Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bayesian social aggregation with non-Archimedean utilities and probabilities

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Economic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider social decisions under uncertainty. Given certain richness conditions, we show that the ex ante social preference order satisfies a Pareto axiom with respect to ex ante individual preferences, along with an axiom of Statewise Dominance, if and only if all agents admit subjective expected utility (SEU) representations with the same beliefs, and furthermore the social preferences are utilitarian (i.e. the social utility function is the sum of the individual utility functions). In these SEU representations, the utility functions take values in an ordered abelian group, and probabilities are represented by order-preserving automorphisms of this group. This group may be non-Archimedean; this allows the SEU representations to encode lexicographical preferences and/or infinitesimal probabilities. Relative to earlier results in Bayesian social aggregation, our framework is minimal, with a finite set of states of nature, no structure on the set of social outcomes, and preferences not assumed to be continuous.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aczél, J., Maksa, G.: Solution of the rectangular \(m\times n\) generalized bisymmetry equation and of the problem of consistent aggregation. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 203(1), 104–126 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alon, S., Gayer, G.: Utilitarian preferences with multiple priors. Econometrica 84(3), 1181–1201 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aumann, R.J.: Utility theory without the completeness axiom. Econometrica 30(3), 445–462 (1962)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baucells, M., Shapley, L.S.: Multiperson utility. Games Econ. Behav. 62(2), 329–347 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bewley, T.F.: Knightian decision theory. Part I. Decis. Econ. Finance 25(2), 79–110 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billot, A., Qu, X.: Utilitarian aggregation with heterogeneous beliefs. Am. Econ. J. Microecon. 13(3), 112–23 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billot, A., Vergopoulos, V.: Aggregation of Paretian preferences for independent individual uncertainties. Soc. Choice Welf. 47(4), 973–984 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blume, L., Brandenburger, A., Dekel, E.: An overview of lexicographic choice under uncertainty. Ann. Oper. Res. 19(1–4), 231–246 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Blume, L., Brandenburger, A., Dekel, E.: Lexicographic probabilities and choice under uncertainty. Econometrica 59(1), 61–79 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blume, L., Brandenburger, A., Dekel, E.: Lexicographic probabilities and equilibrium refinements. Econometrica 59(1), 81–98 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borie, D.: Lexicographic expected utility without completeness. Theor. Decis. 81(2), 167–176 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandl, F.: Belief-averaging and relative utilitarianism. J. Econ. Theory 198, 105368 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broome, J.: Weighing Lives. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ceron, F., Vergopoulos, V.: Aggregation of Bayesian preferences: unanimity vs monotonicity. Soc. Choice Welf. 52(3), 419–451 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, C., Hayashi, T.: Preference aggregation under uncertainty: Savage vs. Pareto. Games Econ Behav. 54, 430–440 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, C., Hayashi, T.: Preference aggregation with incomplete information. Econometrica 82(2), 589–599 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chateauneuf, A., Wakker, P.: From local to global additive representation. J. Math. Econ. 22, 523–545 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chipman, J.S.: The foundations of utility. Econometrica 28, 193–224 (1960)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, P.: The group of order preserving automorphisms of an ordered abelian group. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 9(3), 382–389 (1958)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danan, E., Gajdos, T., Hill, B., Tallon, J.-M.: Robust social decisions. Am. Econ. Rev. 106(9), 2407–2425 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai, N., Critch, A., Russell, S.J.: Negotiable reinforcement learning for Pareto optimal sequential decision-making. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 4712–4720 (2018)

  • Dietrich, F.: Fully Bayesian aggregation. J. Econ. Theory 194, 105255 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubra, J., Maccheroni, F., Ok, E.A.: Expected utility theory without the completeness axiom. J. Econ. Theory 115(1), 118–133 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evren, Ö.: On the existence of expected multi-utility representations. Econ. Theory 35(3), 575–592 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-007-0252-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evren, Ö., Ok, E.A.: On the multi-utility representation of preference relations. J. Math. Econ. 47(4–5), 554–563 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C.: The Foundations of Expected Utility. Volume 31 of Theory and Decision Library. D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht (1982)

