Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Anthropometric models of bone mineral content and areal bone mineral density based on the bone mineral density in childhood study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

New models describing anthropometrically adjusted normal values of bone mineral density and content in children have been created for the various measurement sites. The inclusion of multiple explanatory variables in the models provides the opportunity to calculate Z-scores that are adjusted with respect to the relevant anthropometric parameters.

Introduction

Previous descriptions of children’s bone mineral measurements by age have focused on segmenting diverse populations by race and sex without adjusting for anthropometric variables or have included the effects of a single anthropometric variable.

Methods

We applied multivariate semi-metric smoothing to the various pediatric bone-measurement sites using data from the Bone Mineral Density in Childhood Study to evaluate which of sex, race, age, height, weight, percent body fat, and sexual maturity explain variations in the population’s bone mineral values. By balancing high adjusted R 2 values with clinical needs, two models are examined.

Results

At the spine, whole body, whole body sub head, total hip, hip neck, and forearm sites, models were created using sex, race, age, height, and weight as well as an additional set of models containing these anthropometric variables and percent body fat. For bone mineral density, weight is more important than percent body fat, which is more important than height. For bone mineral content, the order varied by site with body fat being the weakest component. Including more anthropometrics in the model reduces the overlap of the critical groups, identified as those individuals with a Z-score below −2, from the standard sex, race, and age model.

Conclusions

If body fat is not available, the simpler model including height and weight should be used. The inclusion of multiple explanatory variables in the models provides the opportunity to calculate Z-scores that are adjusted with respect to the relevant anthropometric parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Peck W (1993) Consensus development conference: diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of osteoporosis. Am J Med 94:646–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kalkwarf H, Zemel B, Gilsanz V, Lappe JM, Horlick M, Oberfield S, Mahboubi S, Fan B, Frederick MM, Shepherd JA, Winer KK, Shepherd JA (2007) The bone mineral density in childhood study: bone mineral content and density according to age, sex, and race. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:2087–2099

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zemel BS, Kalkwarf HJ, Gilsanz V, Lappe JM, Oberfield S, Shepherd JA, Frederick MM, Huang X, Lu M, Mahboubi S, Hangartner T, Winer KK (2011) Revised reference curves for bone mineral content and areal bone mineral density according to age and sex for black and non-black children: results of the Bone Mineral Density in Childhood Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96:3160–3169

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zemel BS, Leonard MB, Kelly A, Lappe JM, Gilsanz V, Oberfield S, Mahboubi S, Shepherd JA, Hangartner TN, Frederick MM, Winer KK, Kalkwarf HJ (2010) Height adjustment in assessing dual energy x-ray absorptiometry measurements of bone mass and density in children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 3:1265–1273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lewiecki EM, Gordon CM, Baim S, Leonard MB, Bishop NJ, Bianchi ML, Kalkwarf HJ, Langman CB, Plotkin H, Rauch F, Zemel BS, Binkley N, Bilezikian JP, Kendler DL, Hans DB, Silverman S (2008) International Society for Clinical Densitometry 2007 Adult and Pediatric Official Positions. Bone 6:1115–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wainer H, Thissen D (1975) Multivariate semi-metric smoothing in multiple prediction. J Am Stat Assoc 70:568–573

    Google Scholar 

  7. Khamis H, Guo S (1993) Improvement in the Roche-Wainer-Thissen stature prediction model: a comparative study. Am J Hum Biol 5:669–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Short DF, Zemel BS, Gilsanz V, Kalkwarf HJ, Lappe JM, Mahboubi S, Oberfield SE, Shepherd JA, Winer KK, Hangartner TN (2011) Fitting of bone mineral density with consideration of anthropometric parameters. Osteoporos Int 4:1047–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tanner J (1962) Growth at adolescence, 2nd edn. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  10. McKay HA, MacLean L, Petit M, MacKelvie-O’Brien K, Janssen P, Beck T, Khan KM (2005) “Bounce at the Bell”: a novel program of short bouts of exercise improves proximal femur bone mass in early pubertal children. Br J Sports Med 39:521–526

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Neter J, Wasserman W, Kutner M, Richard D (1990) Applied Linear Statistcal Models. Irwin Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Horlick M, Wang J, Pierson R Jr, Thornton J (2004) Prediction models for evaluation of total body bone mass with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry among children and adolescents. Pediatrics 114:E337–E345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Baptista F, Fragosa O, Vieira F (2007) Influence of body composition and weight-bearing physical activity in BMD of pre-pubertal children. Bone 40(Sup 1):S24–S25

  14. Hogler W, Brioday J, Woodhead H, Chan A, Cowell C (2003) Importance of lean mass in the interpretation of total body densitometry in children and adolescents. J Pediatr 143:81–88

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gordi T, Khamis H (2004) Simple solution to a common statistical problem: interpreting multiple tests. Clin Ther 5:780–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. CDC Growth Charts (2000) [Graph illustration Weight for age percentiles: Girls 2 to 20 years] Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/growthcharts/data/set1/chart-04.pdf. Accessed Dec 2014

  17. Jackson RL, Kelly HG (1945) Growth charts for use in pediatric practice. J Pediatr 27:215–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gordon CM, Bachrach LK, Carpenter TO, Crabtree N, Fuleihan GE, Kutilek S, Lorenc RS, Tosi LL, Ward KA, Ward LM, Kalkwarf HJ (2008) Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry interpretation and reporting in children and adolescents: the 2007 ISCD pediatric official positions. J Clin Densitom 11:43–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. F. Short.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(XLSX 141 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Short, D.F., Gilsanz, V., Kalkwarf, H.J. et al. Anthropometric models of bone mineral content and areal bone mineral density based on the bone mineral density in childhood study. Osteoporos Int 26, 1099–1108 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-014-2916-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-014-2916-x

Keywords

Navigation