Skip to main content
Log in

Head-on Collision of a Detonation with a Planar Shock Wave

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Shock Waves Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The phenomenon that occurs when a Chapman–Jouguet (CJ) detonation collides with a shock wave is discussed. Assuming a one-dimensional steady wave configuration analogous to a planar shock–shock frontal interaction, analytical solutions of the Rankine–Hugoniot relationships for the transmitted detonation and the transmitted shock are obtained by matching the pressure and particle velocity at the contact surface. The analytical results indicate that there exist three possible regions of solutions, i.e. the transmitted detonation can have either strong, weak or CJ solution, depending on the incident detonation and shock strengths. On the other hand, if we impose the transmitted detonation to have a CJ solution followed by a rarefaction fan, the boundary conditions are also satisfied at the contact surface. The existence of these multiple solutions is verified by an experimental investigation. It is found that the experimental results agree well with those predicted by the second wave interaction model and that the transmitted detonation is a CJ detonation. Unsteady numerical simulations of the reactive Euler equations with both simple one-step Arrhenius kinetic and chain-branching kinetic models are also carried out to look at the transient phenomena and at the influence of a finite reaction thickness of a detonation wave on the problem of head-on collision with a shock. From all the computational results, a relaxation process consisting of a quasi-steady period and an overshoot for the transmitted detonation subsequent to the head-on collisions can be observed, followed by the asymptotic decay to a CJ detonation as predicted theoretically. For unstable pulsating detonations, it is found that, due to the increase in the thermodynamic state of the reactive mixture caused by the shock, the transmitted pulsating detonation can become more stable with smaller amplitude and period oscillation. These observations are in good agreement with experimental evidence obtained from smoked foils where there is a significant decrease in the detonation cell size after a region of relaxation when the detonation collides head-on with a shock wave.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fickett, W., Davis, W.C.Detonation. University of California Press, Berkeley (1979)

  2. Lee J.H.S. (2001). Detonation waves in gaseous explosives. In: Ben-Dor G., Igra O., Elperin T. (eds). Handbook of Shock Waves, Vol. III, Academic, New York, pp. 309–415

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Terao, K., Yoshida, T., Kishi, K., Ishii, K. Interaction between shock and detonation waves. In:CD-Rom Proceedings of 18th International Colloquium on the Dynamics of Explosions and Reactive Systems, Seattle, USA (2001)

  4. Frank, W.J. Interaction of a Shock Wave with a Wire Screen. University of. Toronto Inst. Aerophysics UTIA Technical Notes, No. 13.(1957)

  5. Oppenheim A.K., Urtiew P.A., Stern R.A. (1959) Peculiarity of shock impingement on area convergence. Phys. Fluids 2(4): 427–431

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Reynolds, W.C. The Element Potential Method for Chemical Equilibrium Analysis: Implementation in the Interactive Program STANJAN, 3rd ed. Mechanical Engineering Department, Stanford University(1986)

  7. Oran E.S., DeVore C.R. (1994) The stability of imploding detonations: results of numerical simulations. Phys. Fluids 6(1): 369–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Short M., Sharpe G.J. (2003) Pulsating instability of detonations with a two-step chain-branching reaction model: theory and numerics. Combust. Theory Modelling 7, 401–416

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Toro E.F. (1999) Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluids Dynamics, 2nd edi. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Ng H.D. (2005) The Effect of Chemical Reaction Kinetics on the Structure of Gaseous Detonations. Ph.D. Thesis, McGill University, Montreal, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  11. Berger M.J., Oliger J. (1984) Adaptive mesh refinement for hyperbolic partial differential equations. J. Comput. Phys. 53, 484–512

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Ng H.D., Lee J.H.S. (2003) Direct initiation of detonation with a multi-step reaction scheme. J. Fluid Mech. 476, 179–211

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee H.I., Stewart D.S. (1990) Calculation of linear detonation instability: one-dimensional instability of planar detonations. J. Fluid Mech. 216, 103–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Konnov, A.A. Detailed reaction mechanism for small hydrocarbons combustion. Release 0.4, http://homepages.vub.ac.be/~akonnov/ (1998)

  15. Botros, B.B., Zhu, Y.J., Ng, H.D., Lee, J.H.S. The unsteady dynamics of the head-on collision between a detonation and a shock wave. In: CD-Rom Proceedings of 20th International Colloquium on the Dynamics of Explosions and Reactive Systems, Montreal, Canada (2005)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. D. Ng.

Additional information

Communicated by K. Takayama.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ng, H.D., Botros, B.B., Chao, J. et al. Head-on Collision of a Detonation with a Planar Shock Wave. Shock Waves 15, 341–352 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-006-0022-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-006-0022-5

Keywords

Pacs

Navigation