Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

GPS coordinate time series measurements in Ontario and Quebec, Canada

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geodesy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

New precise network solutions for continuous GPS (cGPS) stations distributed in eastern Ontario and western Québec provide constraints on the regional three-dimensional crustal velocity field. Five years of continuous observations at fourteen cGPS sites were analyzed using Bernese GPS processing software. Several different sub-networks were chosen from these stations, and the data were processed and compared to in order to select the optimal configuration to accurately estimate the vertical and horizontal station velocities and minimize the associated errors. The coordinate time series were then compared to the crustal motions from global solutions and the optimized solution is presented here. A noise analysis model with power-law and white noise, which best describes the noise characteristics of all three components, was employed for the GPS time series analysis. The linear trend, associated uncertainties, and the spectral index of the power-law noise were calculated using a maximum likelihood estimation approach. The residual horizontal velocities, after removal of rigid plate motion, have a magnitude consistent with expected glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA). The vertical velocities increase from subsidence of almost 1.9 mm/year south of the Great Lakes to uplift near Hudson Bay, where the highest rate is approximately 10.9 mm/year. The residual horizontal velocities range from approximately 0.5 mm/year, oriented south–southeastward, at the Great Lakes to nearly 1.5 mm/year directed toward the interior of Hudson Bay at stations adjacent to its shoreline. Here, the velocity uncertainties are estimated at less than 0.6 mm/year for the horizontal component and 1.1 mm/year for the vertical component. A comparison between the observed velocities and GIA model predictions, for a limited range of Earth models, shows a better fit to the observations for the Earth model with the smallest upper mantle viscosity and the largest lower mantle viscosity. However, the pattern of horizontal deformation is not well explained in the north, along Hudson Bay, suggesting that revisions to the ice thickness history are needed to improve the fit to observations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams J (1989) Postglacial faulting in eastern Canada: nature, origin and seismic hazard implications. Tectonophysics 163:323–331. doi:10.1016/0040-1951(89)90267-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams J, Basham P (1989) The seismicity and seismotectonics of Canada east of the Cordillera. Geosci Can 16(1):3–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams J, Halchuk S (2003) Fourth generation seismic hazard maps of Canada: values for over 650 Canadian localities intended for the 2005 National Building code of Canada. Geolog Surv Can Open File 4459:1–155. doi:10.4095/214223

    Google Scholar 

  • Altamimi Z, Collilieux X, Métivier L (2011) ITRF2008: an improved solution of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame. J Geodesy 85(8):457–473. doi:10.1007/s00190-011-0444-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altamimi Z, Métivier L, Collilieux X (2012) Itrf2008 plate motion model. J Geophys Res 1978–2012. doi:10.1029/2011JB008930

  • Argus DF, Heflin MB (1995) Plate motion and crustal deformation estimated with geodetic data from the global positioning system. Geophys Res Lett 22:1973–1976. doi:10.1029/95GL02006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Sever YE, Kroger PM, Borjesson JA (1998) Estimating horizontal gradients of tropospheric path delay with a single GPS receiver. J Geophys Res 103(B3):5019–5035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basham PW, Forsyth DA, Wetmiller RJ (1977) The seismicity of northern Canada. Can J Earth Sci 14(7):1646–1667. doi:10.1139/e77-140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bent AL (1996) An improved source mechanism for the 1935 Timiskaming, Quebec earthquake from regional waveforms. Pure Appl Geophys 146(1):5–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertiger W, Desai SD, Haines B, Harvey N, Moore AW, Owen S, Weiss JP (2010) Single receiver phase ambiguity resolution with GPS data. J Geodesy 84:327–337. doi:10.1007/s00190-010-0371-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beutler G, Bock H, Dach R, Fridez P, Gade A, Hugentobler U, Jaggi A, Meindl M, Mervart L, Prange L, Schaer S, Springer T, Urschl C, Walser P (2007) Bernese GPS Software Version 5.0. In: Dach R, Hugentobler U, Fridez P, Meindl M (eds) Astronomical Institute University of Bern, Bern

