Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Risk factors for failure of repeat midurethral sling surgery for recurrent or persistent stress urinary incontinence

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

To study the outcomes following repeat midurethral sling (MUS) surgery in patients with persistent or recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failure of primary MUS surgery and risk factors for surgical failure.

Methods

The medical records of 24 patients who underwent repeat MUS surgery at a single tertiary center from January 2004 to February 2014 were reviewed. The types of MUS used for the repeat surgey were transobturator, retropubic and single incision slings. Objective cure was defined as no demonstrable involuntary leakage of urine during increased abdominal pressure in the absence of a detrusor contraction observed during filling cystometry, and subjective cure was defined as a negative response to Urogenital Distress Inventory six (UDI-6) question 3 during follow-up between 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. The change in the inclination angle between the urethra and pubic axis was measured with introital ultrasonography and the cotton swab test performed.

Results

The objective and subjective cure rates were 79.2 % and 75 %, respectively. There were no differences in demographics between the patients with failure of surgery and those with successful surgery. Significant independent risk factors for failure of repeat MUS surgery were a change in cotton swab angle at rest and straining of <30° (OR 4.6, 95 % CI 2.5 – 7.9°), a change in inclination angle of <30° (OR 4.6, 95 % CI 2.5 – 7.9°), intrinsic sphincter deficiency (OR 3.4, 95 % CI 1.8 – 6.1) and a mean urethral closure pressure of <60 cm H2O (OR 2.9, 95 % CI 1.5 – 4.5). In one patient the bladder was perforated.

Conclusions

Repeat MUS surgery is safe and has a good short-term success rate, both objectively and subjectively, with independent risk factors for failure related to bladder neck hypomobility and poor urethral function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jonsson Funk M, Siddiqui NY, Kawasaki A, Wu JM (2012) Long-term outcomes after stress urinary incontinence surgery. Obstet Gynecol 120(1):83–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fong ED, Nitti VW (2010) Review article: mid-urethral synthetic slings for female stress urinary incontinence. Br J Urol Int 106:596–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Abdel-Fattah M, Familusi A, Fielding S, Ford J, Bhattacharya S (2011) Primary and repeat surgical treatment for female pelvic organ prolapse and incontinence in parous women in the UK: a register linkage study. BMJ Open 1(2):e000206

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Fialkow M, Symons RG, Flum D (2008) Reoperation for urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(5):546.e1–546.e8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stav K, Dwyer PL, Rosamilia A, Schierlitz L, Lim YN, Chao F, De Souza A, Thomas E, Murray C, Conway C, Lee J (2010) Repeat synthetic mid urethral sling procedure for women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 183:241–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Meyer F, Hermieu JF, Boyd A, Dominique S, Peyrat L, Haab F, Ravery V (2012) Repeat mid-urethral sling for recurrent female stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 24(5):817–822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lo TS, Horng SG, Chang CL, Huang HJ, Tseng LH, Liang CC (2002) Tension-free vaginal tape procedure after previous failure in incontinence surgery. Urology 60(1):57–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Uebersax JS, Wyman JF, Shumaker SA, McClish DK, Fantl JA (1995) Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program for Women Research Group. Neurourol Urodyn 14(2):131–139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shumaker SA, Wyman JF, Uebersax JS, McClish D, Fantl JA (1994) Health-related quality of life measures for women with urinary incontinence: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program in Women (CPW) Research Group. Qual Life Res 3(5):291–306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rogers RG, Coates KW, Kammerer-Doak D, Khalsa S, Qualls C (2003) A short form of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 14(3):164–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Su TH, Lau HH (2010) Validation of a Chinese version of the short form of the pelvic organ prolapse/urinary incontinence sexual questionnaire. J Sex Med 7(12):3940–3945

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lo TS, Horng SG, Liang CC, Lee SJ, Soong YK (2004) Ultrasound assessment of mid-urethra tape at three-year follow-up after tension-free vaginal tape procedure. Urology 63(4):671–675

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. de Leval J (2003) Novel surgical technique for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: transobturator vaginal tape inside-out. Eur Urol 44:724–730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Davila GW, Johnson JD, Serels S (2006) Multicenter experience with the Monarc transobturator sling system to treat stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17:460–465

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Moore RD, Mitchell GK, Miklos JR (2009) Single-center retrospective study of the technique, safety, and 12-month efficacy of the MiniArc single-incision sling: a new minimally invasive procedure for treatment of female SUI. Surg Technol Int 18:175–181

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lo TS, Tan YL, Wu PY, Cortes EF, Pue LB, Al-Kharabsheh A (2014) Ultrasonography and clinical outcomes following surgical anti-incontinence procedures (Monarc vs Miniarc). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 182:91–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lo TS, Wang AC, Horng SG, Liang CC, Soong YK (2001) Ultrasonographic and urodynamic evaluation after tension free vaginal tape procedure (TVT). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80(1):65–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shek KL, Chantarasorn V, Dietz HP (2010) The urethral motion profile before and after suburethral sling placement. J Urol 183(4):1450–1454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, Monga A, Petri E, Rizk DE, Sand PK, Schaer GN (2010) An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J 21(1):5–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lose G (1997) Urethral pressure measurement. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl 166:39–42

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bakali E, Buckley BS, Hilton P, Tincello DG (2013) Treatment of recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive synthetic suburethral tape surgery in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD009407

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ashok K, Wang AC (2010) Recurrent urinary stress incontinence: an overview. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 36(3):467–473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Walsh CA (2011) Recurrent stress urinary incontinence after synthetic mid-urethral sling procedures. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 23(5):355–361

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Abdel-Fattah M, Ramsay I, Pringle S, Hardwick C, Ali H, Young D, Mostafa A (2011) Evaluation of transobturator tension-free vaginal tapes in management of women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence. Urology 77:1070–1075

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee K-S, Doo CK, Han DH, Jung BJ, Han J-Y, Choo M-S (2007) Outcomes following repeat mid urethral synthetic sling after failure of the initial sling procedure: rediscovery of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure. J Urol 178:1370–1374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Verbrugghe A, de Ridder D, Van der Aa F (2013) A repeat mid-urethral sling as valuable treatment for persistent or recurrent stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 24(6):999–1004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nikolopoulos KI, Betschart C, Doumouchtsis SK (2015) The surgical management of recurrent stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 94(6):568–576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hashim H, Terry TR (2012) Management of recurrent stress urinary incontinence and urinary retention following midurethral sling insertion in women. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 94:517–522

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Jang HC, Jeon JH, Kim DY (2010) Changes in sexual function after the midurethral sling procedure for stress urinary incontinence: long-term follow-up. Int Neurourol J 14:170–176

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Norlelawati Ab. Latip for editorial assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tsia-Shu Lo.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lo, TS., Pue, L.B., Tan, Y.L. et al. Risk factors for failure of repeat midurethral sling surgery for recurrent or persistent stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 27, 923–931 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2912-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2912-5

Keywords

Navigation