  • Fishburn, P.C.: Lexicographic orders, utilities and decision rules: a survey. Manag. Sci. 20, 1442–1471 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.: Preference structures and their numerical representations. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 217(2), 359–383 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C., LaValle, I.H.: Multiattribute expected utility without the Archimedean axiom. J. Math. Psych. 36(4), 573–591 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C., LaValle, I.H.: Subjective expected lexicographic utility: axioms and assessment. Ann. Oper. Res. 80, 183–206 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C., LaValle, I.H.: Subjective expected lexicographic utility with infinite state sets. J. Math. Econ. 30(3), 323–346 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleurbaey, M.: Welfare economics, risk and uncertainty. Can. J. Econ. 51(1), 5–40 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleurbaey, M., Michel, P.: Intertemporal equity and the extension of the Ramsey criterion. J. Math. Econ. 39(7), 777–802 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleurbaey, M., Tungodden, B.: The tyranny of non-aggregation versus the tyranny of aggregation in social choices: a real dilemma. Econ. Theory 44(3), 399–414 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-009-0462-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, L.: Partially Ordered Algebraic Systems. Dover, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gajdos, T., Tallon, J.-M., Vergnaud, J.-C.: Representation and aggregation of preferences under uncertainty. J. Econ. Theory 141, 68–99 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galaabaatar, T., Karni, E.: Expected multi-utility representations. Math. Soc. Sci. 64(3), 242–246 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galaabaatar, T., Karni, E.: Subjective expected utility with incomplete preferences. Econometrica 81(1), 255–284 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu-Roegen, N.: Choice, expectations and measurability. Q. J. Econ. 68(4), 503–534 (1954)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilboa, I., Minardi, S., Wang, F.: Consumption of values, HEC Paris Research Paper No. ECO/SCD-2020-1406 (2020)

  • Gilboa, I., Samet, D., Schmeidler, D.: Utilitarian aggregation of beliefs and tastes. J. Polit. Econ. 112, 932–938 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, H.: Aggregation in Economic Analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1964)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, J.Y.: A nonstandard characterization of sequential equilibrium, perfect equilibrium, and proper equilibrium. Int. J. Game Theory 38(1), 37–49 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, J.Y.: Lexicographic probability, conditional probability, and nonstandard probability. Games Econ. Behav. 68(1), 155–179 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, P.: Elementary non-Archimedean representations of probability for decision theory and games. In: Humphreys, P. (ed.) Patrick Suppes: Scientific Philosoher, Chapter 2, vol. 1, pp. 25–59. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1994)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, P.: Consequentialism, non-Archimedean probabilities, and lexicographic expected utility. In: Bicchieri, C., Jeffrey, R., Skyrms, B. (eds.) The Logic of Strategy, Chapter 2, pp. 39–66. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, P.J.: Non-Archimedean subjective probabilities in decision theory and games. Math. Soc. Sci. 38(2), 139–156 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J.C.: Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility. J. Polit. Econ. 63, 309–321 (1955)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausner, M.: Multidimensional utilities. In: Thrall, R., Coombs, C. (eds.) Decision Processes, pp. 167–180. Wiley, New York (1954)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausner, M., Wendel, J.G.: Ordered vector spaces. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 3, 977–982 (1952)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi, T., Lombardi, M.: Fair social decision under uncertainty and responsibility for beliefs. Econ. Theory 67(4), 775–816 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-017-1097-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzberg, F.: Elementary non-Archimedean utility theory. Math. Soc. Sci. 58(1), 8–14 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzberg, F.: Hyperreal expected utilities and Pascal’s wager. Logique et Anal. (N.S.) 54(213), 69–108 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaminski, B.: On quasi-orderings and multi-objective functions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 177(3), 1591–1598 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kannai, Y.I.: Nonstandard concave utility functions. J. Math. Econ. 21(1), 51–58 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L., Nau, R.: A theorem for Bayesian group decisions. J. Risk Uncertain. 43, 1–17 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J.M.: A Treatise on Probability. Macmillan, New York (1921)

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoblauch, V.: Continuously representable Paretian quasi-orders. Theor. Decis. 60(1), 1–16 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laplace, P.-S.: Essai philosophique sur les probabilités. H. Remy (1829)

  • Lehmann, D.: Expected qualitative utility maximization. Games Econ. Behav. 35(1–2), 54–79 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, M.: Cardinality versus ordinality: a suggested compromise. Am. Econ. Rev. 96(4), 1114–1136 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Legaz, J.E.: Lexicographic utility and orderings. In: Barberà, S., Hammond, P., Seidl, C. (eds.) Handbook of Utility Theory, pp. 345–369. Kluwer AP, Dordrecht (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Legaz, J.-E., Singer, I.: Lexicographical order, lexicographical index, and linear operators. Linear Algebra Appl. 128, 65–95 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, D., Mikkola, K., Thomas, T.: Utilitarianism with and without expected utility. J. Math. Econ. 87, 77–113 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mongin, P., Pivato, M.: Social evaluation under risk and uncertainty. In: Adler, M.D., Fleurbaey, M. (Eds.), Handbook of Well-Being and Public Policy, Chapter 24. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 711–745 (2016)

