Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The prevalence of abnormal posterior compartment anatomy and its association with obstructed defecation symptoms in urogynecological patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Symptoms of obstructive defecation (OD) are common in women. Transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) has been used for the evaluation of defecatory disorders. The aim of our study was to determine the overall prevalence of anatomical abnormalities of the posterior compartment and their correlations with OD in women seen in a tertiary urogynecology clinic.

Methods

This is a retrospective study on 750 women seen at a tertiary urogynecological unit who had undergone a standardized interview, clinical examination, and 4D TPUS. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were undertaken to study the association between examination findings and symptoms of OD. This study was approved by the local human research ethics committee (Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee, IRB approval no. 13–16).

Results

The datasets of 719 women were analyzed. Mean age was 56.1 (18.4–87.6) years. Ninety-seven patients (13 %) reported fecal incontinence, 190 (26 %) constipation, and 461 (64 %) symptoms of OD. On examination, 405 women (56 %) were diagnosed with significant posterior compartment prolapse (POP-Q ≥ stage 2), which was associated with symptoms of OD (p < 0.0001). On ultrasound, 103 (14 %) patients had an enterocele, 382 (53 %) a true rectocele and 31 (4.3 %) had rectal intussusception. On multivariate analysis true rectocele (p = 0.003) and rectal intussusception (p = 0.004) remained significantly associated with symptoms of OD.

Conclusion

Both symptoms of OD and anatomical abnormalities of the posterior compartment are highly prevalent in urogynecological patients. Ultrasound findings of a true rectocele and rectal intussusception are significantly associated with obstructed defecation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Everhart JE, Go VLW, Johannes RS, Fitzsimmons SC, Roth HP, White LR (1989) A longitudinal survey of self-reported bowel habits in the United States. Dig Dis Sci 34(8):1153–1162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sonnenberg A, Koch TR (1989) Physician visits in the United States for constipation: 1958 to 1986. Dig Dis Sci 34(4):606–611

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Surrenti E, Rath DM, Pemberton JH, Camilleri M (1995) Audit of constipation in a tertiary referral gastroenterology practice. Am J Gastroenterol 90(9):1471–1475

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zbar A, Lienemann A, Fritsch H, Beer-Gabel M, Pescatori M (2003) Rectocele: pathogenesis and surgical management. Int J Colorectal Dis 18(5):369–384

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Spence-Jones C, Kamm MA, Henry MM, Hudson C (1994) Bowel dysfunction: a pathogenic factor in uterovaginal prolapse and urinary stress incontinence. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 101(2):147–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Andromanakos N, Skandalakis P, Troupis T, Filippou D (2006) Constipation of anorectal outlet obstruction: pathophysiology, evaluation and management. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 21(4):638–646

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Karlbom U, Påhlman L, Nilsson S, Graf W (1995) Relationships between defecographic findings, rectal emptying, and colonic transit time in constipated patients. Gut 36(6):907–912

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Pannu HK, Kaufman HS, Cundiff GW, Genadry R, Bluemke DA, Fishman EK (2000) Dynamic MR imaging of pelvic organ prolapse: spectrum of abnormalities. Radiographics 20(6):1567–1582

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hutchinson R, Mostafa A, Grant E, Smith N, Deen K, Harding L, Kumar MD (1993) Scintigraphic defecography: quantitative and dynamic assessment of anorectal function. Dis Colon Rectum 36(12):1132–1138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dietz HP, Steensma AB (2005) Posterior compartment prolapse on two- dimensional and three- dimensional pelvic floor ultrasound: the distinction between true rectocele, perineal hypermobility and enterocele. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 26:73–77

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rodrigo N, Shek KL, Dietz HP (2011) Rectal intussusception is associated with abnormal levator ani muscle structure and morphometry. Tech Coloproctol 15(1):39–43. doi:10.1007/s10151-010-0657-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Perniola G, Shek C, Chong CC, Chew S, Cartmill J, Dietz HP (2008) Defecation proctography and translabial ultrasound in the investigation of defecatory disorders. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31(5):567–571. doi:10.1002/uog.5337

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, Shull BL, Smith AR (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175(1):10–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dietz HP (2010) Pelvic floor ultrasound: a review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202(4):321–334. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2009.08.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dietz HP, Haylen BT, Broome J (2001) Ultrasound in the quantification of female pelvic organ prolapse. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18(5):511–514

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dietz HP, Korda A (2005) Which bowel symptoms are most strongly associated with a true rectocele? Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 45:505–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dietz H, Bernardo M, Kirby A, Shek K (2011) Minimal criteria for the diagnosis of avulsion of the puborectalis muscle by tomographic ultrasound. Int Urogynecol J 22(6):699–704

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dietz H, Beer-Gabel M (2012) Ultrasound in the investigation of posterior compartment vaginal prolapse and obstructed defecation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 40(1):14–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Steensma AB, Oom DM, Burger CW, Schouten WR (2010) Assessment of posterior compartment prolapse: a comparison of evacuation proctography and 3D transperineal ultrasound. Colorectal Dis 12(6):533–539

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Beer-Gabel M, Teshler M, Schechtman E, Zbar AP (2004) Dynamic transperineal ultrasound vs. defecography in patients with evacuatory difficulty: a pilot study. Int J Colorectal Dis 19(1):60–67

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Grasso R, Piciucchi S, Quattrocchi C, Sammarra M, Ripetti V, Beomonte Zobel B (2007) Posterior pelvic floor disorders: a prospective comparison using introital ultrasound and colpocystodefecography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30(1):86–94

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Beer-Gabel M, Assoulin Y, Amitai M, Bardan E (2008) A comparison of dynamic transperineal ultrasound (DTP-US) with dynamic evacuation proctography (DEP) in the diagnosis of cul de sac hernia (enterocele) in patients with evacuatory dysfunction. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:513–519

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vangruting IT, Stankiewic R, Sultan A (2015) Accuracy of evacuation proctogram, MRI and ultrasound for detecting posterior compartment disorders. Int Urogynecol J 26(S1):S69–S70

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dietz HP, Steensma AB (2006) The prevalence of major abnormalities of the levator ani in urogynaecological patients. BJOG 113(2):225–230. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00819.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Guzmán Rojas R, Shek K, Langer S, Dietz H (2013) The prevalence of anal sphincter injury in primiparous women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 42(4):461–466

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dietz HP, Rojas RG, Shek KL (2014) Postprocessing of pelvic floor ultrasound data: how repeatable is it? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 54(6):553–557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Richardson AC (1995) The anatomic defects in rectocele techniques and enterocele. Female Pelvic Med Reconstruct Surg 1(4):214–221

    Google Scholar 

  28. Guzman Rojas R, Kamisan Atan I, Shek KL, Dietz HP (2015) Defect-specific rectocele repair: medium-term anatomical, functional and subjective outcomes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 55:487–492. doi:10.1111/ajo.12347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tan L, Shek KL, Atan IK, Rojas RG, Dietz HP (2014) The repeatability of sonographic measures of functional pelvic floor anatomy. Int Urogynecol J 26:1667–1672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Siafarikas F, Stær-Jensen J, Braekken I, Bø K, Engh ME (2013) Learning process for performing and analyzing 3D/4D transperineal ultrasound imaging and interobserver reliability study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 41(3):312–317

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rodrigo Guzman Rojas.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

H.P. Dietz and K.L. Shek have received unrestricted educational grants from GE; R.A. Guzmán Rojas and I. Kamisan Atan report that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guzman Rojas, R., Kamisan Atan, I., Shek, K.L. et al. The prevalence of abnormal posterior compartment anatomy and its association with obstructed defecation symptoms in urogynecological patients. Int Urogynecol J 27, 939–944 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2914-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2914-3

Keywords

Navigation