Skip to main content
Log in

New radial overlap pass for efficient CPO tool paths

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the current state of pocket machining using Contour-Parallel Offset (CPO) tool paths, the user typically manually inputs the axial and radial passes parameters into the machine tool. To enhance the automation of machining processes, this paper introduces a fresh formulation for the radial pass between contours. This new formulation is designed to be adaptable to all forms of polygonal pocket boundaries, including those involving line-line or line-arc configurations. By incorporating this innovative radial pass, automatic adjustment is achieved for pocket contours of various shapes, ensuring precise recesses and eliminating the occurrence of uncut areas between passes, particularly at corners. A key advantage of this radial overlap pass lies in its capability to minimize the overall length of the tool path. This benefit proves particularly significant during the initial roughing phase of pocket machining. A comprehensive evaluation through detailed comparisons and tested scenarios has been conducted. The results obtained for the three tested cases demonstrate a significant advantage for our new radial overlap pass compared to the best methods seen in the literature. This validates the effectiveness of this new approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hbaieb M, Othmani R, Bouzid W (2011) Time modeling in high-speed machining of mold pocket. Int J Adv Manuf Techno 53:113–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2844-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Selvaraj P, Radhakrishnan P (2006) Algorithm for pocket milling using Zig-zag tool path. Def Sci J 56(2):117–127. https://doi.org/10.14429/dsj.56.1876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Park SC, Choi BK (2000) Tool-path planning for direction-parallel area milling. Comput Aided Des 32(1):17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4485(99)00080-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim HC, Sung GL, Min YY (2006) An optimized contour parallel tool path for 2D milling with flat end mill. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 31(5):567–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-005-0228-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Park SC, Chungb YC (2002) Offset tool-path linking for pocket machining. Comput Aided Des 34(4):299–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4485(01)00088-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Göloglu C, Arslan Y (2009) Zigzag machining surface roughness modeling using evolutionary approach. J Intell Manuf 20(2):203–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-008-0222-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hyun CK (2007) Tool path modification for optimized pocket milling. Int J Prod Res 45:5715–5729. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540600919340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Choi BK, Park SC (1999) A pair-wise offset algorithm for 2D point-sequence curve. Comput Aided Des 31:735–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4485(99)00060-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Held M (1998) Voronoi diagrams and offset curves of curvilinear polygons. Comput Aided Des 30(4):287–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4485(97)00071-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Weck M, Altintas Y, Beer C (1994) CAD assisted chatter-free NC tool path generation in milling. Int J Mach Tools Manufact 34:879–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/0890-6955(94)90066-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yazar Z, Koch KF, Merrick T, Altan T (1994) Feed rate optimization based on cutting force calculations in 3-axis milling of dies and moulds with sculptured surfaces. Int J Mach Tools Manufact 34:365–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/0890-6955(94)90006-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen CS, Lee AC (1998) Design of acceleration/deceleration profiles in motion control based on digital FIR filters. Int J Mach Tools Manufact 38:799–825. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(97)00065-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tarng YS, Shyur YY (1993) Identification of radial depth of cut in numerical control pocketing routines. Int J Mach Tool Manufact 33:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/0890-6955(93)90059-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pateloup C, Duc E, Ray P (2004) Corner optimization for pocket machining. Int J Mach Tool Manufact 44:1343–1353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.04.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang L, Zheng L (2004) Prediction of cutting forces in milling of circular corner profiles. Int J Mach Tools Manufact 44:225–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2003.10.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hinduja S, Roaydi A, Philimis P, Barrow G (2001) Determination of optimum cutter diameter for machining 21/2 - O pockets. Int J Mach Tool Manufact 41:687–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(00)00098-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Choy HS, Chan KW (2003) A corner-looping based tool path for pocket milling. Comput Aided Des 35(2):155–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4485(02)00049-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mansor MSA, Hinduja S, Owodunni OO (2006) Voronoi diagram-based tool path compensations for removing uncut material in 21⁄2D pocket machining. Comput Aided Des 38(3):194–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2005.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Park SC, Chungb YC, Choi BK (2003) Contour-parallel offset machining without tool retractions. Comput Aided Des 35(9):841–849. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4485(02)00111-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhao ZY, Wang CY, Zhou HM, Qin Z (2007) Pocketing toolpath optimization for sharp corners. J Mater Process Technol 192(193):175–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.04.096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lin Z, Fu J, Shen H, Gan W (2013) Global uncut regions removal for efficient contour parallel milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68(5–8):1241–1252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-4915-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Abdullah H, Ramli R, Wahab DA (2017) Tool path length optimization of contour parallel milling based on modified ant colony optimization. Int J Adv Manuf Techno 92:1263–1276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0193-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Abdullah H, Ramli R, Wahab DA (2020) Effect of contour interval on minimization of tool path length in pocket milling process. J Eng Sci Technol 15(5):3502–3513

    Google Scholar 

  24. Abdullah H, Law Boon Hui C, Zakaria MS (2023) Minimization of machining process sequence based on ant colony algorithm and conventional method. J Eng Sci Technol 18(2):949–962

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bahloul E, Brioua M, Rebiai C (2015) An efficient contour parallel tool path generation for arbitrary pocket shape without uncut regions. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 16(6):1157–1169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-015-0150-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the post-graduation of the Département de Génie Mécanique, Faculté de Technologie of the Université Batna 2, Algeria.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The author has completed manuscript work, read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elhachemi Bahloul.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (MP4 79520 KB)

Supplementary file2 (AVI 356816 KB)

Supplementary file3 (MP4 40321 KB)

Appendices

Appendix 1

CPO trajectory generation algorithm.

figure b

Appendix 2

Coordinates of CPO tool paths.

Table 9

Table 9 Coordinates of CPO tool paths (dr = 19.60 mm, 98% of diameter) (Appendix Fig. 10)

Appendix 3

Figure 

Fig. 10
figure 10

CPO with tool guide curve (dr = 19.60)

10

Appendix 4

Table 10

Table 10 Coordinates of CPO tool paths with (dr = 16.3840 mm) (Appendix Fig. 11)

Appendix 5

Figure 11

Fig. 11
figure 11

CPO with tool guide curve (dr = 16.3840)

11

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bahloul, E. New radial overlap pass for efficient CPO tool paths. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 130, 2969–2984 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12803-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12803-1

Keywords

Navigation