  • Mongin, P.: Consistent Bayesian aggregation. J. Econ. Theory 66, 313–351 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mongin, P.: The paradox of the Bayesian experts and state-dependent utility theory. J. Math. Econ. 29, 331–361 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mongin, P., Pivato, M.: Ranking multidimensional alternatives and uncertain prospects. J. Econ. Theory 157, 146–171 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mongin, P., Pivato, M.: Social preference under twofold uncertainty. Econ. Theory 70(3), 633–663 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-019-01237-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narens, L.: Measurement without Archimedean axioms. Philos. Sci. 41, 374–393 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narens, L.: Abstract Measurement Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nataf, A.: Sur la possibilité de construction de certains macromodèles. Econometrica 16, 232–244 (1948)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nau, R.: The shape of incomplete preferences. Ann. Stat. 34(5), 2430–2448 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ok, E.A.: Utility representation of an incomplete preference relation. J. Econ. Theory 104(2), 429–449 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ok, E.A., Ortoleva, P., Riella, G.: Incomplete preferences under uncertainty: indecisiveness in beliefs versus tastes. Econometrica 80(4), 1791–1808 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, D.: Justifiability to each person. Ratio 16(4), 368–390 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, A.P.: Archimedes wake. Ph.D. thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, Department of Philosophy (2013)

  • Pivato, M., Tchouante, É.F.: Bayesian social aggregation with almost-objective uncertainty (preprint) (2023)

  • Pivato, M.: Multiutility representations for incomplete difference preorders. Math. Soc. Sci. 66(3), 196–220 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pivato, M.: Additive representation of separable preferences over infinite products. Theor. Decis. 77(1), 31–83 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pivato, M.: Bayesian social aggregation with accumulating evidence. J. Econ. Theory 200, 105399 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qu, X.: Separate aggregation of beliefs and values under ambiguity. Econ. Theory 63(2), 503–519 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-015-0944-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, M.K.: Rational choice. In: Preferences, Utility and Demand (A Minnesota Symposium), pp. 29–58. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York (1971)

  • Russell, J.S.: Non-Archimedean preferences over countable lotteries. J. Math. Econ. 88, 180–186 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L.J.: The Foundations of Statistics. Dover Publications Inc., New York (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, T.: What We Owe to Each Other. Belknap Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skala, H.J.: Nonstandard utilities and the foundation of game theory. Int. J. Game Theory 3, 67–81 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skala, H.J.: Non-Archimedean Utility Theory. Springer, Berlin (1975)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sprumont, Y.: Belief-weighted Nash aggregation of Savage preferences. J. Econ. Theory 178, 222–245 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprumont, Y.: Relative utilitarianism under uncertainty. Soc. Choice Welf. 53(4), 621–639 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temkin, L.S.: Rethinking the Good: Moral Ideals and the Nature of Practical Reasoning. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • van Daal, J., Merkies, A.: Aggregation in Economic Research: From Individual to Macro Relations. Reidel, Dordrecht (1984)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van Daal, J., Merkies, A.: The problem of aggregation of individual economic relations. consistency and representativity in historical perspective. In: Eichhorn, W. (ed.) Measurement in Economics, pp. 607–637. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg (1988)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Voorhoeve, A.: How should we aggregate competing claims? Ethics 125(1), 64–87 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yılmaz, Ö.: Utility representation of lower separable preferences. Math. Soc. Sci. 56(3), 389–394 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuber, S.: Harsanyi’s theorem without the sure-thing principle: on the consistent aggregation of Monotonic Bernoullian and Archimedean preferences. J. Math. Econ. 63, 78–83 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. THEMA, CY Cergy Paris Université, Cergy-Pontoise Cedex, France

    Marcus Pivato & Élise Flore Tchouante

Authors
  1. Marcus Pivato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Élise Flore Tchouante
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcus Pivato.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

We are grateful to Federica Ceron, Tzachi Gilboa, Peter Hammond and Brian Hill for their helpful suggestions. We thank Philippe Mongin for telling us about the theorem of Aczél and Maksa. This research was supported by Labex MME-DII (ANR11-LBX-0023-01) and CHOp (ANR-17-CE26-0003).

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pivato, M., Tchouante, É.F. Bayesian social aggregation with non-Archimedean utilities and probabilities. Econ Theory 77, 561–595 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-023-01509-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-023-01509-w

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation