Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Validation of the Wexner scale in a Hebrew-speaking population

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score, known as the Wexner Score (WS), is a simple, disease-specific questionnaire for anal incontinence (AI) assessment. We aimed to translate and validate a Hebrew version of the WS.

Methods

Between November 2018 and December 2019, the WS was back translated and reviewed by a multidisciplinary pelvic floor team. The questionnaire was filled out by patients visiting the urogynecology and surgical pelvic floor clinics. Two weeks after completion, the patients were contacted using telephone surveys to assess the test-retest reliability examination. Construct validity was assessed by comparing the WS to the Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory 8 (CRADI-8), a part of the validated Hebrew version of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory questionnaire (PFDI-20).

Results

Overall, 91 female patients completed the WS questionnaire. Eighty-five percent (n = 78) responded to the re-test WS questionnaire. A high intraclass coefficient of 0.87 was found in the WS total score, with a range from 0.82 to 0.86 for its subscales. A significant positive relationship between the Hebrew versions of the WS and CRADI-8 scores was established (r = 0.66, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

A new, Hebrew-translated version of the WS is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing AI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bharucha AE, Zinsmeister AR, Locke GR, Seide BM, McKeon K, Schleck CD, et al. Prevalence and burden of fecal incontinence: a population-based study in women. Gastroenterology. 2005;129(1):42–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bharucha AE, Rao SS. An update on anorectal disorders for gastroenterologists. Gastroenterology. 2014;146(1):37–45.e2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cotterill N, Norton C, Avery KN, Abrams P, Donovan JL. Psychometric evaluation of a new patient-completed questionnaire for evaluating anal incontinence symptoms and impact on quality of life: the ICIQ-B. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(10):1235–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Melville JL, Fan MY, Newton K, Fenner D. Fecal incontinence in US women: a population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(6):2071–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carvalho C, da Silva Serrão PRM, Beleza ACS, Driusso P. Pelvic floor dysfunctions in female cheerleaders: a cross-sectional study. Int Urogynecol J. 2019.

  6. Aitola P, Lehto K, Fonsell R, Huhtala H. Prevalence of faecal incontinence in adults aged 30 years or more in general population. Color Dis. 2010;12(7):687–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jangö H, Langhoff-Roos J, Rosthøj S, Sakse A. Mode of delivery after obstetric anal sphincter injury and the risk of long-term anal incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(6):733.e1–e13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wegnelius G, Hammarström M. Complete rupture of anal sphincter in primiparas: long-term effects and subsequent delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90(3):258–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nordenstam J, Altman D, Brismar S, Zetterström J. Natural progression of anal incontinence after childbirth. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009;20(9):1029–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Johanson JF, Lafferty J. Epidemiology of fecal incontinence: the silent affliction. Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;91(1):33–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gordon D, Groutz A, Goldman G, Avni A, Wolf Y, Lessing JB, et al. Anal incontinence: prevalence among female patients attending a urogynecologic clinic. Neurourol Urodyn. 1999;18(3):199–204.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bener A, Saleh N, Burgut FT. Prevalence and determinants of fecal incontinence in premenopausal women in an Arabian community. Climacteric. 2008;11(5):429–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Alsheik EH, Coyne T, Hawes SK, Merikhi L, Naples SP, Kanagarajan N, et al. Fecal incontinence: prevalence, severity, and quality of life data from an outpatient gastroenterology practice. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2012;2012:947694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36(1):77–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rusavy Z, Jansova M, Kalis V. Anal incontinence severity assessment tools used worldwide. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;126(2):146–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cam C, Selcuk S, Asoglu MR, Tug N, Akdemir Y, Ay P, et al. Validation of the Wexner scale in women with fecal incontinence in a Turkish population. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(11):1375–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fonseca AM, Meinberg MF, Lucas DV, Monteiro MV, Figueiredo EM, Fonseca L, et al. Cultural adaptation and validation of the Wexner scale in patients with anal incontinence in a Brazilian population. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(6):959–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(12):1417–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Barber MD. Questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007;18(4):461–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(1):103–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Barber MD, Kuchibhatla MN, Pieper CF, Bump RC. Psychometric evaluation of 2 comprehensive condition-specific quality of life instruments for women with pelvic floor disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185(6):1388–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lowenstein L, Levy G, Chen KO, Ginath S, Condrea A, Padoa A. Validation of Hebrew versions of the pelvic floor distress inventory, pelvic organ prolapse/urinary incontinence sexual function questionnaire, and the urgency, severity and impact questionnaire. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012;18(6):329–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Geller EJ, Barbee ER, Wu JM, Loomis MJ, Visco AG. Validation of telephone administration of 2 condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(6):632.e1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

R Meyer: Project development, data collection, manuscript writing.

M Alcalay: Project development, data collection, manuscript writing.

R Jamal: Data collection, manuscript revision.

N Horesh: Data collection, manuscript writing.

T Friedman: Data collection, manuscript revision.

R Nadler: Manuscript writing.

D Carter: Data collection, manuscript revision.

E Ram: Project development, data collection, manuscript writing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raanan Meyer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meyer, R., Alcalay, M., Jamal, R. et al. Validation of the Wexner scale in a Hebrew-speaking population. Int Urogynecol J 31, 2583–2587 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04400-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04400-7

Keywords

Navigation