Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The interaction of stress and urgency urinary incontinence and its effect on quality of life

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The objective was to estimate the impact of stress and urgency urinary incontinence (UI) on the quality of life (QOL), and to determine whether the impact varies according to UI severity.

Methods

We used data from the General Longitudinal Overactive Bladder Evaluation–UI study in women. Stress and urgency UI symptom severity scores ranged from 0 to 8. We used logistic regression to test the relation among different severity levels of stress and urgency UI, and their interaction with the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7). This was categorized according to percentage ranges as 0–40 % (reference), 41–80 %, and 81–100 %.

Results

Both stress and urgency UI were significantly associated with IIQ-7. Higher scores had higher odds ratios (ORs). The OR for urgency vs stress UI was greater at the same severity level. For instance, comparing IIQ-7 quintiles (0–40 % vs 41–80 %), the OR for an association with an urgency UI score of 5–6 was 5.27 (95 % CI = 3.78–7.33) vs 2.76 (95 % CI = 2.07–3.68) for a stress UI score of 5–6. Both UI subtypes were more strongly related to the upper (81–100 %) than the to the lower (41–80 %) quintiles. There was a strong positive urgency UI and stress UI interaction with the upper (i.e., 81–100 %) but not the two next lower (41–80 %) quintiles.

Conclusion

The impact of UI subtypes on QOL varies according to the score of IIQ-7, stress and urgency UI, and their interaction. Urgency vs stress UI has a stronger impact. The effect is greatest for high IIQ-7 scores with a significant share mediated by the interaction of the two UI subtypes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thomas TM, Plymat KR, Blannin J, Meade TW (1980) Prevalence of urinary incontinence. Br Med J 281:1243–1245

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hannestad YS, Rortveit G, Sandvik H, Hunskaar S (2000) A community-based epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence: the Norwegian EPINCONT Study. J Clin Epidemiol 53:1150–1157

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Thom D (1998) Variation in estimates of urinary incontinence prevalence in the community: effects of differences in definition, population characteristics, and study type. J Am Geriatr Soc 46:473–480

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Milsom I (2000) The prevalence of urinary incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 79:1056–1059

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Herzog AR, Fultz NH (1990) Prevalence and incidence of urinary incontinence in community-dwelling populations. J Am Geriatr Soc 38:273–281

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hunskaar S, Burgio K, Diokno A, Herzog AR, Hjalmas K, Lapitan MC (2003) Epidemiology and natural history of urinary incontinence in women. Urology 62:16–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Melville JL, Katon W, Delaney K, Newton K (2005) Urinary incontinence in US women: a population-based study. Arch Intern Med 165:537–542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Minassian VA, Stewart WF, Hirsch AG (2008) Why do stress and urge incontinence co-occur much more often than expected? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19:1429–1440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Minassian VA, Stewart WF, Wood CG (2008) Urinary incontinence in women: variation in prevalence estimates and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol 2:324–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Minassian VA, Drutz HP, Al-Badr A (2003) Urinary incontinence as a worldwide problem. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 82:327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Frick AC, Huang AJ, Van den Eeden SK, Knight SK, Creasman JM, Yang J et al (2009) Mixed urinary incontinence: greater impact on quality of life. J Urol 182:596–600

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Coyne KS, Zhou Z, Thompson C, Versi E (2003) The impact on health-related quality of life of stress, urge and mixed urinary incontinence. BJU Int 92:731–735

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Currie CJ, McEwan P, Poole CD, Odeyemi IA, Datta SN, Morgan CL (2006) The impact of the overactive bladder on health-related utility and quality of life. BJU Int 97:1267–1272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tennstedt SL, Fitzgerald MP, Nager CW, Xu Y, Zimmern P, Kraus S et al (2007) Quality of life in women with stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18:543–549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stewart WF, Minassian VA, Hirsch AG, Kolodner K, Fitzgerald M, Burgio K et al (2010) Predictors of variability in urinary incontinence and overactive bladder symptoms. Neurourol Urodyn 29:328–335

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hirsch AG, Minassian VA, Dilley A, Sartorius J, Stewart WF (2010) Parity is not associated with urgency with or without urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 21:1095–1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Stewart WF, Van Rooyen JB, Cundiff GW, Abrams P, Herzog AR, Corey R et al (2003) Prevalence and burden of overactive bladder in the United States. World J Urol 20:327–336

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Herzog AR, Diokno AC, Brown MB, Normolle DP, Brock BM (1990) Two-year incidence, remission, and change patterns of urinary incontinence in noninstitutionalized older adults. J Gerontol 45:M67–M74

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sandvik H, Seim A, Vanvik A, Hunskaar S (2000) A severity index for epidemiological surveys of female urinary incontinence: comparison with 48-hour pad-weighing tests. Neurourol Urodyn 19:137–145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Uebersax JS, Wyman JF, Shumaker SA, McClish DK, Continence Program for Women Research Group (2005) Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: The incontinence impact questionnaire and the urogenital distress inventory. Neurourol Urodyn 14:131–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J et al (2010) An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn 29:4–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Brubaker L, Stoddard A, Richter H, Zimmern P, Moalli P, Kraus SR et al (2009) Mixed incontinence: comparing definitions in women having stress incontinence surgery. Neurourol Urodyn 28:268–273

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Brubaker L, Lukacz ES, Burgio K, Zimmern P, Norton P, Leng W et al (2011) Mixed incontinence: comparing definitions in non-surgical patients. Neurourol Urodyn 30:47–51

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chiaffarino F, Parazzini F, Lavezzari M, Giambanco V, Gruppo Interdisciplinare di Studio Incontinenza Urinaria (GISIU) (2003) Impact of urinary incontinence and overactive bladder on quality of life. Eur Urol 43:535–538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dooley Y, Lowenstein L, Kenton K, FitzGerald M, Brubaker L (2008) Mixed incontinence is more bothersome than pure incontinence subtypes. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19:1359–1362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Minassian VA, Devore E, Hagan K, Grodstein F (2013) Severity of urinary incontinence and effect on quality of life in women by incontinence type. Obstet Gynecol 121:1083–1090

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Eaker S, Bergstrom R, Bergstrom A, Adami HO, Nyren O (1998) Response rate to mailed epidemiologic questionnaires: a population-based randomized trial of variations in design and mailing routines. Am J Epidemiol 147:74–82

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dallosso HM, Matthews RJ, McGrother CW, Clarke M, Perry SI, Shaw C et al (2003) An investigation into nonresponse bias in a postal survey on urinary symptoms. BJU Int 91:631–636

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Financial support disclosure

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under award number R01DK082551. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

    Vatché A. Minassian

  2. Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA

    Haiyan Sun, Xiaowei S. Yan & Deseraé N. Clarke

  3. Sutter Health System, Sacramento, CA, USA

    Walter F. Stewart

Authors
  1. Vatché A. Minassian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Haiyan Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiaowei S. Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Deseraé N. Clarke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Walter F. Stewart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vatché A. Minassian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Minassian, V.A., Sun, H., Yan, X.S. et al. The interaction of stress and urgency urinary incontinence and its effect on quality of life. Int Urogynecol J 26, 269–276 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2505-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2505-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation