Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fighting terrorism in Africa: evidence from bundling and unbundling institutions

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study assesses government mechanisms in the fight against terrorism with particular emphasis on the bundling and unbundling of ten governance dynamics. The empirical evidence is based on a panel of 53 African countries for period 1998–2012 and generalized method of moments. The following findings are established. First, for the most part, political governance and its constituents, respectively, have negative effects on all terrorism dynamics, with the following consistent increasing order of negative magnitude: unclear terrorism, transnational terrorism, domestic terrorism and total terrorism. Second, overwhelmingly for economic and institutional governances, the governance dynamics and their constituent components affect terrorism negatively, with the magnitude on domestic terrorism consistently higher than that on transnational terrorism. Third, for most specifications, the effect of general governance is consistently negative on terrorism variables. Theoretical and practical policy implications are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source: Authors

Fig. 2

Source: Authors

Fig. 3

Source: Authors

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Governance and institutions are used interchangeably throughout the study. The latter concept is quite distinct from “institutional governance” which is represented by corruption control and the rule of law (see Asongu 2016a).

  2. In the sentence, “applied econometrics” does not refer to a specific journal, but rather to the use of econometrics to accept or reject existing theoretical underpinnings and empirical trends.

  3. Emphasis on original.

  4. The fixed effects results are not reported because of lack of space.

  5. While the discussion of findings is tailored to incorporate both initial/baseline results and robustness check estimations, emphasis on “initial regressions” here is because the comparative perspective is not apparent with robustness check results. This is essentially because for the most part, the effects on domestic terrorism are not significant in robustness check results.

References

  • Ajide KB, Raheem ID (2016) Institutions-FDI nexus in ECOWAS countries. J Afr Bus 17(3):319–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akcinaroglu S, Radziszewski E (2013) Private military companies, opportunities, and termination of civil wars in Africa. J Confl Resolut 57(5):5795–5821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alfa-Wali M, Sritharan K, Mehes M, Abdullah F, Rasheed S (2015) Terrorism-related trauma in Africa, an increasing problem. J Epidemiol Glob Health 5(2):201–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrés AR, Asongu SA (2013) Fighting software piracy: which governance tools matter in Africa? J Bus Ethics 118(3):667–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrés AR, Asongu SA, Amavilah VHS (2015) The impact of formal institutions on knowledge economy. J Knowl Econ 6(4):1034–1062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58(2):277–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano M, Bover O (1995) Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. J Econom 68(1):29–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argomaniz J (2015) European Union responses to terrorist use of the Internet. Coop Confl 50(2):250–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asongu SA (2016a) Determinants of growth in fast developing countries: evidence from bundling and unbundling institutions. Polit Policy 44(1):97–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asongu SA (2016b) Sino-African relations: a review and reconciliation of dominant schools of thought. Polit Policy 44(2):351–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asongu SA, Kodila-Tedika O (2016) Fighting African conflicts and crime: which governance tools matter? Int J Soc Econ 43(5):466–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asongu SA, De Moor L (2017) Financial globalisation dynamic thresholds for financial development: evidence from Africa. Eur J Dev Res 29(1):192–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asongu SA, Nwachukwu JC (2016a) Revolution empirics: predicting the Arab Spring. Empir Econ 51(2):439–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asongu SA, Nwachukwu JC (2016b) The mobile phone in the diffusion of knowledge for institutional quality in sub-Saharan Africa. World Dev 86(October):133–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asongu SA, Nwachukwu JC (2016c) Conditional linkages between iron ore exports, foreign aid and terrorism. Miner Econ 29(2):57–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asongu SA, Nwachukwu JC (2017) Fighting terrorism: empirics on policy harmonization. German Econ Rev. https://doi.org/10.1111/geer.12126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asongu SA, Ssozi J (2016) Sino-African relations: some solutions and strategies to the policy syndromes. J Afr Bus 17(1):35–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Asongu S, Efobi U, Beecroft I (2015a) FDI, aid, terrorism: conditional threshold evidence from developing countries. African Governance and Development Institute working paper no. 15/019, Yaoundé

  • Asongu S, Efobi U, Beecroft I (2015b) Inclusive human development in pre-crisis times of globalisation-driven debts. Afr Dev Rev 27(4):428.442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asongu SA, Tchamyou VS, Asongu N, Tchamyou NP (2018) Fighting terrorism in Africa: benchmarking policy harmonization. Physica A 492:1931–1957