  • Blewitt G (2003) Self-consistency in reference frames, geocenter definition, and surface loading of the solid Earth. J Geophys Res 108(B2). doi:10.1029/2002JB002082

  • Blewitt G (2014) Nevada Geodetic Laboratory (NGL), Position time series. Nevada Geodetic Laboratory, Reno, NV. http://geodesy.unr.edu/index.php. Accessed 1 July 2014

  • Blewitt G, Lavallée D (2002) Effect of annual signals on geodetic velocity. J Geophys Res 107:9–11 ETG 9-1-ETG 9-11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boehm J, Niell AE, Tregoning P, Schuh H (2006) The global mapping function (GMF): a new empirical mapping function based on data from numerical weather model data. J Geophys Res. 10.129/2005GL025546

  • Bos MS, Scherneck HG (2011) Free ocean tide loading provider. http://holt.oso.chalmers.se/~loading

  • Bos MS, Bastos L, Fernandes RMS (2010) The influence of seasonal signals on the estimation of the tectonic motion in short continuous GPS time-series. J Geodyn 49:205–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bos MS, Fernandes RMS, Williams SDP, Bastos L (2013) Fast error analysis of continuous GNSS observations with missing data. J Geodesy 87(4):351–360. doi:10.1007/s00190-012-0605-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchbinder GGR, Lambert A, Kurtz RD, Bower DR, Anglin FM, Peters J (1988) Twelve years of geophysical research in the Charlevoix seismic zone. Tectonophysics 156:193–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calais E, Han JY, DeMets C, Nocquet JM (2006) Deformation of the North American plate interior from a decade of continuous GPS measurements. J Geophys Res 111. doi:10.1029/2005JB004253

  • Crough ST (1981) Mesozoic hotspot epeirogeny in eastern North America. J Geology 9:2–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dach R, Hugentobler U, Fridez P (2005) Bernese GPS Software 5.0. Astron. Institute University Of Berne, Berne

    Google Scholar 

  • Dach R, Hugentobler U, Fridez P, Meindl M (2007) Bernese GPS Software Version 5.0. Astron. Institute University Of Berne, Berne

    Google Scholar 

  • Dineva S, Eaton D, Ma S, Mereu RF (2007) The October 2005 Georgian Bay, Canada, earthquake sequence: Mafic Dykes and their role in the mechanical heterogeneity of precambrian crust. Bull Seism Soc Am 97:457–473. doi:10.1785/0120060176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dmitrieva K, Segall P (2013) A network approach to estimation of GPS velocity uncertainties. In: Abstract G21A-0737 presented at 2013 fall meeting, AGU, San Francisco, Calif., 9–13 Dec

  • Dong D, Fang P, Bock Y, Cheng MK, Miyazaki S (2002) Anatomy of apparent seasonal variations from GPS-derived site position time series. J Geophys Res 107(B4). doi:10.1029/2001JB000573

  • Dyke AS, Morris TF, Green DEC (1991) Postglacial tectonic and sea level history of the central Canadian Arctic. J Geolog Surv Can Bull 397:56

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyke AS, Andrews JT, Clark PU, England JH, Miller GH, Shaw J, Veillette JJ (2002) The Laurentide and Innuitian ice sheets during the last glacial maximum. J Quat Sci Rev 21(1):9–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton DW, Adams J, Asudeh I, Atkinson GM, Bostock MG, Cassidy JF, Ferguson IJ, Samson C, Snyder DB, Tiampo KF, Unsworth MJ (2005) Investigating Canada’s lithosphere and earthquake hazards with portable arrays. Eos 86(17):169–176. doi:10.1029/2005EO170001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenton CH (1994) Postglacial faulting in Canada: an annotated bibliography. Geolog Surv Can Open File 2774:1–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu Y, Freymueller JT, Jensen T (2012) Seasonal hydrological loading in southern Alaska observed by GPS and GRACE. Geophys Res Lett 39(L15310). doi:10.1029/2012GL052453

  • Geruo A, Wahr J, Zhong S (2013) Computations of the viscoelastic response of a 3-D compressible Earth to surface loading: an application to glacial isostatic adjustment in Antarctica and Canada. Geophys J Int 192(2):557–572. doi:10.1093/gji/ggs030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goudarzi MA, Cocard M, Santerre R, Woldai T (2013) GPS interactive time series analysis software. GPS Solut 17:595–603. doi:10.1007/s10291-012-0296-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimley DA (2000) Glacial and non-glacial sediment contributions to Wisconsin episode loess in the Central United States. Geol Soc Am Bull 112:1475–1495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GSC (2015) Historic earthquakes in Canada. Tech. report. http://www.earthquakescanada.nrcan.gc.ca. Accessed 2 June 2015

  • Hampel FR (1974) The influence curve and its role in robust estimation. J Am Stat Assoc 69(346):383–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heaman LM, Kjarsgaard BA (2000) Timing of eastern North American kimberlite magmatism: continental extension of the Great Meteor hotspot track? Earth Planet Sci Lett 178:253–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Pajares M, Juan JM, Sanz J, Orus R (2007) Second-order ionospheric term in GPS: implementation and impact on geodetic estimates. J Geophys Res 112(B08417):2007. doi:10.1029/2006JB004707

    Google Scholar 

  • James TS (1991) Post-glacial deformation. Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, Ph.D. dissertation

  • James TS, Lambert A (1993) A comparison of VLBI data with the ICE-3G glacial rebound model. Geophys Res Lett 20:871–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James TS, Morgan WJ (1990) Horizontal motions due to postglacial rebound. Geophys Res Lett 17:957–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaniuth K, Völksen C (2003) Comparison of the BERNESE and GIPSY/OASIS II software systems using EUREF data. J Mitt Bundesamtes Kartographie Geodasie 29:314–319

    Google Scholar 

  • King MA, Whitehouse PL, Van der Wal W (2016) Incomplete separability of Antarctic plate rotation from glacial isostatic adjustment deformation within geodetic observations. Geophys J Int 204(1):324–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemann V, Martinec Z, Ivins ER (2008) Glacial isostasy and plate motion. J Geodyn 46(3–5):95–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koohzare A, Vanicek P, Santos M (2008) Pattern of recent vertical crustal movements in Canada. J Geodyn 45:133–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson G, Schaetzl R (2001) Origin and evolution of the Great Lakes. J Great Lakes Res 27:518–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leys C, Ley C, Klein O, Bernard P, Licata L (2013) Detecting outliers: Do not use standard deviation around the mean, use absolute deviation around the median. J Exp Soc Psychol 49(4):764–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lougheed SC, Morrill N (2015) Quaternary history of western Ontario: impacts on physical landscape and Biota. http://opinicon.wordpress.com/physical-environment/quaternary

  • Ludden J, Hynes A (2000) The Abitibi–Grenville Lithoprobe project: two billion years of crust formation and recycling in the Precambrian Shield of Canada. Can J Earth Sci 37:459–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyard F, Lefévre F, Letellier T, Francis O (2006) Modelling the global ocean tides: a modern insight from FES2004. J Ocean Dyn 56:394–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma S, Atkinson GM (2006) Focal depths for small to moderate earthquakes (mN_2.8) in Western Quebec, Southern Ontario, and Northern New York. Bull Seism Soc Am 96:609–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma S, Eaton DW (2007) Western Quebec seismic zone (Canada): clustered, midcrustal seismicity along a mesozoic hot spot track. J Geophys Res 112. doi:10.1029/2006JB004827

  • Mainville A, Craymer M (2005) Present-day tilting of the Great Lakes region based on water level gauges. Geol Soc Am Bull 117:1070–1080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mao A, Harrison CGA, Dixon TH (1999) Noise in GPS coordinate time series. J Geophys Res 104:2797–2816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzotti S, Townend J (2010) State of stress in central and eastern North American seismic zones. Lithosphere 2:76–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitrovica JX, Davis JL, Shapiro II (1993) Constraining proposed combinations of ice history and earth rheology using VLBI-determined baseline length rates in North America. Geophys Res Lett 20:2387–2390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitrovica JX, Davis JL, Shapiro II (1994) A spectral formalism for computing three dimensional deformations due to surface loads: Ii. Present-day glacial isostatic adjustment. J Geophys Res 99:7075–7101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niell AE (1996) Global mapping functions for the atmosphere delay at radio wavelengths. J Geophys Res 101:3227–3246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peltier WR, Drummond R (2008) Rheological stratification of the lithosphere: a direct inference based upon the geodetically observed pattern of the glacial isostatic adjustment of the North American continent. Geophys Res Lett 35. doi:10.1029/2008GL034586

  • Peltier WR (2004) Global glacial isostasy and the surface of the ice-age Earth: the ICE-5G (VM2) Model and GRACE. Ann Rev Earth Planet Sc 32:111–149. doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.32.082503.144359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peltier WR, Argus DF, Drummond R (2015) Space geodesy constrains ice-age terminal deglaciation: the global ICE-6G_C (VM5a) model. J Geophys Res 120:450–487. doi:10.1002/2014JB011176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrie EJ, King MA, Moore P, Lavallée DA (2010) A first look at the effects of ionospheric signal bending on a globally processed GPS network. GPS Solut 84:491–499. doi:10.1007/s00190-010-0386-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Purcell A, Tregoning P, Dehecq A (2016) An assessment of the ICE6G_C(VM5A) glacial isostatic adjustment model. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 121(5):3939–3950. doi:10.1002/2015JB012742

  • Quinlan G (1984) Postglacial rebound and the focal mechanisms of eastern Canadian earthquakes. Can J Earth Sci 21:1018–1023. doi:10.1139/e84-106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santamaría-Gómez A, Mémin A (2015) Geodetic secular velocity errors due to interannual surface loading deformation. J Geophys Int 202, doi:10.1093/gji/ggv190

  • Scherneck HG (1991) A parameterized solid Earth tide model and ocean tide loading effects for global geodetic baseline measurements. J Geophys 106:677–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sella GF, Dixon TH, Mao A (2002) Revel: a model for recent plate velocities from space geodesy. J Geophys Res 107. doi:10.1029/2000JB000033

  • Sella GF, Stein S, Dixon TH, Craymer M, James TS, Mazzotti S, Dokka RK (2007) Observations of glacial isostatic adjustment in the stable North America with GPS. Geophys Res Lett 34. doi:10.1029/2006GK027081

  • Shilts WW, Rappol M, Blais A (1992) Evidence of late and postglacial seismic activity in the Témiscouata-Madawaska Valley, Québec-New Brunswick, Canada. Can J Earth Sci 29:1043–1059. doi:10.1139/e92-085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon KM, James TS, Henton JA, Dyke AS (2016) A glacial isostatic adjustment model for the Central and Northern Laurentide ice sheet based on relative sea level and GPS measurements. Geophys J Int 205(3):1618–1636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steigenberger P, Seitz M, Böckmann S, Tesmer V, Hugentobler U (2012) Precision and accuracy of GPS-derived station displacements. J Phys Chem Earth 53–54:72–79. doi:10.1016/j.pce.2010.07.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sykes LR (1978) Intraplate seismicity, reactivation of re-existing zones of weakness, alkaline magmatism and other tectonism post-dating continental fragmentation. Rev Geophys 16:621–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talwani P (1999) Fault geometry and earthquakes in continental interiors. Tectonophysics 305:371–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terasmae J (1981) Some problems of late Wisconsin history and geochronology in southeastern Ontario. Can J Earth Sci 17:361–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas WA (2006) Tectonic inheritance at a continental margin. GSA Today 16(2):4–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiampo KF, Fernández J, Jentzsch G, Charco M, Rundle JB (2004) New results at Mayon, Philippines, from a joint inversion of gravity and deformation measurements. Pure Appl Geophys 161:1433–1452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiampo KF, Mazzotti S, James TS (2011) Analysis of GPS measurements in Eastern Canada using principal component analysis. Pure Appl Geophys 169(8):1483–1506. doi:10.1007/s00024-011-0420-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiampo KF, González PJ, Samsonov SV (2013) Results for a seismic creep on the Hayward fault using polarization persistent scatterer InSAR. Earth Planet Sci Lett 367:157–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushingham AM, Peltier WR (1991) Ice-3G: A new global model of late Pleistocene deglaciation based upon geophysical predictions of post-glacial relative sea level change. J Geophys Res 96:4497–4523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Wal W, Barnhoorn A, Stocchi P, Gradmann S, Wu P, Drury M, Vermeersen B (2013) Glacial isostatic adjustment model with composite 3D earth rheology for Fennoscandia. Geophys J Int 192(3):1109–1115. doi:10.1093/gji/ggt099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanDam T, Wahr J, Milly PCD, Shmakin AB, Blewitt G, Lavallée D, Larson KM (2001) Crustal displacements due to continental water loading. J Geophys Res 28:651–654

    Google Scholar 

  • VanDam T, Collilieux X, Wuite J, Altamimi Z, Ray J (2012) Nontidal ocean loading: amplitudes and potential effects in GPS height time series. J Geodesy 86:1043–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Wu P, van der Wal W (2008) Using postglacial sea level, crustal velocities and gravity-rate-of-change to constrain the influence of thermal effects on mantle heterogeneities. J Geodyn 46:104–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb FH, Zumberge JF (1997) An introduction to GIPSY/OASIS II. JPL Publication D-11088

  • Williams SDP, Bock Y, Fang P, Jamason P, Nikolaidis RM, Prawirodirdjo L, Miller M, Johnson DJ (2004) Error analysis of continuous GPS position time series. J Geophys Res 109(B03412). doi:10.1029/2003JB002741

  • Williams SDP (2003) The effect of coloured noise on the uncertainties of rates estimated from geodetic time series. J Geodesy 76:483–494. doi:10.1007/s00190-002-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams SDP (2008) Cats: GPS coordinate time series analysis software. GPS Solut 12(2):147–153. doi:10.1007/s10291-007-0086-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodgold C (2010) Earthquakes Canada. Personal Communication, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu P, Hasegawa HS (1996) Induced stresses and fault potential in eastern Canada due to a disc load: a preliminary analysis. Geophys J Int 125:415–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Bock Y, Johnson H, Fang P, Williams S, Genrich J, Wdowinski S, Behr J (1997) Southern California permanent GPS geodetic array: error analysis of daily position estimates and site velocities. J Geophys Res 102(B8):18,035–18,055. doi:10.1029/97JB01380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zumberge JF, Heflin MB, Jefferson DC, Watkins MM, Webb FH (1997) Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks. J Geophys Res 102:5005–5017

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Canadian Geodetic Survey, Natural Resources Canada, and the POLARIS consortium. We also acknowledge the Web site of Dr. Richard Peltier, which provided digital files of the ICE-5G and ICE-6G loading histories and ICE-6G crustal motion predictions utilized here , accessible at http://www.atmosp.physics.utoronto.ca/~peltier/data.php. We thank the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) for operational support of POLARIS through its Major Facilities Access program. The research of HA and KT was supported by the NSERC Collaborative Research and Development (CRD) grant, “Real-time ground motion tools for seismic hazard management”. The Nevada Geodetic Lab is acknowledged for analysis of GPS data using GIPSY/OASIS-II software and for making all processed results accessible to the public at http://geodesy.unr.edu/. The authors also thank Dr. Joe Henton for his constructive advice on the GPS solutions. This is an output of the Earth Sciences Sector (ESS) Public Safety Geoscience Program. The ESS contribution number is 20160263.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hadis Samadi Alinia.

Appendices

Appendix 1: GPS data processing using Bernese version 5

In this paper, RINEX data for GPS stations spanning 2008–2012 (Table 6) are processed using the Bernese Processing Engine (BPE) (Beutler et al. 2007) and a double-differencing technique. Table 6 contains all information related to the GPS RINEX data in this analysis, including position of the sites, monuments, receiver and antenna types, the first date of data availability, length, and end date. The offset dates for the considered time interval are shown as well.

The updated precise orbit information and the Earth orientation parameter (EOP) spanning of our GPS campaign are introduced into the program to create the standard orbit files. In the preprocessing phase, the code observation files are used to synchronize the receiver clock with the GPS times, and then, the baselines are created based on the zero-difference observation files. In addition, at this stage, the cycle slips and outliers are detected and removed by considering the RMS value of the observations and multiple ambiguities are added for the phase observations using the triple-combination approach.

Table 6 GPS station information for stations from the POLARIS network and those operated by Canadian Geodetic Survey (CGS), Natural Resources Canada

The ionospheric delay signals are eliminated using ionosphere-free linear combination (L3) of carrier phase measurements. The effect of the higher-order ionosphere has not been considered as they have less than 1-mm effects (Hernández-Pajares et al. 2007; Petrie et al. 2010). The tropospheric effects are modeled by applying the (Niell 1996) mapping function for both the dry and the wet part which maps the zenith troposphere delay to the satellite-station direction. The benefit of using this model is that the calculation of the wet and dry mapping functions does not depend on the local surface meteorology and it gives an accurate positions for stations over latitude of 43\(^{\circ }\)N and below 75\(^{\circ }\)N for minimum elevation angle of three degrees.

Here, we considered the minimum elevation angle equal to five degrees that minimizes multipath errors. The ocean tidal loading effects that cause crustal deformation and therefore site displacement are corrected from the horizontal and vertical components by introducing a GOT00.2 model containing eleven coefficients for each particular site to the program. This file contains the magnitude of the ocean loading effect for a subset of IGS stations so that the amplitude and phase shifts values for other stations in our study were obtained from Bos and Scherneck (2011). These values were not corrected for the center of mass motion so that our frame origin is in the solid earth center (CM).

Next, all baselines are processed separately and the ambiguities are resolved by the quasi-ionosphere-free (QIF) ambiguity resolution strategy. New coordinates and troposphere parameters files are introduced, and the results consist of two parts. The first part refers to the solution where the ambiguities are estimated as real-valued measurement biases, whereas the second part reports the results after resolving the ambiguity parameters to integer values. It is important to know that the ambiguities larger than the specified RMS could not be resolved.

Then, the final network solution is implemented in which the correlation between the observations is considered and the ambiguities that have been resolved already are introduced as known parameters. In this way, the free network or the minimum constraint solution, in which no station is fixed to its a priori coordinates, is carried out in this paper. This approach is optimal for defining the geodetic datum with a minimum number of constraints where there are inconsistencies in the reference stations coordinates. Then, the coordinates obtained from the last solution are compared to the a priori coordinates for the IGS core sites so that the stations with the residual more than the considered threshold, 15 mm for north and east directions and 30 mm for up direction, would be rejected in the datum definition. In this phase, seven transformation parameters are calculated by comparing the two sets of coordinates, the output coordinates from the last step to the first input file containing stations coordinates in IGS08, in the Helmert transformation program. Then, the repeatability of the coordinate solution is checked to report the difference in each individual coordinate set to the mean value. In the final solution at each epoch, the troposphere parameters have to be pre-eliminated and to avoid singularities, all station coordinates have to be constrained. The station coordinates obtained in the last step are introduced here.

Subsequently, the obtained daily GPS position time series spanning approximately 5 years are analyzed to estimate the velocities of the GPS sites. The outliers are eliminated as follows: First coordinates with jumps of more than 300 mm are removed manually, and then, the Hampel filter (Hampel 1974) is employed. In this method, if a point differs from the mean by more than three times the standard deviation, it is replaced by the median of the window containing the six surrounding points.

We employed the sigma averaging (SIGAVG) method presented by Goudarzi et al. (2013) in the GPS interactive time series analysis (GITSA) software (Goudarzi et al. 2013) to detect jumps and discontinuities in the position time series. This approach divides the time series into different segments based on the introduced threshold, here set at 3 mm, and detects discontinuities at the border of adjacent segments without jumps.

In order to analyze the GPS time series more adequately, the rate uncertainties and the linear trend are determined by employing Hector software (Bos et al. 2013). A maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) approach is used to calculate the noise in the time series (Williams et al. 2004) by computing the parameters of the noise model, including the amplitude and spectral index. This software also computes the constant velocity, offsets which may occur due to GPS equipment changes, annual and semiannual variations, and velocity uncertainties. Here, the combination of the power-law noise (colored noise) and white noise is taken into account as source of noises in the time series. In addition, the AmmarGrag method is employed for the likelihood computation because the percentage of missing data is less than 50% of the total time series length. The covariance matrix which represents the time-dependent positions is computed from (Williams 2008) (Eq. 4):

$$\begin{aligned} C=a_{w}^{2}I + b_{k}^{2}J_{k} \end{aligned}$$
(4)

where \(a_{w}\) and \(b_{k}\) are the white and power-law amplitudes, respectively. These depend on the variance of the noise, innovation noise, \(\sigma ^2\). I is the unit matrix with n \(\times \) n dimension, and \(J_{k}\) is the covariance matrix for the power-law noise with spectral index k.

Figure 15 illustrates the daily vertical position time series for station TYNO and its corresponding fitted sine function.

Fig. 15
figure 15

Detrended position changes time series at station TYNO in eastern Ontario. The pink line corresponds to the best fit annual sinusoidal function

To verify the correctness of choice of the noise model, the power spectra analysis is carried out by fitting the combination of white plus power-law noise model to the computed spectrum for the GPS observations. This analysis represents the difference between observations minus the estimated linear trend and additional offsets and periodic signals. Figure 16 shows the power spectral density (PSD) plot for the vertical position time series of station TYNO. At high frequencies, the fitted model is flat, which is representative of the white noise. At lower frequencies, the fitted model obeys a power-law noise with a slope of approximately one, which implies the presence of flicker noise in the time series.

Fig. 16
figure 16

Computed PSD of the residuals for up component for station TYNO. The fitted white plus power-law noise model is shown by the solid green line. The red \(''\)x\(''\) is the calculated spectrum for the observations

Appendix 2: GPS data processing using GIPSY/OASIS-II software

The time series of GPS stations on the NGL Web site (http://geodesy.unr.edu/) were processed using GIPSY/OASIS-II software (Webb and Zumberge 1997) and made available by Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL). The precise point positioning (PPP) technique (Zumberge et al. 1997) was applied to the ionosphere-free carrier phase and pseudorange data. The daily GPS coordinate time series are produced using GPS satellite orbit, GPS satellite clock, and satellite antenna calibration models. The elevation cutoff angle was set at seven degrees. Troposphere effects were modeled using the global mapping function (GMF) proposed by Boehm et al. (2006), and horizontal gradients were estimated using a random walk stochastic process at every five minutes (Bar-Sever et al. 1998).

The first order of ionosphere effect was removed with the ionosphere-free carrier phase and pseudorange data combination. As the higher-order ionosphere effect has very low amplitude, less than 1mm, it was not considered in the process (Hernández-Pajares et al. 2007). Non-tidal atmospheric loading model was not applied, and only the effects of ocean loading were corrected by using the FES2004 tidal model (Lyard et al. 2006) which was provided by http://holt.oso.chalmers.se/loading (Scherneck 1991). The ocean loading effect was modeled in the CM frame (Blewitt 2003; Fu et al. 2012). In addition, the integer ambiguities for every station were solved using the wide lane and phase bias (WLPB) approach (Bertiger et al. 2010). The resulted coordinates were obtained in the frame of JPL’s fiducial-free orbit so that they were transformed into reference frame IGS08 employing a seven-parameter transformation computed with JPL’s orbit products (Blewitt 2014).

A similar time series analysis was performed for the time series obtained from this solution to estimate the velocities, velocity uncertainties, and spectral index associated with the power-law noise.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Samadi Alinia, H., Tiampo, K.F. & James, T.S. GPS coordinate time series measurements in Ontario and Quebec, Canada. J Geod 91, 653–683 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-016-0987-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-016-0987-5

Keywords

Navigation