Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prior ankle fractures in postmenopausal women are associated with low areal bone mineral density and bone microstructure alterations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

In a cross-sectional analysis in postmenopausal women, prior ankle fractures were associated with lower areal bone mineral density (BMD) and trabecular bone alterations compared to no fracture history. Compared to women with forearm fractures, microstructure alterations were of lower magnitude. These data suggest that ankle fractures are another manifestation of bone fragility.

Introduction

Whether ankle fractures represent fragility fractures associated with low areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) and/or bone microstructure alterations remains unclear, in contrast to the well-recognised association between forearm fractures and osteoporosis. The objective of this study was to investigate aBMD, vBMD and bone microstructure in postmenopausal women with prior ankle fracture in adulthood, compared with women without prior fracture or with women with prior forearm fractures, considered as typically of osteoporotic origin.

Methods

In a cross-sectional analysis in the Geneva Retirees Cohort study, 63 women with ankle fracture and 59 with forearm fracture were compared to 433 women without fracture (mean age, 65 ± 1 years). aBMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; distal radius and tibia vBMD and bone microstructure were measured by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

Results

Compared with women without fracture, those with ankle fractures had lower aBMD, radius vBMD (−7.9 %), trabecular density (−10.7 %), number (−7.3 %) and thickness (−4.6 %) and higher trabecular spacing (+14.5 %) (P < 0.05 for all). Tibia trabecular variables were also altered. For 1 standard deviation decrease in total hip aBMD or radius trabecular density, odds ratios for ankle fractures were 2.2 and 1.6, respectively, vs 2.2 and 2.7 for forearm fracture, respectively (P ≤ 0.001 for all). Compared to women with forearm fractures, those with ankle fractures had similar spine and hip aBMD, but microstructure alterations of lower magnitude.

Conclusion

Women with ankle fractures have lower aBMD and vBMD and trabecular bone alterations, suggesting that ankle fractures are another manifestation of bone fragility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Giangregorio LM, Leslie WD (2010) Time since prior fracture is a risk modifier for 10-year osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res 25:1400–1405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Seeley DG, Kelsey J, Jergas M, Nevitt MC (1996) Predictors of ankle and foot fractures in older women. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. J Bone Miner Res 11:1347–1355

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hasselman CT, Vogt MT, Stone KL, Cauley JA, Conti SF (2003) Foot and ankle fractures in elderly white women. Incidence and risk factors. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:820–824

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Taylor AJ, Gary LC, Arora T et al (2011) Clinical and demographic factors associated with fractures among older Americans. Osteoporos Int 22:1263–1274

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Valtola A, Honkanen R, Kroger H, Tuppurainen M, Saarikoski S, Alhava E (2002) Lifestyle and other factors predict ankle fractures in perimenopausal women: a population-based prospective cohort study. Bone 30:238–242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Greenfield DM, Eastell R (2001) Risk factors for ankle fracture. Osteoporos Int 12:97–103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ingle BM, Eastell R (2002) Site-specific bone measurements in patients with ankle fracture. Osteoporos Int 13:342–347

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee KM, Chung CY, Kwon SS, Won SH, Lee SY, Chung MK, Park MS (2013) Ankle fractures have features of an osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporos Int 24:2819–2825

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stein EM, Liu XS, Nickolas TL et al (2011) Abnormal microarchitecture and stiffness in postmenopausal women with ankle fractures. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96:2041–2048

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Delmas PD, Marin F, Marcus R, Misurski DA, Mitlak BH (2007) Beyond hip: importance of other nonspinal fractures. Am J Med 120:381–387

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stone KL, Seeley DG, Lui LY, Cauley JA, Ensrud K, Browner WS, Nevitt MC, Cummings SR (2003) BMD at multiple sites and risk of fracture of multiple types: long-term results from the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. J Bone Miner Res 18:1947–1954

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lauritzen JB, Lund B (1993) Risk of hip fracture after osteoporosis fractures. 451 women with fracture of lumbar spine, olecranon, knee or ankle. Acta Orthop Scand 64:297–300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Center JR, Bliuc D, Nguyen TV, Eisman JA (2007) Risk of subsequent fracture after low-trauma fracture in men and women. JAMA 297:387–394

