Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Measurement Properties Analysis of the Brazilian Portuguese Version of the ICIQ-VS

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The high prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in women requires assessments using validated instruments. We aimed to translate, cross-culturally adapt to Brazilian Portuguese, and analyze the measurement properties of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Vaginal Symptoms Module (ICIQ-VS-Br).

Methods

Participants were Brazilian women older than 18 years presenting vulvovaginal symptoms according to the Vulvovaginal Symptoms Questionnaire (VSQ-Br). The development of the ICIQ-VS-Br included the steps of translation, synthesis, back-translation, expert meeting, and pre-test. We analyzed construct validity by correlating the ICIQ-VS-Br and VSQ-Br. The participants answered the ICIQ-VS-Br the second time 7 to 10 days after the first response. We measured test–retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), internal consistency using Cronbach’s alpha, and construct validity using Pearson’s correlation coefficient.

Results

The study included 313 women. Reproducibility was analyzed for the three subscales of the ICIQ-VS-Br, resulting in an ICC of 0.92 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.94) for “vaginal symptoms,” 0.85 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.89) for “sexual matters,” and 0.87 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.91) for “quality of life.” Construct validity showed a moderate correlation between ICIQ-VS-Br and VSQ-Br, confirming our hypotheses.

Conclusions

The ICIQ-VS-Br demonstrated validity and reproducibility, indicating that the instrument can be used in scientific research and clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Verbeek M, Hayward L. Pelvic floor dysfunction and its effect on quality of sexual life. Sex Med Rev. 2019;7:559–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29:4–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Louis-Charles K, Biggie K, Wolfunbarger A, Wilcox B, Kienstra CM. Pelvic floor dysfunction in the female athlete. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2019;18(2):49-52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Potter J. Female sexuality: assessing satisfaction and addressing problems. Decker Med Family Med. 2009;1–23 https://doi.org/10.2310/FM.1254

  5. Price N, Jackson S, Avery K, et al. Development and psychometric evaluation of the ICIQ Vaginal Symptoms Questionnaire: the ICIQ-VS. BJOG. 2006;113:700–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Koleli I, Astepe BS. Validation of the Turkish version of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-vaginal symptoms (ICIQ-VS). Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30:1203–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire. ICIQ Validation Methodology. Available at http://iciq.net/validation-methodology. Accessed on 19 December 2022.

  8. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25:3186–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. COSMIN Checklist Manual. EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, 2012.

  10. Epstein J, Santo RM, Guillemin F. A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:435–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Alem MER, Chaves TC, de Figueiredo VB, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Vulvovaginal Symptoms Questionnaire. Menopause. 2022;29(9):1055-61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mokkink LB, Prinsen CAC, Patrick DL, et al. COSMIN Study Design checklist for Patient-reported outcome measurement instruments. Amsterdam: The Netherlands; 2019. p. 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mokkink, Lidwine B, van der Vleuten C, et al. COSMIN risk of bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability and measurement error of outcome measurement instrument. User Manual Version. 2021. Available at https://www.cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/user-manual-COSMIN-Risk-of-Bias-tool_v4_JAN_final.pdf

  14. Armijo-Olivo S, de Castro-Carletti EM, Calixtre LB, et al. Understanding clinical significance in rehabilitation: a primer for researchers and clinicians. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022;101(1):64–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15:155–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Hentschel H, Alberton DL, Capp E, et al. Validation of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for Portuguese language. Clin Biomed Res. 2007;27:10–4.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short forms of two conditions-specific quality of life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(1):103–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (Process 2019/14666-7) for funding the study. The funders did not have any role in the study design, data collection and analysis, manuscript preparation, or publication decision. The authors also thank the Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar) and the University Hospital of UFSCar managed by Empresa Brasileira de Serviços Hospitalares for their support in the development of the study and authorization of data collection. Finally, we thank the participants who made this study possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.M.F. Fabricio: project development, data collection, manuscript writing; R.F.C.M. Padovez: project development, manuscript review; G.G. Poli: project development, data collection; M.G. Venancio: project development, data collection. C.M.A. Silva: project development, data collection; C.H. Jorge: project development, manuscript review; P. Driusso: project development, manuscript review; A.C.S. Beleza: project development, manuscript writing and review.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Carolina Sartorato Beleza.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

None.

Additional information

Handling Editor: G. Alessandro Digesu

Editor in Chief: Maria A. Bortolini

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fabricio, A.M.F., de Fátima Carreira Moreira Padovez, R., Poli, G.G. et al. Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Measurement Properties Analysis of the Brazilian Portuguese Version of the ICIQ-VS. Int Urogynecol J 35, 703–712 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-024-05747-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-024-05747-x

Keywords

Navigation