Skip to main content
Log in

The reflection of cylindrical shock wave segments on cylindrical concave wall segments

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Shock Waves Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The reflection of a two-dimensional cylindrical shock wave segment on a concave-cylindrical wall segment was investigated from an experimental and numerical perspective. Qualitatively, the experimental results show that a cylindrical shock behaves similarly to a plane shock when propagating up a concave-cylindrical wall segment. Thus, whatever differences exist must be quantitative. The length of the cylindrical shock’s Mach stem was plotted against the subtending angle. From the plots, two limits are highlighted, one where the shock’s radius is much larger than the wall’s radius and another where the wall has the larger radius. The former being akin to a plane shock interacting with a cylindrical wall segment. An increase in initial shock Mach number was observed to affect the type of Mach reflection that is formed (whether it is an inverse or stationary Mach reflection) as well as the transition point to a transitioned regular reflection. An expression which relates the shock’s Mach stem to the subtending angle was derived. Comparisons between the expression’s predictions, experimental and CFD data were completed, and they showed good correlation. Further, the expression was shown to reduce to that derived by Itoh et al. when the shock’s radius was much larger than the wall’s radius.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

\(M_0\) :

Initial shock Mach number

\(M_\mathrm{s}\) :

Plane shock Mach number

\(M_\mathrm{w}\) :

Wall shock Mach number

\(M_1\) :

Mach stem Mach number

\(u_1\) :

Fluid velocity behind the shock

\(a_1\) :

Sound speed behind the shock

\(a_0\) :

Sound speed ahead of the shock

\(R_\mathrm{w}\) :

Wall radius

\(R_\mathrm{s}\) :

Initial shock radius

r :

Shock radius

\(\lambda \) :

Mach stem length

\(\mathrm{d}s\) :

Arc length element

\(\phi \) :

Angle subtended by the Mach stem

\(\theta _\mathrm{F}\) :

Angle when Mach reflection first forms

\(\theta \) :

Shock orientation

\(\theta _\mathrm{w}\) :

Shock orientation at the wall

\(\eta (M)\) :

Modification to Whitham’s theory

\(\phi ^*\) :

Angle when the shock transitions from MR to RR

u(r):

Gas speed behind the shock

a(r):

Speed of sound behind the shock

\(u_\mathrm{s}(r)\) :

Shock speed

References

  1. Ben-Dor, G.: Shock Wave Reflection Phenomena, pp. 249–305. Springer, Berlin (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71382-1

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Guderley, G.: Starke kugelige und zylindrische Verdichtungsstösse in de Nähe des Kugelmittelpunktes bzw de Zylinderachse. Luftfahrtforschung 19, 128–129 (1942)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Whitham, G.: On the propagation of shock waves through regions of non-uniform area or flow. J. Fluid Mech. 4(4), 337–360 (1958). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112058000495

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Ben-Dor, G., Takayama, K.: Analytical prediction of the transition from Mach to regular reflection over cylindrical concave wedges. J. Fluid Mech. 158, 365–380 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112085002695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Takayama, K., Ben-Dor, G.: A reconsideration of the transition criterion from Mach to regular reflection over cylindrical concave surfaces. KSME J. 3, 6–9 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02945677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Itoh, S., Okazaki, N., Itaya, M.: On the transition between regular and Mach reflection in truly non-stationary flows. J. Fluid Mech. 108, 383–400 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112081002176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gruber, S., Skews, B.: Weak shock wave reflection from concave surfaces. Exp. Fluid. 54, 1571–1585 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-013-1571-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hornung, H., Oertel, H., Sanderman, R.: Transition to Mach reflexion of shock waves in steady and pseudosteady flow with and without relaxation. J. Fluid Mech. 90(3), 541–560 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1017/S002211207900238X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Whitham, G.: A new approach to problems of shock dynamics. Part I. Two-dimensional problems. J. Fluid Mech. 2(2), 145–171 (1957). https://doi.org/10.1017/S002211205700004X

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Gray, B.J., Skews, B.W. Kontis, K. (Ed.): Reflection transition of converging cylindrical shock wave segments. In: 28th International Symposium on Shock Waves, vol. 2, pp. 995–1000. Springer, Berlin (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25685-1_151

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Lock, G.D., Dewey, J.M.: An experimental investigation of the sonic criterion for transition from regular to Mach reflection of weak shock waves. Exp. Fluids 7, 289–292 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00198446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Skews, B., Gray, B., Paton, R.: Experimental production of two-dimensional shock waves of arbitrary profile. Shock Waves 25, 1–10 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-014-0541-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the South African National Research Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. B. Ndebele.

Additional information

Communicated by O. Igra and A. Higgins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ndebele, B.B., Skews, B.W. The reflection of cylindrical shock wave segments on cylindrical concave wall segments. Shock Waves 28, 1185–1197 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-018-0812-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-018-0812-6

Keywords

Navigation