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pritchard JM, Giangregorio LM, Ioannidis G, Papaioannou A, Adachi JD, Leslie WD (2012) Ankle fractures do not predict osteoporotic fractures in women with or without diabetes. Osteoporos Int 23:957–962

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Boutroy S, Bouxsein ML, Munoz F, Delmas PD (2005) In vivo assessment of trabecular bone microarchitecture by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:6508–6515

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stein EM, Liu XS, Nickolas TL et al (2010) Abnormal microarchitecture and reduced stiffness at the radius and tibia in postmenopausal women with fractures. J Bone Miner Res 25:2572–2581

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nicks KM, Amin S, Atkinson EJ, Riggs BL, Melton LJ 3rd, Khosla S (2012) Relationship of age to bone microstructure independent of areal bone mineral density. J Bone Miner Res 27:637–644

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Morin P, Herrmann F, Ammann P, Uebelhart B, Rizzoli R (2005) A rapid self-administered food frequency questionnaire for the evaluation of dietary protein intake. Clin Nutr 24:768–774

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chevalley T, Bonjour JP, van Rietbergen B, Ferrari S, Rizzoli R (2013) Fracture history of healthy premenopausal women is associated with a reduction of cortical microstructural components at the distal radius. Bone 55:377–383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nishiyama KK, Macdonald HM, Buie HR, Hanley DA, Boyd SK (2010) Postmenopausal women with osteopenia have higher cortical porosity and thinner cortices at the distal radius and tibia than women with normal aBMD: an in vivo HR-pQCT study. J Bone Miner Res 25:882–890

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gunnes M, Mellstrom D, Johnell O (1998) How well can a previous fracture indicate a new fracture? A questionnaire study of 29,802 postmenopausal women. Acta Orthop Scand 69:508–512

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chevalley T, Bonjour JP, van Rietbergen B, Rizzoli R, Ferrari S (2012) Fractures in healthy females followed from childhood to early adulthood are associated with later menarcheal age and with impaired bone microstructure at peak bone mass. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97:4174–81

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Deere K, Sayers A, Rittweger J, Tobias JH (2012) A cross-sectional study of the relationship between cortical bone and high-impact activity in young adult males and females. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97:3734–3743

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Compston JE, Flahive J, Hosmer DW et al (2014) Relationship of weight, height, and body mass index with fracture risk at different sites in postmenopausal women: the Global Longitudinal study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW). J Bone Miner Res 29:487–493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ong T, Sahota O, Tan W, Marshall L (2014) A United Kingdom perspective on the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and bone health: a cross sectional analysis of data from the Nottingham Fracture Liaison Service. Bone 59:207–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Melton LJ 3rd, Riggs BL, van Lenthe GH, Achenbach SJ, Muller R, Bouxsein ML, Amin S, Atkinson EJ, Khosla S (2007) Contribution of in vivo structural measurements and load/strength ratios to the determination of forearm fracture risk in postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res 22:1442–1448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Svedbom A, Ivergard M, Hernlund E, Rizzoli R, Kanis JA (2014) Epidemiology and economic burden of osteoporosis in Switzerland. Arch Osteoporos 9:187. doi:10.1007/s11657-014-0187-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Ms. F. Merminod, RD; M.-A. Schaad, RN; and A. Sigaud, RN, for the management of participants; Ms. C. Genet and Mr. G. Conicella for DXA and HR-pQCT measurements; and Ms. R. Sudan for manuscript editing. We thank the Swiss Foundation for Research in Ageing AETAS for the kind supply of its mobile osteodensitometer, the Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine Clinical Research Center and the BNP-Paribas Foundation for their support.

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Biver.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Biver, E., Durosier, C., Chevalley, T. et al. Prior ankle fractures in postmenopausal women are associated with low areal bone mineral density and bone microstructure alterations. Osteoporos Int 26, 2147–2155 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-015-3119-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-015-3119-9

Keywords

Navigation