Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Do patients discharged from the physiotherapy-led pelvic health clinic re-present to the urogynaecology service?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article has been updated

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The physiotherapy-led pelvic health clinic (PLPHC) is an advanced practice clinic that manages women from the urogynaecology waitlist with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and/or urinary incontinence (UI) at Gold Coast Health, Australia. This study was aimed at determining re-referral rates and reasons for re-presentation of women previously managed and discharged from the PLPHC. We hypothesised that there would be low representation rates for the same condition within 12 months of discharge.

Methods

A retrospective audit was undertaken of all (n = 209) patients discharged between 1 January and 31 December 2017. Re-presentation rates and reasons for re-referral for women seen in the PLPHC and discharged without requiring urogynaecology medical specialist review were analysed and descriptive analysis performed.

Result

Of the 209 patients, 67 were referred to, or had, urogynaecology medical specialist review after their initial physiotherapy care and were removed from further analysis. Of the remaining 142 patients, who were initially managed by physiotherapy only, 10 (7.1%) women were re-referred to specialist medical outpatient gynaecology and urology out-patient departments, for management of a different diagnosis, and 10 (7.1%) for their original diagnoses, within 12 months of discharge. Of the latter, 1 patient required further physiotherapy and urogynaecologist management; 7 patients required ongoing pessary management; 1 patient continued with urologist medical management; and 1 failed to attend.

Conclusion

This study presents novel data on low re-presentation rates in the 12 months following discharge for patients with POP or UI managed in a PLPHC; and provides further support for advanced scope of practice physiotherapy gynaecological service models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 06 August 2021

    The ORCID links for authors Zara Howard and Kelly A. Weir were inadvertently interchanged. This has been fixed and corrected.

References

  1. Irwin DE, Kopp ZS, Agatep B, Milsom I, Abrams P. Worldwide prevalence estimates of lower urinary tract symptoms, overactive bladder, urinary incontinence and bladder outlet obstruction. BJU Int. 2011;108(7):1132–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Thakar R, Stanton S. Management of genital prolapse. BMJ. 2002;324(7348):1258–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Incontinence in Australia. 2013, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: Canberra, Australia, p. 1–163.

  4. Deloitte Access Economics. The economic impact of incontinence in Australia. Kingston, ACT 2604. Australia. 2011; p. 1–72.

  5. Dumoulin C, Adewuyi T, Booth J, Bradley C, Burgio K, Hagen S, et al. Adult conservative management. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Wagg A, Wein A, editors. Incontinence. Tokyo: ICUD ICS; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wu Y, Welk B. Revisiting current treatment options for stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse: a contemporary literature review. Res Rep Urol. 2019;11:179–88.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lone F, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Karamalis G. A 5-year prospective study of vaginal pessary use for pelvic organ prolapse. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;114(1):56–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Neumann P. The Guidelines for the Use and Support of Pessaries in the Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse. 2012, Adelaide: iCAHE. p. 78.

  9. Kearney R, Brown C. Self-management of vaginal pessaries for pelvic organ prolapse. BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2014;3(1):u206180.w2533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brennen R, Sherburn M, Rosamilia A. Development, implementation and evaluation of an advanced practice in continence and women's health physiotherapy model of care. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;59(3):450–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Edwards H, Greitschus J, Nucifora J, Weekes C, Kuys S, Sam S. Gynaecology physiotherapy screening clinics improve access to care and health outcomes for women on gynaecology outpatient waiting lists. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36 (2p. Supplement: S3):pS175–6.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Howard Z, Jackman A, Bongers M, Corcoran K, Nucifora J, Weir KA. Outcomes of a physiotherapy-led pelvic health clinic. Aust N Z Contin J. 2018;24(2):43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stute M, Moretto N, Raymer M, et al. Process to establish 11 primary contact allied health pathways in a public health service. Aust Health Rev. 2018;42(3):258–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chang AT, Gavaghan B, O'Leary S, McBride L-J, Raymer M. Do patients discharged from advanced practice physiotherapy-led clinics re-present to specialist medical services? Aust Health Rev. 2017;42:334–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cottenden A, Bliss DZ, Buckley B, et al. Management using continence products. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Wagg A, Wein A, editors. Incontinence. Tokyo: ICUD ICS; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sarma S, Ying T, Moore KM. Long-term vaginal ring pessary use: discontinuation rates and adverse events. BJOG. 2009;116(13):1715–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to acknowledge assistance provided by the Gold Coast Health Urogynaecology team, clinical and administrative staff of the PLPHC, and Health Informatics and Business Analytics services.

Funding

The project received funding from the Gold Coast Health Allied Health Research Clinical Backfill scheme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J. Nucifora: research question and design, protocol development, data collection, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript writing; Z. Howard: research question and design, protocol development, data collection, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript editing; K.A. Weir: research question and design, protocol development, data interpretation, manuscript editing, research mentoring.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer Nucifora.

Ethics declarations

Financial disclaimers/conflicts of interest

None declared.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nucifora, J., Howard, Z. & Weir, K.A. Do patients discharged from the physiotherapy-led pelvic health clinic re-present to the urogynaecology service?. Int Urogynecol J 33, 689–695 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-04912-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-04912-w

Keywords

Navigation