  • Ba J, Ng S (2006) Confidence intervals for diffusion index forecasts and inference for factor-augmented regression. Econometrica 74(4):1133–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai J (2003) Inferential theory for factor models of large dimensions. Econometrica 71(1):135–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai J (2009) Panel data models with interactive fixed effects. Econometrica 77(4):1229–1279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi BH (2008) Forecasting with panel data. J For 27(2):153–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandyopadhyay S, Sandler T, Younas J (2014) Foreign direct investment, aid, and terrorism. Oxf Econ Pap 66(1):25–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barros CP, Faira JR, Gil-Alana LA (2008) Terrorism against American citizens in Africa: related to poverty? J Policy Model 30(1):55–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass L (2014) What motivates European youth to join ISIS? Syria comment. http://www.joshualandis.com/blog/push-factors-helping-isil-recruitment-loretta-bass/. Accessed 01 Dec 2015

  • Beck T, Demirgüç-Kunt A, Levine R (2003) Law and finance: why does legal origin matter? J Comp Econ 31(4):653–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell SR, Clay KC, Murdie A, Piazza J (2014) Opening yourself up: the role of external and internal transparency in terrorism attacks. Polit Res Q 67(3):603–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhavnani R (2011) Three two tango: territorial control and selective violence in Israel, the West Bank, and Gaza. J Confl Res 55(1):133–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J Econom 87(1):115–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond S, Hoeffler A, Tample J (2001) GMM estimation of empirical growth models. University of Oxford, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bravo ABS, Dias CMM (2006) An empirical analysis of terrorism: deprivation, Islamism and geopolitical factors. Def Peace Econ 17(4):329–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockhoff S, Kieger T, Meierrieks D (2014) Great expectations and hard times—the (nontrivial) impact of education on domestic terrorism. J Confl Res 59(7):1186–1215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chenoweth E (2010) Democratic competition and terrorist activity. J Polit 72(1):16–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi S-W (2010) Fighting terrorism through the rule of law? J Confl Resolut 54(6):940–966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi S-W, Salehyan I (2013) No good deed goes unpunished: refugees, humanitarian aid, and terrorism. Conffl Manag Peace Sci 30(1):53–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clavarino T (2014) Africa, the new outpost of terrorism. RT op-edge. https://www.rt.com/op-edge/180996-africa-outpost-islamic-terrorism/. Accessed 20 Jan 2016

  • Costa A, Hermandez M, Sebastian-Gallés N (2008) Bilingualism aids conflict resolution: evidence from the ANT task. Cognition 106(1):59–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewan S, Ramaprasad J (2014) Social media, traditional media and music sales. MIS Q 38(1):101–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit A (2009) Governance institutions and economic activity. Am Econ Rev 99(1):5–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drakos K, Gofas A (2006) In search of the average transnational terrorist attack venue. Def Peace Econ 17(2):73–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efobi U (2015) Politicians’ attributes and institutional quality in Africa: a focus on corruption. J Econ Issues 49(3):787–813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efobi U, Asongu SA (2016) Terrorism and capital flight from Africa. Int Econ 148(December):81–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efobi U, Asongu S, Beecroft I (2015) Foreign direct investment, aid and terrorism: empirical insight conditioned on corruption control. African Governance and Development Institute working paper no. 15/007, Yaoundé

  • Enders W, Todd S (2006) The political economy of terrorism. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Enders W, Sandler T, Gaibulloev K (2011) Domestic versus transnational terrorism: data, decomposition, and dynamics. J Peace Res 48(3):319–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eubank WL, Weinberg L (1994) Does democracy encourage terrorism? Terror Polit Violence 6(4):417–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eubank WL, Weinberg LB (2001) Terrorism and democracy: perpetrators and victims. Terror Polit Violence 13(1):155–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewi M, Aning E (2006) Assessing the role of the African Union in preventing and combating terrorism in Africa. Afr Sec Rev 15(3):32–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyerman J (1998) Terrorism and democratic states: soft targets or accessible systems. Int Interact 24(2):151–170

  • Fazel A (2013) The growing terrorism threat in Africa. Mail & Guardian. http://mg.co.za/article/2013-12-17-the-growing-terrorism-threat-in-africa. Accessed 20 Jan 2016

  • Feridun M, Shahbaz M (2010) Fighting terrorism: are military measures effective? Empirical evidence from Turkey. Def Peace Econ 21(2):193–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Findley MG, Young JK (2011) Terrorism, democracy, and credible commitments. Int Stud Q 55(2):357–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster P (2014) Jihadists from around the world flock to fight with Isil; UN. The Telegraph. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/islamic-state/11200701/Jihadists-from-around-the-world-flock-to-fight-with-Isil-UN.html. Accessed 01 Dec 2015

  • Fukuyama F (2013) What is governance? Governance 26(3):347–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaibulloev K, Sandler T (2009) The impact of terrorism and conflicts on growth in Asia. Econ Polit 21(3):359–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gailbulloev K, Sandler T, Santifort C (2012) Assessing the evolving threat of terrorism. Glob Policy 3(2):135–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gani A (2011) Governance and growth in developing countries. J Econ Issues 45(1):19–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner KL (2007) Fighting terrorism the FATF way. Glob Gov Rev Multilater Int Organ 13(3):325–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Gause FG III (2005) Can democracy stop terrorism? Foreign Aff 84(5):62–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenaway-McGrevy R, Han C, Sul D (2012) Asymptotic distribution of factor augmented estimators for panel regression. J Econom 169(1):48–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman AM, Shelton C, Cleven E (2013) Press freedom, publicity, and the cross-national incidence of transnational terrorism. Polit Res Q 66(4):896–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook D (2015) A critical analysis of the role of the internet in the preparation and planning of acts of terrorism. Dyn Asymm Confl 8(2):121–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe IT (2002) Principal component analysis, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser HF (1974) An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 39(1):3–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kangoye T (2013) Does aid unpredictability weaken governance? Evidence from developing countries. Dev Econ 51(2):121–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann D, Kraay A, Mastruzzi M (2007a) Growth and governance: a reply. J Polit 69(2):555–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann D, Kraay A, Mastruzzi M (2007b) Growth and governance: a rejoinder. J Polit 69(2):570–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann D, Kraay A, Mastruzzi M (2010) The worldwide governance indicators: methodology and analytical issues. World Bank Policy Research working paper no. 5430, Washington

  • Kavanagh J (2011) Selection, availability, and opportunity: the conditional effect of poverty on terrorist group participation. J Confl Res 55(1):106–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelsey D, Le Roux S (2017a) Strategic ambiguity and decision-making: an experimental study. Theory Decis. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-017-9618-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelsey D, Le Roux S (2017b) Dragon slaying with ambiguity: theory and experiments. J Pub Econ Theory 19(1):178–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krieger T, Meierrieks D (2015) Does income inequality lead to terrorism? Evidence from the post-9/11 Era. Discussion paper series, Wilfried Guth Endowed Chair for Constitutional Political Economy and Competition Policy, University of Freiburg, no. 2015-04

  • Kurtz M, Schrank A (2007a) Growth and governance: models, measures, and mechanisms. J Polit 69(2):538–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz M, Schrank A (2007b) Growth and governance: a defense. J Polit 69(2):563–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai B (2007) ‘Draining the swamp’: an empirical examination of the production of international terrorism, 1968–1998. Confl Manag Peace Sci 24(4):297–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee C-Y (2013) Democracy, civil liberties and hostage-taking terrorism. J Peace Res 50(2):235–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Q (2005) Does democracy promote or reduce transnational terrorist incidents? J Confl Resolut 49(2):278–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love I, Zicchino L (2006) financial development and dynamic investment behaviour: evidence from panel VAR. Q Rev Econ Finance 46(2):190–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutz BJ, Lutz JM (2014) Economic, social and political globalization and terrorism. J Soc Polit Econ Stud 39(2):186–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz BJ, Lutz JM (2015) Globalisation and terrorism in the middle east. Perspect Terror 9(5):27–46

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie CR, McAleer M (1997) On efficient estimation and correct inference in models with generated regressors: a general approach. Jpn Econ Rev 48(4):368–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nangila KJ P (2016) The role of international terrorism in shaping governance in Africa; a case study of Kenya, 1998–2015. Institute of Diplomacy and International Studies. http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/handle/11295/100202. Accessed 14 Jun 2017

  • Oluwatobi S, Efobi U, Olurinola I, Alege P (2015) Innovation in Africa: why institutions matter? S Afr J Econ 83(3):390–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxley L, McAleer M (1993) Econometric issues in macroeconomic models with generated regressors. J Econ Surv 7(1):1–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagan A (1984) Econometric issues in the analysis of regressions with generated regressors. Int Econ Rev 25(1):221–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH (2006) Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica 74(4):967–1012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piazza J (2007) Draining the swamp: democracy promotion, state failure, and terrorism in 19 Middle Eastern States. Stud Conf Terror 30(6):521–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piazza J (2008a) Incubators of terror: do failed and failing states promote transnational terrorism? Int Stud Q 52(3):468–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piazza J (2008b) Do democracy and free markets protect us from terrorism? Int Polit 45(1):72–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price G N, Elu J U (2016) Global warming and cross-state Islamist terrorism in Nigeria. Department of Economics, Morehouse College, Atlanta GA. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307957422_Global_Warming_And_Cross-State_Islamist_Terrorism_In_Nigeria. Accessed 12 Jun 2017

  • Roodman D (2009a) A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 71(1):135–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roodman D (2009b) How to do xtabond2: an introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. Stata J 9(1):86–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross JI (1993) Structural causes of oppositional political terrorism: towards a causal model. J Peace Res 30(3):317–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savun B, Phillips BJ (2009) Democracy, foreign policy, and terrorism. J Confl Resolut 53(6):878–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid AP (1992) Terrorism and democracy. Terror Polit Violence 4(4):14–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock JH, Watson MW (2002) Forecasting using principal components from a large number of predictors. J Am Stat Assoc 97(460):1167–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straus S (2012) Wars do end. Changing patterns of political violence in sub-Saharan Africa. Afr Affairs 111(443):179–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavares J (2004) The open society assesses its enemies: shocks, disasters and terrorist attacks. J Monet Econ 51(5):1039–1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tchamyou VS, Asongu SA (2017) Information sharing and financial sector development in Africa. J Afr Bus 18(1):24–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonwe DA, Eke SJ (2013) State fragility and violent uprisings in Nigeria. Afr Sec Rev 22(4):232–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Tusalem RF (2015) State regulation of religion and the quality of governance. Polit Policy 43(1):94–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg LB, Eubank WL (1998) Terrorism and democracy: what recent events disclose? Terror Polit Violence 10(1):108–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerlund J, Urbain J-P (2012) Cross-sectional averages versus principal components. Maastricht University, RM/11/053, Maastricht

  • Westerlund J, Urbain J-P (2013a) On the estimation and inference in factor-augmented panel regressions with correlated loadings. Econ Lett 119(3):247–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerlund J, Urbain J-P (2013b) On the implementation and use of factor-augmented regressions in panel data. J Asian Econ 28(October):3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windsor JL (2003) Promoting democratization can combat terrorism. Wash Q 26(3):43–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yerrabati S, Hawkes D (2015) Economic governance and economic growth in South and East Asia & Pacific region: evidence from systematic literature reviews and meta-analysis. Adv Econ Bus 3(1):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are indebted to the editor and reviewers for constructive comments. The research on which this work is based was made possible in 2015 by the Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa (CODESRIA), Comparative Research Network Grant funded by SAREC and NORAD. We thank Chris A. Shisanya, Phil R. Oyono and other participants of the Comparative Research Network Workshop of May 2015 in Dakar, for constructive comments. We are also highly indebted to Mamay Jah, Ato K. Onoma and Kouassivi A. Sofonnou for constructive comments, logistics and networking coordination.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simplice Asongu.

Appendices

Appendices

1.1 Appendix 1: Definitions of variables

Variables

Signs

Definitions of variables (measurement)

Sources

Political stability

PS

“Political stability/no violence (estimate): measured as the perceptions of the likelihood that the government will be destabilized or overthrown by unconstitutional and violent means, including domestic violence and terrorism”

World Bank (WDI)

Voice and accountability

VA

“Voice and accountability (estimate): measures the extent to which a country’s citizens are able to participate in selecting their government and to enjoy freedom of expression, freedom of association and a free media”

World Bank (WDI)

Political governance

Polgov

First principal component of political stability and voice and accountability. The process by which those in authority are selected and replaced

PCA

Government effectiveness

GE

“Government effectiveness (estimate): measures the quality of public services, the quality and degree of independence from political pressures of the civil service, the quality of policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of governments’ commitments to such policies”

World Bank (WDI)

Regulation quality

RQ

“Regulation quality (estimate): measured as the ability of the government to formulate and implement sound policies and regulations that permit and promote private sector development”

World Bank (WDI)

Economic governance

Ecogov

“First principal component of government effectiveness and regulation quality. The capacity of government to formulate and implement policies, and to deliver services”

PCA

Rule of law

RL

“Rule of law (estimate): captures perceptions of the extent to which agents have confidence in and abide by the rules of society and in particular the quality of contract enforcement, property rights, the police, the courts, as well as the likelihood of crime and violence”

World Bank (WDI)

Corruption-control

CC

“Control of corruption (estimate): captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is exercised for private gain, including both petty and grand forms of corruption, as well as ‘capture’ of the state by elites and private interests”

World Bank (WDI)

Institutional governance

Instgov

First principal component of rule of law and corruption control. The respect for citizens and the state of institutions that govern the interactions among them

PCA

General governance

G.gov

First principal component of political, economic and institutional governances

PCA

Domestic terrorism

Domter

Number of domestic terrorism incidents (in Ln)

Enders et al. (2011) and Gailbulloev et al. (2012)

Transnational terrorism

Tranter

Number of transnational terrorism incidents (in Ln)

 

Unclear terrorism

Unclter

Number of terrorism incidents whose category in unclear (in Ln)

 

Total terrorism

Totter

Total number of terrorism incidents (in Ln)

 

Variables

Signs

Definitions of variables (measurement)

Sources

Internet

Internet

Internet penetration (per 100 people)

World Bank (WDI)

Inclusive development

IHDI

Inequality-adjusted human development index

UNDP

Growth

GDPg

Gross domestic product (GDP) growth rates (annual %)

World Bank (WDI)

Inflation

Inflation

Consumer price index (annual %)

World Bank (WDI)

Military expense

Milit

Military expenditure (% of GDP)

World Bank (WDI)

Urbanization

Urban

Urban population growth rate (% of annual)

World Bank (WDI)

Population

Popg

Population growth rate (% of annual)

World Bank (WDI)

Foreign aid

NODA

Total net official development assistance (% of GDP)

World Bank (WDI)

Trade openness

Trade

Export plus import of commodities (% of GDP)

World Bank (WDI)

Financial openness

FDI

Net foreign direct investment inflows (% of GDP)

World Bank (WDI)

  1.  WDI World Bank Development Indicators, PCA principal component analysis, UNDP United Nations Development Program, Ln natural logarithm

1.2 Appendix 2: Summary statistics (1998–2012)

 

Mean

SD

Minimum

Maximum

Observations

Political stability

\(-\) 0.551

0.929

\(-\) 3.297

1.087

265

Voice and accountability

\(-\) 0.679

0.723

\(-\) 2.155

1.009

265

Political governance

0.0008

1.268

\(-\) 3.304

2.671

265

Government effectiveness

\(-\) 0.723

0.620

\(-\) 2.354

0.823

265

Regulation quality

\(-\) 0.695

0.638

\(-\) 2.630

0.906

265

Economic governance

0.009

1.354

\(-\) 3.951

3.511

265

Rule of law

\(-\) 0.706

0.660

\(-\) 2.595

1.032

265

Control of corruption

\(-\) 0.602

0.577

\(-\) 1.848

0.971

265

Institutional governance

0.003

1.349

\(-\) 3.490

3.316

265

General governance

0.008

2.170

\(-\) 6.208

5.242

265

Domestic terrorism

0.401

0.805

0.000

4.781

265

Transnational terrorism

0.203

0.451

0.000

2.802

265

Unclear terrorism

0.060

0.193

0.000

1.566

265

Total terrorism

0.500

0.885

0.000

4.895

265

Internet penetration

4.766

8.022

0.002

51.174

264

Inclusive development

0.872

4.210

0.161

45.231

220

GDP growth

4.706

4.230

\(-\) 8.149

32.265

259

Inflation

10.012

25.435

\(-\) 6.934

275.983

242

Military expenditure

2.245

2.899

0.151

35.846

231

Urbanization

3.551

1.556

\(-\) 0.287

12.984

265

Population

2.283

0.949

\(-\) 0.220

8.382

265

Foreign aid

10.463

11.425

0.017

95.445

259

Trade openness

77.976

35.648

24.528

230.414

252

Financial openness

5.354

8.880

\(-\) 1.846

96.149

259

  1. SD standard deviation

1.3 Appendix 3: First correlation matrix (uniform sample size: 197)

Political governance

Economic governance

Institutional governance

Control variables

Terrorism variables

 

PS

VA

Polgov

GE

RQ

Ecogov

CC

RL

Instgov

G.gov

Internet

IHDI

GDPg

Inflation

Milit

Domter

Tranter

Unclter

Totter

 

1.000

0.629

0.901

0.637

0.623

0.652

0.683

0.770

0.747

0.802

0.236

0.029

\(-\) 0.033

\(-\) 0.238

\(-\) 0.260

\(-\) 0.535

\(-\) 0.530

\(-\) 0.365

\(-\) 0.596

PS

 

1.000

0.903

0.708

0.743

0.749

0.704

0.747

0.747

0.840

0.200

0.204

0.007

\(-\) 0.136

\(-\) 0.334

\(-\) 0.238

\(-\) 0.266

\(-\) 0.111

\(-\) 0.277

VA

  

1.000

0.745

0.745

0.776

0.768

0.840

0.828

0.910

0.242

0.129

\(-\) 0.014

\(-\) 0.207

\(-\) 0.329

\(-\) 0.428

\(-\) 0.440

\(-\) 0.263

\(-\) 0.483

Polgov

   

1.000

0.870

0.970

0.882

0.903

0.919

0.935

0.384

0.237

0.014

\(-\) 0.190

\(-\) 0.156

\(-\) 0.187

\(-\) 0.245

\(-\) 0.121

\(-\) 0.224

GE

    

1.000

0.964

0.790

0.854

0.846

0.908

0.289

0.210

\(-\) 0.045

\(-\) 0.245

\(-\) 0.216

\(-\) 0.156

\(-\) 0.216

\(-\) 0.084

\(-\) 0.194

RQ

     

1.000

0.867

0.910

0.915

0.953

0.350

0.231

\(-\) 0.014

\(-\) 0.223

\(-\) 0.191

\(-\) 0.178

\(-\) 0.239

\(-\) 0.107

\(-\) 0.217

Ecogov

      

1.000

0.885

0.971

0.923

0.309

0.207

\(-\) 0.050

\(-\) 0.177

\(-\) 0.103

\(-\) 0.246

\(-\) 0.312

\(-\) 0.212

\(-\) 0.297

CC

       

1.000

0.970

0.962

0.363

0.134

\(-\) 0.026

\(-\) 0.205

\(-\) 0.175

\(-\) 0.270

\(-\) 0.299

\(-\) 0.181

\(-\) 0.313

RL

        

1.000

0.970

0.346

0.176

\(-\) 0.040

\(-\) 0.196

\(-\) 0.143

\(-\) 0.266

\(-\) 0.315

\(-\) 0.202

\(-\) 0.314

Instgov

         

1.000

0.334

0.191

\(-\) 0.024

\(-\) 0.220

\(-\) 0.227

\(-\) 0.299

\(-\) 0.344

\(-\) 0.197

\(-\) 0.348

G.gov

          

1.000

0.018

\(-\) 0.023

\(-\) 0.062

\(-\) 0.087

0.079

0.052

0.129

0.063

Internet

           

1.000

\(-\) 0.078

\(-\) 0.016

\(-\) 0.040

0.090

0.052

\(-\) 0.031

0.080

IHDI

            

1.000

\(-\) 0.197

\(-\) 0.052

0.076

0.157

0.060

0.089

GDPg

             

1.000

\(-\) 0.128

0.0002

0.030

0.061

0.027

Inflation

              

1.000

0.185

0.107

0.040

0.194

Milit

               

1.000

0.661

0.760

0.973

Domter

                

1.000

0.641

0.785

Tranter

                 

1.000

0.776

Unclter

                  

1.000

Totter

  1. PS political stability/non-violence, VA voice and accountability, Polgov political governance, GE government effectiveness, RQ regulation quality, Ecogov economic governance, CC corruption control, RL rule of law, Instgov institutional governance, G.gov general governance, Internet internet penetration, IHDI inequality-adjusted human development index, GDPg gross domestic product growth, Milit military expenditure, Domter domestic terrorism, Tranter transnational terrorism, Unclter unclear terrorism, Totter total terrorism

1.4 Appendix 4: Second correlation matrix (uniform sample size: 250)

Political governance

Economic governance

Institutional governance

Control variables

Terrorism variables

 

PS

VA

Polgov

GE

RQ

Ecogov

CC

RL

Instgov

G.gov

Urban

Popg

NODA

Trade

FDI

Domter

Tranter

Unclter

Totter

 

1.000

0.655

0.905

0.626

0.592

0.631

0.659

0.767

0.737

0.798

\(-\) 0.245

\(-\) 0.234

\(-\) 0.100

0.286

\(-\) 0.062

\(-\) 0.530

\(-\) 0.543

\(-\) 0.374

\(-\) 0.589

PS

 

1.000

0.913

0.718

0.727

0.749

0.682

0.763

0.747

0.849

\(-\) 0.086

\(-\) 0.160

0.057

0.041

\(-\) 0.070

\(-\) 0.248

\(-\) 0.287

\(-\) 0.141

\(-\) 0.284

VA

  

1.000

0.740

0.727

0.760

0.737

0.814

0.816

0.906

\(-\) 0.180

\(-\) 0.216

\(-\) 0.021

0.177

\(-\) 0.073

\(-\) 0.424

\(-\) 0.287

\(-\) 0.141

\(-\) 0.284

Polgov

   

1.000

0.861

0.965

0.848

0.895

0.901

0.931

\(-\) 0.219

\(-\) 0.364

\(-\) 0.235

0.060

\(-\) 0.169

\(-\) 0.150

\(-\) 0.225

\(-\) 0.101

\(-\) 0.184

GE

    

1.000

0.964

0.733

0.835

0.810

0.892

\(-\) 0.120

\(-\) 0.231

\(-\) 0.219

0.014

\(-\) 0.209

\(-\) 0.130

\(-\) 0.206

\(-\) 0.101

\(-\) 0.165

RQ

     

1.000

0.820

0.897

0.887

0.945

\(-\) 0.176

\(-\) 0.309

\(-\) 0.235

0.038

\(-\) 0.196

\(-\) 0.145

\(-\) 0.223

\(-\) 0.105

\(-\) 0.181

Ecogov

      

1.000

0.871

0.967

0.900

\(-\) 0.212

\(-\) 0.324

\(-\) 0.072

0.124

\(-\) 0.113

\(-\) 0.238

\(-\) 0.305

\(-\) 0.222

\(-\) 0.285

CC

       

1.000

0.966

0.963

\(-\) 0.258

\(-\) 0.317

\(-\) 0.168

0.128

\(-\) 0.156

\(-\) 0.239

\(-\) 0.275

\(-\) 0.172

\(-\) 0.277

RL

        

1.000

0.963

\(-\) 0.243

\(-\) 0.331

\(-\) 0.140

0.119

\(-\) 0.140

\(-\) 0.246

\(-\) 0.300

\(-\) 0.204

\(-\) 0.291

Instgov

         

1.000

\(-\) 0.214

\(-\) 0.308

0.358

\(-\) 0.330

\(-\) 0.148

\(-\) 0.281

\(-\) 0.338

\(-\) 0.204

\(-\) 0.327

G.gov

          

1.000

0.768

0.415

\(-\) 0.295

0.153

0.070

0.060

0.042

0.080

Urban

           

1.000

0.415

\(-\) 0.295

0.153

\(-\) 0.004

0.053

\(-\) 0.014

0.011

Popg

            

1.000

\(-\) 0.086

0.259

\(-\) 0.055

\(-\) 0.057

\(-\) 0.116

\(-\) 0.062

NODA

             

1.000

0.407

\(-\) 0.186

\(-\) 0.132

\(-\) 0.109

\(-\) 0.194

Trade

              

1.000

0.022

0.093

0.058

0.037

FDI

               

1.000

0.674

0.730

0.976

Domter

                

1.000

0.596

0.791

Tranter

                 

1.000

0.755

Unclter

                  

1.000

Totter

  1. PS political stability/non-violence, VA voice and accountability, Polgov political governance, GE government effectiveness, RQ regulation quality, Ecogov economic governance, CC corruption-control, RL rule of law, Instgov institutional governance, G.gov general governance, Urban urbanization, Popg population growth, NODA net official development assistance, FDI foreign direct investment, Domter domestic terrorism, Tranter transnational terrorism, Unclter unclear terrorism, Totter total terrorism

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Asongu, S., Tchamyou, V., Asongu, N. et al. Fighting terrorism in Africa: evidence from bundling and unbundling institutions. Empir Econ 56, 883–933 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-017-1378-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-017-1378-3

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation