Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

High fracture probability predicts fractures in a 4-year follow-up in women from the RAC-OST-POL study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 23 July 2015

Abstract

Summary

In 770 postmenopausal women, the fracture incidence during a 4-year follow-up was analyzed in relation to the fracture probability (FRAX risk assessment tool) and risk (Garvan risk calculator) predicted at baseline. Incident fractures occurred in 62 subjects with a higher prevalence in high-risk subgroups. Prior fracture, rheumatoid arthritis, femoral neck T-score and falls increased independent of fracture incidence.

Introduction

The aim of the study was to analyze the incidence of fractures during a 4-year follow-up in relation to the baseline fracture probability and risk.

Methods

Enrolled in the study were 770 postmenopausal women with a mean age of 65.7 ± 7.3 years. Bone mineral density (BMD) at the proximal femur, clinical data, and fracture probability using the FRAX tool and risk using the Garvan calculator were determined. Each subject was asked yearly by phone call about the incidence of fracture during the follow-up period.

Results

Of the 770 women, 62 had a fracture during follow-up, and 46 had a major fracture. At baseline, BMD was significantly lower, and fracture probability and fracture risk were significantly higher in women who had a fracture. Among women with a major fracture, the percentage with a high baseline fracture probability (>10 %) was significantly higher than among those without a fracture (p < 0.01). Fracture incidence during follow-up was significantly higher among women with a high baseline fracture probability (12.7 % vs. 5.2 %) and a high fracture risk (9.2 vs. 5.3 %) so that the “fracture-free survival” curves were significantly different (p < 0.05). The number of clinical risk factors noted at baseline was significantly associated with fracture incidence (chi-squared = 20.82, p < 0.01). Prior fracture, rheumatoid arthritis, and femoral neck T-score were identified as significant risk factors for major fractures (for any fractures, the influence of falls was also significant).

Conclusions

During follow-up, fracture incidence was predicted by baseline fracture probability (FRAX risk assessment tool) and risk (Garvan risk calculator). A number of clinical risk factors and a prior fracture, rheumatoid arthritis, femoral neck T-score, and falls increased independent of fracture incidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A et al (2008) FRAX™ and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK. Osteoporos Int 19:385–397

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nguyen ND, Frost SA, Centre JR et al (2007) Development of a nomogram for individualizing hip fracture risk in men and women. Osteoporos Int 18:1109–1117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nguyen ND, Frost SA, Centre JR et al (2008) Development of prognostic nomograms for individualizing 5-year and 10-year fracture risks. Osteoporos Int 19:1431–1444

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tremollieres AF, Pouilles JM, Drewniak N, Laparra J, Ribot CA, Dargent-Molina P (2010) Fracture risk prediction using BMD and clinical risk factors in early postmenopausal women: sensitivity of the WHO FRAX tool. J Bone Miner Res 25:1002–1009

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Czerwiński E, Kanis JA, Osieleniec J et al (2011) Evaluation of FRAX to characterise fracture risk in Poland. Osteoporos Int 22:2507–2512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tamaki J, Iki M, Kadowaki E et al (2011) Fracture risk prediction using FRAX®: a 10-year follow-up survey of the Japanese Population-Based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Cohort Study. Osteoporos Int 22:3037–3045

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fraser LA, Langsetmo L, Berger C et al (2011) Fracture prediction and calibration of a Canadian FRAX® tool: a population-based report from CaMos. Osteoporos Int 22:829–837

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bolland MJ, Siu ATY, Mason HB et al (2011) Evaluation of the FRAX and Garvan fracture risk calculators in older women. J Bone Miner Res 25:420–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Azagra R, Roca G, Encabo G et al (2012) FRAX® tool, the WHO algorithm to predict osteoporotic fractures: the first analysis of its discriminative and predictive ability in the Spanish FRIDEX cohort. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 13:204

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cordomi CT, del Rio LM, Di Gregorio S et al (2013) Validation of the FRAX predictive model for major osteoporotic fracture in a historical cohort of Spanish women. J Clin Densitom 16:231–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Czerwiński E, Borowy P, Kumorek A, Amarowicz J, Górkiewicz M, Milert A (2013) Fracture risk prediction in outpatients from Krakow region using FRAX tool versus fracture risk in 11-year follow-up. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 6:617–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Leslie WD, Brennan SL, Lix LM et al (2013) Direct comparison of eight national FRAX® tools for fracture prediction and treatment qualification in Canadian women. Arch Osteoporos 8:145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Crandall CJ, Larson JC, Watts NB et al (2014) Comparison of fracture risk prediction by the US Preventive Services Task Force strategy and two alternative strategies in women 50-64 years old in the Women's Health Initiative. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99:4514–4522

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rubin KH, Abrahamsen B, Friis-Holmberg T et al (2013) Comparison of different screening tools (FRAX®, OST, ORAI, OSIRIS, SCORE and age alone) to identify women with increased risk of fracture. A population-based prospective study. Bone 56:16–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pluskiewicz W, Adamczyk P, Czekajło A, Grzeszczak W, Burak W, Drozdzowska B (2012) Epidemiological data on osteoporosis in women from the RAC-OST-POL study. J Clin Densitom 15:308–314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Włodarek D, Głąbska D, Kołota A et al (2014) Calcium intake and osteoporosis: the influence of calcium intake from dairy products on hip bone mineral density and fracture incidence – a population-based study in women over 55 years of age. Public Health Nutr 17:383–389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Drozdzowska B, Wiktor K, Pluskiewicz W (2013) Functional status and prevalence of falls and fractures in population-based sample of postmenopausal women from the RAC-OST-POL Study. Int J Clin Pract 67:673–681

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pluskiewicz W, Adamczyk P, Czekajło A, Grzeszczak W, Burak W, Drozdzowska B (2014) Influence of education, marital status, occupation, and the place of living on skeletal status, fracture prevalence, and the course and effectiveness of osteoporotic therapy in women in the RAC-OST-POL Study. J Bone Miner Metab 32:89–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rokicki W, Drozdzowska B, Czekajło A, et al (2015) Relationship between visual status and functional status and the risk of falls in postmenopausal women, the RAC-OST-POL Study. Arch Med Sci (in press)

  20. Lorenc R, Głuszko P, Karczmarewicz E. et al (2013) Recommendations for diagnostic and therapeutic management in osteoporosis (in Polish). Medycyna Praktyczna 1–48

  21. Jarvinen TLN, Sievanen H, Khan KM, Heinonen A, Kannus P (2008) Shifting the focus in fracture prevention from osteoporosis to falls. BMJ 336:124–126

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pluskiewicz W, Drozdzowska D, Adamczyk P (2013) Ten-year risk in the assessment of osteoporosis management efficacy in postmenopausal women: a pilot study. Climacteric 16:117–126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pluskiewicz W, Adamczyk P, Franek E et al (2010) Ten-year probability of osteoporotic fracture in 2012 Polish women assessed by FRAX and nomogram by Nguyen et al. – conformity between methods and their clinical utility. Bone 46:1661–1667

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Pluskiewicz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pluskiewicz, W., Adamczyk, P., Czekajło, A. et al. High fracture probability predicts fractures in a 4-year follow-up in women from the RAC-OST-POL study. Osteoporos Int 26, 2811–2820 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-015-3196-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-015-3196-9

Keywords

Navigation