312–5317. IEEE.
Singh B, Singh SN (2009) Improved reactive power capability of grid connected doubly-fed induction generators. Wind Eng 33(4):403–415
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Narain, A., Srivastava, S.K. & Singh, S.N. Impact of wind power generation on ATC calculation with uncertain equal load. Electr Eng 104, 3–11 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-020-01159-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-020-01159-4