Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Onabotulinumtoxin a injection with or without hydrodistension for treatment of bladder pain syndrome

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Onabotulinumtoxin A (BoNT-A) injection has been used for bladder pain syndrome (BPS) treatment with good results. Our aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of BoNT-A injection with or without hydrodistension (HD).

Methods

Retrospective analysis of patients treated with BoNT-A injection with or without HD because of BPS between 2008 and 2014 in our department. One hundred U of Botox® was injected in the trigone and 100 U in the bladder wall. Follow-up included a VAS of pain (0–10), a patient satisfaction scale (0–10) and a treatment benefit scale (1–2: response to treatment; 3–4: non-response to treatment). Complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification. BoNT-A retreatment was offered at the patient’s request. Reasons for non-retreatment request were collected. Postoperative outcomes were compared between BoNT-A and BoNT-A + HD.

Results

Forty-one patients were included (39 females, 2 males), median age: 73 years (69–78.5). Reduction in VAS, postoperative VAS = 0, satisfaction with surgery and responders to treatment were significantly higher after BoNT-A + HD (n = 26) than after BoNT-A (n = 15). Eleven (26.8%) complications (CD ≤ 2) were detected, with no differences between treatment groups. Mean follow-up was 153 (± 83) months. Twelve (46.2%) patients in the BoNT-A + HD group and seven (46.7%) patients in the BoNT-A group requested retreatment. Lack of severe pain was a common reason for treatment discontinuation.

Conclusion

BoNT-A injection could represent a safe and effective BPS treatment. BoNT-A + HD seems to be better than BoNT-A alone for pain relief, with no significant additional morbidity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. van de Merwe JP, Nordling J, Bouchelouche P, et al. Diagnostic criteria, classification, and nomenclature for painful bladder syndrome/interstitial cystitis: an ESSIC proposal. Eur Urol. 2008;53:60–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chrysanthopoulou EL, Doumouchtsis SK. Challenges and current evidence on the management of bladder pain syndrome. Neurourol Urodyn. 2014;33:1193–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gafni-Kane A, Botros SM, Du H, et al. Measuring the success of combined intravesical dimethyl sulfoxide and triamcinolone for treatment of bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24:303–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nordling J, Fall M, Hanno P. Global concepts of bladder pain syndrome (interstitial cystitis). World J Urol. 2012;30:457–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chennamsetty A, Khourdaji I, Goike J, et al. Electrosurgical management of Hunner ulcers in a referral center’s interstitial cystitis population. Urology. 2015;85:74–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rahnama’i MS, Marcelissen T, Apostolidis A, et al. The efficacy of botulinum toxin a and sacral neuromodulation in the management of interstitialcystitis (IC)/bladder pain syndrome (BPS), what do we know? ICI-RS 2017 think thank. Bristol Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37:S99–S107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Giannantoni A, Porena M, Costantini E, et al. Botulinum a toxin intravesical injection in patients with painful bladder syndrome: 1-year follow up. J Urol. 2008;179:1031–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pinto RA, Costa D, Morgado A, et al. Intratrigonal onabotulinumtoxinA improves bladder symptoms and quality of life in patients with bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis: a pilot, single center, randomized, double-blind. Placebo Controlled Trial J Urol. 2018;199:998–1003.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu HT, Kuo HC. Intravesical botulinum toxin a injections plus hydrodistension can reduce nerve growth factor production and control bladder pain in interstitial cystitis. Urology. 2007;70:463–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuo HC, Jiang YH, Tsai YC, et al. Intravesical botulinum toxin—a injections reduce bladder pain of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome refractory to conventional treatment—a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35:609–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chung SD, Kuo YC, Kuo HC. Intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injections for refractory painful bladder syndrome. Pain Physician. 2012;15:197–202.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuo HC, Chancellor MB. Comparison of intravesical botulinum toxin type a injections plus hydrodistention with hydrodistention alone for the treatment of refractory interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome. BJU Int. 2009;104:657–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Peters KM, Carrico DJ, Kalinowski SE, et al. Prevalence of pelvic floor dysfunction in patients with interstitial cystitis. Urology. 2007;70:16–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Homma Y, Ueda T, Ito T, et al. Japanese guideline for diagnosis and treatment of interstitial cystitis. Int J Urol. 2009;16:4–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Colman S, Chapple C, Nitti V, et al. Validation of treatment benefit scale for assessing subjective outcomes in treatment of overactive bladder. Urology. 2008;72:803–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Errando-Smet C, Ruiz MA, Villacampa-Aubá F, et al. Spanish cultural adaptation and psychometrical validation of the treatment benefit scale (TBS) in the symptomatic treatment of overactive bladder. Med Clin (Barc). 2013;140:6–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classifcation of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Manning J, Dwyer P, Rosamilia A, et al. A multicentre, prospective, randomised, double-blind study to measure the treatment effectiveness of abobotulinum a (AboBTXA) among women with refractory interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25:593–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Smith CP, Radziszewski P, Borkowski A, et al. Botulinum toxin a has antinociceptive effects in treating interstitial cystitis. Urology. 2004;64:871–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Akiyama Y, Nomiya A, Niimi A, et al. Botulinum toxin type a injection for refractory interstitial cystitis: a randomized comparative study and predictors of treatment response. Int J Urol. 2015;22:835–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Karsenty G, Elzayat E, Delapparent T, et al. Botulinum toxin type a injections into the trigone to treat idiopathic overactive bladder do not induce vesicoureteral reflux. J Urol. 2007;177:1011–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pinto R, Lopes T, Silva J, et al. Persistent therapeutic effect of repeated injections of onabotulinum toxin a in refractory bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis. J Urol. 2013;189:548–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Giannantoni A, Mearini E, Del Zingaro M, et al. Two-year efficacy and safety of botulinum a toxin intravesical injections in patients affected by refractory painful bladder syndrome. Curr Drug Deliv. 2010;7:1–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kuo HC. Repeated intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injections are effective in treatment of refractory interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome. Int J Clin Pract. 2013;67:427–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Chuang YC, Kuo HC. A prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial of bladder instillation of liposome formulation onabotulinumtoxinA for interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome. J Urol. 2017;198:376–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Webster GD, Galloway N. Surgical treatment of interstitial cystitis. Indications, techniques, and results. Urology. 1987;29:34–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

L. Mateu: Project development, data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing.

C. Gutierrez: Project development, data collection, manuscript writing.

J. Palou: Manuscript editing.

C. Errando: Project development, data analysis, manuscript editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Mateu Arrom.

Ethics declarations

Declarations

Funding: No funding was obtained.

Financial disclaimer/conflicts of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mateu Arrom, L., Gutierrez Ruiz, C., Palou, J. et al. Onabotulinumtoxin a injection with or without hydrodistension for treatment of bladder pain syndrome. Int Urogynecol J 32, 1213–1219 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04451-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04451-w

Keywords

Navigation