Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Urinary incontinence in female outpatients in Singapore

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence, symptom characteristics, risk factors and impact on quality of life (QoL) of urinary incontinence (UI) in female outpatients in Singapore, to describe the attitudes of these women towards UI, and to investigate the barriers to healthcare-seeking behaviour in symptomatic women.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study in a convenience sample and 249 women enrolled from outpatient clinics. A modified self-administered questionnaire which included two validated instruments (the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence short form and the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7) was used.

Results

Questionnaires from 230 women were included in the analysis. The overall prevalence of UI was 41.74% (95% CI 35.49–48.26%). Most of the symptomatic women suffered from mild UI and the most common subtype was stress UI. Age (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00–1.05), vaginal delivery (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.43–4.97) and being sexually active (OR 2.41, 95% CI 1.31–4.43) were associated with UI. Among symptomatic women, only 41.25% (95% CI 30.82–52.53%) had sought medical attention before. The most common barrier to healthcare-seeking behaviour was embarrassment. The median QoL score was 33.33, indicating a mild impact of UI on QoL. QoL score was associated with UI severity (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Despite the high prevalence of UI, only about 41% of UI sufferers had sought medical attention before. Common barriers included embarrassment, fear of surgery and misconceptions. This study emphasizes the need for policy development for UI prevention and management in Singapore.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, et al. The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Urology. 2003;61(1):37–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lucas MG, Bedretdinova D, Bosch JLHR, et al. Guidelines on urinary incontinence. Arnhem: European Association of Urology; 2014.

  3. Ju CC, Swan LK. Merriman A, et al. Urinary incontinence among the elderly people of Singapore. Age Ageing. 1991;20(4):262–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tsai YC, Liu CH. Urinary incontinence among Taiwanese women: an outpatient study of prevalence, comorbidity, risk factors, and quality of life. Int Urol Nephrol. 2009;41(4):795–803.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hsieh CH, Su TH, Chang ST, et al. Prevalence of and attitude toward urinary incontinence in postmenopausal women. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008;100(2):171–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Perera J, Kirthinanda DS, Wijeratne S, et al. Descriptive cross sectional study on prevalence, perceptions, predisposing factors and health seeking behaviour of women with stress urinary incontinence. BMC Womens Health. 2014;14:78.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Elbiss HM, Osman N, Hammad FT. Social impact and healthcare-seeking behavior among women with urinary incontinence in the United Arab Emirates. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013;122(2):136–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Uebersax JS, Wyman JF, Shumaker SA, et al. Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program for Women Research Group. Neurourol Urodyn. 1995;14(2):131–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Danforth KN, Townsend MK, Lifford K, et al. Risk factors for urinary incontinence among middle-aged women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194(2):339–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Botlero R, Urquhart DM, Davis SR, et al. Prevalence and incidence of urinary incontinence in women: review of the literature and investigation of methodological issues. Int J Urol. 2008;15(3):230–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cooper J, Annappa M, Quigley A, et al. Prevalence of female urinary incontinence and its impact on quality of life in a cluster population in the United Kingdom (UK): a community survey. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2015;16(4):377–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Horng SS, Huang N, Wu SI, et al. The epidemiology of urinary incontinence and it’s influence on quality of life in Taiwanese middle-aged women. Neurourol Urodyn. 2013;32(4):371–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Maserejian NN, Minassian VA, Chen S, Hall SA, McKinlay JB, Tennstedt SL. Treatment status and risk factors for incidence and persistence of urinary incontinence in women. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(6):775–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li-Tsa Koh.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Patient consent

This was a questionnaire study, so only verbal consent was needed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luo, R., Dai, W., Tay, L.H. et al. Urinary incontinence in female outpatients in Singapore. Int Urogynecol J 29, 579–584 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3488-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3488-z

Keywords

Navigation